As hard to believe as this might be for some people, myself included, to understand, apparently the most popular national political figure in America today is the very same one who was rejected by her own party just three short years ago. And just who might that stellar individual be who is so close to the hearts of so many Americans? Why it is none other that our present Secretary of State, Hitlery Clinton. You could have knocked me over with a feather. Something that makes the point very clearly regarding all that is currently wrong with our country, is the fact that nearly two-thirds of Americans still hold a favorable view of her and one-third are suffering a form of buyer’s remorse, saying the U.S. would be better off now if she had become president in 2008 instead of Barry "Almighty." Personally, I just don't think that we'd really be all that much better off than we are now had we a President Clinton instead of President Barry "Almighty." These two are essentially cut from the same "progressive" cloth, therefore, while they may chose different paths, the ultimate destination which they identified for this country, would be virtually the same. That being the ever elusive utopia that people of their kind have always said was out there.
Anyway, this finding now comes to us by way of the latest Bloomberg National Poll which, again, apparently shows a higher level of wishful thinking about a Hitlery Clinton presidency than when a similar question was asked back in July 2010. Then, roughly only a quarter of Americans held such a view. “Looking back, I wonder if she would have been a stronger leader, knowing the games and the politics and all that goes on,” said Susan Dunlop, 50, a homemaker in New Port Richey, Florida. “I don’t think she would have bent as much.” Hitlery wouldn't have bent as much? What the Hell does that mean? Don't tell that Ms. Dunlop is one of those who thinks Barry has "compromised" too much with those "extreme" Republicans. But look, let's be honest here, it's not difficult to be a better leader than a guy who has absolutely no leadership traits or qualities whatsoever. He has never held any position that has required him to be any sort of a leader. Who exactly does one lead when you are nothing more than a "community agitator?" My teenage daughter would make a better leader than Barry.
Clinton, who is now 63, a former first lady and U.S. senator from New York, fought with Barry for the Democratic nomination until June 2008, in what was often a combative primary that included her questioning his presidential readiness. While 34 percent now say things would be better under a Clinton administration, almost half, or 47 percent, say things would be about the same and 13 percent say worse. While I'm not exactly sure how things could be any worse than they are now, I do agree with those who say that things would be about the same. Both of these people are disciples of Saul Alinsky and avid practitioners of the tactics he laid out in his "Rules for Radicals," so in that respect I think it safe to assume the results of electing Clinton would have differed very little from what we've experienced since electing Barry. “Some of her appeal is that she is not Barack Obama,” said J. Ann Selzer, president of Des Moines, Iowa-based Selzer & Co., which conducted the Sept. 9-12 poll. Well, duh! But Hitlery wasn't Barry back then in 2008 either, so I'm not sure what J. Ann Selzer might be talking about.
We all know that Barry’s job approval rating has decline with it now standing at the lowest of his presidency, 45 percent. Republicans, for whatever reason, are slightly more inclined than the national average to think the U.S. would be better off with Clinton running the country, with 39 percent saying so. A majority of Democrats, 57 percent, say things would be the same. And I would tend to agree. Both of these characters are extremely liberal, to say the least, so to think that things would be appreciably different with Clinton as president is more than a bit naïve. Clinton’s international sphere of influence offers some of the only areas where Barry scores well in the poll. On Libya, for instance, 42 percent approve of his job performance, while 65 percent like his efforts on terrorism, which include the May capture and killing of al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden. To me, the bin Laden thing proves nothing, I contend that Barry place a minor role in that, if he had any role whatsoever. I see that taking place with him being informed after the fact out of fear that he would have squelched it.
Oddly enough, a plurality of Tea Party supporters, 44 percent, say the U.S. would actually be better off with Hitlery Clinton as president, even though 59 percent of those respondents have an unfavorable impression of her. Gee, I can't imagine why. “She’s a more stable person who gets results,” said Joseph Cherney, 67, a retired Republican automotive purchasing worker from Mineral Ridge, Ohio. “The president we have now isn’t much of a president because he really doesn’t do anything. He’s pompous and arrogant.” I'm not sure how "stable" Hitlery is, but I would argue that words such as pompous and arrogant can also, and quite aptly, be used when describing Hitlery. And I would also argue that Barry has gotten results, now they may not be the results that most freedom loving Americans would agree with, but they are results none the less. After all, he was able to shove Obamacare down our throats, and the opportunity to seize of our healthcare had been something that Democrats had been salivating over for decades. As well, he was able to seize control of two auto companies as well as a huge portion of the financial segment of our economy.
Women, as a segment of population, are no more or less likely to think the U.S. would be better off with Hitlery Clinton at the helm than the rest of the population. She is more likable to women, with 68 percent holding a favorable view, compared to 59 percent of men. All age groups hold favorable views of Clinton, although those 65 years and older are more fawning, with 68 percent in that group holding a favorable view. Ninety percent of Democrats like Clinton, compared to 35 percent of Republicans and 63 percent of independents. And obviously, those in the northeast U.S., a liberal bastion to say the least, are her biggest backers, with 77 percent there holding a favorable view, compared to 59 percent in the South and West and 64 percent in the Midwest. I simply cannot understand what it is about this woman that would endear her to so many people. She is devious, conniving, patently dishonest as well as a congenital liar. She cares very little for those people for whom she professes to have some deep concern for, caring much more about industrious ways that they can be used in her effort to satisfy her own ambition. She is as much a fraud as is Barry "Almighty."
It was during a September 4 interview on Fox News, that former Vice President Dick Cheney praised Hitlery as he speculated on whether the Democrats would have been better off if she had been nominated. “I have the sense that she’s one of the more competent members of the current administration, and it would be interesting to speculate about how she might perform were she to be president,” he said. Now get me wrong, I really do like Mr. Cheney, but I'm not sure we hold the same opinion regarding Ms. Clinton's competency. While she is obviously more competent than her boss, I think it fair to say that she is only marginally more so. Clinton was asked about Cheney’s remarks and whether she had any interest in challenging Obama in a primary during a Sept. 9 interview on CNN. “It’s below zero,” Clinton said, when asked about the chances of a challenge to Barry. “One of the great things about being secretary of state is I am out of politics. I am not interested in being drawn back into it by anybody.” Although, you can never assume that what Ms. Clinton is telling you is actually the truth. Because like her husband, she lies about everything.
Now I am one of those who are of the opinion that Hitlery is most assuredly the lesser of two evils here, when compared to Barry "Almighty." But it's not by much that she is considered to be so. They both possess a similar, and rather frightening, view of what they think America should look like and it differs substantially from the view held by a majority of those who truly love this country and the freedoms that come with living in this country. Freedoms that, while still enjoyed by its citizens, have, however, been reduced as of late by a rapidly expanding government with Barry and the Democrats at the controls. But, like I have said, the differences between these two are ever so slight, and definitely not of the magnitude that would suggest that where this country is at the present time, economically, socially, financially as well as internationally, would be markedly different were we under a Clinton and not a Barry "Almighty" administration. When you're talking about the presidencies, in this case, of Barry and Hitlery, the differences between these two regarding how they would choose to govern would be negligible. The ultimate result of one would have proven to be just as disastrous as that of the other.
No comments:
Post a Comment