.

.

Thursday, June 21, 2012

BILL MAHER…WHAT KIND OF PERSON THINKS THIS WAY?

Gee, if it wasn't for conservatives in this country, or the Republican Party what would perennial jerk off, Bill Maher have to talk about? Certainly not our current president, who has very quickly become the most corrupt individual to hold his office since Richard Nixon. As we all know, ripping Republicans has pretty much become old hat for Bill, but he certainly didn’t hold back when he called the GOP “the Party of the Apes” on his blog this week. In a Monday post titled “The Right Shift,” Maher presented the typical line of drivel so often heard from those of his rather perverted political persuasion. You see, once again he attempts to argue, that those who should be made to bare the brunt of the blame for Washington gridlock are the Republicans. And it is they, the Repblicans, who should be made to face the consequences and to be on the receiving end of any voter wrath directed at Congress come the next election.

In writing, “The idea that the blame for our government’s dysfunction is equally shared by the parties just is a giant, steaming mound of horsesh-t and anyone who has paid attention to politics over the last 20 years knows it,” Maher once again has proven himself to be either a lair on the scale of a Clinton or, as someone completely oblivious to how our system of government is supposed to work. Now even if he's only half as smart as he seems to think himself, I feel confident in at least being able to assume that he is somewhat familiar with how our system is designed to work. So therefore the only option left is that he's simply your average everyday liar. He blamed for any and all gridlock on the GOP, “Or as I like to call it, ‘The Rise of the Party of the Apes.’” And he chose quoted from a Washington Post op-ed that made waves back in April titled, “Let’s just say it: Republicans are the problem.” And coming from the Washington Post such an opinion should not come as a surpirse.

Quoting from that same Washington Post op-ed, Maher the authors write: “We have been studying Washington politics and Congress for more than 40 years, and never have we seen them this dysfunctional. In our past writings, we have criticized both parties when we believed it was warranted. Today, however, we have no choice but to acknowledge that the core of the problem lies with the Republican Party.” He says they’re not saying Democrats are blameless and perfect. Maher then describes how it reminds him of something his friend Barney Frank, recently said, “…people have said to me, well, why can't you work things out with the Republicans, and my answer to my friends has been: Exactly on what issues do you think Michele Bachmann and I can compromise?” He then describes what Barney is saying thiis way, how do you expect me to work on the 2+2=4 bill when their side believes math is a liberal plot to turn your kid queer?

He uses Dick Lugar, who he identifies as being a staunch conservative, just not the modern-day insane variety and bemoans as an example and the fact that Luger was throttled in the Republican Senate primary in Indiana by a Tea Party guy named Richard Mourdock. And after Mourdock won he said this about working with the other side: “I certainly think bipartisanship ought to consist of Democrats coming to the Republican point of view.” To which, Maher responds in his typical crude manner, is sort of like saying to your girlfriend, “I think both our sexual needs will best be fulfilled by you blowing me.” About Allen West, here Maher gets particularly disgusting, saying he should be taken off to a padded cell and given 20 CCs of the high test. He points out that Ornstein and Mann start off their Post op-ed by noting that recently Rep. Allen West said that there are “78 to 81” Democrats in Congress who are members of the Communist Party, saying that such extreme remarks and views are now taken for granted.

Is there anyone, anywhere else on the entire planet, besides Barry of course, who is more enthralled with the sound of their own voice, than is this jerk Maher? And wouldn't you think that eventually this clown would get tired of sounding like a proverbial broken record. I mean just who is it that he's hoping to have some impact on here? Anybody who might watch his idiotic little show, or listen to any of his never-ending, and quite psychotic, rants are already very firmly in the Barry camp. Is it all an attempt by this clone to see how much he can shock people or does he genuinely believe that he can somehow have some influence on the next election? And as far as his little tantrum directed at Rep. West, it makes me think that his reaction, like that of "BJ" Clinton, to what West said might indicate that West's comments must have hit a little too close to home. How else do you explain the level of venom in Maher's idiotic rant directed at West?

No comments:

Post a Comment