JAMES CLYBURN, WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A RACIST…

There are racists, and then there are racists.  And then there are men like James Clyburn, a Democrat member of the U.S. House, who was first elected in 1992.  Men who espouse some of the most vile, bigoted and disgusting views imaginable, about those whose only ‘crime’ is that they happen to have been born white.  And men who are still able to be re-elected because they possess that one most important ‘quality’ when it comes to being elected by their devoted black constituents.  The fact that they are black.  Of course, that only seems to work for black Democrats.

Now I’m pretty sure most have heard by now how it was that our esteemed Mr. Clyburn recently came rushing to the defense of his fellow member of Congress, a man described by Nancy Pelosi as being an icon, John Conyers.  Mr. Conyers has been accused of committing what can best be described as behavior that is, to say the least, rather improper toward several women that he came into close contact with.  And apparently the issue that Clyburn has with those accusations is not the behavior that was exhibited by Mr. Conyers, but the skin color of his accusers.  

Clyburn actually went so far as to compare Congressman Conyers’ accusers to child murderer Susan Smith, who falsely claimed a black man had abducted her kids.  Clyburn argued that these accusations of sexual misconduct may not be credible because all of the accusations come from white women.  It was Robert Draper, a writer for the New York Times, who suggested on Wednesday of this week that the allegations of sexual assault towards Conyers are not legitimate and they mirror those of Susan Smith’s, who first falsely claimed that a black man abducted her kids.

Draper tweeted, “Also at this morning’s House Democratic caucus: James Clyburn compared Conyers’ accusers to the child murderer Susan Smith, who initially claimed a black man had abducted her kids. Clyburn said, these are all white women who’ve made these charges against Conyers.”  Thus far two separate women have accused Conyers of making unwanted sexual advances towards them.  Conyers admitted last week to reaching a $27,000 settlement with a former congressional staffer in 2015. However, the congressman denied allegations of sexual harassment.

And of course Clyburn’s office was quick to deny allegations that he had used the Susan Smith metaphor, while Draper suggests that multiple sources have told him that Clyburn used the reference on several occasions.  And Cedric Richmond, member of that unique little cadre of racists, the Congressional Black Caucus, tweeted, “This is not accurate. @Clyburn used the Smith example to illustrate the dangers of convicting people before getting all the facts. Although Smith killed her kids, she blamed an innocent person & a lot of people believed that innocent person was guilty.”

Let’s face it, Clyburn has long been little more than a racist pig who slams the White population and continues to ignore the real problems in the Black community.  Young black men between the ages of 14 and 34 make up 3.3% of the population yet commit 50% of the violent crimes while 70% of the births are to single black women.  It is not Whites that are the problem.  It’s the Black community which continues to do so much harm to themselves and to the nation.  And it’s sad that so many blacks are unable to see that they’re simply being taken advantage of by men like Clyburn.

And Conyers is obviously a guy who seems to like more than a little cream in his coffee. Women with a white problem should just declare themselves black, end of problem.  It's the new rage and it's being introduced in universities and other places around the country. If Conyers is trying to use this as a defense I think it's great.  It serves as the perfect example of how the left doesn't really care about women.  Especially those women who voted for President Trump and were mostly white, and who were excoriated for not voting for the liberal who, in this case, was female.

White liberals, with backup coming from racist scumbags like Clyburn, have managed to convince blacks that they were the only people ever to suffer the indignity of slavery. Which is a lie.  Blacks didn’t build the pyramids!  And how about all those castle's in Europe, or that big wall in China?   They were ALL built courtesy of slave labor.  Yet blacks are encouraged, by white liberals and black racists, to use slavery as THE excuse for their own inability to fix their own lives.  Black families used to stick together.  Raise their children.  And it was then that a Democrat came along.  

These days you’d be hard-pressed to find an intact black family in any inner city.  Who yo' baby Daddy?  That’s how they talk, and how they vote.  And what’s really starting to piss me off is how by simply being white I’m seen as a fool, a liar, a racist and not trustworthy.  When in truth it’s a vast majority of blacks who are racist and basically untrustworthy.  I did not own slaves and I am not responsible for their pathetic life that always seems to be blamed on whites.  Whites are not shooting blacks Chicago/Baltimore at the rate of 600, or more, per year.  Other blacks are!

And it is also not my fault that so many blacks end up in prison, since it is they who choose to do the crime and therefore it’s their fault that they’re made to do the time.  And I did not decide to have babies that I had no way of being able to support nor do I ask my government to support me and/or my children.  My life, and the lives of my family, matters just as much as someone who is black and maybe more because I actually respect the country in which I live and those who fought for that freedom including all those white folks who fought in the Civil War to end slavery.

And if I happen to get shot by a police officer, regardless of his or her color, it will be because I’m in the process of breaking the law not because I’m white, ditto with those blacks who have been shot by the police. The fact that they were either breaking the law or resisting arrest is going to be what precipitates any confrontation which results in them being on the receiving end of a bullet.  I am white and have no desire to be black.  Although, I must admit that there have been times when I’ve threatened to come back black in my nest life because there are some benefits.

I mean, it’s from racist boobs like Clyburn that we’re always hearing about something that blacks call ‘white privilege’.  But it’s not whites who can come out of high school with crappy grades and still get into a good college because of quotas that favor blacks.  And it’s not whites who are difficult to fire from a job because their employer fears being called a racist.  And it’s certainly not whites who can garner for themselves a high paying job regardless of their lack of qualifications, because they’re white.  White privilege?  Hardly!  That’s black privilege, plain and simple!

HERE COME DA JUDGE???

Now while I am about as far removed from being a political strategist as you can get, it would seem to me that maybe old Mitch McConnell and his posse of ‘Establishment’ types might have been just a bit too eager to pull the trigger in their effort to sabotage Judge Roy Moore as he seeks to become the next Senator from the great state of Alabama.  They have thrown everything they could, including the kitchen sink, at him.  And their last ditch effort is to have some retired Marine Colonel casting himself as a write-in candidate, but that too may not be enough.

Because with the dust now finally beginning to settle it would appear that only one man will likely be left standing, and it ain’t McConnell!  And the good Colonel notwithstanding, I’m thinking that when all is said and done, it’s the Judge who will be heading off to do battle in the DC Swamp, while his Democrat opponent goes back to whatever he was doing before running for office and the Marine who had hoped to act as spoiler goes back to, sculpting.  The Judge will head to DC to give them what-for in the Senate and I'll be cheering him on every step of the way. 

So it’s now been weeks since any new accusers have managed to crawl out from under their respective rocks and despite all of their best efforts Judge Moore remains the Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Alabama.  And regardless of all the pleas made by so-called party ‘leaders’ in Washington, it would seem that barring any new trickery being tried, it could very well be Senator Moore in just another couple of weeks.  But I have no doubt that between ‘Team McConnell’ and the Democrats, we shouldn’t be too confident about a Moore victory just yet.

But that said, as of now, what’s left of the remaining ‘allegations’ concern entirely legal behavior: an older, single man dating young women ‘above’ the age of consent.   Moore’s many opponents in the state-controlled media treat those relationships as if they were somehow morally revolting and politically disqualifying.  The hypocrisy of that position becomes all the more apparent when compared with how those in the media treat a figure possessing a different political affiliation who is ‘guilty’ of having done the very same thing.  But then that’s just how they operate.  

The only reason we’re even still talking about that issue is because the Washington Post embellished its original story on Moore, in which he was accused of molesting a 14-year-old four decades ago, both to entice the first alleged victim to come forward and to create the impression of a pattern of predatory behavior for which there is no evidence.  The rest of the mainstream media soon followed suit, with the ‘Crappy News Network’ (CNN) assuming the lead in what turned out to be little more than a continuing attempt to sabotage Judge Moore’s candidacy.  

And then there was the New Yorker story claiming that the Judge had once been kicked out of a mall for hitting on young women.  That story too was later debunked, though it’s evidently still widely believed by many of the kooks on the left.  The stories about Moore dating young women are what lawyers call “character” evidence, and it is inadmissible in court, and for good reason.  Whatever accusations there are that remain against Moore continue to unravel despite the best efforts of those seeking to keep those accusations alive and in the headlines.

Another thing which it has been said might be working in Judge Moore’s favor is the fact that there are still many voters in Alabama who are able to remember the 1998 election, when a Republican running for lieutenant governor, Steve Windom, was falsely accused of sexual misconduct. That may be one reason why Moore is leading in new polls.  The other reason is that voters resent being shamed into submission by those they view as being the political and media elite.  Those would be the very same elites who view those folks in Alabama as being little more than rubes.  

IS POOR ‘LITTLE JAKE’ TAPPER FEELING PICKED ON???

I think we all know, or at least we should if we’ve been paying attention, how it is that President Trump feels about CNN, the network known to many of us as the ‘Crappy News Network’.  And recognizing the network as we all do, as being one of the primary purveyors of ‘fake news, the president’s opinion of both the network and those currently employed by it, should come as no surprise.  But a couple of the president’s more recent Tweets concerning his rather low opinion of the network apparently struck a nerve among some of those who work there.

Because it was during Monday’s episode of CNN’s “The Lead” that host Jake Tapper criticized President Donald Trump for his recent tweets about Jake’s network.  You see, it was over that last few days that the president had Tweeted, “Fox News is MUCH more important in the United States than CNN, but outside of the U.S., CNN International is still a major source of (Fake) news, and they represent our Nation to the WORLD very poorly. The outside world does not see the truth from them!”  Jake apparently disagreed with that portrayal.

And then what seems to have nudged Jake a little closer to the edge was when, just a few days later, the president Tweeted, “We should have a contest as to which of the Networks, plus CNN and not including Fox, is the most dishonest, corrupt and/or distorted in its political coverage of your favorite President (me). They are all bad. Winner to receive the FAKE NEWS TROPHY!”  Personally, I tend to agree with the president’s assessment of things when it comes to those who seem to take such great pleasure in spreading what they know is bogus information.

And as expected, Jake seemed to take exception to the president’s tweets saying, “That is false. The amazing journalists at CNN International bring the truth to the world. They’re carrying out important, rare and often dangerous work. They have been for decades.”  Now while I mean to offense to Jake, there are few, if any, who work for this supposed ‘news’ network who can be accurately identified as being bona fide journalists.  And sadly it’s nearly to a person that there is very little interest in presenting anything that is not ‘fake news.’

And it was after going on to detail developments regarding Michael Flynn that Jake continued his rant by saying, “Now, that I’m I am sharing these facts with you, facts the president does not care for might explain why he seeks to discredit CNN and all media organizations who report on him without fear or favor, “The Washington Post,” “the New York Times.” The president does not care for us reporting these facts and seems that he does not want you to believe these facts.”  Let’s be real, if there are two things that do not go together, it’s CNN and ‘facts.’

Anyway, it was then that the Jakester went on to say, “The president said he wanted to give an award based on which network is the most, quote, dishonest, corrupt, and/or distorted, but his problems with journalism seem to be rooted in the exact opposite. He hates that which is honest and ethical and precise. Ask yourself, why might that be.”  I guess what I found most amazing about Jake’s idiotic little tantrum was the fact that he was actually serious, and also that he was able to make it all the way through it without so much as cracking a smile.

And I gotta say, Jake truly does deserve a big pat on the back from all of his colleagues there at the old ‘fake news’ network for his effort to defend his stellar organization against that mean, old President Trump.  But let’s face it, the fact that Jake was able to lie so convincingly should be seen as a little worrisome, because if he can lie that convincingly when talking about a network that truly is little more than a spewer of endless leftist propaganda, then what else might he also be lying to us about, and just as convincingly?  It makes you wonder.  

But look folks, this is far from being rocket science.  Jake is on what has become a long list of hundreds in the state-controlled media who openly advocate for wide open borders, unlimited and illegal immigration, and for every other leftist cause that’s out there.  He’s a puppet on a string willing to say exactly what Jeff Zucker pays him to say in order to protect the DC Swamp from the president.  And were it not for the efforts of the media clones like Jake, to protect members of the ‘The Swamp,’ it could likely be successfully drained in a single election cycle.

And I must admit that I do find it rather humorous that a CNN talking head feel justified in lecturing me on the subject of “honesty.”  That takes some weapons grade chutzpah if you ask me.  Propaganda is all well and good when it’s used to harass, and to indict, Trump’s campaign staff.  CNN once ruled the cable news, then they chose to pick sides, and very obviously so, by adding a significantly liberal bias to everything they did.  And it was the kiss of death.  Look at them now with not a single credible ‘journalist’ among them, and yet they wonder what happened.

But you know, they truly are some rather arrogant, and yet pretty ignorant people.  But then, doesn’t that apply to all liberals?  They’re just not the brightest bulbs in the box. And it’s President Trump, unlike most Republican presidents who have come before him, who is willing to call them out on what they report when it is nothing more than fake news.  He’s the first one in a very long time who’s not afraid to push back when he gets pushed.  And morons like Jake aren’t used that.  Which makes them angry, which in turn makes them whine.  And nobody likes a whiner. 

THE RINO SABOTEURS CONTINUE THEIR ASSAULT AGAINST JUDGE MOORE…

What is it about our current cadre of congressional RINOs that has them so afraid of one guy down in Alabama?  Because even as the accusations being made against Judge Moore continue to unravel, it would seem that the number of RINOs who have become increasingly fearful of a Moore victory, and therefore more determined than ever in their effort to convince the Judge that he needs to step aside not only for the good of the party, but the good of the country, continues to grow.  And yet, we hear nary a word about the Democrat of whom we have pictures while groping a sleeping female.  Our RINOs seem to have no problem with the true perverts among them.    

And again just this past weekend it was RINO John Thune, Senator from South Dakota, appearing on “Fox News Sunday,” who said he would like to see President Trump ask Alabama GOP Senate hopeful Roy Moore to step aside.  Thune said, “I would like to see the president come out and support what many of us have said and that is that Roy Moore needs to step aside, allow somebody else to be write in candidate. We can win that seat.”  He continued, “If Roy Moore wins and he comes into the Senate in January there will immediately be an ethics investigation which is going to be a cloud that he will be operating in. It’s going to be a distraction to us and our agenda.”

Meanwhile, also on Sunday, it was during an appearance on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” that Thune’s fellow RINO, and a guy who’s just as much of a Moore opponent as is Thune, Sen. Rob Portman, from Ohio, said it “would be better for the country” if Alabama GOP Senate hopeful Roy Moore stepped aside.  Better for the country?  And it was the host of this ‘fake news’ show, the esteemed bonehead Chuck Todd, who proceeded to ask Portman, “Do you agree with the president that it is better if Alabamians elect someone accused of being a child molester over a democratic simply due to ideology?”  Nope, no bias here, let’s just move along to the lynching.  

Portman responded, “Well, I stand with what I said earlier which is I think it would be best if he stepped aside. I think the president said that initially. I think that would be better for the country. The election is in a few weeks and there is a possibility for folks to do write in candidates. We will see. I think it would be best if he stepped aside.”  Todd asked, “If you were a voter in Alabama what would you do? Jeff Flake said he would vote Democrat if Roy Moore was the only other option?  And Portman agreed with his fellow RINO soon to be ex-Senator Jeff Flake, saying, “I would probably vote for a Republican but it wouldn’t be Roy Moore.” 

And it was then that Todd went on to ask, “You would cast that vote knowing it probably throws the election, the more Republicans that split their vote. You are okay if a Democrat gets elected as long as it is not Roy Moore?”  And Portman said, “As you know I endorsed Luther Strange. He is my colleague now. I never endorsed Roy Moore. When the allegations came out I did say as the women went on the record I thought there was a lot of credibility in what they were saying and I didn’t find the response very credible. And that’s how I came up with my position.”  I smell fear coming from the RINO's because they know ‘Senator’ Moore represents a serious threat to them.

Yet rumor now has it that this next election will result in what is already being described by some as a tidal wave of Democrat gains.  And if that truly does turn out to be the case, then I can only assume that the American voter is a dumber breed than even I thought.  What the game plan should be, and what it truly needs to be, is to make 2018 the year when we finally make RINOs extinct.  And certainly not by electing Democrats!  Our primary focus needs to be on wiping out Rinosaurs like Corker, Flake, and any other who doesn't want to be embarrassed by getting defeated in a primary.  We MUST NEVER again elect another RINO or Democrat to higher office!

Because when you vote for a RINO you might as well be voting for a Democrat.  And that’s exactly why we need to primary every single RINO we can.  We need to gut the McConnell forces that seek nothing more than to drag our country to the left, albeit at a slower pace than the Democrats.  The sooner all of the McConnell supporters are voted out, the sooner we can get a real leader in charge, one whose priorities match up much better with the priorities of the American people.  Every RINO, regardless of whether they are in the House or the Senate, needs to be targeted for defeat until we are finally able to make sure that the entire species is made to be forever extinct.

Do nothing professional politicians in the Republican Senate like Thune and Portman are fearful that a man of principle, like Judge Moore, might be crashing into their exclusive little club.  The wretched RINOs squandered landslide Republican victories with their timid hearts and lack of spine.  Thune, McConnell, and the untrustworthy establishment have done great damage to America.  What’s always amazing is that once these tools as elected they immediately become experts. You name it and they’re an expert and they always know better about how you should think.  I wish they would all have a shelf life of one term and then automatically become extinct.

Democrats always love to put forward the claim that they are guardians of middle class Americans and yet the only ones they seem to go out of their way for are those who wish to come to this country illegally and once here seek to stay here, or those who can’t decide what gender they want to be.  When you vote Democrat you vote for the end of our Constitution.  But no big deal, right?  It only happens to be the one document that separates America from every other country on the planet in that it actually guarantees to us those certain unalienable Rights endowed upon us by our Creator.  Something never before achieved throughout the history of mankind.

And now we’re hearing about what I can only assume is yet another last ditch attempt to sabotage Judge Moore and to hand the Alabama election to ultra-liberal, Doug Jones.  And it comes to us in the person of retired Marine Col. Lee Busby, who told The Daily Beast, “I just don’t believe that either one of them are qualified to be in the U.S. Senate.”  He cites the sexual allegations against Moore as having “created enough distaste in my mind” to rule out support for the Republican nominee.  And he lists Democrat candidate Jones’ extreme abortion positions as disqualifying for Alabama voters.  Yet oddly enough, he does admit to attending a fundraiser for Jones.

Apparently, since retiring, Busby has been the CEO of his own business and worked as a defense consultant and investment banker.  And besides attending a Jones fundraiser, he also voted for Ohio governor, and vocal NeverTrumper, John Kasich in 2016.  If there is one thing that’s 100% guaranteed in this scenario, it’s that McConnell is behind the Colonel’s entering the race.  The RINOs depend on Moore’s not being elected, and McConnell will do whatever is necessary, including the election of a Democrat, to make certain that Moore loses.  And all I can say is that if you are an Alabama voter, please don’t fall for this crap!  Because they’re thinking that you will.

Lastly, the good Colonel notwithstanding, in my opinion there’s no need for the Judge to step aside, because from what I have seen there is not one iota of evidence that he has done anything wrong.  All we have heard are nothing more than unsubstantiated rumors and innuendo started by a rag of newspaper.  Meanwhile, there is plenty of evidence that Judge Moore is a decent, honorable man and a perfect gentleman.  He will be a splendid Senator who will represent the interests of the people of Alabama.  The question is why are Republicans, like Thune and Portman, to name just a couple, so anxious to hand over this longtime Republican seat to an ultra-liberal Democrat?

ACCORDING TO MARTY O’MALLEY, OBAMA GOES FROM HERO TO ZERO…

You know, I seem to recall how, just a few years back, there was a rather substantial number of Democrats who were so euphoric when it came to the election of the first black president that they very confidently announced that his election was something so special that with it would come 40 years of solid Democrat rule all across America.  Even the candidate himself had rather boldly proclaimed to anyone who would listen that ‘He’ was the ‘One’ for whom we had all been waiting, and if the American people saw fit to elect him they would be ushering in what he described as being a “fundamental transformation” of the United States of America. 

Well, thankfully, that much ballyhooed claim about 40 years of Democrat rule fell just a bit short, by about 38 years, when it was just two years later that the Republicans were handed control of the U.S. House.  Not that they chose to do all that much with their new found power.  But if nothing else it did seem to start a chain reaction, of sorts, as all across the country as the Democrat Party was tossed out of a number of governors’ mansions, lost a rather impressive number of state legislature seats, as well as more than a few U.S. House and Senate seats and finally in 2016, even the presidency.  All in a span of eight years starting with the election of the ‘One’.  

All of which brings to this past Wednesday and ABC’s “Powerhouse Politics” podcast during which 2016 Democrat presidential candidate and ex-Maryland governor Marty O’Malley made the rather unusually honest statement regarding how it was that ex-president Barry Obummer’s decision to set up ‘Organizing for America’ rather than “infusing” his energy into the Democrat Party devastated the party on state and local levels like a “bad forest fire.”  And while I think blaming most, if not all, of the problems currently facing the Democrat Party on Obummer is little more than an excuse, it is also something that should come as being not much of a surprise.

It was during this same podcast that Marty said, “To put it kindly, President Obama decided to set up a separate political organization rather than infusing that energy of his candidacy and his amazing and historic victory, rather than infusing that energy into the veins of the Democratic Party and making the Democratic Party new and more energetic, instead the president and his people decided to set up a separate organization in ‘Organizing for America.’  I guess the president, perhaps and his people, thought their roles in history was to transform us, allow all of us to transcend beyond the need for political parties. ”

He continued, “So when the Republicans and their small group of very wealthy donors, who are not afraid to write big checks, saw what was happening, they immediately filled that vacuum. And in a very methodical way, fielded candidates with a whole lot of money to run for state senate, state legislators, backed candidates for governor. And they were able to wipe us out at the state level and increasingly at the local level. We’ve never gone through a period of time, at least not in modern history were the Democratic Party lost so many seats and so many governors offices even as our president was a Democratic.”

And Marty went on to say, “That was a mistake that we made. We have to learn from that mistake. And I believe what is happening now is the party is regenerating itself, almost like after a bad forest fire.”  Now granted the Democrats did recently win a couple of governorships, in New Jersey and Virginia, but those were in two states where they were pretty much expected to win.  And just they did shortly after the election of Obummer, the Democrats might once again be feeling just a bit over confident.  Because, at least at this point, I doubt that these two victories can be seen as being some sort of harbinger regarding the 2018 elections.   

But Marty is far from being someone who anyone should be listening to when it comes to what’s best for his party.  After all, he was the guy who ran the city of Baltimore into the ground as mayor, before becoming Maryland’s governor.  And it was after that, that he decided to run for president, and in the primaries couldn't even carry his home state!  We saw firsthand how the voters who knew him best wanted no part of him being their President!  He had done such a terrific job as governor that the people of Maryland elected only the ninth Republican governor in Maryland’s history to replace him.  That should tell you all you need to know about Marty.

But anyway, in getting back to Obummer, I think it’s safe to say that after his first four years many of us were able to recognize in which direction things were heading.  And why it took a full eight years for some folks to see what many of us were able to recognize much sooner, well, that’s something you’ll have to ask those who thought voting for Obummer once just wasn’t enough.  I know Trump's message was different but in 2012 there was a choice that would have allowed for at least a “slightly” different direction than to continue down the very SAME path for another four years.  But unfortunately it was another opportunity missed.

Missed because Romney was weak and, as it turned out, someone who was nothing more than another political creature of ‘The Swamp’.  To this day I feel that he could have beat Obummer, but he was just too worried about bringing up those issues he needed to in order to win.  But even at that, I did vote for him, and as disgusting as it may sound to some, I did it because I viewed him as being the definite lesser of two evils.  I knew he wasn’t the conservative I had been hoping for, but I felt that regardless of that fact, the dams would have closed a bit in 2012 rather than having them wide open during another four years of Obummer at the helm.

And I find it all to be rather amazing that all of these sore losers, like Marty, never mention all of the extremely bad legislative and policy decisions that have resulted in the Democrats, until very recently, continuing to get their asses handed to them, electorally speaking.  There’s never any mention about unpopular Obamacare, nothing about their addiction to identity politics, nothing against those Democrats who are so vocal in the supporting of any number of anti-US groups and nothing ever about what appears to a concerted effort by the Democrats to ignore white, middle class America.  Kind of what the Democrats are continuing to promote.

And I also found it interesting that Marty failed to mention the 70+ taxes that he signed into law during his tenure as governor, taxes that put a huge burden on the people of his state, such as his absurd rain tax.  Interesting too is how he failed to mention the 72,000 Marylanders who left the state during his tenure due to the punishing taxes and the absurd liberal policies that he put forward.  And he also failed to mention the fact that his Lieutenant Governor lost the bid to succeed him as governor when Marylanders picked Republican Larry Hogan, only the second Republican in nearly 50 years, primarily because of those tax and liberal policies.

But those like Marty fail to recognize that it was NEVER about money.  It has ALWAYS been about the ideology.  Democrats lost because they allowed, and even encouraged, socialists and communists to infiltrate your party in an attempt to change the very fabric of our country.  The American people were having none of it or of our Dictator-in-Chief who came into office as a man on what was nothing less than a mission to search and destroy.  And to assist him in his endeavor he had what was a proxy army, of sorts, in the form of the state-controlled media.  And it was Hitlery who had made it clear that Obummer’s mission, would be her mission as well.

Democrats attack our economy, our police officers, our schools, our doctors, our military and even the skin color of the majority of Americans.  And then they presented Hitlery as being their candidate for president.  Hitlery's ideology is not America first, it’s “Me First.”  Hitlery, she who has committed every crime known to mankind and is still allowed to walk free.  I just wish more folks would come to see the Democrat Party as something worthy of nothing more than to be relegated to the ash heap of political relevancy, if for no other reason than because of its near total lack of morality and a level of degeneracy seldom seen.  But I doubt many will. 

WHATEVER THE REASON, I’M JUST THANKFUL HITLERY LOST…

So here we are more than a year after our last presidential election and still Hitlery seems to be still in search of a reason on which she can hang her humiliating defeat.  To the point where she is now pointing a rather boney finger at, where else but, the eight years of former ex-president Obummer as the reason she couldn’t campaign on an “agenda of change” and conceivably win the 2016 election.  This despite the fact that Obummer actively campaigned for her throughout the 2016 campaign.

It was during an interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt earlier this week that Hitlery bemoaned being seen as an extension of the Obummer years.  Hitlery told Hewitt, “It is true that when you run to succeed a two-term president of your own party, you have a historical headwind blowing against you.”  And she went on to say, “It’s not just this campaign can be set apart from everything that’s ever happened in our politics. It is a challenge.”    

And Hitlery also suggested her campaign suffered from mixed messaging.  She said, “If you are both the candidate defending a lot of the areas of agreement, but also putting forth an agenda for change, which is what I tried to do, it is often difficult to get the second part of that message through.”  Is that what she was trying to do?  Because while I must admit that I didn’t pay that much attention to her campaign, what I did see of it, there were few, if any, areas where she differed from Obummer.

Not that she really wanted to distance herself from Obummer.  Hitlery said, “I was proud to serve in the Obama administration. I did not agree with everything that President Obama decided, but on balance, I really think he did what had to be done to rescue the economy, which as we all remember, was in desperate straits.”  People heard this coming from her and looked back at eight years of anemic economic growth and an $10 Trillion increase in the national debt and said no way, no Hitlery.

Despite her misgivings about messaging, Hitlery says she continues to have a “high regard for the campaign that we put together, and all of the people who were working in it so hard.”  Hitlery continued to differentiate her campaign from that of Donald Trump, whom she described as “the first reality TV candidate,” while she insisted she was “for better or worse, the candidate of reality.”  Ok, but whose reality?  Hitlery was set to continue policies that had been proven not to work.

And it was during the same interview that Hitlery said she was “very much worried by the actions and rhetoric” of President Donald Trump.  She said, “I don’t have any personal stake in this presidency. I have a citizen’s stake. I have a concerned person’s stake. And I am, as you might guess, very much worried by the actions and rhetoric of our current president. And so I was cordial with him before we ran against each other. He supported me when I ran for the Senate in New York.”

She said, “And then he began to traffic in all kinds of conspiracies like the birther conspiracy, and you know, then making all kinds of outrageous and untrue attacks on immigrants and others, and really being an equal opportunity insulter. I really did hope, and as I said in my concession speech, which I talk about in the book, I said we all need to give him a chance. And we all need to support our president. We have one president at a time. And I’ve been very disappointed in the way that he has conducted himself.”  This coming from the woman married to ‘Slick Willy?”

Hewitt asked, “After this is all done, do you see becoming friendly with him again?”  And Hitlery responded by saying, “I don’t know the answer to that question, Hugh. I think that you know, his attacks on so many of the concerns that I’ve always had, I’ll give you just a quick example, I was involved in the bipartisan program called the Children’s Health Insurance Program, Ted Kennedy, Orrin Hatch, I mean real, you know, real Republican-Democratic cooperation at the end of the 90s.”

She continued by saying, “My husband signed it into law in a Republican Congress, and George W. Bush continued it. Barack Obama and a Republican Congress continued it. And it takes care of 9 million kids whose families, you know, are too well off, even though they are working families for Medicaid, and they don’t have insurance under an employer that covers the very expensive costs of caring for kids with chronic, congenital, traumatic conditions.”

And she added, “Okay, so I don’t think a word has been said by the current president, and certainly the Congress has failed to reauthorize it. So at the end of this year, right around Christmas, 9 million kids and their families are going to start being told they no longer have health insurance for cystic fibrosis, for diabetes, for cancer, whatever it might be. I don’t understand that, Hugh. I don’t get it. And so it’s not just personal with, you know, threats against me and all that stuff that goes on.”

And she concluded by saying, “It’s really a values issue for me, because you know, I do think we’re put on this Earth in large measure to try to help take care of each other. And we can do that in smart ways, and I’ve always tried to be on the smart side of that. But you know, to walk away from caring for kids, I just don’t understand it.”  I hate to be the one to break it to her, but her ‘values’ are not the ‘values’ of most Americans.  And when has she ever been on the smart side of anything?

Look, Hitlery had 90% of the state-controlled media actively promoting her despite knowing what a terrible candidate she actually was.  And at the same time they were busy promoting her they were doing all that they could to tear down her opponent.  And add to that the fact that Hitlery, quite literally, had all of Hollyweird in her corner as well.  And she also had most of academia in her corner, we now know that she literally owned the DNC, and still, even with all that she couldn’t win. 

And it wasn’t because she was a woman. It was because the majority of those who actually vote in election didn’t believe her to be trustworthy and she confirmed their distrust by keeping a private email server and lying about it.  She lost because she called 50% of the voting public “deplorable.”  She lost because she’s a hypocrite, championing women’s rights and then trashing/threatening the women your husband harassed and abused. You lost because her political positions shift with the wind.

But most of all, she lost because, while Donald Trump was talking about the economy and jobs, all she was talking about was Donald Trump.  And as we saw, a “He’s worse than me” strategy wasn’t really an effective campaign strategy.  If it had been it would now be President Hitlery and not President Trump.  Anyone who happened to catch any of her campaign speeches knew long before the election, regardless of what all the polls were supposedly telling us, that Hitlery was toast.  

But I suppose, to a limited extent, hers is a legitimate complaint.  The biggest part of Obummer’s legacy is the election of Donald Trump.  It was Obummer, as much as it was Hitlery, that the voters were voting against.  Future elections may see a recurring pattern of “We will Vote for: No Democrats, No Liberals, No East-Coast Snobs, No Left-Coast Marxists.”  Eight years of Obummer taught many Americans some serious lessons about Progressivism.  Hence Democrat desire to keep our borders open.

It was about her loss that Hitlery said, “Hack, hack, what difference, at this point, does it make?  I’ve been suffering from PTSD ever since the snipers were shooting at me as I disembarked the helicopter, I am not able to handle the various technological devices I have, I misplaced my server, when I found it I needed to wipe it, like with a cloth.  And I’ve had to deal with so many bimbo eruptions I could puke!  This is all part of the vast, right wing conspiracy and it’s not my fault, hack, wheeze, I lost!”

And remember it was Hitlery who did her college thesis on her hero Saul Alinsky. For those of you who have never heard of Alinsky, he wrote "Rules for Radicals". It’s a ‘how to’ for anarchists that gives them ‘rules’ that will aid them in overthrowing the USA.  Alinsky was a socialist who wanted to undermine and overthrow America in order to fundamentally transform America's capitalist order and change it to communism.  Hitlery’s entire ‘career’ has been based on the overthrow of America.

DEMOCRATS CONTINUE TO REMAIN STUCK IN 2016…

What is it about the 2016 election that has Democrats so stubbornly unable to move on?  After all, it was they who chose to rig their own primary process to virtually guarantee that their worst possible candidate would ‘win’ the nomination.  And then to add insult to injury their most favored candidate then went on to run what can only be described as being the worst campaign in modern political history.  And yet it was on this past Tuesday’s episode of MSNBC’s “Hardball,” that former Democratic National Committee chairwoman Donna Brazile had the nerve to claim that President Donald Trump’s victory over Hitlery in the 2016 presidential election was not legitimate.  Not legitimate?  How is it that one can come to such a conclusion?

And it was during this very same interview that Ms. Brazile would go on to say, “My personal view is that it was not a legitimate election.”  And she continued by saying, “Remember, I was the campaign manager of Al Gore in 2000, where, as you well know, the Supreme Court decided. This election will always have an asterisk by it. And that’s why I think Donald Trump should take steps as president to clean up our system so that no more foreign governments, no foreign meddling can occur in the future.”  I must admit that I am a bit curious about how it is that Ms. Brazile is able to make the claim that President Trump’s victory is in any way illegitimate.  It worked perfectly.  Trump won the most Electoral College votes, and Hitlery didn’t.

And Ms. Brazile went on to add, “I have worked on more campaigns than many Americans and I can tell you something when you see all of the evidence that is mounting of how the Russians interfered in our election which is why I wrote the booked “Hacked,” when you see on social media with what they did on social media with Facebook and Twitter…We need to get to the bottom of it.” You know, it's kind of bizarre, really, how Brazile can say that Trump's election is “illegitimate” when she's the one who admitted to cheating for Hitlery during the election.  I guess I would only like to ask her, out of all those campaigns that she claims to have worked on, during how many of them did she cheat?  I think that’s a reasonable question.

But personally, I can’t help but think that’s her story and she’s simply sticking to it.  I mean she really has no alternative.  But to be honest, if we’re talking about an election that does truly deserve an asterisk, I’m thinking it would be the 1992 election.  Because had it not been for Ross Perot’s third party run, ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton most certainly would never have won.  And I’m now of the opinion that Brazile has pretty much gone through whatever credibility she may have once had and is no longer in a position to judge anyone.  She lied about giving debate questions to Hitlery, before admitting that she did, before lying again.  And it was then that she lost all credibility.  She’s has become a voice that’s no longer relevant in politics.

The list of those things that caused Hitlery to lose her second attempt at becoming the nation’s first woman president go well beyond her email fiasco and Wikileaks.  Most Democrats were pretty ho-hum about the information regarding Hitlery's personal email fiasco and pretty much ignored the Wikileaks releases.  Those ‘issues’ likely did more damage to her with undecideds and Independents.  She lost because of a combination of things, the not least of which was that a rather substantial number of voters saw simply her as being so corrupt.  And then there was the fact that she always appeared to be so angry.  And then too there was that whole “deplorables” thing which kind of went over like the proverbial turd in a punchbowl. 

The very simple fact is that Hitlery lost because she ignored the rust belt blue collar workers, and lost those states which are typically pretty easy wins for Democrats.  And now instead of accepting the fact that Hitlery simply blew it, and blew it rather badly, her many minions have spent much of the past year ignoring the needs of the American people while trying to do nothing more than to get President Trump impeached.  And I wouldn’t doubt that they likely have some absurd fantasy about getting Hitlery enthroned in what they view as being her rightful place.  What about that makes any sense?  It’s not like she’s the first Democrat to ever lose an election, although she is the first candidate of either party to have blown one so badly.

And you would think that the simple fact that President Trump won 2,623 counties and Hitlery won only 493 counties would have at least some impact on claims of illegitimacy such as Ms. Brazile’s.  After all, that’s well over 5 to 1.  What took place was nothing more than a regular electoral landslide, albeit of epic proportions, considering that candidate Trump had never before been a candidate for public office.  But he understood how to win according to the rules.  Hitlery and her criminal voter base, on the other hand, cheated with at least 5 million of her votes very safely considered to have been fraudulent.  And when taking that into account, it was President Trump who won the popular vote as well, when those votes are discounted. 

And if Ms. Brazile wants to be talking about the topic of illegitimacy, then we will most certainly have to start with Hitlery’s illegitimate acquisition of the Democrat nominating process at the expense of Bernie Sanders and his supporters.  Ms. Brazile herself was complicit in that operation and has even written an entire book on how Hitlery essentially bought the DNC and therefore the nomination.  Why should anyone with half a brain give credence to anything she has to say after the fact about how President Trump's victory is somehow not legitimate?  What is there about the general election that would make it less than a legitimate election?  It would seem to me that all of the shenanigans took place during the Democrat primary elections. 

It was the Democrats, including Ms. Brazile, who cheated by rigging the debates, by rigging the primary, and who had 99 percent of state-controlled media supporting Hitlery and yet she still managed to lose.  And let’s face it, the Democrats would have worked to rig the general election as well if they had actually thought that candidate Trump had had a snowballs chance in Hell of becoming President Trump.  After all, they had the FBI, the DOJ as well as the media in their corner, in other words pretty much the same trifecta Hitler had.  They used the IRS to destroy their opposition. These people need to be eliminated from politics and the DOJ has more than enough evidence to investigate and prosecute some of this collusion and sedition.

So, illegitimate and deserving of an asterisk?  Hardly!  And what might Ms. Brazile be smokin’, snortin’ or shootin’ up in order to make such an idiotic claim?  What is it about this last election that prevents Democrats from coming to grips with the fact that they lost and accepting what the real reason was behind that loss?  And it had nothing whatsoever to with the Russians or anything else.  The primary reason the Democrats lost this election was because of just one thing, and that is who it was that they chose to run as their candidate.  Yes, Ms. Brazile, it really is just that simple.  Had there been nearly any other candidate on the Democrat side, Donald J. Trump would very likely be sitting in Trump Tower today and not the Oval Office.

JUDGE MOORE, GOING IT ALONE AND WINNING…

I can’t help but think that the Republican Party might just have done Judge Moore a pretty sizable favor when they made to decision to cut off any and all funding they had been providing to his campaign because of these sex bogus charges.  Because it’s according to Birmingham, AL’s ABC affiliate WBMA, and the channel’s political reporter Lauren Walsh, that the Republican Senate hopeful has had a pretty significant jump fundraising since allegations first surfaced accusing him of inappropriate behavior and sexual misconduct earlier this month.

Judge Moore’s campaign chair Rich Hobson told Ms. Walsh that his campaign “raised more than $1 million in the last 10 days since the falsehoods came out.”  He went on to say, “And that’s without the support of the RNC.”  And he added, “We continue to ask for prayers and support to get us to the finish line on December 12 when the citizens of Alabama will elect Judge Roy Moore as their next U.S. Senator.”  Moore and Jones face off early next month in the special election for the seat formerly held by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

What this contest really needs to be about who is for open borders and mass amnesty and who is for securing our border, ending chain migration and enforcing existing immigration laws.  Period!  End of story!  Everything else is pretty much meaningless.  We should be using California as our canary in the coal mine.  We cannot let rapid and illegal importation of immigrants alter our demographics any more than they already have.  The Democrats are mining for voters in their quest for single party rule.  And we need to work to stop it now before it’s too late.

And it doesn’t help that those elected under the Republican banner have done nothing of what they promised us, effectively making the party appear to many as rather toxic.  And now with this obvious attempt to sabotage the Moore campaign, despite the fact that it continued to come apart at the seams, has only made matters worse.  It would seem that the RINOs would rather hand the Democrats a victory than to have Moore win.  They seem to favor Obamacare, Illegal alien invasions, abortion, destruction of our industrial and economic base.

And I gotta tell ya, it’s only by electing Judge Moore, and people of a similar mind, that we will have any hope of being able to yank control of the party away from the RINO Establishment.  There must be a vert stark difference between our political parties, something that does not now exist.  Then and only then will we be able to act as the antidote, so to speak, to Democrat treachery, sedition, and treason.  ‘The Swamp’ knows that if Moore gets in it truly is the beginning of the end.  They have shown they will everything they can to prevent that.

These ‘Establishment’ types have thrown everything but the kitchen at Judge Moore in their effort to derail his campaign.  Many see his candidacy as a bigger threat than Trump’s.  The Democrats and the RINOs hate Moore so much because he is a kind of rare political fighter that reveals their cowardice.  Moore hasn't just spoken out against liberal activist judges he has actually defied their illegal unconstitutional orders.  Even Trump hasn't gone that far.  Moore is a Vietnam vet who is not afraid of a confrontation when it is the right time to fight that war.

As for the RNC, I never donate to it.  Their treatment of Judge Moore makes very clear the contempt they have for conservatives.  It also exposes their cowardice in the face of these accusations.  Men need to take a stand if they are innocent because not all women are angels and more than a few will make false claims in order to extort money or notoriety from a prominent man.  The charges against Judge Moore continue to unravel a little more every day.  Voters in Alabama must not be fooled into allowing the Democrat in this contest to win. 

DOWN IN ALABAMA, DOUG JONES IS FEELING LIKE HE’S GOT IT ALL WRAPPED UP???

Well, it’s beginning to sound more and more like old Doug Jones, down there in Alabama, thinks that he just might have this try for a Senate gig pretty much in the bag.  Of course, if he does pull it out he’ll have his soon to be BFF Mitch McConnell to thank.  But when you’re a slimy Democrat it matters not how you go about getting one in the ‘W’ column, only that you do.  And I make that assumption only because that up until recently he’s kind kept those things which he supports, as does any good Democrat, pretty close to the vest.  You know, things like his support for abortion on demand right up to the time of delivery, or for men being able to use share the women’s restroom with our wives and daughters and well as for supporting those municipalities who violate federal law by calling themselves sanctuary cities.

And since he’s feeling a bit more comfortable these days about his chances, again thanks primarily to McConnell and cadre of RINOs, Jones has also been a bit more open about his position regarding our southern border and his willingness to leave it wide open in the hopes, I assume, of bringing in as many potential Democrat voters as possible.  He has now come out firmly against President Trump’s plan to construct a border wall along the United States-Mexico border.  It was in a statement to Fox News that Jones slammed Trump’s most prominent immigration initiative, the building of a border wall on the southern border to stem the flow of illegal immigration, Mexican cartel activity, and drug flow into the U.S.  When asked if he supported the construction of the border wall, Jones said, “No, I do not. I think it’s too expensive.”  

And it was in blasting the whole notion about the border wall that Jones continued by saying, “I don’t think we need to be spending $20 billion dollars.”  And he went on to say, “I want to put it on healthcare, I want to get tax cuts for the middle class.”  Now of course in stating all of his supposed concerns regarding the cost of the border wall he failed to make any mention about the annual cost of illegal immigration that, while benefitting multinational corporations and the wealthy, upper-class, has been a detriment to America’s working and middle-classes.  The most recent estimates by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), reveal that an illegal alien costs each American taxpayer approximately $8,075, totaling a burden of roughly $116 Billion annually.  All of which seems to be rather unimportant to Mr. Jones.

Jones likes to claim that he was not an “ultra-liberal,” a claim made by his opponent Roy Moore’s wife, Kayla.  You see, it was just last week that Mrs. Moore said of Mr. Jones:  “Our opponent—who is an ultra-liberal, who was an Obama delegate, who is for full-term abortions, who is for more gun restrictions, who is for transgender bathrooms, who is for transgender [people] in the military—is against everything we in Alabama believe and stand for.”  She puts forth a very strong argument for not voting for someone who, to put it quite simply, is nothing more than another example of what we already have far too many of in Washington, a run of the mill America hating and Constitution shredding “ultra-liberal.”  And it should be very clear why it is that there had been such a concerted effort against Judge Moore by ‘The Establishment!’

Jones has also continued to make it very clear, and on more than one occasion, that he is one of those “ultra-liberals” who believe that every right enumerated in the Bill of Rights is limited, and the Second Amendment is certainly no exception.  And it was according to the Alabama Political Reporter that Jones described himself as “a Second Amendment guy,” but stressed that some gun control is necessary.  He said, “We’ve got limitations on all constitutional amendments in one form or another.” This position is contrary to the clear language of the amendment, which states that the right to keep and bear arms “shall not be infringed.”  He stressed that he loves to hunt but still believes in “smart” gun laws.  “Smart” gun laws?  Is he like talking about the same kind of “smart” gun laws that they have worked so well in Chicago?   

And let’s not forget how it was that, during a September 24, 2017 appearance on ‘Meet the Press’, Jones said, “The biggest issue, I think, that’s facing the Second Amendment right now is that we need to make sure we shore up the National Crime Information System, the NICS system for background checks, to both keep guns out of the hands of criminals, but at the same time, cut down on error so that law-abiding citizens can get those.”  New gun control focused on background checks has been introduced by a couple of ‘The Swamp’s’ more sleazy individuals, RINO John Cornyn and Democrat Chris Murphy since Jones made that appearance on ‘Meet the Press.’  And just like Jones, it’s Democrat Chris Murphy who has himself made it quite clear that he too believes that the Second Amendment has certain ‘limitations.’ 

And we know that because it was during a May 2013 appearance on MSNBC Rachel Maddow’s ‘Lean Forward’, that our esteemed leftwing kook Mr. Murphy said, “The Second Amendment is not an absolute right, not a God-given right. It has always had conditions upon it like the First Amendment has.”  So it’s “not and absolute right, not a God-given right?”  Says who?  Another one of those “ultra-liberal” Democrats who apparently hasn’t got a clue when it comes to what the Constitution actually says?  One of those who is of the opinion that it’s those in government who know far better what best for the rest of us?  Are we really willing to allow ourselves to be convinced that it’s a good idea to elect another one of these “ultra-liberals” to Congress?  I thought the whole idea here was to drain ‘The Swamp’ not to replenish it.      

And so it’s on that note that I will continue to pray, every single day until the election, that the good people of Alabama will tell this Marxist Democrat (oops, I repeat myself) that there is no cost too high for the sovereignty of a nation, and no cost too steep to do all that we can to ensure that our sons and daughters are free from rape, murder, and all manner of the such by those that Democrats insist upon allowing into our country in unprecedented numbers.  Jones apparently desires that we have it as bad in this country as they have it in Europe, where our police warn our women to stay inside at night or risk getting raped by the invading and unchecked ‘refugees’ and immigrants.  While those in government seem determined to take from us the best way we have of defending ourselves.  That makes absolutely no sense.

I have no doubt that the Democrats, as well as more than a few RINOs, think that the people of Alabama are a bunch of uneducated, empty-headed rubes.  Doug Jones wants to deprive the people of Alabama of their Second Amendment right, he wants to kill their unborn babies, and thinks the good folks of Alabama are as dumb as a loaf of bread.  What's truly sad is that it’s this creep that the Republicans would rather have as a colleague.  I hope the good folks of Alabama are able to see through all of the garbage.  But if the people of Alabama do elect this guy, Jones, I can’t help but wonder if they will ever again be able to look into the eyes of their children or their children’s children confident in the knowledge that they did the right thing.  Because once this guy is in office it’s going to be too late!  Vote wisely, Alabama, please.

‘MAD MAXINE’ WATERS, TRULY INSPIRING…NOT!!!

There was a time, and not all that long ago really, when I thought that the dumbest boob on two legs was that less than stellar Democrat member of Congress, Sheila Jackson Lee.  And never in my wildest dreams did I ever think anyone would ever come along capable of knocking her off the pedestal upon which I had placed her.  But lo and behold, I was proven wrong, and in a pretty significant way.  And while I have known for some time that there were numerous candidates out there, male and female, to my way of thinking they all fell just a bit short when it came to actually being able to replace Ms. Lee as the most ignorant buffoon on the planet.

But the election of President Donald Trump seems to have drawn out from a rather significant number of rocks more than a few on the left eager to replace Ms. Lee.  To the point where those who once ran pretty close behind Ms. Lee, have now actually succeeded in pushing her aside for the top honor of ‘Most Ignorant.’  The new and current reigning champ is none other than ‘Mad Maxine’ Waters.  But don’t get me wrong, it wouldn’t take all that much for Lee to regain the title, in fact it was just recently that she put forth what can only be described as a rather valiant effort.  But still she managed to fall just short.  But I’m sure she’ll keep trying. 

And it was just this past Thursday that our esteemed Ms. Waters proved once again why she’s the champ when she made an appearance on Bloomberg.  It was there that she was heard to say that when she calls for President Donald Trump to be impeached, she “inspires” people.  ‘Mad Maxine’ said, “Let me just say this — I have learned over the years that I have been in this business that there are few people who are willing to speak truth to power and to talk about what really is bothering our society and our democracy. It is not thought well of to step outside of that box. When I talk about impeachment, I described what I think about this president.”

And she went on to say, “I think he is deplorable. I think he defined himself in the campaign, the way that he mocked and mimicked a disabled journalist, the way he talked about grabbing women by their private parts, the way he called names of his peers. I think that is unacceptable. For people to allow this kind of behavior to be normalized is beyond what I believe our democracy should be all about.”  She added, “I encourage people, and I inspire people, and I show people that you do not have to be intimidated. You do not have to be afraid. You do not have to be traditional. You need to step outside of the box and tell it like it is.”

And she wrapped up her little sophomoric diatribe, saying, “That is what I do everywhere I go. I say ‘Impeach 45.’ I get people knowing and understanding that perhaps he should be impeached, and focus on what he has done, the way he has defined himself, his relationship with Putin, and the belief that there has been collusion and obstruction of justice, it is all there. I will talk about it everywhere I go.”  That she is able to convince herself that such foolishness is in any way acceptable behavior for someone who has been elected to her position is disappointing.  She paints a rather sad picture of today’s Democrat Party.

To be honest, the only thing Waters inspires in anyone is, RACISM!!  Waters was elected to Congress in the year of 1990.  During her time in Congress, her family has made over a million dollars from Waters’ government connections.  Throughout Waters’ 27 years in Congress, she only managed to pass three bills: a Haiti relief bill, the renaming of a post office, and a modification of the national flood insurance program. Additionally, Waters failed to gain much popularity in Congress.  And ‘Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics’ in Washington labeled her as the most corrupt member in Congress during the years of 2005, 2006, 2009, and 2011!

And what makes her such a truly disgusting individual is the fact that it’s not courtesy of her brilliant pieces of legislation, or her encouraging our youth by extolling the virtues and opportunities provided in this great country that she ‘inspires’ people.  Far from it!  Instead, she considers it to be ‘inspiring’ by calling for the impeachment of our president who has been in office for less than a year.  And I wonder, did she approve of people speaking “truth to power” during Obummer’s presidency?  No, she said those who dared to disagree with him did so only because they were racist.  This creep is nothing but a corrupt, race-baiting, socialist!

But I gotta tell you, what she has inspired me to do is to never vote for a Democrat, something I’ve only done once in my entire life, and have regretted doing so ever since.  She is a droning, nonsensical, loudspeaker for the left, and nothing more than a gaudy makeup, bad wig wearing, bigmouthed mental case.  And what she does do is to make the case for requiring mental health exams for all politicians, especially Democrats.  Another point, the people who keep re-electing this moron also need to question their sanity.  The woman has been in office for nearly thirty years and what has she accomplished for those who vote for her? Absolutely nothing!

As a side note here, have you ever noticed the way the conservative blacks speak compared to how the majority of liberal blacks act and speak.  The conservatives actually make sense, speak good English, and present their argument intelligently. Meanwhile, the liberals tend to do little more than to scream the same talking points over and over, rarely speak so that you can understand them and dress like clowns.  And yet because blacks have become so dumbed down and are kept uninformed they tend to vote for the liberal who says I’ll keep you on welfare, and not for the conservative who says I’ll see that you get a job.  How truly inspiring.