.

.

Friday, June 8, 2012

WHY ARE LIBERALS SO UNHAPPY WITH OBAMA?

Lots of rumors are flying around these days about how just so disappointed those that make up the Democratic Party’s most passionate voters are in their Messiah, Barry "Almighty". They are described as trying to be hopeful and as struggling to hide their growing frustration with Barry. While Republicans continue to expend a great deal of energy in attacking Barry as a big-government liberal, many self-professed liberals argue instead, that Barry hasn’t fought hard enough for progressive priorities on taxes, health care and the economy. I can only assumed that this particular crowd consists primarily of those too lazy to support themselves and would rather have that chore be placed on the shoulders of someone else. They see the government as being the answer to all of their pathetic little problems, while those of us with a brain are able to recognize the fact that it's just the opposite that's true. Government is NEVER the answer!

But in what may even more problematic for Barry is the fact that with the election now only a mere five months away, some of those hardcore liberal wack-jobs are threatening to not only stop donating money or time, but also to not show up to vote in November. All this for the man who so overwhelmingly ignited their passions and captured their twisted imaginations just four short years ago. “I want to be happy with him,” whined Democrat airhead Kristine Vaughan, a 45-year-old school psychologist from Canton, Ohio. “But I am finding that he has succumbed to the corporate influence as much as everyone else. I think he has so much potential to break out of that, but overall he has been a disappointment.” Really? So this is the mentality of your average modern-day Democrat? Maybe she should go in search of a good psychologist for herself, because she is very obviously in need of some 'special' treatment, because she is most definitely more than a little nuts.

This bimbo, Vaughan, goes on to say that she isn’t quite sure yet whether or not she’ll vote for Barry a second time and she probably won’t donate money the way she did during his first campaign. She stated that she refuses to support Republican challenger Mitt Romney, but is considering writing in another candidate in protest. Oh, right! Look, I think I can say with a certain amount of confidence that idiots like this Vaughan person, will walk into the voting booth this November, hold their noses if necessary, and pull the lever for Barry. They have no other viable option. And anyone who thinks that they will do anything else is screwy. Personally, I'm not sure what it is that they find as being so disappointing. What is it, in his continuing efforts to destroy our country, that they feel he hasn't done? He's given them socialized medicine, decided to support gay marriage and pushed to scale back military action in the Middle East.

I think it pretty safe to say that most of these pathetic, whiny-assed, Democrats still, in the end, plan on voting for Barry. Their continuing gripes are really nothing new, they have been heard for pretty much all of Barry’s term. But these left-leaning backers’ varying levels of enthusiasm do have the potential to cause some trouble for Barry in an election that we're being told will be a close one. This is a president whose 2008 victory was fueled by a massive network of grass-roots volunteers and small-dollar donors. Polls now show that Barry is locked in a tight race the outcome of which is likely to be decided in several swing states where he scored narrow victories four years ago. Places like Ohio, Florida and Virginia are expected to be especially competitive, and Barry will need his liberal supporters to both work on his behalf and turn out in significant numbers on Election Day. Which, at the end of the day, I'm sure they will.

Apparently the widespread, and rather naïve, belief in Barry’s idiotic 'bumper sticker' slogan of "Hope and Change" has, over time, turned to frustration where Barry is now perceived as having been far too 'compromising' in his responding to supposed Republican pressure by devoting a significant portion of the 2009 stimulus package to tax cuts. Those in favor of Barry's ultra-progressive agenda and his continuing efforts to turn us into another Europe, were further irked when he abandoned the so-called “public option” in his health care overhaul, chose not to go after big banks more aggressively in his financial overhaul bill and chose to support the extension of Bush-era tax cuts. Now, many say Barry is not fighting hard enough for tax increases on the wealthy to help close the federal deficit. “I look forward to him fighting much harder,” said Arshad Hasan, executive director of Democracy for America, a group founded by Howard 'The Screamer' Dean.

But, like many liberals here, Hasan offered a mixed review of the president. He said Barry’s decision to support gay marriage was “a huge accomplishment for progressives.” He also was hopeful that Barry might shift further to the left should he win a second term. I think that's a given, and is the primary reason to keep that from happening. “There’s also a strain of thought among progressives that he’s waiting until after the election to come out and be more boldly progressive,” Hasan said. “I don’t know which way that’s going to go, but I know that either way, we get a much better deal than if Mitt Romney is elected.” Rashad Robinson is the executive director of something called the Color of Change, a liberal group that promotes, of all things, African-American political influence. He said some blacks now have less enthusiasm for Barry, saying, “President Obama hasn’t done everything we wanted. But we know what Romney would do.” How's that exactly?

Personally I fail to understand just what all of these crybabies have to be so unhappy about. It's people like me who have continued to take it in the shorts for the last nearly 4 years. I think it quite obvious that Barry has been on mission, since day one, to 'fundamentally transform" this country into something that would make it completely unrecognizable, and it has to be stopped. Now I'm quite confident that the bleeding heart liberals amongst us would very much love this country to become the utopian nanny-state of their dreams, and the thought of it actually becoming a reality has them all feeling nearly orgasmic. However, it's been proven time and again, that such a system just doesn't work. And what is it about these people that makes them so willing, even eager, to relinquish complete control of their lives and to then hand it over to faceless, incompetent, bureaucrats? I just do not get it!

No comments:

Post a Comment