What is it about the 2016 election that has
Democrats so stubbornly unable to move on?
After all, it was they who chose to rig their own primary process to
virtually guarantee that their worst possible candidate would ‘win’ the
nomination. And then to add insult to
injury their most favored candidate then went on to run what can only be
described as being the worst campaign in modern political history. And yet it was on this past Tuesday’s episode
of MSNBC’s “Hardball,” that former Democratic National Committee chairwoman
Donna Brazile had the nerve to claim that President Donald Trump’s victory over
Hitlery in the 2016 presidential election was not legitimate. Not legitimate? How is it that one can come to such a
conclusion?
And it was during this very same interview that Ms.
Brazile would go on to say, “My personal view is that it was not a legitimate
election.” And she continued by saying,
“Remember, I was the campaign manager of Al Gore in 2000, where, as you well
know, the Supreme Court decided. This election will always have an asterisk by
it. And that’s why I think Donald Trump should take steps as president to clean
up our system so that no more foreign governments, no foreign meddling can
occur in the future.” I must admit that I
am a bit curious about how it is that Ms. Brazile is able to make the claim
that President Trump’s victory is in any way illegitimate. It worked perfectly. Trump won the most Electoral College votes,
and Hitlery didn’t.
And Ms. Brazile went on to add, “I have worked on
more campaigns than many Americans and I can tell you something when you see
all of the evidence that is mounting of how the Russians interfered in our
election which is why I wrote the booked “Hacked,” when you see on social media
with what they did on social media with Facebook and Twitter…We need to get to
the bottom of it.” You know, it's kind of bizarre, really, how Brazile can say
that Trump's election is “illegitimate” when she's the one who admitted to
cheating for Hitlery during the election.
I guess I would only like to ask her, out of all those campaigns that she
claims to have worked on, during how many of them did she cheat? I think that’s a reasonable question.
But personally, I can’t help but think that’s her
story and she’s simply sticking to it. I
mean she really has no alternative. But to
be honest, if we’re talking about an election that does truly deserve an
asterisk, I’m thinking it would be the 1992 election. Because had it not been for Ross Perot’s
third party run, ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton most certainly would never have
won. And I’m now of the opinion that Brazile
has pretty much gone through whatever credibility she may have once had and is no
longer in a position to judge anyone. She
lied about giving debate questions to Hitlery, before admitting that she did, before
lying again. And it was then that she
lost all credibility. She’s has become a
voice that’s no longer relevant in politics.
The list of those things that caused Hitlery to lose
her second attempt at becoming the nation’s first woman president go well
beyond her email fiasco and Wikileaks. Most
Democrats were pretty ho-hum about the information regarding Hitlery's personal
email fiasco and pretty much ignored the Wikileaks releases. Those ‘issues’ likely did more damage to her
with undecideds and Independents. She
lost because of a combination of things, the not least of which was that a
rather substantial number of voters saw simply her as being so corrupt. And then there was the fact that she always
appeared to be so angry. And then too
there was that whole “deplorables” thing which kind of went over like the
proverbial turd in a punchbowl.
The very simple fact is that Hitlery lost because
she ignored the rust belt blue collar workers, and lost those states which are
typically pretty easy wins for Democrats.
And now instead of accepting the fact that Hitlery simply blew it, and
blew it rather badly, her many minions have spent much of the past year ignoring
the needs of the American people while trying to do nothing more than to get President
Trump impeached. And I wouldn’t doubt
that they likely have some absurd fantasy about getting Hitlery enthroned in
what they view as being her rightful place.
What about that makes any sense?
It’s not like she’s the first Democrat to ever lose an election,
although she is the first candidate of either party to have blown one so badly.
And you would think that the simple fact that President
Trump won 2,623 counties and Hitlery won only 493 counties would have at least some
impact on claims of illegitimacy such as Ms. Brazile’s. After all, that’s well over 5 to 1. What took place was nothing more than a
regular electoral landslide, albeit of epic proportions, considering that
candidate Trump had never before been a candidate for public office. But he understood how to win according to the
rules. Hitlery and her criminal voter
base, on the other hand, cheated with at least 5 million of her votes very
safely considered to have been fraudulent. And when taking that into account, it was President
Trump who won the popular vote as well, when those votes are discounted.
And if Ms. Brazile wants to be talking about the
topic of illegitimacy, then we will most certainly have to start with Hitlery’s
illegitimate acquisition of the Democrat nominating process at the expense of
Bernie Sanders and his supporters. Ms. Brazile
herself was complicit in that operation and has even written an entire book on
how Hitlery essentially bought the DNC and therefore the nomination. Why should anyone with half a brain give credence
to anything she has to say after the fact about how President Trump's victory
is somehow not legitimate? What is there
about the general election that would make it less than a legitimate election? It would seem to me that all of the
shenanigans took place during the Democrat primary elections.
It was the Democrats, including Ms. Brazile, who cheated
by rigging the debates, by rigging the primary, and who had 99 percent of
state-controlled media supporting Hitlery and yet she still managed to lose. And let’s face it, the Democrats would have worked
to rig the general election as well if they had actually thought that candidate
Trump had had a snowballs chance in Hell of becoming President Trump. After all, they had the FBI, the DOJ as well
as the media in their corner, in other words pretty much the same trifecta
Hitler had. They used the IRS to destroy
their opposition. These people need to be eliminated from politics and the DOJ
has more than enough evidence to investigate and prosecute some of this
collusion and sedition.
So, illegitimate and deserving of an asterisk? Hardly! And what might Ms. Brazile be smokin’, snortin’ or shootin’ up in order to make such an idiotic claim? What is it about this last election that prevents Democrats from coming to grips with the fact that they lost and accepting what the real reason was behind that loss? And it had nothing whatsoever to with the Russians or anything else. The primary reason the Democrats lost this election was because of just one thing, and that is who it was that they chose to run as their candidate. Yes, Ms. Brazile, it really is just that simple. Had there been nearly any other candidate on the Democrat side, Donald J. Trump would very likely be sitting in Trump Tower today and not the Oval Office.
No comments:
Post a Comment