Stacey Abrams lecturing us about Democracy now apparently makes about as much sense as Tony Fauci lecturing us about the ‘Chinese virus’ because neither seem to have a clue know about that which they are lecturing us about. It’s pretty obvious that Abrams, aka ‘The Black Kow,’ and never read word one of the Constitution and even more doubtful is the fact that she would have ANY understanding of it were she ever to take it upon herself to read it. And it’s every time, every SINGLE time, that she opens her mouth that she makes painfully clear that that is fact the case.
This past Thursday Abrams, during an appearance on
Crooked Media’s Pod Save America, made the idiotic claim that voter integrity
laws being established in states such as Texas are a “subversion of American
democracy.” Abrams said, “We are watching the subversion of American democracy
by allowing legislators, people in power to overturn the outcome of elections.”
If it was as obvious that the Republicans had cheated, and ‘won,’ as it now is
that the Democrats cheated in 2020, I have no doubt that this moron would now
be screaming that the election must be overturned.
Abrams’ imbecilic remarks were primarily directed at
Texas’s new election integrity bill, which works to expand the freedoms of poll
watchers, create new voter ID requirements, and crack down on voting by mail. All
of which that most reasonably intelligent people would view as being things
necessary and appropriate if we’re going to be able to have confidence in our
election results. But it’s according to this ‘rocket scientist’ Abrams that the
bill would do nothing more than to give lawmakers the authority to simply overturn
any election if they “don’t like the outcome.”
Abrams said, “I mean, in Texas, the bill that was
stopped briefly — unfortunately, it will come back in special session — said
that you could try to overturn an election without proof of fraud, which means
if you just don’t like the outcome.” And she added, “And there are gonna be
those who push back and say that’s not what it says exactly, but I’m a good
enough lawyer.” Abrams likened the Texas voting bill to Georgia’s, which Gov.
Brian Kemp signed; it limits the number of ballot drop boxes and establishes
photo ID requirements for absentee voters, among other things.
Abrams insisted the “porous” and “poorly written”
election integrity bills are designed to “allow the unspoken to become the
rule,” further claiming that elections can now be overturned by the “bad
actions of others,” something she believes is “deeply problematic.” I find it
rather funny, especially after hearing excerpts from some of her supposed
‘romance’ novels, that she would dare to speak of anything being “poor
written.” And also, it’s a pretty rare event whenever opening her mouth that
she’s able to string enough words together to form a coherent sentence.
And it’s also *president ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden who has
also been critical of Texas’s voter integrity efforts, saying voting as a
“sacred right is under assault with incredible intensity like [he has] never
seen.” ‘Creepy Joe’ also insisted efforts to ensure fair elections are “simply
un-American.” How does that, in any way, make any sense to anyone with even
half a brain? But this is how Democrats now think, and if we’re being honest,
have thought for a very long time. But Democrats now seem to feel quite
comfortable speaking like this out in the open and not just behind closed
doors.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott responded to ‘Creepy Joe’s
criticism, saying he “wouldn’t be surprised if Biden criticized the Senate bill
without even having ever read it.” Abbott said, “I bet he doesn’t have a clue
what’s in there.” And he said, “This, of course, is the same person who reacted
swiftly, calling me a Neanderthal for opening things up, and he proved to be
100 percent wrong. He’s going to be proven to be 100 percent wrong about this.”
He said, “The voter law in the state of Texas is far more accommodative and
provides far more hours to vote than it does in President Biden’s home state of
Delaware, where they offer exactly zero early voting days.”
Abrams is nothing if not a total and complete disgrace.
She is obviously a racist and is clearly an embarrassment to her entire race.
What she’s really complaining about here is how election integrity bills will make
it far more difficult for Democrats to successfully steal elections through such
things as voter fraud and mail-in voting. Everything the Democrats support is the exact
opposite of what’s needed to ensure the integrity of our elections. Personally,
it’s anyone who is opposed to any measure than guarantees the integrity of our
elections, that is clearly pro cheating.
There is nothing wrong or racist in demanding a
voter show identification BEFORE being allowed to vote. There is nothing wrong
or racist about verifying a person's signature on an absentee ballot. There is
nothing wrong or racist about allowing a person to vote only once. The laws
being passed are to ensure election integrity, not, as would be the preference
of Democrats like Abrams, to subvert it. But then what’s more important? Buying
cigarettes or liquor, or voting? And oddly enough only one of these acts don’t
require an ID. Which makes absolutely no sense, none at all.
I must not be as intelligent as Ms. Abrams, which is
a pretty scary thought in itself, so maybe she can show me the parts of any of these
laws where calling for voters to present an ID before voting actually restrict
voting rights. If you are a U.S. citizen over the age of 18, you may vote. Just
because you now have to put out a little effort to obtain an ID and schlep off to
the nearest polling location, is not restricting your right to vote. If you are
too lazy to do these two things, I don’t WANT you voting. You are obviously not
involved enough to know what you are voting for, or against.
The only people who are subverted by voter integrity
laws are the very same people who cheat, who happen to be Democrats, and
especially people like Abrams. With the spread of electronic voting machines,
the chances of election fraud is suddenly skyrocketing. Hackers, foreign states
and other bad actors can easily employ a myriad of techniques to gain access to
any voting system during any election. It’s amazing how stopping voter fraud
somehow subverts democracy. An insecure vote is a step toward authoritarianism.
Strange that integrity of any kind is now called ‘subversion.’
I am curious though regarding how it might be that Abrams
chooses to define ‘democracy?’ Is it voting anytime, anywhere and however many
times one may want to vote? Elections must be secure and protected. If that means
making them a bit less convenient, especially for the people who believe the government
owes them, then so be it. Democrats have two years to force upon states their
twisted vision of our voting process. That anyone could consider this woman suitable
for public office, or believe anything that she says, is amazing. She’s no
better than Sharpton or ‘Mad Maxine.’
Protection of our elections is paramount, hence the
intensity of those like Abrams to complain about it. We see what happens when
the Democrat Party has the chance to cheat. After Hitlery, a much stronger
candidate than ‘Creepy Joe’ on his best day, was humiliated by a complete
political novice, the Democrat Party embarked upon that which was nothing less
than a no holds barred scheme that would allow them to cheat their way to
victory in the next election no matter who their candidate turned out to be. And
they knew they could count in their friends in the media to help them.
Everything the Democrats have done in the last 15+
years has been a subversion of American democracy. Donald Trump won the 2016
election. How did they act? They spent $50 million trying to convince everyone
that Russia somehow stole the election for him. They rioted, they lied and they
screamed, “Not my President.” They had their Democrat judges reverse nearly every
Trump policy. And yet in the end President Trump was proven right nearly every
single time. But with the Democrats now in control of our government the sad
fact is that we are pretty much screwed.
No comments:
Post a Comment