Hey Chris, you freakin moron, this scam has been disproven more times than you can count, even when using both your fingers and toes. Give it up, it's just not important to people especially when they're unemployed, their house is worth less than what they owe on it and when every time they fill up it costs more than it did the last time.
.
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
ANOTHER BRILLIANT PIECE OF JOURNALISM FROM CHRIS MATTHEWS...
Hey Chris, you freakin moron, this scam has been disproven more times than you can count, even when using both your fingers and toes. Give it up, it's just not important to people especially when they're unemployed, their house is worth less than what they owe on it and when every time they fill up it costs more than it did the last time.
QUITE SIMPLY PUT, OBAMA DOESN'T DESERVE TO BE RE-ELECTED...
Attempting to do his best to strike while the political iron is hot, Barry is now out there wherever he can find a television camera as he desperately works to garner for himself as much political mileage as possible from the aftermath of the recent natural disaster that was Hurricane Sandy. Now we know for a fact that Barry is not above using such victims as these in his attempt to score some cheap points because, after all, he allowed four Americans to die without so much as raising a finger to send them any help, and pretty much for the same reason. And in that regard, we're still to learn very much about what he knew and when, or what he did or failed to do during the attack on the Benghazi Consulate that ended in the slaughter of those four brave Americans. The White House is still refusing to say when exactly Barry "Almighty" first learned of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, nor is it saying whom, if anyone, Barry supposedly ordered to make sure our personnel in Benghazi were secured.
What we do know for a fact that it was not caused by any video as was claimed by Barry for two weeks. And there wasn't anything spontaneous about the attack as was also claimed for two weeks. It was a terrorist attack that resulted in the killing of four Americans in Benghazi that day, including former Navy Seal Tyrone Woods, a veteran of the Iraq and Afghan wars; former Navy Seal Glen Doherty, also a veteran of the Iraq and Afghan wars; State Department communications specialist Sean Smith, an Air Force veteran; and U.S. Amb. Christopher Stevens. In an interview on Friday with reporter Kyle Clark of KUSA TV in Denver, Barry claimed that the "minute" he found out that the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was under attack he ordered someone to "make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to." In the Friday interview, KUSA’s Clark asked Barry: "Were they denied requests for help during the attack?" Naturally, Barry, in typical fashion, did not choose to directly answer this question.
In choosing how to respond Barry attempted to do nothing more than to 'bullshit' his way through the question that was asked saying, "Well, we are finding out exactly what happened. I can tell you, as I've said over the last couple of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. "Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to," Barry continued. "Number two, we're going to investigate exactly what happened so that it doesn't happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice. And I guarantee you that everyone in the State Department, our military, the CIA, you name it, had number one priority making sure that [our] people were safe. "These were our folks," Barry said, "and we're going to find out exactly what happened. But what we're also going to do is make sure that we are identifying those who carried out these terrible attacks." If Barry's truly interested in identifying those at fault all he needs to do is to look in a mirror.
So, when exactly was it that Barry first learned of the Benghazi attack and who exactly did he order to take action at that time to secure threatened American personnel? On Monday, Oct. 29, the online news site, CNSNews.com, contacted the White House by phone and e-mail asking the following questions: 1) "At exactly what minute and hour did President Obama find out that our diplomatic mission in Benghazi was under attack?" 2) "Who did he order at that minute and hour to ‘make sure that we are securing our personnel’ in Benghazi?" 3) "Who carried out President Obama's order to secure our personnel in Benghazi and what exactly did they do to accomplish his order that they secure our personnel in Benghazi?" 4) "Did President Obama follow in real-time the efforts of his subordinates to carry out his order to ‘make sure we are securing our personnel’ in Benghazi? 5) "If President Obama did not follow these efforts in real-time, what was the president doing when his subordinates were carrying out his order to ‘make sure we are securing our personnel’ in Benghazi?"
These questions were initially sent to the White House at 10:56 a.m. on Monday, and then were followed up on with a phone message for the White House National Security Staff (NSS) press office. Another email was subsequently sent to the White House press spokespersons at 4:22 p.m. on Monday to give them another opportunity to respond to the questions being asked. At 7:54 a.m. on Tuesday, Oct. 30, both the White House and NSS press offices were again contacted and again the same questions were asked. When the White House press office was again called at 10:04 a.m. on Tuesday, the person answering the phone said these questions, about national security actions taken by the commander in chief, should go to Barry "Almighty's" reelection campaign because Barry had already made his comments about making "sure that we are securing our personnel" in an interview with a Colorado TV station. So this that was supposed to be the most transparent administration in history once again proves it's just the opposite.
So Barry remains free; and quite comfortable, to stonewall the American people regarding why it was that he allowed four Americans to be slaughtered by murdering terrorists, while at the same time seeming quite content to go out in front of any television camera in sight with a big old smile on his face as he prances around to survey all of the damage left behind by Hurricane Sandy. Obviously, and as usual, he figures that if he, and his many friends in the media, ignores the Benghazi thing long enough it will simply go away and just in time for the election. Chances are, if he’s re-elected we will never find out what really happened on that night in Benghazi, and the families of those brave men who were murdered will never know the truth. That is the kind of man that many are now considering to re-elect. He is a rather despicable character, some might even say, sleazy. Personally speaking, Barry has lied to us so many times, how is it that we can now believe anything that he says. And how can you bring yourself to vote for a man who is so incapable of telling the truth?
OBAMA THINKS THAT BY PLAYING PRESIDENT, THAT MAKES HIM A PRESIDENT...
So here we are just seven days from the election and suddenly it is only now that Barry has felt the sudden urge to act like the president? In using the aftermath of what has been called the worst storm to hit the northeast in more than a lifetime, Barry "Almighty" has made a conscious effort to 'play' at being president even though, oddly enough, he did not actually have time to 'be' president at the time, four of our fellow Americans were being slaughtered in Benghazi. And when they asked for help they were told to stand down and were denied any requests for support that just might have prevented them for being killed. And in what can only be described as being a very concerted effort to keep voters' attention distracted away from what has been a disastrous record of the last four years and, more recently, his callously allowing four Americans to die, he is now desperately trying to act the part of president during the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.
Now I'm sure we've all heard him make the same idiotic claims over and over about how he's not concerned about the impact on the elections. But let's face it, after having watched the man as we have been forced to do over the course of the last fur years, when has he ever done anything that wasn't done with a great deal of forethought of how the next election would be effected? I mean, really, am I the only one who thinks it more than just a little odd that he suddenly shows up in the briefing room, the briefing room from which he has been MIA for about, what, a month and a half? On Libya, or for anything else for that matter. Then you get the photo-ops of him in the Situation Room deploying, I guess, the utility crews who will restore power all over America. Whereas you would think he might want to use the Situation Room and had convene high level people during the nine hours our people were under attack in Benghazi.
One thing I don't Barry ever had a firm grasp on was the fact that when you're the president you don't really have the luxury of being able to pick and choose your times to actually be president. But I'm wondering just how people he thinks he might be able to fool, or who might ultimately be fooled, by his playing president, playing Commander-in-Chief during what is a bona fide natural disaster that doesn't really require much leadership from the White House. In time such as this, it's the local leaders, and the first responders who are the one who are called upon the most. All the president is called upon to do is to release money and we all know how really good Barry is at releasing money all the while pretending that it has nothing to do with politics. He's desperate to use this opportunity to showcase himself as being in command and as being a leader. And he may benefit from all the attention being diverted away from
Now I think it fair to say, although I suppose many in Barry's camp might disagree, that Romney has clearly had the momentum, while it has slowed down it is still heading in his direction. But I suppose we can't be sure what will happen once the country sort of wakes up after this deluge of news coverage of the storm in three days or so and refocuses its attention on the campaign. So we wait and see whether or not the momentum will still be there or will have dissipated, that pretty much remains an open question. I'd like to think that there remains in this country enough intelligent people capable of being able recognize that someone's merely playing the part of president seven days from the election does not wipe out acting like everything but a president for the last four years. WE can't afford to allow ourselves to be fooled into believing that Barry has suddenly decided to take his job seriously.
So are there voters who will be swayed by this most recent attempt by Barry to play at being president? I'm sure some will be naïve enough, or stupid enough, to fall for Barry's little charade. I just hope there will be enough who refuse to get sucked in. The bottom line here is that we cannot afford four more years of what we've gotten over the course of the last four years. And just because Barry has picked this time, 7 days from an election to act as he thinks a president should act does not alter the fact that for the last four years he has acted more like a dictator that a president. And it does not erase the fact that he allowed four Americans to be slaughtered, WHILE HE WATCHED IN REAL TIME, and then saw fit to refuse to send them any back up. Does he really expect us to just ignore all of that simply because he goes out there and stands in the middle of the carnage left behind by Hurricane Sandy?
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
TEAM OBAMA WARNS AGAINST "STIGMATIZING" MUSLIMS...
You know, if you listen to this bunch of boobs who are currently in charge, you'd think the biggest terrorist threat facing this country has its roots right here at home and not from murdering religious zealots from the Middle East. Such was the case yet again when we found the esteemed John Brennan, Barry's less than proficient assistant national security adviser for homeland security and counter-terrorism speaking at some place called the Institute of Institutional and European Affairs, which I'm told is located in Dublin, Ireland. It was just this past Friday that we heard Mr. Brennan working desperately to put al Qaeda's terrorism into what this administration views as being its 'proper' perspective. And he did so by comparing it to what he called the "long and painful history of violent extremism" in the United States and Europe.
This administration has always attempted to downplay any perceived threat from those practitioners of that so-called religion of peace and, I assume, that's what this dolt was once again attempting to do by first saying, "Sadly, the threat of violent extremism did not start—and will not end—with al-Qa‘ida." Then going on to say, "On both sides of the Atlantic, we have a long, painful history of violent extremism, from violent anarchists to violent white supremacists to neo-Nazis." He continued with his little spiel saying, "This summer, we saw a white supremacist in Wisconsin kill six worshippers and wound four others at a Sikh temple," Brennan said. "Last year in Norway, we saw Anders Breivik—steeped in a racist and xenophobic ideology—murder 77 innocent men, women and children in a tragedy that truly shocked the world." That was an anomaly.
Brennan was also the director for the National Counterterrorism Center in the George W. Bush administration, and I wasn't a fan of him then either. He said that the challenge the U.S. and Europe faces is "to meet the full range of violent extremism threats in our communities regardless of ideology." He then warned that the West should not "stigmatize" Muslims who are "fellow citizens." Oh, heaven forbid, we can't stigmatize those poor, peace loving Muslims. This idiot went on to say, "The bottom line—on both sides of the Atlantic—is that we have to work with communities rather than stigmatize them," Brennan said. "That is especially true when it comes to our fellow citizens who are Muslim." What a bunch of, to use 'Slow Joe' Biden's favorite word, malarkey. Whose side is this guy on, anyway? (Rhetorical question)
Making it quite clear why it is that we continue to face a threat from these murdering religious fanatics, Brennan said, "In word and deed, we need to show Muslim communities that they are just as much a part of our countries as people of any other faith," Brennan said. "This is a message of inclusion and opportunity that President Obama has conveyed on many, many occasions." Going on to say, "As he has said, the United States is not and never will be at war against Islam; our nation is strengthened by all its citizens, including those who are Muslim," Brennan said. "We are at war against al-Qa’ida—a band of thugs who offer nothing but death and destruction." Adding, "And when it comes to preventing violent extremism and terrorism in our countries, Muslim communities are part of the solution." Talk about being naïve!
I think we all came to realize, and pretty quickly, that the present team was going to be addressing Islamic terrorism considerably different from how the team they were replacing approached it. Where the last guys were willing to take the fight to the terrorists, these new sheriffs riding into town preferred killing the terrorists with kindness whenever possible. On one hand it seemed as if they were completely opposed to any use of torture yet didn't seem opposed to killing terrorists instead of capturing them and possibly harvesting useful intelligence that might be used to either save lives or lead to the capture of more terrorists. Meanwhile they seemed to be much more concerned about any home grown 'terrorists' who they saw as being the much bigger threat. You know like those folks who oppose abortion and support the Second Amendment.
MEET A LIFE-LONG DEMOCRAT WHO'S VOTING FOR ROMNEY...
Eighty-year-old Bryna Franklin says she’s never voted anything but Democrat from the time she could vote. In fact, she was so committed to her party she once headed the Israel branch of Democrats Abroad and was a delegate to the 1992 Democratic National Convention. But the faith in her party has been shaken during the four years that Barry "Almighty" has been president, and she has decided – for the first time in her life – to vote Republican.
Monday, October 29, 2012
MORE CAMPAIGN CHICANERY BY 'TEAM OBAMA'...
Well, well, well, apparently Barry's Labor Department has decided that it has within its power the ability to aid Barry in his quest for re-election. Because those in the position do so said on Monday that the decision has yet to be made on whether or not it will delay the release of Friday’s closely-watched October employment report due to the effects from Hurricane Sandy. Federal government offices in Washington are closed Monday and may be shut again Tuesday due to the storm. It isn’t clear if the closure would cause a delay in processing the data.
"We will assess the situation when the weather emergency is over and notify the press and public of any changes at that time," said Gary Steinberg, spokesman for the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the data arm of the department and I'm quite sure a very dedicated supporter of Barry "Almighty." The Labor Department is also scheduled to release its third quarter employment cost index Wednesday, and the third quarter productivity and weekly jobless claims reports Thursday. The most closely watched is Friday’s jobs report, which will give the final measure the unemployment ahead of next week’s presidential election.
I'm sure we all remember how it was in September, that we were told the unemployment rate somehow fell to 7.8%, which, if real, would be the lowest level since Barry took office back on that very dark day in January 2009. Meanwhile, we're told that the economy has somehow added 114,000 that month. The surveys for the October employment report were conducted earlier this month. The unemployment rate comes from a survey of 60,000 households and the jobs figures comes from the establishment survey of 141,000 business and agencies.
However, what we are now being told is that it remains unclear whether government statisticians and others will be able complete the complicated preparation of the jobs report before scheduled release time due to the weather and associated power outages and transportation disruptions. A Census official said that agency too has made "no decision" on delaying economic data reports due out later this week. The Census, part of the Department of Commerce, is scheduled to release the construction spending report Thursday and the factory order data Friday. Right, this just gets curiouser and curiouser.
And oddly enough, coming along at pretty much the same time as this announcement by the Labor Department, and something that I'm quite sure was nothing more than a pure coincidence, we had Barry’s top campaign strategist, David 'My Mommy Was A Commie' Axelrod, telling reporters that the Romney campaign would not be buoyed by a bad jobs report on Friday, the weekend before Election Day. Romney’s various reasons for confidence include the belief that "bad jobs number Friday could give final lift," as Politico’s Mike Allen noted in his assessment of things.
"That is kind of a perverse sentiment," Axelrod said in response on a conference call today. "I think they’re going to be disappointed." Oh, now isn't that more than a little ironic. With all of the sleazy crap this bunch of slimy characters have pulled and to then malign the Romney campaign as possess a "perverse sentiment." This guy, Axelrod, is the personification of the word, perverse. The Department of Labor may delay the release of the jobs numbers. "A Labor official said the agency will assess the schedule for all its data releases this week when the ‘weather emergency’ is over," The Wall Street Journal reported today.
Election after election it just never ceases to amaze me the lengths to which these corrupt Democrats feel they can go in their effort to make to manipulate the outcome. And I feel pretty confident in saying that you'd be pretty hard pressed to find a group of more corrupt Democrats than this bunch currently under employ of the man now vying for re-election. And it always at the same time that they're working to steal one election or another, that they are very busy trying to claim that it's really the Republicans that we all need to be wary of when it comes to making sure elections don't get stolen.
FAR FROM BEING RE-ELECTED, OBAMA SHOULD BE FACING IMPEACHMENT!!!
Where's the outrage here? What has happened that so many of us in this country can now so easily ignore this gross dereliction of duty by a president? How can any of this sordid Benghazi business be seen as acceptable behavior by our politically oriented Commander-in-Chief? What power is it that this man seems to hold over so many of us, to the point, that no matter what he does we remain supportive of him. And how is it that we have allowed him to bring out the very worst in us? Far from being re-elected this scum should now be facing impeachment charges. He is essentially an accessory to murder and the attempt to then cover it up.
This man, Barack Hussein Obama, has done some pretty despicable things over the course of the last four years, but to allow what took place in Benghazi is the absolute worst. And the fact that so many of my fellow Americans seem to be so willing to give him pass, makes me sick. I'm curious to know how any of his current supporters would feel if perhaps it were their husband, brother, or son who was made to die for no other reason than so that Barry might have a better chance of winning the election. I suppose they're so infatuated with Barry that the death of a loved one, even in such a senseless manner, would be fine with them.
DO NEWSPAPER ENDORSEMENTS REALLY MEAN ALL THAT MUCH?
Apparently there appears to be a bit of "lost faith" between six major Iowa newspapers and Barry "Almighty" in these final days before the 2012 election. But, is it something that will transfer into votes for Gov. Romney? One can only hope. This past Sunday we saw The Des Moines Register, Cedar Rapids Gazette, and Quad City Times and the Sioux City Journal all come out and endorse Gov. Romney. In 2008, Romney was endorsed only by The Fort Dodge Messenger and Omaha World Herald. The final tally means Romney has now secured an unprecedented sweep of endorsements from the six largest papers in the crucial swing-state. But again, does that really mean anything significant? At the end of the day we know how it that these newspapers may feel, but is that an accurate portrayal of how the voters feel?
Now, for sure, I think it is very safe to say that such an accomplishment while unprecedented, we can't be sure what it will accomplish. It’s unprecedented because, for one reason, this marks the very first time that all of the papers have collectively endorsed the same candidate in over 70 years. Four years ago, candidate Barry received warm endorsements from three of the newspapers, and Gov. Romney is the first Republican to be endorsed by the Register in 40 years. Which begs the question, why the change of heart from the editorial boards of the widely-read papers? Each endorsement features blunt, revealing and at times brutal critiques of Barry "Almighty" and his job performance. Though the critiques of the president vary, each endorsement mentions a stagnant, limping economy as the decisive issue that pushes them to back Romney.
Shawn McCoy, Iowa Communications Director for the Romney campaign, noted in a press release that "President Obama won Iowa by nearly 10 points in 2008," but hints that that support has eroded immensely over the last four years of "misguided policies and broken promises." And while all of these endorsements may sound quite impressive and would seem to add some validity to Mr. McCoy's assessment of things, the fact of the matter is that we're still a long way away from Iowa being chalked up as being one that we can place in the win column for Romney. Those casting the votes must want to change the direction in which Barry currently has the country headed. If they are happy with what's being done to our country all the newspaper endorsement in the world simply aren't going to matter.
Some of the sharpest critiques from the papers speak to that eroded support and overall loss of faith in Barry "Almighty":
" The economy is growing at an unacceptably anemic rate"–The Des Moines Register
"Voters this year must decide if they are or are not satisfied with and confident about the direction in which America is moving. We are neither satisfied nor confident. In our view, change is needed."–Sioux City Journal
"The ever-changing account of how his administration has responded to and explained — or hasn’t — the assassination of a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans in Libya is raising troublesome doubts about the chain of command and whether there’s been a cover-up."–The Cedar Rapids Gazette
"The president laments congressional gridlock that fomented under the inflammatory leadership of Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Harry Reid. The president’s deference to their reckless rhetoric further deepened congressional divide. Obama doesn’t deserve all of the blame. But he merits little credit for any meaningful attempt to bridge the gap."–Quad-City Times
"And puzzling to us was why the president didn’t carry the flag for his bipartisan Simpson-Bowles panel, which recommended a necessary combination of spending cuts and revenue increases to seriously launch our way out of the deficit quagmire."–The Cedar Rapids Gazette
"Of the last 11 recoveries from recession, the Obama recovery is the worst. The average retail price of gas has risen by nearly $2 per gallon. Median household income is down more than 8 percent."–Sioux City Journal
"Some Romney critics say he’s "anti-women" and doesn’t care enough about the poor or making sure there’s an adequate safety net for those hit by tragedy or severe circumstances. We believe most of those fears are overblown or misrepresented."–The Cedar Rapids Gazette
"No need to rely on hope. His record includes evidence of change…We endorse a proven manager who won’t need on-the-job training."–Quad-City Times
"Because we wish to see the country chart a new course to economic vitality and fiscal sanity, the Journal endorses former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney to be the next president of the United States."–Sioux City Journal
"We invested heavily in hope back in 2008. Our 2012 endorsement of Mitt Romney comes with an imperative for change."–Quad-City Times
"Barack Obama rocketed to the presidency from relative obscurity with a theme of hope and change. A different reality has marked his presidency. His record on the economy the past four years does not suggest he would lead in the direction the nation must go in the next four years."–The Des Moines Register
Sunday, October 28, 2012
DEMOCRATS REFUSE TO ADDRESS BENGHAZI AND YET ACCUSE GOP OF POLITICIZING THE ISSUE....
DEMOCRAT APPROACH...STALL
GOP APPROACH...GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THINGS
ANDREW SULLIVAN, TRIES TO MAKE THE IDIOTIC ARGUMENT THAT IT'S ALL ABOUT RACE...
Actually, what this election is all about is the wrestling control of our country from the hands of a devout socialist who appears hellbent on destroying it as fast and as thoroughly as he can. Mr. Sullivan and his ilk can continue to make the baseless claims that this election is all about race, but to make that case one would have to ignore completely the fact that Barry has already been elected once. Now since blacks make up only about 20 pecent of the population, in order for Barry to have achieved that little feat, a good number of white people must have voted for him. And while blacks may be thoroughly satisified with the direction in which the country is currently headed, many of those same white people are not, which makes this election not about race, but about Barry's socialist policies. Hence Mr. Sullivan, and other, are left with nothing but to blame everything on race.
Saturday, October 27, 2012
OBAMA’S JOB APPROVAL NUMBERS HEAD SOUTH…
In what I hope may be yet another indicator that more and more people may now be awakening from whatever spell it was that they were under and that caused them to see Barry as something other than what he is, fewer and fewer people now approve of the way that he is doing his job. Barry’s job approval has taken the most precipitous decline it has seen in more than a year and has dropped 7 percentage points in just three days, that according to Gallup.
In the three-day period ending on Oct. 23, according to Gallup, 53 percent said they approved of the job Obama was doing and 42 percent said they did not. On Oct. 24, that dropped to 51 percent who said they approved and 44 percent who said they do not. On Oct. 25, it dropped again to 48 percent who said they approved and 47 percent who said they do not. On Oct. 26, it dropped yet again to 46 percent who said they approved and 49 percent who said they did not.
Granted, a drop of this significance has occurred before, but we weren’t 10 days from an election. The last time we saw such a drop was back in May 2011, when Barry's job approval dropped 7 points in four days, sliding from 53 percent on May 24 to 46 percent on May 28. Now I’m sure there will be many who will say that job approval numbers rise and fall, but I don’t see how they cannot be concerned when the election is so close.
All I can say is that I hope these numbers are right. Like I said, I would really like to think that more folks really are taking stock, so to speak, of where they are today compared to where they were four years ago. They listen to the toxic rhetoric coming from the ‘Barry/Slow Joe’ team as well as the policies that are being talked about and are becoming less sure that the direction that Barry wants to take us does not bode well for either themselves or, more importantly, for their children.
WHY DOES ANYONE WANT TO RE-ELECT THIS GUY?
Because what we are now finding out is that Barry "Almighty’s" green jobs training program, which was part of his much ballyhooed stimulus, that has in reality been nothing more than a completed bust, has failed on most of its key jobs measures. And that’s according to a recently conducted internal audit that found it was training workers who already had jobs that didn’t need green energy skills, and was failing to place new enrollees in jobs once they finished the training.
The Labor Department’s inspector general also said grantees who received the green jobs-training money did a very poor job of reporting whatever results were achieved. It pointed out that only a very dismal 38 percent of those who have completed the training got jobs based on it, and an even more dismal 16 percent kept jobs for at least six months, the key measure of success for the program. "Outcomes for participants were far less than originally proposed," the auditors said.
The government earmarked more than $400 million for green jobs training programs, of which $328.5 million has been spent so far. About half of those involved were already working in the energy sector and wanted retraining, and half were potential new energy workers. Oddly enough, but something I suppose should come as a surprise, after all we are talking about Barry, of those workers who already had energy-sector jobs, the auditors said they were retrained, even though they didn’t need it.
"We found no evidence that the incumbent workers in our sample required services or training to keep their job or obtain a new one," the investigators said in their report. Now as to be expected ,the Labor Department challenged the findings, saying that auditors didn’t consider the full progress of those who got training. The department said some of those who got training found jobs before their training was completed and said they should have been counted.
Jane Oates, a Barry hack as well as assistant secretary for employment and training, said as the rest of the training is completed, they expect the numbers to improve. The audit was released by House oversight committee Chairman Darrell E. Issa, who requested the update. Mr. Issa said in addition to poor performance records, the green jobs money "served as a slush fund" for the Obama administration to dole out payments to allies "like the National Council of La Raza, the Blue Green alliance and the U.S. Steelworkers Union."
This is the kind of green energy shell game that we have seen play out time after time, and all at taxpayer expense. Vast amounts of taxpayer money continues to be "invested" and at the end of the day there is essentially nothing to show for it. Barry continues to spew all manner of nonsense and we still have a substantial number of people who insist on believing him. Now granted many, blacks in particular, have an ulterior motive, for choosing to believe Barry, but all that means is that the rest of us need to be smart enough to see past the smoke and mirrors. But will we?
FATHER OF MURDERED NAVY SEAL ASKS, "WHO MADE THE DECISION NOT TO SAVE MY SON?"
Charles Woods, is the father of Tyrone Woods, one of those brave SEALs who was murdered in the 9/11 terrorist attack that took place at the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya. He recently revealed some of the details from his meeting with Barry "Almighty and Hitlery Clinton at the publicly broadcast memorial service for the slain Americans which took place at Andrews Air Force Base only days after the attack. And, it was in a recent radio appearance that Mr. Woods publicly asked the question of who it was that made the call not to send in back-up forces to possibly save his son’s life, as well as the three other Americans killed in Benghazi, which also included the American ambassador to Libya.
"When [Obama] came over to our little area" at Andrew Air Force Base, says Woods, "he kind of just mumbled, you know, ‘I’m sorry.’ His face was looking at me, but his eyes were looking over my shoulder like he could not look me in the eye. And it was not a sincere, ‘I’m really sorry, you know, that your son died,’ but it was totally insincere, more of whining type, ‘I’m sorry.’" Woods says that shaking Barry’s hands at his son’s memorial service was "like shaking hands with a dead fish."
"It just didn’t feel right," he says of his encounter with our pathetic commander-in-chief. "And now that it’s coming out that apparently the White House situation room was watching our people die in real time, as this was happening," Woods says, he wants answers on what happened—and why there was no apparent effort to save his son’s life. "Well, this is what Hillary did," Woods continues. "She came over and, you know, did the same thing—separately came over and talked with me. I gave her a hug, shook her hand. And she did not appear to be one bit sincere—at all. And you know, she mentioned that the thing about, we’re going to have that person arrested and prosecuted that did the video. That was the first time I had even heard about anything like that."
Woods continues: "Apparently even the State Department had a live stream and was aware of their calls for help. My son wasn’t even there. He was at a safe house about a mile away. He got the distress call; he heard them crying for help; that’s why he and Glen risked their lives to go that extra mile just to take care of the situation. And I’m sure that wasn’t the only one received that distress call—you know, come save our lives … I’m sure that other people in the military, in the State Department, in the White House, received that same call that he would receive. And I’m sure that most military people would jump at the chance … to protect that life [and] not leave anyone behind."
Woods made clear that he isn't "mad," but that he wants to the "truth" to be told because he feels " abandoned." Woods says he was told by military officials that the military could have "come above [the area] and completely carpeted area," and therefore saved the officials in Benghazi, Libya. But that someone gave the command for the American military not to save the lives of the Americans under attack. "When I heard, you know, that there's a very good chance that the White House as well as other members of the military knew what was going on and obviously someone had to say, don't go rescue them. Because every person in the military--their first response [would be], we're going to go rescue them. We need to find out who it was that gave that command--do not rescue them."
Ya know, I spent 24 year in the Navy and my wife spent over 22, serving under such incompetent commanders-in-chief as Jimmy "Peanut Brain" Carter and "BJ" Clinton. I wish I could say that this most recent, and disgusting, act of Barry’s, his deciding to leave brave men alone on foreign soil to die, was an anomaly, something that no Democrat commander-in-chief had ever before done. But sadly, such is not the case. Barry was essentially doing nothing more than to follow the example set for him by Democrat presidents of the recent past. For instance, in August 1993, "BJ" sent in a force of Rangers and Special Forces units to Somalia, their mission was to capture the brutal warlord Mohammad Farrah Aidid and restore order.
That force asked for heavy armor, in the form of Abrams tanks and Bradley armored vehicles, as well as the AC-130 gunship, but the Clinton Administration denied those requests. On October 3 on a mission to pick up Aidid, two Black Hawks were unexpectedly shot down; in the ensuing urban gun battle, 18 American soldiers were killed and another 73 injured. Many military experts believe that if the U.S. forces had had armor, fewer would have died. "BJ’s" limp-wristed Secretary of Defense, Les Aspin, resigned two months after Somalia, having acknowledged that his decision on the armor had been an error. A 1994 Senate Armed Services Committee investigation reached the same conclusion.
What was, and continues to be, demonstrated by Barry throughout this entire episode is not something that can merely chalked up as being ineptness or incompetence. It was purposeful! He chose to allow these four men to die, rather than take the risk of creating a situation that might have some adverse effect on his ability to get re-elected. He saw it as being something that he thought, and most likely still thinks, that he and his team, as well as those in the state-controlled media who still aren’t talking about this, can successfully keep from the voters until after the election. If we, the American people, allow such a travesty to take place, doesn’t that make us just as guilty as Barry is himself? What he is, is an accessory to murder!
Is this really the type of individual we want to be representing our nation to the World? Now granted, he’s fit right in with the majority of other world ‘leaders’, but I would think that most Americans would want something a better, at least those Americans who genuinely love their country. For those who don’t, well then, I don’t suppose it matters much to them that our president is nothing more than a political thug who is only too happy to sacrifice the lives of those working to protect our country if it can increase his chances of winning an election. Because, after all, if he wins there’s a better chance that those government checks will keep coming. Such is what America has now become, I guess. And how sad it is.
OUR 'PRESIDENT' IS A GUTLESS POLITICAL OPPORTUNIST...AND AN ACCESSORY TO THE MURDER OF FOUR AMERICANS....
WHAT A REAL "BULLSHITTER" LOOKS LIKE
Four Americans are dead because this pathetic individual cared more about the potential for collateral damage that might be suffered by his re-election campaign than he cared about the lives of those serving their country overseas. There is a special place in Hell for scumbags like Barry. Most likely there is a seat being saved for him that's right next to Ted 'I Got Away With Murder' Kennedy.
Friday, October 26, 2012
THE UNDERSTATEMENT OF THE MILLENNIUM...
In 11 days the American people will have the opportunity to correct the major mistake they made 4 years ago. Let's all hope and pray that they have the wisdom to make the right choice and send Barry back to Chicago where he belongs.
BEWARE OF AL "BULL HORN" SHARPTON AND HIS VOTER INTIMIDATION BRIGADES...
Don't let this racist loudmouth and his brigades of racist thugs intimidate you. He must think this is the only way Barry can win. We need to get rid of Barry and then proceed to do some serious fumigation of the White House so that vermin like Sharpton will realize that they are no longer welcome!
OBAMA IS A DISGRACE TO THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT...
When it comes to the protecting the lives of Americans here at home and abroad over the course of the last four years, it's become increasingly difficult to determine just who it is, in that regard, is the most incompetent member of Barry's administration. Sometimes it would appears that it's Barry himself who poses the most significant threat to the safety of Americans, and at other times it would appear to be our, somewhat less than stellar, Secretary of State, Hitlery Clinton. And then still at other times it appears that it just might be that old Clinton retread, and moron to the extreme, Leon Panetta, our boob of a Secretary of Defense. Now if you listen to those who support these people, these folks who make up cadre of misfits are supposed to be some the smartest people on the planet. But I have to say that I’ve seen very little evidence that would indicate that that is in fact the case. The result of these individuals having been in their positions is that this country is much more worse off that it was before they came onto the scene.
And we now find out that Fox News has learned from a number of sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later was denied by U.S. officials, who also told the CIA operators twice to "stand down" rather than help the ambassador's team when shots were heard at approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11. Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was part of a small team who was at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When he and others heard the shots fired, they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to "stand down," according to sources familiar with the exchange. Soon after, they were again told to "stand down." Woods and at least two others ignored those orders and made their way to the consulate which at that point was on fire. Shots were exchanged.
The rescue team from the CIA annex evacuated those who remained at the consulate and Sean Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack. They could not find the ambassador and returned to the CIA annex at about midnight. At that point, they called "again" for military support and help because they were taking fire at the CIA safe house, or annex. The request was "again" denied. There were no communications problems at the annex, according those present at the compound. The team was in constant radio contact with their headquarters. In fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Spectre gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights.
The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours -- enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. Fox News has also learned that two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait, among them Delta Force operators. A Special Operations team, or CIF which stands for Commanders in Extremis Force, operating in Central Europe had been moved to Sigonella, Italy, but they were never told to deploy. In fact, a Pentagon official says there were never any requests to deploy assets from outside the country. A second force that specializes in counterterrorism rescues was on hand at Sigonella, according to senior military and intelligence sources. According to those sources, they could have flown to Benghazi in less than two hours. They were the same distance to Benghazi as those that were sent from Tripoli. Spectre gunships are commonly used by the Special Operations community to provide close air support.
According to sources there on the ground during the attack, the special operator on the roof of the CIA annex had visual contact and a laser pointing at the Libyan mortar team that was targeting the CIA annex. The operators were calling in coordinates of where the Libyan forces were firing from. Our boob of a Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta, told reporters at the Pentagon as recently as Thursday that there was not a clear enough picture of what was occurring on the ground in Benghazi to send help. "There's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on here," Panetta said. "But the basic principle here ... is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on." Fox News has learned that there were two military surveillance drones redirected to Benghazi shortly after the attack on the consulate began. They were already in the vicinity. The second surveillance craft was sent to relieve the first drone. Both were capable of sending real time visuals back to U.S. officials in Washington, D.C. Any U.S. official or agency with the proper clearance, including the White House Situation Room, could call up that video.
Tyrone Woods was later joined at the scene by fellow former Navy SEAL Glen Doherty, who was sent in from Tripoli as part of a Global Response Staff or GRS that provides security to CIA case officers and provides counter-surveillance and surveillance protection. They were killed by a mortar shell at 4 a.m. Libyan time, nearly seven hours after the attack on the consulate began -- a window that represented more than enough time for the U.S. military to send back-up from nearby bases in Europe, according to sources familiar with Special Operations. Four mortars were fired at the annex. The first one struck outside the annex. Three more hit the annex.
A motorcade of dozens of Libyan vehicles, some mounted with 50 caliber machine guns, belonging to the February 17th Brigades, a Libyan militia which is friendly to the U.S., finally showed up at the CIA annex at approximately 3 a.m. An American Quick Reaction Force sent from Tripoli had arrived at the Benghazi airport at 2 a.m. (four hours after the initial attack on the consulate) and was delayed for 45 minutes at the airport because they could not at first get transportation, allegedly due to confusion among Libyan militias who were supposed to escort them to the annex, according to Benghazi sources. Fox News has also learned that Stevens was in Benghazi that day to be present at the opening of an English-language school being started by the Libyan farmer who helped save an American pilot who had been shot down by pro-Qaddafi forces during the initial war to overthrow the regime. That farmer saved the life of the American pilot and the ambassador wanted to be present to launch the Libyan rescuer's new school
Four Americans were, quite simply, "allowed" to die and for no other reason that Barry, and members of his corrupt team, deemed ding anything else might have somehow jeopardized Barry’s election chances. Is this what we expect from our Commander-in-Chief? Since this incident first happened, The White House has done nothing other than to blatantly attempt to cover up the facts because of the looming election. These four people were sacrificed at the alter of Barack Hussein Obama so that he may yet win re-election. It would appear that no cost is to high for others to pay as long as the facts can be kept from ever seeing the light of day, at least until after the election. And my reason for saying this, contrary to what buffoons like Chris Matthews may claim, has nothing whatsoever to do with Barry's race. It's his policies that I take exception to, they have resulted in nothing more than to make our economy even weaker and our world much less safe.
Thursday, October 25, 2012
JUST HOW FAR WOULD A REPUBLICAN GET WITH A STORY LIKE THIS?
What is it about these Chicago type hoodlums who have currently invaded the White House and who continue to presume that they are somehow not only above the law but also above the constraints that the Constitution places on the office of the president? Because with them now finding themselves embroiled, and buried hip deep in a growing controversy that at least has the potential 'scandal' to dwarf the "Fast And Furious" debacle. And with us now 12 days from the election, Team Barry has commenced to now be pulling out all the stops in their continuing effort to deceive the American people at least until we get past the election. At this point the White House is simply declining to say when, exactly, Barry "Almighty" first learned of three emails that the State Department sent to the White House on Sept. 11, 2012, directly notifying the Executive Office of the President that the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was under attack, that U.S. Amb. Chris Stevens was at the Benghazi mission at the time of the attack, and that the group Ansar al-Sharia had taken credit for the attack. Now imagine, just for a second, if Richard Nixon had used the same lame excuse as is being used by this cadre of crooks, regarding that little incident that took place over there that Watergate office complex.
This band of political thugs over there at the White House have also declined to say when Barry might have first met with the National Security Council after the Benghazi attack. "I have been asked by one of our spokespeople to relay ‘that we decline to comment,’" said White House National Security Staff aide, Debbie Bird, in a written response. DECLINE TO COMMENT? What the Hell kind of answer is that? Ms. Bird had been asked point blank: 1) "When did the President first meet with the National Security Council after the Benghazi attack on 9/11/12?" 2) "When did White House staff first discuss the substance of the e-mails that went to the White House with the President or with the National Security Advisor?" And we get a no comment? White House Spokemoron Jay "Lyin' Piece Of Dog Squeeze" Carney also took a question about the e-mails today during a press gaggle held aboard Air Force One at 9:34 a.m. A reporter asked: "Jay, there are some emails that have emerged, which suggest that the White House and other areas of the government were told within hours of the Benghazi attack that an extremist group had claimed responsibility. How is that compatible with the idea that it was a spontaneous attack?" Carney, of course, sought to downplay the significance of those very revealing State Department emails.
"There were emails about all sorts of information that was becoming available in the aftermath of the attack," Carney said. Adding, "The email you’re referring to was an open-source, unclassified email referring to an assertion made on a social media site that everyone in this room had access to and knew about instantaneously. There was a variety of information coming in." He went on to say, "The whole point of an intelligence community and what they do is to assess strands of information and make judgments about what happened and who was responsible." Adding, "and I would refer you to what we’ve already said about, and what the DNI [Director of National Intelligence] has already said about, the initial assessments of the intelligence community, and the fact that throughout this process, I and others made very clear that our preliminary assessments were preliminary, that an investigation was underway, and that as more facts became available, we would make the American people aware of them." He then repeated, "Again, this was an open-source, unclassified email about a posting on a Facebook site. I would also note I think that within a few hours, that organization itself claimed that it had not been responsible. Neither should be taken as fact. That’s why there’s an investigation underway." Not sure who it was he was trying to convince.
On those few occasions when it does actually meet, the NSC is then chaired by Barry "Almighty", and includes our inept Secretary of State, Hitlery Clinton, our even more inept Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta, our pretty much worthless National Security Advisor, Tom Donilon, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey, Treasury Secretary Timmy "The Tax Cheat" Geithner and U.S. Attorney General Eric " The Racist" Holder. The way things are supposed to work is that a NSC meeting designed to provide an opportunity for the leader of the intelligence community to communicate directly with the leader of the State Department in the presence of the president and for all of them to weigh any conflicting information. The three emails in question were sent by the State Department to various government officials, including two officials in the Executive Office of the President, on Sept. 11, 2012, while the attack on the Benghazi was still taking place and immediately after it had taken place. Each of the emails has been redacted so that the suffixes of most of the email addresses are intact—showing where the people who sent them and received them work—but the prefixes are blacked out, so the personal identities of the senders and receivers is obscured. Shouldn't we be able to assume that emails of this nature would make their way to the president?
It might also be worth mentioning here, I think, that none of these emails that have thus far come to light have made any mention, whatsoever, of the YouTube video or some spontaneous demonstrations at the U.S. mission in Benghazi, that both Barry and other members of his administration continued to make such a big issue of as being the primary cause for the deaths of four Americans. Five days after the State Department sent these emails to the White House, U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice went on national television programs and essentially lied to the world claiming that the administration believed that what had happened in Benghazi had started as a spontaneous protest against a video that had been posted on YouTube. "But based on the best information we have to date," Rice said on CBS’s "Face the Nation," "what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what, it began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo, where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video." Rice added, "We do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned." The day after the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Barry was winging his way westward to Las Vegas for yet another fundraiser.
So, just for the sake of argument, how far does anyone think that George W. Bush would have gotten with an effort to use this same sort of tactics? I would hazard to guess, not very far. By this time Democrats everywhere, as well as our entire state-controlled media complex, would be asking why impeachment hearing weren't already underway. But our Democrat president, as usual, seems to get a complete pass. And of course it doesn't hurt that he's also black. All the more reason to cut him even more slack. This level of dishonesty should be considered by every single American as being completely unacceptable. But sadly, such is obviously not the case. For nearly four years now this country seems to have been rotting from the inside out, and unless we can manage to extricate ourselves from the man who is mainly responsible for that rotting having taken place and who by the way currently serve as our president, that process will only continue and will, in all likelihood, speed up until there is nothing left of this once proud nation but a hollow shell. In less than two weeks we will have the opportunity to administer what I think can be described as a healthy dose of the antiseptic called truth, and to stem the destruction of our country that has been underway since January 20, 2009. If we fail to act then our present condition could very well become terminal.
FURTHER PROOF OF HOW IT'S 'ALWAYS' THE DEMOCRATS WHO CHEAT...
The son of Rep. Jim Moran, DEMOCRAT from Virginia, who serves as the field director for his father’s campaign, has been caught on video advising an undercover reporter how to fraudulently cast ballots in the name of registered voters by forging utility bills and relying on the assistance of Democrat lawyers.
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)