DEMOCRATS: ALWAYS WRONG, BUT NEVER IN DOUBT…

So it’s now that we have one of the dumbest bitches on all of planet Earth rushing into defend ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden’s blatantly unqualified Supreme Court pick, Ketanji Brown Jackson. Now personally if I was Ms. Jackson the last thing, and I do mean the very last thing, that I would want to have happen is to have a moron like ‘Crazy Mazie’ Hirono on my side. I mean, let’s face it, old Mazie has all the brains of a head of lettuce. But, be that as it may, it was Mazie who very recently showed up to pay a visit to yet another moron, and a racist one to boot, Joy Reid.

Now correct me if I’m wrong, but I thought I had read somewhere that Reid had gotten her racist ass fired. Apparently not? Anyway, the specific reason for Mazie’s recent visit was to use the platform provided to her to chastise Republicans for being mean to Ms. Jackson during her ongoing confirmation hearings. Well ain’t that the pot calling the kettle black, right? Does anyone remember this boob during the Democrat inquisition conducted against Bret Kavanaugh? Because I gotta tell you, it’s still pretty fresh in my memory. But hey, just more hypocrisy from a Democrat.

And so it was during Thursday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “The ReidOut,” hosted by racist homophobe Joy Reid, that Mazie accused Republicans on the Judiciary Committee of attacking Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson for being “a black woman representing poor people” and that their statements, along with criticism of her record on sex crimes, were nothing more than “dog whistles.” Question, how is it that she can accuse the Republicans of attacking the ‘woman’ who, when asked to do so, was not able to actually define what a woman is? Just sayin'.

Mazie said that Sen. Josh Hawley has voted to confirm judges with similar sentencing records to Jackson’s and “that’s why I brought it up, and that’s why I asked Judge Jackson, do you think that these judges who have been sentencing along the lines that you have, that they are soft on child pornographers? Of course, the answer is no. This is what you call a double standard. And they also attacked Judge Jackson for representing — a black woman representing poor people. You know, you could call these things dog whistles.” Democrats and their “dog whistles!"

And so says the very same senator who asked every individual nominated to the Supreme Court by President Trump if, “if they have ever engaged in any kind of sexual impropriety (gang rapes or sexual blackmail) in their lives!” And it didn’t seem to matter if the nominee was a woman or a man, she asked, and asked, and asked, and then asked again in a twisted attempt to label all conservative Supreme Court nominees as sexual predators! Now a very liberal nominee is seeking confirmation and Mazie is accusing the other side of doing what she herself is guilty of?

But I can’t help but wonder if we’re all watching the same confirmation hearings that old Mazie is? I mean I didn't see anyone say anything about her race or economic status. These confused women don’t even know what they are, let alone be able to discern reality for what it is. Have you ever seen a woman more screwed up in the head than Mazie? This woman sees the world through an entirely different lens than normal people do. Her perverted, twisted, sick view of things is a telling sign that she should be under medical supervision, as well as heavily medicated.

And what is it with Democrats and “dog whistles?” ‘Mad Maxine’ Waters has used that term for years has have many in the ‘fake news’ media. Mazie hasn’t been a contributing member of the Senate for years, yet she continues to be reelected. Being soft on criminals and being called out for it is not a “dog whistle,” it’s the truth. Sitting on the board of a school that teaches CRT and then saying "I thought you meant public schools" when challenged about it and not being able to define a woman should bring shame on, and infuriate, black women everywhere. But does it?

It’s like the Democrats were desperate to find the lowest common denominator as the baseline for choosing their racially motivated choice in order to fill the slot being vacated by a white man. The Democrats purposely limited their search to black women for this position and yet set about calling the Republicans racist? She was selected by the Democrats because of her skin color and gender, not because she was some great legal mind. And then, when she is questioned, like every other nominee, Democrats object to that? Then why have a hearing? What’s the purpose of it?

There are two types of people in this country who we expect to lie to us, meteorologists and Democrat politicians regardless of whether they operate at the local, state or federal level. Democrats know they can’t explain away the kiddy porn issue. If there were just one or two cases involved here, that would be one thing, but it’s not. This is a large quantity of clearly pro kiddy porn decisions. Why do you think the White House is still covering up information on only those specific cases? This is a disturbing trend we’re seeing from Democrats. And it’s pretty disgusting.

And if, as Mazie says, Ms. Jackson’s purpose on the Supreme Court would be to represent poor people, then, as a reasonably well off, white, senior citizen, who is my representative on the court? Judges, and especially Supreme Court Justices, don’t REPRESENT anyone. Their job, whether they know it or not, is to simply apply the Constitution to the facts of the cases that come before them. That’s it. Period. The end. They are specifically NOT supposed to consider how their decisions will affect this or that community. THAT consideration and analysis is the job of legislatures.

Look, I think it’s pretty clear that Ms. Jackson lied when answering many of the questions she was asked. She said she didn’t know or didn't remember multiple times. Other nominees were asked about what they did in college and she couldn’t remember cases she presided over on the bench which she should have been prepared for. There are so many much more intelligent people out there that are much more qualified than her, but they simply have the wrong color skin. What a disgrace for our country. Instead of picking the best, this administration is more interested in tokens.

There is clearly a very concerted, and very well-funded, effort among those in the Democrat Party, and on the left in general, to make sex with children, child pornography, as well as all other forms of child sexual abuse LEGAL. And this cadre of sexual deviants clearly includes ‘Crazy Mazie.’ And am I the only one who sees it as being more than a little disturbing that it’s always those who are doing their best to make more Americans aware of this who are constantly being portrayed as the villains by Democrats and so very many of those involved in the ‘fake news’ media.

And it’s Ms. Jackson who is very much at home there on the hard left and will, if permitted a lifetime appointment on the court will allow the taking of America even further down the rabbit-hole of wokeness to the point where that it will become impossible to get back out. The left will be able to count on her to endorse efforts to make changes to our system of checks and balances such that, the democracy they so dearly love, and to whom they are so committed, gets hammered and our voting, for instance, mirrors that of shithole countries like Cuba and Venezuela.

And finally, here’s a for instance for ya. If a private company put an ad out saying they wanted only to hire a white male for a senior leadership position would that be racist and discriminatory to other races and genders? Of course. Yet ‘Creepy Joe’ can get away by doing just that for the Supreme Court. Jackson is only there because she’s Black and a woman, although she can’t even define what a woman is. There are likely thousands of other far more qualified judges that could have been selected to be on Court, but they won’t fill the racist quota of being just a Black Woman.