Oddly enough, it seems that while Mexico is entitled to enforce their Constitution, we here in the U.S., are not to be afforded that same luxury. The reason I even mention this is because of the fact that the Mexican Constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens as well as the denial of many rights to non-citizens. The General Law on Population, which spells out the country’s immigration policy, should cause all Americans, including congressional Democrats, to ask: Why is our southern neighbor pushing us to water down our immigration laws and policies when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent? If a felony is a crime punishable by more than a year in prison, Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico. And yet if the United States were ever to implement the same policy, Mexico would, no doubt, strongly denounce it as being a manifestation of American bigotry.
Mexico’s main immigration law welcomes only foreigners deemed useful to Mexican society:
_ Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
_ Immigration officials must “ensure (that) immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and that of their dependents. (Article 34)
_ Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence has upset “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” if they are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” if they are not good citizens in their own country, if they have broken Mexican laws, or if “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
_ The secretary of governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)
Mexican authorities keep track of every person in the country:
_ Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request: i.e., help in the arrest of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
_ A National Population Registry tracks every “individual who comprises (sic) the population of the country,” verifying each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86)
_ A national Catalogue of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), assigning each a tracking number. (Article 91)
Foreigners with fake papers or who enter the country under false pretenses may be imprisoned:
_ Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
_ Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)
Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:
_ Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
_ Deported foreigners who try to re-enter Mexico without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
_ Foreigners who violate terms of their visa may be sentenced for up to six years in prison. (Articles 119, 120, and 121) Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa (as by working without a permit) can also be imprisoned.
Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says:
_ “A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of 300 to 5,000 pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)_ Foreigners with immigration problems may be deported, rather than imprisoned. (Article 125)
_ Foreigners who “(make attempts) against national sovereignty or security” will be deported. (Article 126)
Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are considered criminals:
_ A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
_ Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)
After even a cursory review of Mexico immigration policy, what becomes more than a little obvious here is the fact that it runs completely counter to what Mexican leaders, as well as Democrats in this country, have been demanding of the United States for years. And I'm a little curious, if this type of approach is perfectly acceptable for Mexico then why is not for the U.S.? Why is it that we continue to be condemned through all manner of rhetoric when all that we wish to do is to apply the same restrictions as Mexico does? The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices and how it preaches to the U.S. about our immigration policy clearly reveals the Mexican government’s agenda here: which is to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States. That, by anyone's definition, is not, to use Barry's favorite word, a very fair arrangement.
According to the Mexican Constitution foreign-born, naturalized Mexican citizens may not become federal lawmakers (Article 55), cabinet secretaries (Article 91) or supreme court justices (Article 95). The president of Mexico, like the president of the United States, constitutionally must be a citizen by birth, but Article 82 of the Mexican constitution mandates that the president’s parents also be Mexican-born citizens, thus according secondary status to Mexican-born citizens born of immigrants. The Mexican constitution forbids immigrants and naturalized citizens to become members of the clergy. Article 130 says, “To practice the ministry of any denomination in the United Mexican States it is necessary to be a Mexican by birth.” Well, imagine placing such restrictions on someone for no other reason than because they are from another country. Quick, somebody call the ACLU!
The Mexican Constitution actually goes so far as to actually single out “undesirable aliens.” Article 11 guarantees federal protection against “undesirable aliens resident in the country.” The Mexican constitution provides the right of private individuals to make citizen’s arrests. Article 16 states, “in cases of flagrante delicto, any person may arrest the offender and his accomplices, turning them over without delay to the nearest authorities.” Therefore, the Mexican Constitution appears to grant Mexican citizens the right to arrest illegal aliens and hand them over to police for prosecution. Imagine the uproar had Arizona attempted to enact something like that! Frankly, I see absolutely nothing wrong with Mexico's policy, I would just like the U.S. to be able to enjoy playing by the same rules. But yet if we do we're somehow deemed as acting completely improper.
The Mexican Constitution also very clearly states that foreigners may be expelled for any reason and without due process. According to Article 33, “the Federal Executive shall have the exclusive power to compel any foreigner whose remaining he may deem inexpedient to abandon the national territory immediately and without the necessity of previous legal action.” So like I said, what's wrong with this picture? Why is it okay for Mexico to possess what most Democrats would most definitely describe as being a draconian immigration policy if we were to attempt to put into place the same type of restrictions? Why is it that we here in the U.S. are forced to let in every stray who is able to get here. And not only that, but to provide to them all manner of benefit typically enjoyed by our citizens or those who chose to come here legally?
None of this makes any sense. And it's but one more idiotic example of just how screwy things have gotten because we refuse to take a tough stand regarding who it is that we allow to enter our country. The Democrat Party is determined in its efforts to expand, and by any means necessary, its voter base and long ago made the conscious decision to make those U.S. citizens who have the misfortune to live on our border-states expendable. The United States is not to take any measure designed to restrict the flow of illegals into this country, as such action may offend those who have a tendency to vote for Democrats. Such action shows just how low the Democrats are willing to go and how transparent they are as they go about their trolling for votes. Therefore, from the Democrat perspective I can only assume that any American lives lost along our border are to be considered as being insignificant.
No comments:
Post a Comment