I’m really tired of hearing about how it is that of us on the right hate women and how we are somehow how trying to deny healthcare to women. I’m tired of hearing about just because we’re not of the opinion that sexual intercourse should be an Olympic Event we’re somehow anti-woman. The left in this country seems to think that sex a free for all, no holds barred, anytime the mood strikes you kinda thing. That girls should start having sex as soon as possible, the younger the better. They hand out contraceptives of every sort in our schools and if your teenage daughter should happen to get pregnant and want an abortion, you, her parents, may have nothing to say about it, or, you may never even know about it. So yes, the left is determined to turn our daughters into sluts and then have the nerve to get upset with someone who was doing nothing more than pointing out that sad little fact. The moral decay that has taken place in this country has its roots the left generally, and the Democrat Party specifically. Personal responsibility and individual accountability have essentially become undesirable traits and those who advocate such sentiments are, today, referred to as being extremist. These people have what can only be described as a weird preoccupation with sex.
Which brings me to a couple of real skanks, coming to us in the form of those patriotic Americans, Jane Fonda and Gloria Steinem. These days we now find these two old, pathetic, and rather beat looking, “icons” of the feminist establishment, busy taking aim at Rush Limbaugh in their bid to end the career of the popular conservative talk show host. We know full well where it is that Fonda’s rather peculiar political ideology has as its home, and while Steinem may be a bit less overt in her demonstration regarding just how much she hates this country, these two are peas from the same degenerate pod. They demonstrate on a pretty frequent basis just what a blatant fraud this so called “woman’s movement” is really all about. Apparently, the only women old frigid freaks like these two rush to defend are those on the left who bring all manner of ridicule upon themselves. In some op-ed written for the Communist News Network (CNN) and posted on their website, these two pathetic morons, joined by yet another flaming nutjob and self described radical feminist activist Robin Morgan, went so far as to actually liken Limbaugh to Nazi propagandist Josef Goebbels because, they say, he labels all of his enemies as “sub-human."
This screwball little trio writes, “Limbaugh doesn't just call people names, he promotes language that deliberately dehumanizes his targets. Like the sophisticated propagandist Josef Goebbels, he creates rhetorical frames -- and the bigger the lie the more effective -- inciting listeners to view people they disagree with as sub-humans. His longtime favorite term for women, "femi-nazi," doesn't even raise eyebrows anymore, an example of how rhetoric spreads when unchallenged by coarsened cultural norms.” Listen "ladies", and I use the term very loosely, if there is anyone out there who "dehumanizes" his targets, it's Bill "The Bonehead" Maher, with the same being said about every "comedian" out there who thinks they can get a cheap laugh by making fun of women. And I can't but wonder what is it that these three "feminists" consider as being worse, the mocking of women in an effort to get a cheap laugh, or the using of a ridiculous situation such as someone going before a panel of Democrats to advocate the dispensing of free birth control to make the point of just how far in the toilet our control has become, morally speaking. Guess we now know the answer to that!
Anyway, this silly little "op-ed" was just one of several developments in the continuing Limbaugh "controversy" over this past weekend, and I'm sure those on the left will not be letting the issue drop anytime soon. And while many radio and media experts don’t think Limbaugh will be silenced, or even that he will be financially hurt, by the controversy, there are, of course many others, especially on the left, demonstrating what can only be described as wishful thinking, suggesting the anti-Rush campaign is could do real damage to conservative talker. So what do Fonda, Steinem and others in their bizarre camp really want? They want to silence Rush and anyone else who would dare to expose them and their desire to spread their toxic strain of hatred all across this country. They are calling on advertisers and listeners to bring pressure on Limbaugh’s syndicator, Clear Channel Communications, to fire him. They’re interested in having Limbaugh banned from the airwaves by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) after branding his show, easily the most popular and lucrative talk show on radio, as hate speech. This effort is far from being something new. In fact, liberals have been pushing such an effort at several points during the Barry "Almighty" administration.
I'm sure many of us remember back in 2010, when faux reverend Al "Bull Horn" Sharpton, and by the way a real expert when it comes to hate speech, along with West Virginia DEMOCRAT Jay Rockefeller, raised the notion of having right-wing broadcasters taken off the air because they do not broadcast in the "public interest." "You've got to remember that those stations that Rush Limbaugh is on and others are regulated by FCC, granted by FCC; they go back to them to get waivers," Old "Bull Horn" ranted on his own radio show in November, 2010. "They go back to them to get consolidation," Sharpton continued. "They have the right to set standards. That does not impair your right to speak what you believe, but it does say that you are not going to do that to offend groups of Americans based on their race, their gender, their sexual status - none of that." "Bull Horn" is a fine one to be asking about standards being set. I mean here we have guy who serves no other function than to go about the spreading of as much racial hatred as he possibly can using some of the incendiary rhetoric that you'll hear anywhere! Where's the public interest in that?
Then of course we had that imbecile Rockefeller who, in trying to "appear" even handed, made some rather odd comments about both right-leaning Fox News and left-leaning MSNBC. Said Rockefeller during a Senate hearing: "There's a little bug inside of me which wants to get the FCC to say to Fox and to MSNBC, 'Out. Off. End. Goodbye.' It would be a big favor to political discourse; to our ability to do our work here in Congress; and to the American people, to be able to talk with each other and have some faith in their government and, more importantly, in their future." Sounds to me like this douche bag should see a constitutional doctor about that bug of his. Rockefeller, Sharpton and any number of other leftist loons in this country have long decried their loss of control over just what information is allowed to reach the American public. They have long blamed the Reagan administration for de-regulating the FCC and giving rise to talk radio and contentious cable news shows that they believe cripple what they ironically refer to as being honest public discourse. Their plan is to use the FCC through what they call “guidelines” that will essentially allow bureaucrats to pick and choose the shows that somehow elevate the public discourse.
Apparently old Fonda and Steinem are of the opinion, albeit a rather twisted one, what they insist on referring to as a grassroots effort, could bring about such regulation and eventually silence Limbaugh and others like him for good. “If Clear Channel won't clean up its airways, then surely it's time for the public to ask the FCC a basic question: Are the stations carrying Limbaugh's show in fact using their licenses "in the public interest?" Clean up the airways? “Spectrum is a scarce government resource. Radio broadcasters are obligated to act in the public interest and serve their respective communities of license. In keeping with this obligation, individual radio listeners may complain to the FCC that Limbaugh's radio station (and those syndicating his show) are not acting in the public interest or serving their respective communities of license by permitting such dehumanizing speech." I think it more than just a little odd that you have these foul mouthed liberals talking about cleaning up the airways. I mean where was the outrage from these supposed voices of reason when we heard the kooks on "Air America" advocating the assassination of George W. Bush. Yea, I know, that was joking around and just meant to be fun. Right!
But you have to laugh at the fact that these three pathetic amigos actually have the gall to insist that “this isn’t political.” Rather, they make the claim that Limbaugh is supposedly so toxic that the actual fate of American society is at stake. "While we disagree with Limbaugh's politics, what's at stake is the fallout of a society tolerating toxic, hate-inciting speech. For 20 years, Limbaugh has hidden behind the First Amendment, or else claimed he's really 'doing humor' or 'entertainment.' He is indeed constitutionally entitled to his opinions, but he is not constitutionally entitled to the people's airways," they write. Is that not the most ludicrous bunch of gibberish you've ever heard? Who is it out there that are the most prolific practitioners of spreading all manner of hatred? Ah, that would be pretty much anyone in the Democrat Party and most definitely anyone who calls themselves a Liberal. Hate has a home in this country and it's on the left. If American society, or what's left of it, is truly at stake here, it got that way because of those who are now being the most vocal against Mr. Limbaugh. They have been the purveyors of a very corrosive and intense brand of hate that has slowly been eating away at our society for decades.
So if you listen to these mental midgets it all fine and good when it’s guys like Maher and Letterman who busy themselves slandering conservative women, but let some liberal bimbo be made fun of in anyway and it's "Katie bar the door" as they come looking to lynch any culprit who is brave enough to dare ridicule said bimbo. These guys are allowed to get away saying anything no matter how vile, because they describe themselves as potty-mouthed “comedians.” I bet these girls must have thought that old Andrew "Dice" Clay, you remember him, was an absolute scream! Now there was a big supporter of women! The sheer level of arrogance possessed by these people who seem to relish their lives in the sewer is demonstrated by their enthusiastic determination to bring us all down to their rather slimy level. They are determined in their effort to silence any and all voices who dare to point out the damage they have done and that they continue to do to this country. They see themselves as being the enlightened ones, the sophisticated ones, and as such, it is their ideas and only theirs, that are worthy of being put into action, action that, they say, will result in an America as it was truly meant to be…Godless and completely without any socially redeeming value.
No comments:
Post a Comment