Well, with ex-Vice President Al Gore is joining the growing chorus of Democrats who are now throwing their weight behind the Occupy Wall Street movement, I guess our bizarre cast of usual suspects is not pretty much complete. And chubby old Al is so freakin enthusiastic about these protests that he claims that he’s even “cheering” the revolutionists on. On his “journal,” he explained that he’s been watching and reading about the protests “with both interest and admiration.” Praising a New York Times editorial that was published this past Sunday, Al wrote the following: "From the economy to the climate crisis our leaders have pursued solutions that are not solving our problems, instead they propose policies that accomplish little. With democracy in crisis a true grassroots movement pointing out the flaws in our system is the first step in the right direction. Count me among those supporting and cheering on the Occupy Wall Street movement." Again with the reference that this collection of freaks, derelicts, misfits and all manner of social outcast, backed up by union goons is some how a "grassroots" movement. The whole notion is ludicrous. This is no "grassroots" movement, this is an orchestrated assault on the very foundations of this country, and against an economic system that has been the envy of the world.
But our buddy Al went above and beyond simply “cheering” these young "protesters" on. He concluded his little piece by posting a link, encouraging readers to “support” the movement. Upon clicking on it, readers are taken to a donation page for the “NYC General Assembly” for Occupy Wall Street. It is here that readers can give money to help prop up the protest movement. The Huffington Post‘s Hayley Miller reminds us that Al appeared on Keith Olbermann’s show, “Countdown,” where he stressed the need for an American uprising. Here's the bizarre quote: “We need to have an American spring — you know, the Arab spring. The non-violent part of it isn’t finished yet, but we need to have an American spring, a kind of an American non-violent change where people on the grassroots get involved again. Not the, you know, not in the Tea Party-style.” Not in the Tea Party style? Why not, is it because that would be violent enough to satisfy Al? Must we have a little looting and other carnage for Al's appetite for "change" to be satisfied here? This fat slob is disgusting, and isn't what's he's really calling for here, the overthrow of our government? Does the term sedition ring a bell here? And isn't what all, and any number of Democrats doing here fit that definition?
All of this blossoming support coming from liberals both in government and out, continues to spring forth even though many questions still exist surrounding who, exactly, is behind the continuing protests. Sure, we know the basics. But then I suppose that matters very little to the likes of Al Gore and his former boss, "Slick Willie" and the rest of the pathetic libs offering up their support. But beyond the few organizational structures we’ve heard about and the public figures who have come out to express their solidarity with the frustrated bunch, who is actually funding this monumental movement? While a new report from Reuters doesn’t definitively tie billionaire George Soros to the protesters, the news agency speculates that the Occupiers may have benefited at least indirectly from his generosity. Reuters reports: "There has been much speculation over who is financing the disparate protest, which has spread to cities across America and lasted nearly four weeks. One name that keeps coming up is investor George Soros, who in September debuted in the top 10 list of wealthiest Americans. Conservative critics contend the movement is nothing but a Trojan horse for a secret Soros agenda. Reuters did find indirect financial links between Soros and Adbusters, an anti-capitalist group in Canada which started the protests with an inventive marketing campaign aimed at sparking an Arab Spring type uprising against Wall Street.
While Soros has denied any connection whatsoever, he has said that he can “understand [the protesters'] sentiment.” Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh, though, doesn’t buy into this denial. Limbaugh recently said, “George Soros money is behind this.” Here’s more on the potential ties: According to disclosure documents from 2007-2009, Soros’ Open Society gave grants of $3.5 million to the Tides Center, a San Francisco-based group that acts almost like a clearing house for other donors, directing their contributions to liberal non-profit groups. Among others the Tides Center has partnered with are the Ford Foundation and the Gates Foundation. Disclosure documents also show Tides, which declined comment, gave Adbusters grants of $185,000 from 2001-2010, including nearly $26,000 between 2007-2009. Soros has denied comment, claiming that he has never heard of Adbusters. And knowing George as we all do, there's no reason not to believe his denials, right? Now I suppose it's all just a coincidence. Nothing to see here, folks, move along, move along. You know, we're never gonna find out whose really behind all of this. But I think it safe to say that is stems from the left in this country and therefore I would not be the least bit surprised to find out that the Democrat Party has its hands in it as well as our thug "community agitator" of a president.
These are very dangerous times, my friends, and they are not going to become any less so between now and November, 2012. And we cannot allow the scum on the left to bully their way to election success next year. We're going to need to be prepared to enter the fray and to perhaps get a little bloody, because the alternative is simply too frightening to even contemplate. We must rid ourselves of this disastrous president and the sleazy anti-American characters that he has chosen to surround himself with. They are desperate to extinguish this the last best hope for man, to douse that beacon of freedom to the World that this nation has been for over 200 glorious years. This is our time, and we now know the task that lies ahead. Will we take the baton from those who have been called the Greatest generation and finish the race, or will we instead simply sit out the rest of the race because to continue on is just too hard and there is no guarantee that we will win. Well, it's better to have fought and lost than to have never taken part in the battle at all. And what will we say to our children if we simply refuse to defend their futures? How will we be able to look them in the eye and tell them that it just wasn't worth the effort? I for one am not about to allow sleaze bags like Gore and Soros to destroy the future of my daughter. Who among you will join in the fight?
No comments:
Post a Comment