Attempting to do his best to strike while the political iron is hot, Barry is now out there wherever he can find a television camera as he desperately works to garner for himself as much political mileage as possible from the aftermath of the recent natural disaster that was Hurricane Sandy. Now we know for a fact that Barry is not above using such victims as these in his attempt to score some cheap points because, after all, he allowed four Americans to die without so much as raising a finger to send them any help, and pretty much for the same reason. And in that regard, we're still to learn very much about what he knew and when, or what he did or failed to do during the attack on the Benghazi Consulate that ended in the slaughter of those four brave Americans. The White House is still refusing to say when exactly Barry "Almighty" first learned of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, nor is it saying whom, if anyone, Barry supposedly ordered to make sure our personnel in Benghazi were secured.
What we do know for a fact that it was not caused by any video as was claimed by Barry for two weeks. And there wasn't anything spontaneous about the attack as was also claimed for two weeks. It was a terrorist attack that resulted in the killing of four Americans in Benghazi that day, including former Navy Seal Tyrone Woods, a veteran of the Iraq and Afghan wars; former Navy Seal Glen Doherty, also a veteran of the Iraq and Afghan wars; State Department communications specialist Sean Smith, an Air Force veteran; and U.S. Amb. Christopher Stevens. In an interview on Friday with reporter Kyle Clark of KUSA TV in Denver, Barry claimed that the "minute" he found out that the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was under attack he ordered someone to "make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to." In the Friday interview, KUSA’s Clark asked Barry: "Were they denied requests for help during the attack?" Naturally, Barry, in typical fashion, did not choose to directly answer this question.
In choosing how to respond Barry attempted to do nothing more than to 'bullshit' his way through the question that was asked saying, "Well, we are finding out exactly what happened. I can tell you, as I've said over the last couple of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. "Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to," Barry continued. "Number two, we're going to investigate exactly what happened so that it doesn't happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice. And I guarantee you that everyone in the State Department, our military, the CIA, you name it, had number one priority making sure that [our] people were safe. "These were our folks," Barry said, "and we're going to find out exactly what happened. But what we're also going to do is make sure that we are identifying those who carried out these terrible attacks." If Barry's truly interested in identifying those at fault all he needs to do is to look in a mirror.
So, when exactly was it that Barry first learned of the Benghazi attack and who exactly did he order to take action at that time to secure threatened American personnel? On Monday, Oct. 29, the online news site, CNSNews.com, contacted the White House by phone and e-mail asking the following questions: 1) "At exactly what minute and hour did President Obama find out that our diplomatic mission in Benghazi was under attack?" 2) "Who did he order at that minute and hour to ‘make sure that we are securing our personnel’ in Benghazi?" 3) "Who carried out President Obama's order to secure our personnel in Benghazi and what exactly did they do to accomplish his order that they secure our personnel in Benghazi?" 4) "Did President Obama follow in real-time the efforts of his subordinates to carry out his order to ‘make sure we are securing our personnel’ in Benghazi? 5) "If President Obama did not follow these efforts in real-time, what was the president doing when his subordinates were carrying out his order to ‘make sure we are securing our personnel’ in Benghazi?"
These questions were initially sent to the White House at 10:56 a.m. on Monday, and then were followed up on with a phone message for the White House National Security Staff (NSS) press office. Another email was subsequently sent to the White House press spokespersons at 4:22 p.m. on Monday to give them another opportunity to respond to the questions being asked. At 7:54 a.m. on Tuesday, Oct. 30, both the White House and NSS press offices were again contacted and again the same questions were asked. When the White House press office was again called at 10:04 a.m. on Tuesday, the person answering the phone said these questions, about national security actions taken by the commander in chief, should go to Barry "Almighty's" reelection campaign because Barry had already made his comments about making "sure that we are securing our personnel" in an interview with a Colorado TV station. So this that was supposed to be the most transparent administration in history once again proves it's just the opposite.
So Barry remains free; and quite comfortable, to stonewall the American people regarding why it was that he allowed four Americans to be slaughtered by murdering terrorists, while at the same time seeming quite content to go out in front of any television camera in sight with a big old smile on his face as he prances around to survey all of the damage left behind by Hurricane Sandy. Obviously, and as usual, he figures that if he, and his many friends in the media, ignores the Benghazi thing long enough it will simply go away and just in time for the election. Chances are, if he’s re-elected we will never find out what really happened on that night in Benghazi, and the families of those brave men who were murdered will never know the truth. That is the kind of man that many are now considering to re-elect. He is a rather despicable character, some might even say, sleazy. Personally speaking, Barry has lied to us so many times, how is it that we can now believe anything that he says. And how can you bring yourself to vote for a man who is so incapable of telling the truth?
No comments:
Post a Comment