What is it about these Chicago type hoodlums who have currently invaded the White House and who continue to presume that they are somehow not only above the law but also above the constraints that the Constitution places on the office of the president? Because with them now finding themselves embroiled, and buried hip deep in a growing controversy that at least has the potential 'scandal' to dwarf the "Fast And Furious" debacle. And with us now 12 days from the election, Team Barry has commenced to now be pulling out all the stops in their continuing effort to deceive the American people at least until we get past the election. At this point the White House is simply declining to say when, exactly, Barry "Almighty" first learned of three emails that the State Department sent to the White House on Sept. 11, 2012, directly notifying the Executive Office of the President that the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was under attack, that U.S. Amb. Chris Stevens was at the Benghazi mission at the time of the attack, and that the group Ansar al-Sharia had taken credit for the attack. Now imagine, just for a second, if Richard Nixon had used the same lame excuse as is being used by this cadre of crooks, regarding that little incident that took place over there that Watergate office complex.
This band of political thugs over there at the White House have also declined to say when Barry might have first met with the National Security Council after the Benghazi attack. "I have been asked by one of our spokespeople to relay ‘that we decline to comment,’" said White House National Security Staff aide, Debbie Bird, in a written response. DECLINE TO COMMENT? What the Hell kind of answer is that? Ms. Bird had been asked point blank: 1) "When did the President first meet with the National Security Council after the Benghazi attack on 9/11/12?" 2) "When did White House staff first discuss the substance of the e-mails that went to the White House with the President or with the National Security Advisor?" And we get a no comment? White House Spokemoron Jay "Lyin' Piece Of Dog Squeeze" Carney also took a question about the e-mails today during a press gaggle held aboard Air Force One at 9:34 a.m. A reporter asked: "Jay, there are some emails that have emerged, which suggest that the White House and other areas of the government were told within hours of the Benghazi attack that an extremist group had claimed responsibility. How is that compatible with the idea that it was a spontaneous attack?" Carney, of course, sought to downplay the significance of those very revealing State Department emails.
"There were emails about all sorts of information that was becoming available in the aftermath of the attack," Carney said. Adding, "The email you’re referring to was an open-source, unclassified email referring to an assertion made on a social media site that everyone in this room had access to and knew about instantaneously. There was a variety of information coming in." He went on to say, "The whole point of an intelligence community and what they do is to assess strands of information and make judgments about what happened and who was responsible." Adding, "and I would refer you to what we’ve already said about, and what the DNI [Director of National Intelligence] has already said about, the initial assessments of the intelligence community, and the fact that throughout this process, I and others made very clear that our preliminary assessments were preliminary, that an investigation was underway, and that as more facts became available, we would make the American people aware of them." He then repeated, "Again, this was an open-source, unclassified email about a posting on a Facebook site. I would also note I think that within a few hours, that organization itself claimed that it had not been responsible. Neither should be taken as fact. That’s why there’s an investigation underway." Not sure who it was he was trying to convince.
On those few occasions when it does actually meet, the NSC is then chaired by Barry "Almighty", and includes our inept Secretary of State, Hitlery Clinton, our even more inept Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta, our pretty much worthless National Security Advisor, Tom Donilon, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey, Treasury Secretary Timmy "The Tax Cheat" Geithner and U.S. Attorney General Eric " The Racist" Holder. The way things are supposed to work is that a NSC meeting designed to provide an opportunity for the leader of the intelligence community to communicate directly with the leader of the State Department in the presence of the president and for all of them to weigh any conflicting information. The three emails in question were sent by the State Department to various government officials, including two officials in the Executive Office of the President, on Sept. 11, 2012, while the attack on the Benghazi was still taking place and immediately after it had taken place. Each of the emails has been redacted so that the suffixes of most of the email addresses are intact—showing where the people who sent them and received them work—but the prefixes are blacked out, so the personal identities of the senders and receivers is obscured. Shouldn't we be able to assume that emails of this nature would make their way to the president?
It might also be worth mentioning here, I think, that none of these emails that have thus far come to light have made any mention, whatsoever, of the YouTube video or some spontaneous demonstrations at the U.S. mission in Benghazi, that both Barry and other members of his administration continued to make such a big issue of as being the primary cause for the deaths of four Americans. Five days after the State Department sent these emails to the White House, U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice went on national television programs and essentially lied to the world claiming that the administration believed that what had happened in Benghazi had started as a spontaneous protest against a video that had been posted on YouTube. "But based on the best information we have to date," Rice said on CBS’s "Face the Nation," "what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what, it began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo, where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video." Rice added, "We do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned." The day after the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Barry was winging his way westward to Las Vegas for yet another fundraiser.
So, just for the sake of argument, how far does anyone think that George W. Bush would have gotten with an effort to use this same sort of tactics? I would hazard to guess, not very far. By this time Democrats everywhere, as well as our entire state-controlled media complex, would be asking why impeachment hearing weren't already underway. But our Democrat president, as usual, seems to get a complete pass. And of course it doesn't hurt that he's also black. All the more reason to cut him even more slack. This level of dishonesty should be considered by every single American as being completely unacceptable. But sadly, such is obviously not the case. For nearly four years now this country seems to have been rotting from the inside out, and unless we can manage to extricate ourselves from the man who is mainly responsible for that rotting having taken place and who by the way currently serve as our president, that process will only continue and will, in all likelihood, speed up until there is nothing left of this once proud nation but a hollow shell. In less than two weeks we will have the opportunity to administer what I think can be described as a healthy dose of the antiseptic called truth, and to stem the destruction of our country that has been underway since January 20, 2009. If we fail to act then our present condition could very well become terminal.
No comments:
Post a Comment