"BJ" CLINTON, WHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE FOR US TO FINALLY RID OURSELVES OF THIS GUY?

I simply cannot be only person in this country who wishes that this lying sack of human excrement, "Slick Willie" Clinton, would just ride very quietly off into the sunset. Can I? From his apparent "coming out" and praising someone described as being his former nemesis, to saying he thinks he needs to be paying more taxes, to thinking that his hag of a wife will play some contributing role after 2012, to his critique of the "super-committee," he has an opinion on just about everything, and is happy to express it to anyone willing to listen. But I'm curious, are there still enough people, outside the ranks of imbecilic Democrats, who really care what this slime ball thinks about anything? Ever since he stood in front of the American people, looked us all dead in the eye and shook that bony old finger, after only God knows where it had been, and LIED to us, I've had no use for this man. And oh by the way, just how many military secrets did he hand over to Communist China? That act alone was impeachable. And now he's supposed to be revered as being some senior statesman? The truth is, he's nothing more than a living, breathing, piece of dog squeeze!



On the topic of Newt Gingrich, “It’s not any traditional charisma,” said "Slick Wille," who was recently busy out pimping his supposed new best-seller, "Back to Work: Why We Need Smart Government for a Strong Economy," in a recent interview. Who besides flaming liberals are going to buy about the benefits of government? Anyway, instead, Clinton believes that Gingrich is emerging because “he thinks about this stuff all the time.” "Slick Willie's" praise for his one-time rival, whose willingness to interrupt normal government functions temporarily in 1995 and 1996 contributed ultimately to balancing the federal budget, came in a recent interview. It was back in a September that Clinton had predicted that Gingrich, who at the time was polling in the single digits, would make a comeback. “He’s articulate and he tries to think of a conservative version of an idea that will solve a legitimate problem,” Clinton said in an interview just this week explaining the Gingrich resurgence. But I can't help but wonder why "BJ" would choose to dabble in the Republican nominating process. Is he trying to somehow affect the outcome?


"Slick" continued: “For example, I watched the national security debate last night. And Newt said two things that would make an independent voter say, ‘Well, I gotta consider that.’ “He said, ‘OK, I don’t want to legitimize immigrants who came here undocumented, illegally.’ On the other hand, a lot of those people have been here for years, they worked hard, they paid taxes, they’ve got kids in the schools, they’re not criminals, we’re going to have a hard time sending them all home, there’s millions of them. So, I’d like to have a process where they could be here legally but not have a path to citizenship. That sort of splits the difference between the immigration reforms proposed by President Bush and President Obama, which would give a path to citizenship, and would be a version of what President Reagan did.” "Slick" said that he was impressed that Gingrich devised a “red card” system that would be used to stop normalizing the immigration status of illegals if efforts to control the border proved ineffective. “That was a thoughtful response,” "Slick" said. We must be thoughtful.


"Slick Wille" has said that he also credits Gingrich for innovative thinking in his plan to give workers an option to invest their Social Security retirement funds privately. Gingrich said there should be a guarantee, so that, if markets nose-dive, workers would not receive less than they would have received under the old Social Security system. “See, that’s a new wrinkle on this,” "Slick" said, crediting Gingrich for thinking out of the box. “So he’s always . . . I think he’s doing well just because he’s thinking, and people are hungry for ideas that make some sense.” He stopped short of predicting that Gingrich would win the nomination. So what are we to make of this nicey-nicey talk about Gingrich? Is it real or is it make believe? Anytime you bring old "Slick Willie" into the mix you can never be too sure. One thing you can say about him, is that he is a very convincing liar. He has raised lying to an art form, there are very few that are seen as being as capable at lying as is old "Slick." However, there is one other person would does comes to mind as being as skilled a liar as is old "Slick." And that would, of course, be his "wife."


On the subject of taxes, old "BJ" says that he stands by the many comments that he has made saying he doesn't support tax increases and spending cuts at this moment in the midst of the nation's economic crisis. But he does agree, no big surprise here, with Barry "Almighty's" proposal to raise taxes on the nation's wealthier citizens. “I favor people in my income group, the top 1 percent or a fraction of it, paying more not because I want to punish success, but because I think the only way to balance the budget is through economic growth, spending restraint, and new revenues,” he said. "Slick" emphasized that timing is everything when it comes to raising taxes. Barry, he said, "doesn't propose to raise any taxes before 2013. And he is assuming that the economy will have recovered sufficiently in 2012 to do that." What, pray tell, is he basing that assumption on? That would be a policy he agrees with, he said. I don't believe I have yet heard anyone say that if you want to pay more taxes, you can't. So what's stopping old "Slick" from paying more in taxes?


On the topic of increasing taxes on the wealthy, old "Slick" spewed the typical liberal gibberish saying that, "We're in the best position to chip in. In other words, to me we ought to do it because we should be trying to create an economy of shared prosperity with a growing middle class and declining poverty — not because I want to punish people who are successful or I think they're bad." "And so I think we'll actually benefit from broader prosperity, from having a more vibrant small-business community, from having more middle class wages going up, and stronger families, and especially reversing this big increase in poverty through work, having poor people work their way into the middle class," he said. And in spewing yet another bit of liberal propaganda, "Slick" remains a supporter of the notion that it would be a mistake to cut discretionary spending in a bid to reduce the deficit, because it would have a negative impact on the nation's future. Guys like "Slick" are living out there lives in some alternate universe where you can just spend and spend and spend some more and face no consequences.


On the topic of his Saul Alinsky worshiper of a "wife," old "Slick" revealed that he has discussed with his wife, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, her plans after she leaves Barry's administration. The old battle ax has stated publicly that she plans to step down at the end of Barry's first term, even if he wins re-election in 2012. Can we really trust her when she says that she unsure whether she'll seek out a new role in public life or remain just a private citizen? "Slick" said that he has discussed the matter with her "a little bit." "I think she wants, and she has said publicly, to continue a lot of the work that she's done, she did as a private citizen, as first lady, as senator and as secretary of state," "BJ" said. "Around the world, she's done an enormous amount of good in, you now, the so-called soft power areas, empowering women and girls, helping them, giving them access to capital, helping them make a living, promoting better healthcare practices." Then "Slick" added, "I think she will have a major role to play in the nongovernmental world. That's what she plans to do, and I think she'll do it well."


And finally on the topic of the failed "super committee," old "BJ," in what appeared to an attempt to be seen as being objective, acted as if he were placing an equal amount of blame on both the Democrats and the Republicans for being so caught up in their differences that they failed to recognize opportunities to agree on common-sense ways to reduce the budget deficit. He said both sides in the recent standoff may have concluded that they would be better off waiting until after the election to find areas of agreement. "Now, in my book," he said, "I outlined a whole bunch of cuts they could make in that budget, and savings they could achieve based on a 1,000-plus page report by the Government Accounting Office that outlines duplicative programs and things of that kind. But if you do it all, you could maybe get up to a $100 billion a year, if you included collecting a third of the taxes that are owed today but not paid.” Liberals like "BJ" will spout all kinds of things in their effort to avoid cutting spending. Because the actual cutting of spending goes completely against their entire warped philosophy.


However, old "Slick" noted that he is very concerned that “the default position which allows the Republicans to hold firm on taxes, and the Democrats to hold firm on Social Security and Medicare, ignores that there are some options that would not be particularly painful for either side." "Slick," who was pretty much forced into balancing the budget after suffering a head-on collision with fiscal hawks and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, did designate some areas that he thinks should not be cut. He described discretionary spending, which is only 15 percent of the total budget, as "our future." Cutting those programs would hurt Americans down the road, he said. He also contended that it is a mistake to cut foreign aid, which is only 1 percent of the budget. "That's why Bob Gates, who was President Bush's secretary of defense, pleaded with the Congress not to cut it, because he said, 'Making more friends and fewer enemies is always cheaper than going to war.' And that needs to be part of our national security spending," "BJ" said. Gates may have been appointed by Bush, but he was in no way a conservative.


At some point I can only hope that America's fascination with old "Slick Willie" will eventually begin to wane and finally get to the point where no one, any longer, gives a rat's ass what he, our first black president, has to say about anything. He is nothing more than a self-promoting opportunist who is absolutely addicted to being in the spotlight. He insists on injecting himself into whatever conversations are taking place regarding the most important topics is at the time. As if he would ever have anything intelligent, or relevant, to add to any conversation of substance. There is only one person in this world that this sleazy character cares about. And that person is William Jefferson Clinton. He, almost as much as Barry "Almighty," is quite literally thrilled with the sound of his own voice, and he considers himself as being on a higher plain than those of us who are mere mortals. The arrogance of these egomaniacs like Clinton, suffer from what can only be describes as delusions of grandeur. They purport to have all of the answers, but more often than not they're not even asking the right questions.