Well, here we go again. Ms. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Democrat a Representative from here in Florida and the stellar chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), has demonstrated, yet again, just what a complete moron she is, and in a way that only she can do. The most recent demonstration of her rather unique lack of any intelligence whatsoever, came on Thursday of this week when she made the statement that is “an extreme and radical step" for states to enact constitutional amendments that say human life begins at conception. Adding, “For the vast majority of Americans, including people on both sides of the abortion issue, this is an extreme and radical step.” An "extreme and radical step?" For any other group, old Debbie would be considered as being an embarrassment to be hidden somewhere, but apparently not for the Democrat Party. Instead, it would seem that possessing such a level of senility is sufficient to earn someone a very prominent place in leadership. She's right up there with the previous head of the DNC, and other well-known "psychotic," Howard "The Screamer" Dean. That this proud advocate of socialism hasn't yet been shuffled off to the home is testament to just how far left the modern-day Democrat Party has now drifted.
Demonstrating a level of insanity rarely seen anywhere else but among those on the loony left in this country, it was when speaking to reporters on a conference call, that Ms. Wasserman-Schultz said that so-called personhood amendments are nothing short of a “divisive, dangerous, and destructive” attack on women. “To American women, their reproductive health and choice is an intensely personal and private issue between themselves, their families, and their doctors,” the wacked out DNC chairwoman said. “But Republicans in Washington and across the country have tried to limit these rights, with their assault on Planned Parenthood in Congress and restrictive laws in the states being among several examples.” “Now," she said, "the effort by the far right [is] to pass these so-called personhood amendments--divisive, dangerous, and destructive laws which would cripple a woman’s right to choose, limit access to birth control, and put the lives of women with difficult pregnancies at risk.” Ya know, this imbecile continues as being the perfect example of just how far removed from the mainstream, as well as from reality, her party of loons has now become. Which I suppose doesn't say much for the morons who continue to vote for individuals such as Ms. Wasserman-Schultz.
Wasserman-Schultz called these personhood amendments being considered or petitioned for in Mississippi, Ohio, Texas, Kansas, and Florida “the most extreme assault on a woman’s right to choose.” Really, Debbie? Why is it that everything with which those on the far left, which is where this kook-bimbo resides, disagrees, is always labeled as being extreme or as very far outside the mainstream? It's this idiot Wasserman-Schultz and her cadre of kooks out there in the fringe, who are the ones truly operating from the extreme. Personhood amendments define when a human being becomes a "person" under the law. An amendment proposed in Mississippi, for example, says that a person is “every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning or the functional equivalent thereof.” Wasserman-Schultz said that the Mississippi amendment, which will go before voters on November 8, will outlaw all abortions and some forms of birth control (presumably because they kill human embryos) and also IUDs, the morning-after pill, and in vitro fertilization procedures that create and discard human embryos. Now I haven't read this specific legislation myself, to know whether or not she's lying. But if history is any indicator, then like all Democrats, I doubt she's read it either, preferring instead to simply shoot from the hip.
Under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states are required to provide equal protection of the law to all persons. Wasserman-Schultz said that one of her main goals was to dissuade Florida voters from signing a petition needed to get a personhood amendment on the ballot there in 2012. “We’re sounding the alarm bells now because it’s absolutely critical that Floridians understand just how extreme this personhood campaign is, what it would do to not only a woman’s right to choose but to saving the lives of women, to the opportunity for parents to be--the opportunity for men and women to become parents when they’ve not been able to,” she said. Florida's proposed amendment says: “The words ‘person’ and ‘natural person’ apply to all human beings, irrespective of age, race, health, function, condition of physical and/or mental dependency and/or disability, or method of reproduction, from the beginning of the biological development of that human being." Come on now, sounding the alarm bells? Really? How can anybody take this psychotic boob seriously? And she calls our side extreme? By her continuing to rant on all topics from abortion to the blaming of Bush for the rise of Hamas, Ms. Wasserman-Shultz proves the point better than I ever could that she is a bona fide kook.
It is a fact that over 40+ Million abortions have now taken place in this country since the Roe versus Wade, Supreme Court decision. I find it hard to believe how someone, especially a woman, can continue to do what amounts to the advocating for a "procedure," the result of which, is what can only be called an epidemic involving rampant infanticide. Her holding of such a position very clearly exposes her, and those like her, as being among the one who can, and much more accurately, be described as being extreme. It's people like Ms. Wasserman-Schultz and even our "Fearless Leader," Barry "Almighty," who can go so far with their endorsement as to have no problem whatsoever with even the more gruesome procedure referred to as partial-birth abortion. But I find their rather enthusiastic support for abortion disturbing, as well as more than a little confusing. Because it's pretty common knowledge that it's liberals, or at least those who have a higher pre-disposition for voting Democrat, who are far more likely than conservatives to have an abortion. So it would seem like all they're doing here is to be a willing party to the killing off of their own voter base. And in this age of increasingly closer elections, that would seem, at least to me, as being more than a little counter-productive.
No comments:
Post a Comment