She may be gone, or almost gone, but it'll be a long time before she will be able to be forgotten, if for no other reason than the amount of damage our departing Secretary of State leaves behind which will undoubted prove to be irreparable. Especially when you consider the fact that her replacement, none other than John Kerry-Heinz, is even more of an incompetent boob than she is. The man has neither the necessary brains nor the aptitude for the job at hand, than does your average ice cube. So as Hitlery Clinton heads for the exit, as she does so, she takes a swipe at the critics of Barry and of his administration's handling, some would call bungling, of the September 11 attack on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya that resulted in the needless death of four Americans, one of them our ambassador. She told The Associated Press (AP) that critics of the administration's handling of the attack don't live in an "evidence-based world" and their refusal to "accept the facts" is unfortunate and regrettable for the political system. In other words, it's their fault because they didn't believe the 'facts' as they were created out of whole cloth by our president, our U.N. Ambassador and Hitlery herself.
In her last one-on-one interview before finally stepping down, our esteemed Hitlery told the AP that the attack in Benghazi was the low point of her time as America's top diplomat. Gee, there were so many, how is it, exactly, that she was able to settle on just this one? But she suggested that the furor over the assault would not affect whether she runs for president in 2016. Like anybody could actually think that she would ever permit something as trivial as the allowing of one of our ambassadors to get murdered to stand in her way of running for the White House. She's a scummy Democrat, so for her the death of an American ambassador actually becomes somewhat of a resume enhancer. While she insisted that she has not yet decided what her future holds, she said she "absolutely" still plans to make a difference on issues she cares about in speeches and in a sequel to her 2003 memoir, "Living History," that will focus largely on her years as secretary of state. In other words, it'll be a book that will, most likely be more fiction than fact, and, as is usually the case with anyone named Clinton, one in which the truth will likely be sacrificed in order to tell a good story.
It was also during the above mentioned interview that Hitlery was described as being relaxed but also clearly perturbed by the many allegations from those Republican lawmakers and commentators that the administration had intentionally misled the public about whether the attack was a protest gone awry or a terrorist attack, or intentionally withheld additional security for diplomatic personnel in Libya knowing that an attack could happen. Gee, like there's no chance of that ever happening with this current crowd of political hoodlums. It's like, how dare anyone question her integrity? Look, if we've learned anything from being around the Clintons, and for what seems like for freakin ever, it's that whenever dealing with anyone possessing the last name of Clinton you can never really be sure what you can believe and what you can't. In fact you can even be sure of what the definition of is, is. Both of the Clintons seem to either possess the gene, or are afflicted with of some personality disorder, that causes them to be of the opinion that nothing they do is ever to be questioned and everything they say is to believed. It's all really quite bizarre. And I almost feel sorry for daughter Chelsea. Almost.
Now what some suspicious folks might view it as putting the fox in charge of the hen house, there was an independent panel that was convened by Hitlery herself, the supposed purpose of which was to look into the incident. And it did result in some somewhat scathing criticism of the State Department even singling out four officials, some might say scapegoats, for serious management and leadership failures. But it also determined that there was no guarantee that extra personnel could have prevented the deaths of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, and three other Americans. And of course Hitlery was nowhere near being blamed, of course, after all we wouldn't want to damage, in any way, her chances of running for president in 2016. She has, however, said she accepts responsibility for the situation. Well, gee, that's mighty big of her. "I was so unhappy with the way that some people refused to accept the facts, refused to accept the findings of an independent Accountability Review Board, politicized everything about this terrible attack," she said. "My job is to admit that we have to make improvements and we're going to." Right!
Hitlery faced a barrage of probing questions about Benghazi from Republican lawmakers when she 'testified' before Congress recently in appearances that were delayed from December because of some supposed illness. But I think most intelligent people were pretty much able to see right through that little charade, if not before her 'testimony, then certainly afterward. It was pretty obvious that she had spent a lot of time being coached regarding how to both answer a question without really providing any kind of an answer, and in how to run out the clock, so to speak. Afterward, there were more than a few lawmakers who continued to accuse her and the administration of withholding evidence. And they were more than justified in doing so. One of those was Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., who told a television interviewer that he thought Hitlery was getting "away with murder." But isn't that pretty much par for the coarse whenever dealing with Democrats in general and the Clintons more specifically. That's what these people are famous, or infamous for, getting away with stuff that would normally land others either in jail or earn them permanent political exile.
In the interview, Clinton had little patience for such allegations. So, what? And then she started talking about what must be that same vast right-wing conspiracy that always seems to be hot on the trail of both her and her pervert of a husband. She said "There are some people in politics and in the press who can't be confused by the facts," she said. "They just will not live in an evidence-based world. And that's regrettable. It's regrettable for our political system and for the people who serve our government in very dangerous, difficult circumstances." Evidence-based world, she says. What a laugher! Personally I think it all boils down to who it is that's presenting that evidence. If it's someone who has at least some level of credibility, the evidence has a better chance of being believed, on the other hand of it's presented by someone like Hitlery there's less a chance of it being believed. And if there's one thing we've learned from our many dealings with the Clintons, it's that you can NEVER take anything they say at face value. She's another one of those narcissistic individuals who believe that just because she says it, we MUST believe it. Sorry, not happenin!
At the same time, Hitlery said she refused to be discouraged by the fact that critics "are never going to accept the facts and the limitations of the facts." She added that "you have to get up every day and work to do best you can and communicate that to the vast majority of fair-minded Americans whether they're in Congress, in the press or in the public." Because of that, she said, the partisan divide should not dissuade anyone with a cause from getting involved in politics and she hinted strongly that a divisive atmosphere would not stop her in any future endeavor. "You have to have a thick skin because (politics) is just going to be a contact sport as far as we can look into the future." And what seems to be truly bizarre is that while she is still considered by many to be one of the more divisive figures in American politics, she leaves office as one of its most popular. I say bizarre, because she is without a doubt one of the most dishonest, and dare I say corrupt, individuals that you will find anywhere in American politics. And the fact that she remains so admired by so many is a pretty sad commentary on where it is that our country is today, morally speaking.
To believe anything that comes out of her mouth, whether it be about Benghazi or any of the many other disasters that occurred on her watch, requires nothing less than a willing suspension of disbelief. And the damage that she has done to this country, herself or to assist Barry "Almighty" in doing, should be seen as being more than sufficient for barring her from all manner of public service from this point on. Just the thought of having her as our president, especially after being made to endure 8 years of Barry, is enough to make me lose all manner of sleep at night. That would be the ultimate nightmare scenario. Of course, there's liable to be very little left of this country by the time Barry gets through with it, but Hitlery, most assuredly, would finish off whatever there is that's left. And can you possible imagine old 'Slick Willie" creeping around the halls of the White House again. No woman would be safe, except, of course, for Hitlery. Because we know he ain't gonna be making any kind of move on her. Either way, any scenario that has Hitery in the White House is absolutely terrifying to me. Barry has us hanging by a thread, and by the time he's finished I'm sure the thread will have been cut sending us into a place I shudder to think about. If Hitlery were to be elected, the nightmare would only be made to continue.
No comments:
Post a Comment