Here's one more example that very clearly demonstrates the urgency with which we need to address the issue of America severing all ties with the obviously corrupt, and grossly dysfunctional, organization known as the United Nations. This dysfunctional cadre of dictators, despots and tyrants needs to now be officially and by force if necessary, escorted off of American soil and relocated to some far off distant land where it can do the least amount of damage, especially to America. Because now it's readying itself for a full frontal assault on our Constitution by coming gunning for our second Amendment rights. How, you may ask, can it do that? Doesn't our Constitution make us immune to whatever cockamamie ideas this group of misfits, malcontents and miscreants can come up with? Well folks, that only works when you have a president who actually takes serious his oath to protect and defend our Constitution. And that's just not Barry "Almighty." He views our Constitution as being nothing more than an impediment. The method now being contemplated by that venerable organization comes at us in the form of something called the U.N.’s “Small Arms Treaty.” This twisted body of international psychopaths is attempting to pass the measure off as an effort intended to do nothing more than to combat terrorists and insurgents, but you can be sure that the measure has a very different, and much more sinister, purpose. Because under the guise of a proposed global “Small Arms Treaty”…you can be quite certain that an even more insidious threat is being formulated, one that would have dire consequences for our Constitutional right for law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. This supposed international treaty, at least from the Barry "Almighty" administration’s perspective, is seen as being an ideal vehicle by which he can orchestrate efforts to increase domestic gun control. If implemented, Barry believes it will be then be able to enforce rougher licensing requirements, create more red tape, create an “international gun registry,“ ”confiscate and destroy all ‘unauthorized’ civilian firearms’” and severely impede Americans’ right to bear arms. Ah, more of that "Hope and Change" that all of you morons voted for! Sadly, this plan is very real chance with the U.S. having already joined with 152 other countries to endorse a U.N. Arms Treaty Resolution that will lead to a 2012 conference. It is during this meeting that plans to enact these international new controls will take place. Secretary of State, Mrs. "BJ" Clinton has already said she that will actively encourage the Senate to ratify the resolution as well.
It may come as surprising news to many of you, but the United Nations does not now, and never has, exactly approved of our Second Amendment. Not one bit. It's viewed as being a bit Neanderthal, or cowboyish. And they very much hope to do something about it with the help of some very powerful American friends, such as our "community agitator" president. What, exactly, does the intended agreement entail? While the terms have yet to be made public, if passed by the U.N. and ratified by our Senate, it will almost certainly force the U.S. to:
1. Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.
2. Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).
3. Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the ant-gun media never seem to grasp).
4. Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.
5. In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights.
Have no doubt, this plan is very real and very dangerous, posing a very serious threat, and with it enjoying the very strong support of our Dear Beloved Leader, Barry "Almighty," it stands a very good chance of becoming a reality. We need to be leaning very heavily on the Republicans in the Senate and stress to them, in no uncertain term, that we need to turn this thing back, ratification of this "obamanation" must be prevented at all costs. As I said, it was only January of last year that the U.S. joined 152 other countries in endorsing a U.N. Arms Treaty Resolution that will establish the 2012 conference assigned the responsibility of drafting up the blueprint for enactment of this insidious attack on American sovereignty. And with Mrs. "BJ" Clinton having already pledged her full support in pushing hard for Senate ratification of this blatant violation of our Constitution, it's readily apparent that she too has taken a position of standing very firmly against the God given rights that have been bestowed upon the American people. Former U.N. ambassador John Bolton has cautioned gun owners to take this initiative seriously, stating that the U.N. “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.” Although professing to support the Second Amendment during her failed presidential election bid, Mrs. "BJ" Clinton is far from being generally known as a gun rights enthusiast, ranking right there with Barry himself as being obvious in her disdain for our Second Amendment rights. She has been a long-time activist for federal firearms licensing and registration, and a vigorous opponent of state Right-to-Carry laws. As a New York senator she ranked among the National Rifle Association’s worst “F”-rated gun banners who voted to support the sort of gunpoint disarmament that marked New Orleans’ rogue police actions against law-abiding gun owners in the anarchistic aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
Barry "Almighty's" "community agitator" record on citizen gun rights is pretty sad to say the least, which I'm sure comes as no big surprise to anyone. And it doesn’t reflect his ever being much of a gun rights advocate. Take, for example consider, his appointment of rabid a anti-gun rights advocate and former Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels as an alternate U.S. representative to the U.N., or his choice of Andrew Traver who has worked to terminate civilian ownership of so-called “assault rifles” to head the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. And as an Illinois state senator, Barry "Almighty" was a very aggressive advocate for expanding gun control laws of all sorts, and ,in one of the few times he managed to do more than to vote present, even voted against legislation giving gun owners an affirmative defense when they use firearms to defend themselves and their families against home invaders and burglars. He also served on a 10-member board of directors of the "radically activist" anti-gun Joyce Foundation in Chicago during a period between 1998-2001 when it contributed $18,326,183 in grants to anti-Second Amendment organizations. So, if someone were to break into your home when you are there, which would you prefer to have close at hand: 1) a telephone to call 911, or 2) a loaded gun of respectable caliber? That’s a pretty easy question for me to answer. There are many like me all across this great country, and fewer of them would be alive today were it not for the exercising of their gun rights. In fact law-abiding citizens in America used guns in self-defense 2.5 million times during 1993 (about 6,850 times per day), and actually shot and killed 2 1/2 times as many criminals as police did (1,527 to 606). Those civilian self-defense shootings resulted in less than 1/5th as many incidents as police where an innocent person was mistakenly identified as a criminal (2% versus 11%).
Finally, just how effective do you really think gun bans have been in making citizens safer in any of the other countries where they have been enacted? Sorry to say, but the success rate has not been very high! Lets just take the number of home break-ins while residents are present as an indicator. In Canada and Britain, both with tough gun-control laws, nearly half of all burglaries occur when residents are present. But in the U.S. where many households are armed, only about 13% happen when someone is home. Sounds like a big plus for gun rights to me. So in recognizing that clear statistical benefit evidence, 41 states now allow competent, law-abiding adults to carry permitted or permit-exempt concealed handguns. As a result, crime rates in those states have typically fallen at least 10% in the year following enactment. Sounds like another big plus. So, the majority in our Senate is smart enough to realize that the U.N.’s gun-grab agenda is unconstitutional, politically suicidal for those who support it, and down-right idiotic—right? Well we can only hope so. Because if I've learned anything over the years from watching our stellar members of Congress, you can never entirely count on being able to do the right thing. Their egos always seem to get in the way. And while there are a relatively few loyal Barry "Almighty" Democrats who are truly “pro-gun”, many are loathe to vote against treaties that carry the president’s international prestige, causing him embarrassment. Let's see, preventing any further embarrassment to Barry, who constantly embarrasses himself, or protecting the Constitution, now that'd be a tough decision. Also, don’t forget that the Senate did confirm anti-gun Barry nominee Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Many within the few who voted against her did so only because of massive grassroots pressure from constituents who take their Constitutional protections very seriously. Now, more than ever, it’s imperative to stick by our guns in demanding that all Constitutional rights be preserved. If not, we will surely lose both.
No comments:
Post a Comment