DEBBIE WIZZERMAN SCHULTZ…LIAR, HYPOCRITE…DEMOCRAT…

It was during a recent interview that the Democrat National Committee Chairmoron, the esteemed Ms. Debbie Wizzerman Schultz was asked what was really a very simple, yet very direct question. Ms. Wizzerman Schultz was asked to name those Democrat candidates for whom Barry "Almighty" had been seen actively campaigning for.

All Ms. Wizzerman Schultz, who I might add is another political waste of skin from here in Florida, could do in her effort to respond to this very simple request, was to break out what has become her frequently used pair of dancin’ shoes. Because all she really did was to repeatedly dodge the very simple question and in what has become very typical Democrat fashion.

It was while appearing on Bloomberg TV’s "With All Due Respect," that Wizzerman Schultz was asked why ex-resident ‘Slick Willie’ Clinton is now seen nearly everywhere campaigning for those Democrats involved in tight Senate races but Barry is nowhere to be seen. Wizzerman Schultz said, "The president is campaigning in competitive races during this election cycle."

Wizzerman Schultz was, oddly enough, repeatedly pressed by the program’s co-hosts, Mark Halperin and John Heilemann, to name just one Senate race, just one, where Democrats have been busily distancing themselves from Barry, for which he's campaigned. Heilemann then asked, "What competitive Senate races is the president campaigning in?"

Wizzerman Schultz still did nothing but to continue to repeat herself, saying only, "Like I said, the president has been campaigning in competitive races." Wizzerman Schultz added, "There are races that the president is campaigning in around the country, and he’s also governing." Governing? Guess that why the Ebola crisis is going so well, right?

The American people can not, no they MUST NOT, allow themselves to be fooled by what Democrats like Wizzerman Schultz are trying to pull off here. These Democrats who are now so desperate to separate themselves for Barry ‘Almighty’ are, just like Barry himself said, are the very ones who support him and his American dream-killing agenda.

So make no mistake about it, when you step into the voting booth in less than two weeks, you will be presented with a choice. And that choice is, do you want things to continue exactly as they have for the last six years, or do you want something different. If you are happy with the way things have been going the choice is an easy one, vote for the Democrat.

DEBBIE WIZZERMAN SCHULTZ RUSHES IN TO DEFEND HILLARY…

Well there has been much ‘discussion’ over the course of the past several months, but it seems much longer than that, about when, not necessarily if, Hitlery "The Bitch Of Benghazi" Clinton will finally throw her bra into the ring and officially declare herself to be a candidate for president in 2016. And rumor has it that if she does in fact do so, she fully intends do nothing more than to run on her husband’s record. And yet, we’re told raising the fact that her husband is a known rapist should be considered off limits by any her potential rivals or opponents.

And now enter into the fray none other that Democrat National Committee Chairmoron, and that perennial dingbat, Debbie Wizzerman Schultz, who recently said news stories about Hitlery Clinton’s reaction to ‘BJ’ Clinton’s affair with intern Monica Lewinsky in the 1990s, when he was president, should be considered as being "offensive" and added that the Republican focus on the Clintons’ "personal, private family business" is part of the "war on women." So the fact that she stuck up for her pervert of a husband is not be something that canbe brought up?

It was earlier this month while appearing on MSBNC’s "Jansing and Co.", a program that I am not the least bit familiar with, that Wizzerman Schultz was asked about some recently released private papers belonging to the Clintons’ friend Diane Blair that "reveal conversations about the Monica Lewinsky affair." Richard Lui, who I’m guessing is the host of this MSNBC program, asked Wizzerman Schultz, "Some Republicans including Rand Paul and Reince Priebus say, ‘this is all fair game here.’ Are they right here?" Wizzerman Schultz responded with typical faux outrage.

Wizzerman Schultz said, "It’s stunning that the Republican leadership is so obsessed with Hillary Clinton and anyone’s personal, private, family business that they would dredge up 20-year-old issues like that is not only not-fair game, it’s offensive, and I think it’s just another example of their ability to alienate women across this country." She added, "And in the war on women, it’s just another opportunity for us to show that Republicans just don’t get it, and that’s why we’re going to continue to win women and it will matter in 2014 and in 2016."

Look, the bottom line here is that if women are stupid enough to continue to fall for this supposed Republican ‘war on women’ mantra that we hear coming from slimy individuals like Wizzerman Schultz, it will, in the end, say much more about women than it does about the Democrats. Speaking for myself, character, and how much of it is, or is not, possessed by any potential president, should be seen as an important qualifier. And after having suffered through eight long years with a president who possess precious little of that particular trait, do we really want to elect a successor who possesses even less?

Because when it comes to a "war on women", and who it is actually behind it, I think it rather obvious that in Hitlery Clinton, the Democrats have someone on the inside. This woman has repeatedly attacked the very women that her letch of a husband has ever sexually assaulted and even raped. So not only were these women made to suffer the indignity of being manhandled by this pervert, but also by being attacked by the twisted bitch to whom the pervert is married. Come on people, can’t we please do better than to put these two disgusting people back into the White House?

DEMOCRATS SEE OBAMACARE AS A POLITICAL ‘WINNER”…

So let me see if I have this right, it has now been stated that up to 140 Million people are very likely to lose their current healthcare coverage, with untold millions already having done so, and yet, Debbie Wizzerman Schultz, Democrat member of Congress, as well as the chair of the Democrat National Committee, recently made the claim that Obamacare will actually be something that congressional Democrats will not only be able to run on, but win on, in 2014. Now let’s say, just for the sake of argument, that this brain-dead boob is correct in her claim and that the American people will come out en masse in support of Obamacare and vote for Democrats next year. What would such an act say, if anything, about the intelligence of the American people?

Debbie made her rather bold claim during what was an appearance on ‘Bull Dog Candy’ Crowley’s CNN show, "State of the Union", this past Sunday, and she sounded quite confident that Democrat congressional candidates would win if they chose to run on Obamacare in the 2014 midterm elections. "I think, actually, Candy, that Democratic candidates will be able to run on ObamaCare as an advantage leading into the 2014 election," Wizzerman Schultz told ‘Bull Dog’ Crowley. ‘Bull Dog’ had been asking Wizzerman Schultz about the perception that the Obamacare issue had made the Virginia governor’s race much closer than expected, causing scumbag Terry McAuliffe to lose a lot of ground in the closing days of that campaign.

The dumber-than-dirt Ms. Wizzerman Schultz said, "I think Obamacare, because Americans have been feeling the benefits since 2010, where young adults can stay on their parents' insurance until they're 26, where on January 1 if you have a preexisting condition, like I do, as you know, as a breast cancer survivor, the peace of mind … that those Americans are going to have knowing that they can never be dropped or denied coverage for that preexisting condition, the preventative care that's available without a co-pay or a deductible, those are benefits that Americans have already been feeling and will increasingly feel as Obamacare is fully implemented." The benefits that Americans have been feeling since 2010? Benefits, WHAT benefits?

Anyway, at the end of this nutty little exchange, "Bull Dog" Crowley once again asked Wizzerman Schultz: "And just a yes or no, because I've got to run. You believe that Democrats will win running on Obamacare in 2014?" To which Wizzerman Schultz spewed more of her typical drivel, saying, "I think because Americans reject the Tea Party extremism, they want us to focus on creating jobs and working together, and because they will feel—." "That's not exactly a yes," interjected Crowley "--the benefits of Obamacare, yes," concluded Wizzerman Schultz. I suppose she could be right, after all, America has become what is, today, essentially nothing more than a nation of sheep in this era of Barry "Almighty."

Personally speaking, I’d like to think that there are still enough Americans who are able to look at this disaster and recognize the fact that much more is being lost than we could ever hope to gain from this thing called Obamacare. And in so doing, they will then choose to hold accountable those who, through what was nothing more than pure political trickery, brought it into being and told us all that we would need to first pass it in order to then see what was actually in it. The endless stream of lies that have been told in the effort to convince Americans that it was something that it most definitely is not, continues to today. Come 2014 the American people will have one of their few remaining opportunities to kill this debacle, Obamacare. But, will they?

DEBBIE SAYS SHE'S STILL OBAMA'S TOP SURROGATE...

ROMNEY IS THE 'EXTREME' CANDIDATE HERE? YOU'RE KIDDIN RIGHT?



Debbie Wizzerman Schultz takes great pleasure is saying that Mitt Romney is an "extreme candidate." Which is a rather odd opinion coming from the leader of the political party whose own candidate is arguably the most ‘radical’ individual to ever be elected to any public office. This community agitator who had never held, before his current position, any sort of leadership position, a fact that has been painfully obvious to even the most casual of observers for the last four years. He is a devout socialist who believes that the government should be the sole arbiter of any and all rights to be enjoyed by the citizenry. If that does not define ‘extreme’ then I don’t know what does. Barack Hussein Obama is the true ‘extreme’ candidate in this race. His dream is to be the man who will go down in history as he who presided over the diminishing of American power, prestige and influence throughout the world. It was he who cut America ‘down to size.’ His time in office will be seen as a black spot, no pun intended, on the history of our nation. A spot that we will never be able to expunge.

DEBBIE GETS BUSTED, BUT STICKS TO HER LIES...

Whether or not you agree with Anderson Cooper’s politics, which I do not, he is said to be one of the last real journalists left in the mainstream media. And during his CNN show on Thursday, the host proved that during his “Keeping Them Honest” segment where he ripped into Rep. Debbie Wizzerman Schultz for “misquoting” a Los Angeles Times article in a fundraising email, in which she attempted to tie GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s abortion stance to Rep. Todd Akin’s. Akin, as I'm sure you all know, came under fire this week from all sides for arguing that women’s bodies can prevent pregnancies in cases of "legitimate rape." That old Anderson was so intense when dealing with a fellow liberal was surprising to me. But like they say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

The email in question argued that the GOP “just voted to embrace Akin’s position by including a constitutional ban on all abortions — even in cases of rape or incest — in their 2012 platform.” Schultz also criticizes Romney and his running mate Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) in the email for “saying they don’t entirely agree with that plank.” Cooper then addressed the LA Times quote that Schultz used to make her point, which he says she “misquoted.” From the email: “…but guess what? The Los Angeles Times reported yesterday that the platform was, and I quote, ‘written at the direction of Romney’s campaign.’” Those exact words did actually appear in the LA Times, Cooper explained, but Schultz took them “completely out of context.”


Now, here is the entire paragraph that was printed in the Times earlier this week: There is no doubt about who is in charge, of course. Delegates for presumptive nominee Mitt Romney are voting down substantive changes to the platform language that was written at the direction of Romney’s campaign. The biggest question is whether the tone remains polite, as it was at the outset of two days of deliberations, or whether dissenters spoil the image of harmony that the Romney campaign is working hard to produce. You see, the Times article is saying the Romney campaign helped make suggestions for the GOP platform, but it makes no mention of abortion policy. Cooper confronted Schultz for taking the quote out of context to further her own political agenda.


Is this bimbo not a bigger embarrassment than even Howard "The Screamer" Dean was? I mean here Wizzerman Schultz is presented with irrefutable proof that she took things completely out of context, and by the likes of Anderson Cooper, and still she maintains that it doesn't matter. She is the perfect example of just how dishonest those who call themselves Democrats really are. She actually makes the claim that it doesn't matter if she misquoted the Times, as long as she is trying to make her point, because her position is the right one. She lies repeatedly during the entire interview, and to Cooper's credit he calls her out on it. But it's like he's talking to a freakin wall. As always, Democrats feel that they can say anything they want, true or not, and they justify it by saying that their cause is to defend the greater good.

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ CATCHES A LITTLE HEAT FROM UNLIKELY SOURCE...

CAN DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ REALLY BE THAT STUPID?

The highly esteemed DNC Chair’bimbo’, Debbie Wizzerman Schultz, must think we’re all just as stupid as those who make up her little political party of retards. I’m mean there’s just no other way to explain the idiotic things that she says. She recently went so far as to make the imbecilic claim that she has absolutely “no idea the political affiliation” of the pro-Barry “Almighty” super PAC, Priorities USA. That even though it was started by two former Barry aides and has received fundraising support from Barry administration officials. Duh?

This hapless dolt who is an embarrassment to the entire state of Florida, appeared on “Fox News Sunday” and she was asked about the super PAC’s now-famous “cancer” ad that implies Mitt Romney was responsible for the death of a former steelworker’s wife. “First of all, that’s a Priorities USA ad. It is not a Democratic ad. It’s a Priorities USA super PAC,” Wizzerman Schultz said. Adding, “I have no idea the political affiliation of folks who are associated with that super PAC. … that is not affiliated with our campaign or with the party.”


Still, being determined to use this ad she claims was put out by strangers, Wizzerman Schultz proceeded to defend the ad’s substance, saying it “raises facts such as that Mitt Romney when he was CEO of Bain Capital bankrupted companies, laid off workers, cut their benefits and made millions of dollars in profit.” Saying, “That ad points out that there are consequences to making decisions like that that impacted people’s lives in a significant way.” The ad doesn’t raise any facts, it’s nothing more than part of Barry’s continuing smear campaign.


Former steelworker Joe Soptic says in the spot, released last week, that he lost his health insurance after he was laid off by Bain Capital and couldn‘t pay for his wife’s cancer treatment. Strangely enough, it has subsequently emerged that Soptic’s wife died five years after he lost his job, and that she had had her own insurance. So following her Fox appearance, Wizzerman Schultz than took to Twitter to ‘clarify’ her remarks, tweeting: “Clearly Priorities USA is a Democratic SuperPAC. Was trying to state the obvious: we have no control over their activities.”

Yet this freaking hypocrite demands Republicans exert some control over like organizations on the right. These sleazebag Democrats seem to be under the mistaken impression that they themselves are permitted to play by different rules that those they demand that the opposition play by. Some moron from the left recently went so far as to accuse Romney’s campaign of hitting below the belt. I read that and I thought I’d choke. The entire Barry campaign has been nothing more than one lie after another, and still, somehow, it’s Romney who is said to be hitting below the belt.

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK?

Well, well, well, lookee what we have here. Apparently some recently revealed disclosure forms make clear the fact that loudmouth DNC chair, and one of the more dishonest members of Congress, Debbie Wizzerman Schultz, previously held funds with investments in, of all places, Swiss banks, foreign drug companies, and even the state bank of India. Imagine that! This revelation comes only mere days after this screwy bimbo came out and attacked presumptive Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney for holding money in Swiss bank accounts in the past. "Americans need to ask themselves, why does an American businessman need a Swiss bank account and secretive investments like that?" the DNC chair, a chief surrogate for Barry's reelection team, said on Fox News Sunday earlier this week. "Just something, a thought, that I'd like to leave folks with." Well maybe what Americans should also be asking themselves is why does a sitting member of Congress need to have a Swiss bank account. To me, that's the more important question in need of being answered. After all she's supposed to be working for us.



Anyway, it's been a consistent theme of Barry "Almighty's" reelection strategy, with the talking points having now been fully distributed to all hands. And it's one that has now been fully implemented as we have heard the same line of bullshit coming from any number of hypocritical Democrats ranging from "Little Dick" Durbin, that dim bulb, Robert Gates to Ms. Wizzerman Schultz and everyone in-between. The plan being, of course, to attack Romney for foreign investments he held, especially in Swiss bank accounts, "to try to promote his wealthy, out-of-touch businessman persona." But oddly enough disclosure forms reveal that in 2010, Wizzerman Schultz invested in a 401k retirement fund run by Davis Financial Fund. As the fund discloses, it is invested in the Julius Baer Group Ltd. and the State Bank of India GDR Ltd., as well as other financial, insurance, bank institutions. "The Julius Baer Group is the leading Swiss private banking group, focusing exclusively on the demands of sophisticated private clients, family offices and external asset managers from around the world," at least that's how its website describes the firm.


Similarly, according to disclosure forms from 2004, Wizzerman Schultz also had holdings in the Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund. That fund is invested in HSBC bank (a British financial institution), Hengdeli Holdings (a Hong Kong watch company), Novo Nordisk (a Danish drug company), Volkswagen (a German auto company), Rakuten (a Japanese shipping business), Richemont Cie Financiere (a Swiss luxury goods company), and many others.  To be clear, there is nothing in Debbie Wizzerman Schultz's disclosure forms to suggest that the DNC chair invested in anything illegal. But it is clear that some of her holdings had investments overseas, in Swiss banks, foreign drug companies, the state bank of India, and many other overseas holdings. You know, the hypocrisy here is so very obvious. And did this moron Wizzerman Schultz really think that her own holdings wouldn't see the light of day. Or was she counting on the state-controlled media to keep such information well under wraps? What really ought to piss most folks off is the fact that this ignorant bitch looked us all dead in the eye and lied to us.


The Democrats, as well as Barry "Almighty" himself, are desperate to distract as much attention as possible away from what can only be described as his abysmal record. And, as we have seen thus far in the campaign, there is nothing they will not say and no accusation that will not be made. And that includes their attempt to be able to paint Romney as being an out of touch man for holding money in overseas bank accounts, when in reality their own chairman, Wizzerman Schultz, had overseas investments. All this comes in addition to Wizzerman Schultz's outright refusal to disclose her own tax returns, despite continuously calling on Romney to do so. Slimy Democrats like Wizzerman Schultz want to have it both ways. But with the state of our modern-day, state-controlled media, they're used to having it both ways. This time around they must not be permitted to get away with using their typically sleazy tactics, there is simply too much at stake in this next election. This is our last chance, and sadly it may already be too late, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try. We must reduce the number of Democrats and thus limit the amount of damage they can do.

THE END OF THE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ CHAPTER AT THE DNC?

Well, among those who get paid to keep their ear to the ground and listen for such things, it's being reported, kind of, that the venerable Ms. Debbie Wizzerman Schultz's tenure as head of the DNC may be coming to a rather unceremonious end. Rumor has it that there has been considerable momentum building in that directions and there are now reports that Ms. Wizzerman Schultz will not be returning to her position, there atop the Democratic National Committee, after the Fall election season. And apparently, it matters very little whether Barry "Almighty" wins or loses.

Ms. Wizzerman Schultz has had, I think, what can safely be described as a bit of a tumultuous history during her 14 month reign of leading the Democratic National Committee. Almost from the moment that Barry selected her to replace Tom Kaine back in April of 2011, her mouth has seemed to get the better of her on any number of separate occasions. I'm sure we all remember her actually blaming Bush for the rise to power of Hamas, the too many to count rather testy media appearances and finally even Barry's advisors telling old Deb to tone it down.

The rumors of Debbie’s impending departure are also being reported by the National Journal. Also taking part in the rumor mill is the blog, Shark Tank, which has quoted a supposed close associate of Debbie's, albeit anonymously, as claiming that the deal is already done. The Shark Tank story continues: This same source believes that Wasserman Schultz will be forced to resign behind closed doors and then stage an press event in which she tells Americans that her job as the DNC chair was a temporary one and that she is moving on with her congressional career.

So is Debbie Wasserman Schultz being moved out of the spotlight ahead of the November elections? While there is no confirmation from within the DNC itself, or from the White House, another former DNC Chair does seem to be busying himself by throwing a little gasoline on the fire. It was as recently as earlier this month, that we heard "Fast Eddy" Rendell, that devoted supporter of Hitlery Clinton, come at Wizzerman Shulltz a little sideways, telling some radio host that former RNC Chairman Michael Steele was “effective” during his tenure at that post.

However, Rendell added that some of the strong comments made by Rep. Wasserman Schultz questioning Mitt Romney’s qualifications to be President were not helpful. “I think in the end, you’ve got to be credible. There’s nobody out there who thinks that Governor Romney is unqualified.” That said, could it be that the confrontational congresswoman from Florida is merely shifting her focus in preparation for a push to unseat the 71-year-old Nancy Pelosi as the voice that leads House Democrats? Could be. It would seen as being the prefect transition.

It should be noted that Ms. Wizzerman Schultz must be re-elected to serve Florida’s 20th Congressional District before she can ever hope to challenge Pelosi or anyone else hoping to lead the House Democrats. According to the online poll Elections Meter, Wizzerman Schultz has a declining popularity rate that may not bode well for her in the coming November election. Now wouldn't that be a shame. But Floridians are rather notorious for electing, and re-electing some pretty obvious morons to Congress, Alcee Hastings, Corrine Brown, and Frederica Wilson to name just a few.

So while Ms. Wizzerman Schultz has consistently demonstrated a limited amount of brain power, it really should not come as being a significant surprise when taking those others, listed above, into consideration. The collective IQ of those listed would, most likely, be equal to the shoe size of any one of them. Those in Florida would be helping us all out, immensely, in taking a giant step forward if they were to, one by one, replace each and every one of these morons with someone much more interested in getting our country headed back in the right direction. So we'll see!

DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ..."IT'S NOTHING MORE THAN A WITCH HUNT"...



Brilliant!  Absolutely brilliant!!  No wonder she's the head of the DNC.

DEMOCRATS, LET THE WHINING BEGIN...

Debbie Wizzerman Schultz, professional dingbat and chair of the National Democratic Party, seems to be issuing a warning of sorts, saying that despite the Republicans' victory in Wisconsin on Tuesday, Democrats "will not cede an inch in Wisconsin to Mitt Romney" in the general election. Ah, they may not have a choice in the matter. The Walker victory in Wisconsin very clearly demonstrated that there is a growing number of people who may now have finally had enough of being asked to continually foot the bill for ever more exorbitant benefits packages received by over paid and under worked unionized public employees.

And as has been previously been reported, Wisconsin Democrats, in the run-up to Tuesday's recall election, repeatedly criticized the Democratic National Committee for its being slow to send sufficient resources to the state to boost the Democrat running against Gov. Scott Walker. “We are frustrated by the lack of support from the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Governors Association,” a top Wisconsin Democratic Party official told The Washington Post in mid-May. “Scott Walker has the full support and backing of the Republican Party and all its tentacles. We are not getting similar support."

It took Ms. Wizzerman Schultz and the DNC another nine days to issue an emergency fund-raising appeal. On May 24, Wizzerman Schultz sent an email to party supporters, urging them to "help win this thing." But as we all now know, that just didn't happen. It was around midnight, that Ms. Wizzerman Schultz issued the following statement on the results of the Wisconsin recall. Her statement is printed in its entirety:

“Despite the disappointing outcome of tonight’s election, there is no question that over the past year this recall effort sent a message to Scott Walker that his brand of divisive politics is offensive and wrong. Thousands of Wisconsinites mounted this effort in the face of a flood of out of state, secret and corporate special interest money– amounting to a massive $31 million war chest for Governor Walker to just $4 million on our side.
   “I want to thank Mayor Barrett, our other candidates on the ballot tonight and all the passionate, dedicated individuals on the ground who held conversations with their friends, family, neighbors and co-workers about the stakes of this election. The Badger State’s progressive, grassroots tradition was on full display throughout this election, and it will remain front and center as we continue our important work to move Wisconsin forward for working families across the state as we head toward November.”
  "And as we turn our attention to the fall, we will not cede an inch in Wisconsin to Mitt Romney who has been behind in virtually every single recent poll and who wants to go back to the same failed policies of the past from which Wisconsin is recovering. And while we're not taking anything for granted, if Mitt Romney thinks he's going to be the first Republican to win Wisconsin since Ronald Reagan he's got another thing coming."

So there you have it. Now, Ms. Wizzerman Schultz can make all the noise that she wishes to, but the bottom line here is that I think it's pretty hard to deny the fact that the outcome of this recall vote will end up having at least some effect on this November's election. Now while I'm not willing to say that Wisconsin is now squarely in the Romney column, even if Barry is now forced to spend more money there, I'd say that a big plus for the good guys. I'd like to think people are beginning to wake up, the question that remains however, is that will enough of them wake up in time to send Barack Hussein Obama, hm, hm, hm, back to the windy city where he belongs.

DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ AT HER BEST...

Just another rather obvious example of Ms. Wizzerman Shultz's sad lack of actually possessing any legislative skill whatsoever.  Here she is provided time to ask the governor some questions and uses nearly all of the alotted time to do nothing more than to spew her rather idiotic Democrat talking points, leaving the governor with a mere 9 seconds to answer her non-question, question.  She blathers on for what seems like forever, and like all good Demorcats, ends up having really said nothing at all. Is she really the best that her district can offer? 

THAT DIMMEST OF DIM BULBS, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ...

Just when you think you've heard just about every screwy accusation imaginable from Debbie Wizzerman Schultz of Florida, the stellar chairman of the Democratic National Committee, she goes out and proves us all wrong. I say that because she has apparently now actually accused Republicans of "making sure that we would redefine rape." It was during a during a recent conference call that this mouth from the south, Wizzerman Schultz said, “I think the agenda of the Republican Party and of Mitt Romney has clearly been--and can be interpreted as--an attack on the issues that matter to women."

“From the very beginning of this Congress,” she said, “the first priorities in the first bills the Republicans introduced repealing the Affordable Care Act which would dramatically impact women in a negative way [by] making sure that insurance companies could drop us or deny us coverage for preexisting conditions, making sure that we could once again be charged more simply because of our gender for insurance coverage, making sure that we would redefine rape as only being forcible rape--that was H.R. 3.” This is a total misrepresentation of what this bill actually would do. And she knew when she said it!

Anyway, what the ditsy Ms. Wizzerman Schultz was referring to is the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, which sought to make the ban on federal funding of abortions permanent, removing the need to pass the Hyde Amendment every year. And what Wizzerman Schultz failed to mention here is the fact that the bill was co-sponsored by Democratic Rep. Dan Lipinski (Ill.) and 16 Democrats voted with Republicans in support of the measure, which passed by a 251-175 vote last May. So again I think it quite obvious that Ms. Wizzerman Schultz is rather selective in her throwing around her accusations.

The version of the bill that has Ms. Wizzerman Schultz's panties in a bunch, contained an exemption for abortions in the case of “forcible rape” and incest. At the time, liberals seized on the term “forcible,” and claimed it would redefine rape under federal law. They argued the wording excluded non-consensual sex when not accompanied by violence, for example drug-induced rape. However, the bill did not change the criminal definition of rape under federal law or any other law whatsoever. Further, and something that should come as no surprise, while the bill passed the House it never progressed through the Senate.

Like most liberals, this screwy bimbo has a rather peculiar habit of taking herself way too seriously, and assumes that anything she has to say is very much worth listening to. But I'm curious about something. Are there really that many women in this country who are actually stupid enough to believe anything that comes out of the mouth of this certifiable loon? For the life of me I just can't believe that there are. I would like to think that most women would be able to see through all of the drivel spewed by Ms. Wizzerman Schultz. But I suppose that little theory will be put to the test come this November.

MORE DRIVEL FROM LOON DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ...

HEY DEB..HOW BOUT THEM TAX RETURNS...

Well it would seem that turnabout is fair play with Democratic National Committee (DNC) chief Debbie Wizzerman Schultz now being called on to cough up her own personal income tax returns. The request has been made by her congressional opponent, Republican Karen Harrington of Florida. Ms. Harrington's campaign writes, “This week millions of taxpaying Americans will fulfill their requirement of filing their tax returns by paying any and all taxes due to the federal government.” Adding, “Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been asking Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney to release his 2011 tax return even after Governor Romney released his 2010 tax return.” Sleazy characters like Wizzerman Schultz always seem to think that they are somehow entitled to make all manner of demands without ever having to comply to any of demands made upon them by others.

Anyway, Ms. Harrington's campaign does go on to say, “Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz’s request of Governor Romney to release his tax returns screams of hypocrisy, because to the best of our knowledge, Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz has never released a single tax return of her own. As a member of Congress, she is required to release a yearly ‘financial disclosure,’ this yearly disclosure is not a tax return." It goes on to say that, “While asking for Governor Romney to release his past tax returns, and in keeping with the spirit of President Obama’s call for ‘full transparency,’ we ask Congressman Wasserman Schultz to release her own tax returns.” It would seem that transparency means different things to different people. And it is never meant to be applicable to anyone with a (D) after their name. After all, Democrats are to be considered as being above such silly nonsense.

There doesn't appear to any record anywhere of Wizzerman Schultz ever having released any of her personal income tax returns, even though, as the Harrington campaign points out, members of Congress are required to disclose assets, holdings, and various other financial information. Wizzerman Schultz has an annual salary of $174,000, which is the standard rate for members of Congress. As newsbusters.org notes, “her Congressional salary is more than three times greater than the median salary for individuals in her own district (FL-20) which is $54,194.” Ms. Harrington’s request comes at a time when Democrats, Wizzerman Schultz included, have been waging a war on taxes, trying to get Romney to release his financial records going back 17 years. All this at a time when Democrats, including Barry "Almighty", are pushing for increased taxes through what's fondly, or not so fondly, being referred to as the Buffett Rule.

DEBBIE ACCUSES GOP OF ROOTING FOR ECONOMIC FAILURE…

Demonstrating once again that she has all of the intelligence of your basic ice cube, that renowned mouth from the south, Democratic National Committee chair Rep. Debbie Wizzerman Schultz on Sunday came out and accused Republicans of actually “rooting for economic failure.” So, apparently, at least according to Ms. Schultz, those on our side are no longer permitted the luxury of offering any sort of a critique regarding Barry’s handling, or his lack of handling, of our economy without now being accused by nuts like Ms. Wizzerman Schultz of rooting for “economic failure”. Her idiotic remarks came on the heels of a weak jobs report which made the claim that supposedly 120,000 net jobs were created last month, down from more than 200,000 in each of the three previous months.

“What’s really bothersome to me Candy is that it almost seems like my Republican colleagues in Congress and Mitt Romney are rooting for economic failure,” Wasserman Schultz said, singling out GOP presidential frontrunner Mitt Romney during an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union.” She added, “I mean, they’ve been hyper-focused on one job, Barack Obama’s, for really the last two years.” Instead, everyone needs to focus on moving the economy forward for “the middle class and for working families,” she said. “Mitt Romney’s plans, the Republican budget take they just put out in the House, they’re focused on making sure millionaires and billionaires can continue to do even better, and that’s a pretty huge contrast,” Wizzerman Schultz said.

So is this to be the new tack as we head closer to this year’s election, those who possess the nerve take exception to Barry’s socialistic policies and the damage they have wrought are to be portrayed as either being racist or as rooting for failure? You see, this is how the Democrats always try to intimidate their opponents in order to prevent them from exposing what it is that they, the Democrats, are up to. In this specific instance I think most of us have already come to recognize what the Democrats are attempting to do here. And that is to spend us into oblivion. So I think that there is reason for hope in that the more imbeciles like Wizzerman Schultz make these pathetic claims, the more they will fall on deaf ears. Because I think that those outside of such groups as the black community and the Occupy Wall Street crowd are slowly waking up and are now seeing this drivel for what it is.

MS. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ CONTINUES WITH HER OWN LITTLE WAR ON...REALITY….

I've spend a great deal of time here chronicling the antics of one the craziest morons that you'll find anywhere on the planet, none other than Ms. Debbie Wizzerman Schultz. And I thank this perpetual airhead for being so consistent in her ability to provide me with something to write about. And by golly, she's helped me out yet again. Because it seems that our favorite Democrat nutjob, has recently been out and about, busying herself by, of all things, warning Mitt Romney. Warning him about what, you ask? Why, that his “anti-women” stance could cost him votes in his campaign for the White House, saying as recently as last Friday that he needs to end the Republican “war on women.” War on women? Is that really how this loon sees this, or it just more of her weird political theater? And I can only guess that her little warning must have Gov. Romney shaking in his loafers. I know it would me. So anyway, this latest rant by Ms. Wizzerman Schultz came during a recent conference call/briefing where she accused Mr. Romney of “pandering to the extreme right-wing of his party on the issues that matter to Washington women.” Ms. Wizzerman Schultz and representatives from both Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America, both big abortion supporters, have now singled out the former Massachusetts governor as a politician who would, to use their phrase, “allow big corporations to deny health care options to their female employees." Yup, I'm sure that's exactly what he has in mind. Are these morons serious?!

And as to be expected, Ms. Wizzerman Schultz and her fellow abortion fanatics held ever so firmly onto the party line, as rabid Democrats are known to do, that this entire issue is all about nothing more than women's “health issues,” and only about women’s “health issues,” Ms. Wizzerman Schultz, who had sponsored the call to targeted Washington state voters ahead of their caucuses went on to say that, “Playtime is over when it comes to women’s health decisions and no one needs to hear this message more than Mitt Romney.” Romney, as we all now know, won in Washington state on Saturday, further cementing his status as frontrunner. Wizzerman Schultz went on to say Romney’s reversal on the Blunt Amendment, which sought to insert conscience rights into ObamaCare, was not his first “flip-flop when it comes to women.” Romney initially said he opposed the measure, before clarifying and declaring his support, saying that he had misunderstood the question as referring to a state law limiting access to contraception. The amendment failed a vote in the Senate Thursday, 51 to 48. No surprise there, with the "Party of Death" coming out on top. Now to be honest with you, I didn't hear what Romney said, and whether or not it was a "flip-flop" as described by this bimbo I don't know and frankly don't care. What I do know is that Ms Wizzerman-Schultz and her comrades are expending a great deal of energy to call this fight something other than what it actually is. I can only assume that they figure if they say it enough, loud enough, folks will think it true.


Spewing, what has by now become recognized as her own rather unique style of drivel, she made the claim that, “No-one should have been surprised that Mitt Romney wants to give our bosses control over our health care decisions.” Adding, “Romney’s extreme positions on contraception and a woman’s right to choose are only the start at how little he cares about letting women make decisions about our own health.” Extreme? As usual this moron has a tendency to overplay her hand. In attempting to make her case, she pointed to Romney’s varying stances on providing emergency contraception to rape victims, and derided his support for a “personhood” amendment in Massachusetts, which would define life as beginning at conception. Look, science has already proven that point. “A personhood amendment would ban all abortions, even if a woman is a victim of rape or incest, or if she would die otherwise,” Wizzerman Schultz said. Adding, “This is an extreme and radical step, even for Mitt Romney.” She went onto rant that, “It’s time Romney and the rest of the Republican Party end the war on women they started.” Concluding, “Whether it’s the Blunt-Rubio amendment, personhood or attempts to repeal Roe v. Wade, we aren’t going to let extremist politicians dictate to women what we can or cannot do with our bodies.” What this imbecile very obvious leaves out of the entire equation is the fact that once a woman becomes pregnant what is actually taking place here is that there is now one body “within” her body, it's not something considered as being “part” of her body. That is the actual fact of the matter, like it or not.


I'm sure we all know by now that what's driving this bus is the fact that the Barry “Almighty” administration has mandated that all health insurance plans cover the cost of sterilizations and FDA-approved contraceptives, including those that cause abortions. So it should come as expected that also appearing on this same call would be someone like Megan Iturralade, who, supposedly is a nurse at, you guess it, a Catholic hospital in Tacoma, Washington. She also droned on in her own little attempt to portray this entire issue as being all about “women’s health.” She said that she’s been “watching the assault on our health care by politicians like Mitt Romney.” An assault on our healthcare? The only one assaulting our healthcare is Barry. She went on to say, “I currently work as a nurse at a Catholic hospital in Tacoma, Washington that doesn’t offer health insurance that covers birth control.” Adding, “As a result of this, I remain on my parents’ health insurance because it’s difficult to afford the costs of paying for birth control out of pocket.” What a damn crybaby! “Thank goodness for the president’s health care reform law, which will allow me to remain on my parents’ insurance plan until I’m 26,” she added. “Now, because of the leadership of President Obama women like me will have access to free preventative care, including contraception no matter where we work, because our insurance companies and not our employers will cover contraceptive costs.” Oh yes, thank "goodness" for Barry's healthcare reform and his stellar leadership on the issue.


And Ms. Iturralade, who seems to think it perfectly acceptable for me to pay for her birth control and thus her, apparently, frequent bouts of recreational sexual activity, essentially did nothing more than to regurgitate the Democrat talking point as she proceeded to claim, “I know I and other women in Washington have been watching the assault on our health care by politicians like Mitt Romney, and I know the majority of us don’t appreciate having our medical choices dictated to us.” Adding, “And there are going to be consequences for those who insist on pressing forward with these archaic actions and mindsets, and at least for Mitt Romney that consequence is clearly going to be that he’s going to lose the presidential election.” Ok, so this bitch doesn’t like having so-called medical choices dictated to her. But she seems to be perfectly agreeable with that fact that Barry “Almighty” is essentially dictating exactly that in saying what the Catholic Church 'must' provide even though it may go against church teachings. Iturralade’s complaint about the cost of birth control echoed that of recent testimony by part time Georgetown law student/full time slut, Sandra Fluke, who told a Democratic Steering Committee hearing, “Without insurance coverage contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school,” and gave examples of the difficulties students face without subsidized birth control. My goodness, these poor, poor girls, that they should have to cover the cost of their own birth control, well, it just brings a tear to my one good eye!


And lastly, also taking part in this same little feminist gaggle was yet another abortion enthusiast, Dana Laurent, whose claim to fame, or so I'm told, is that she is the “political director” for Planned Parenthood Votes! Washington, an advocacy and political arm of the nation’s largest abortion factory. And of course, she was only too happy to climb aboard the Wizzerman Schultz "women's health" crazy train and echo the prevailing sentiment that Romney is straight out of the stone age. “Women in Washington state are very familiar with the games that Mitt Romney and other anti-choice, anti-family planning Republicans are playing with women’s health,” she spewed. “Americans want a president who is going to make sure that women have access to the health care they need,” Laurent said. These abortion fanatics continue to portray this an issue about “women’s health” and healthcare supposedly being denied to women. And it’s all nothing more than a pack of lies. And then, to cap things off, this moron, Laurent, put on demonstration of what can only be described as a little soothsaying, making the claim that, “Mitt Romney would allow big corporations to deny health care options to their female employees. It’s just that simple.” I just don't understand the overwhelming need of these people whose only desire it seems to be, to allow the murdering of one human being so that another can pursue endless liaisons culminating in varying intensities of sexual gratification. Has life become so meaningless to them as they go in search of the perfect f**k?

DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ...YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP!

Ah, tis election season. That wonderful time that comes upon every couple of year. A time when there are more words are spoken without anything ever actually being said. So, if you follow politics, you’ve probably already seen a lot of interviews where the interviewee refuses to answer any and all questions and instead goes on and on about unrelated topics, spewing only standard talking points. If those interviews frustrate you, there was one that occurred on Fox and Friends just this morning that would have had you pulling your hair out and screaming at your television. The interview/discussion took place between the show’s hosts and DNC Chair Debbie Wizzerman Schultz. In fact, the interview was so frustrating that interviewer and Fox host Brian Kilmeade was even caught rolling his eyes during it. When Kilmeade or fellow host Steve Doocy would ask Ms. Wizzerman Schultz a question, she would either not answer, or would go off on some weird tangent, responding only with an attack on Mitt Romney. And then both proceeded to take some underhanded shots at each other. Really. It got that bad. And at one point it looked like Kilmeade was ready to end the whole thing and walk away.

AND NOW, EVEN MORE FROM THE DUMBEST BITCH ON THE PLANET...

And yes, ladies and gentlemen, I am once again talking about none other than the stellar Chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, Ms. Debbie Wizzerman Schultz. You know, every time I think I’ve heard this dim bulb say the dumbest thing that I’ve ever heard, damn if she doesn’t come up with something even dumber. It’s amazing! Now you would think that there would be somebody, anybody, standing by whenever she gets the urge to open her pie hole and suggest that maybe, just maybe, she should just shut the hell up. The most recent example of this moron's miniscule brain power came about when she chose, once again, to malign the Tea Party as she went about reminding a New Hampshire audience of the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords a year ago. I can only assume that Ms. Giffords, being a fellow Democrat and all, cares very little if she is used in such a way by Ms. Wizzerman Schultz.



"We need to make sure that we tone things down, particularly in light of the Tucson tragedy from a year ago, where my very good friend, Gabby Giffords, who is doing really well, by the way,” was shot, said Rep. Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla. "The discourse in America, the discourse in Congress in particular . . . has really changed, I'll tell you. I hesitate to place blame, but I have noticed it take a very precipitous turn towards edginess and lack of civility with the growth of the tea party movement." This type of behavior is nothing if not very typical those in Ms. Wizzerman Schultz’s party. But to tell you the truth, I’m just not sure who is left to buy this cockamamie drivel being spewed by Ms. Wizzerman Schultz anymore! I mean, where is it today that you hear the most hateful, angry, vile and incendiary rhetoric coming from today. Certainly not from anyone on the Right, and that includes the Tea Party. Listen to anyone on MSNBC or NPR, and that’s just the tame stuff.


So I can only guess that all of foul language and behavior spewed by those losers who comprised that supposed grassroots movement referred to as Occupy Wall Street is to be considered by Ms. Wizzerman Schultz as being totally acceptable. She made the charge that Tea Party members have disrupted town hall meetings and added, "When they come and disagree with you, you're not just wrong, you're the enemy." Now I could be wrong, but it also seems that I remember something about some rather sizeable, and more than a little unseemly, crowds in Wisconsin and Ohio not all that long ago. Crowds that were made up of nuts who were 100 percent liberal, unionized public employees. And when you place these loons next to the Tea Party folks, the differences are pretty stark, with the Tea Party folks coming out looking pretty tame. And the Tea Party folks always clean up after themselves, unlike those destructive slobs on the left.


That's what I love about these wacked out liberals, like Wizzerman Schultz, it’s always, do as I say not as I do. They continue to accuse those on the right of using the same standards, or lack of standards, for conduct. She places ownership of tactics so routinely used by those on the left, with the right. She’s a despicable liar. More often than not every time you see one of these Liberal Democrats on some news show or Sunday talk show, all that they want to is evade actually talking substantively about the issues and descend into what usually is nothing more than a shouting match as they go about trying to shout down of anyone of opposing views. Everything from the destruction of private property and all manner of disruptive tactics, are considered fair play by the likes of Ms. Wizzerman Schultz. And yet she can, and with no problem whatsoever, and while proudly wearing her political hack hat, accuse those who had absolutely nothing to do with the terrible act that she was referencing in an apparent effort to make some sort of political point.