What if after all of the hoopla, and the wringing of
hands over some supposed involvement in our last election by the evil Vlad
Putin, to the point where he who was supposed to have had no chance of winning,
actually won, there ends up being, as so many have already said, no there,
there? What then? Is there any chance that those in our
state-controlled media complex, as well as within the Democrat Party, who have been,
and very enthusiastically so, offering all manner of conspiracy theories be
held to account when they all fall apart?
While I would like to think so, I doubt many of our proud Democrats
would likely give them a pass.
Actually what is far more likely to be found out here,
if we actually have an honest investigation taking place, is just how it was
that Hitlery’s campaign team and the DNC, were far more involved in election
chicanery than was anyone onboard the ‘Trump Train.’ And am I the only one who finds it more than
a bit odd how it was that a guy in the employ of the DNC, of whom it has been
said allegedly fed a rather substantial number of emails to WikiLeaks, suddenly
winds up dead under what are some rather curious circumstances? And yet the focus of any investigation
regarding collusion remains almost entirely on the Trump campaign. But I digress.
The fact is that President Trump had barely returned
home from his first trip abroad as president, than those supposed ‘journalists’
there at the Clinton Broadcasting System (CBS) began to get very busy
suggesting how it is that he can't possibly win a long fight with the ‘fake
news’ media. It was this past Sunday
that CBS reporter Errol Barnett quizzed "Face the Nation" host Johnny
Dickerson, saying, “Trump is back to tweeting his unedited opinions this
morning, telling people among other things, ‘Many of the leaks coming from the
White House are fabricated lies coming from the fake news media.’ Are his
supporters still buying that same excuse?”
For some reason we’re simply supposed to believe
every politicized story, loaded up with all manner of anonymous Trump-trashing
government officials as being nothing less than absolute gospel. It doesn't matter that people leaking these
stories are unquestionably driven by a political agenda. Time and again, these leaked stories have
collapsed. And yet, none of that seems
to matter much to our supposed unbiased and objective ‘journalists’. These people have become so blinded by their
hatred of a duly elected president, one they had virtually guaranteed would
never be elected, they are now involved in nothing less than journalistic
malpractice.
And so it was in responding to Barnett that Johnny
Dickerson said, “His supporters that buy that line is a shrinking group. A lot
of the things he's calling and has called fake news are now things that have
either been supported by officials and members of both parties. The things he
said were fake and made up are now the subject of a special counsel
investigation. It`s hard to make the case that this is a fake set of
inquiries." So why is it that those
issues which have now become the subject of the special counsel are automatically
to be considered something other than ‘fake news’. This assigning of special counsel is all
about politics, not the facts.
So you see, this is now the kind of weird logic that
passes as rational thought these days among those on the ‘looney left’ and,
frankly, has for quite some time now. A
story is not considered as being fake if it's still being investigated. If I tell you that it’s raining and you set
out to investigate that claim and it is sunny, is our story not fake because you're
still investigating it? It's not a
question of evidence as much as it is a question of political power and
momentum. The ends must always justify the
means. From the left’s point of view, character
assassination in order to diminish and hopefully eradicate the adversary, is
always a good thing.
And then it was on the Clinton News Network's program
‘New Day’, this past Tuesday that reporter/co-host, and Fox News reject, Alisyn
Camerota asked former New Hampshire Gov. John Sununu, “Is there anything about
the Russia investigation connected to the Trump campaign that troubles
you?” Sununu said, “Yeah, the reporting
that’s taking place and the exaggeration of veniality at the suggestion – look,
it’s now seven months since the election. And to this day no one has cited a
single piece of evidence. … There is nothing there." He said, “Look, you’re asking hypotheticals
on hypotheticals." And then added,
"You have nothing.”
Camerota then said she was trying to gauge Sununu's
“comfort level” with the allegations against the Trump administration that it
somehow worked with Russian officials in some way to interfere with or
influence the 2016 presidential election.
Sununu responded by saying, “My comfort level -- the only discomfort I
have is with folks in the media trying to create a veniality without having the
courage to specifically tell me what the veniality that I should be concerned
about is. I don't have -- I have not identified a veniality. Have you?” Camerota replied that Sununu “should be concerned
if there was collusion.”
He said, "I don't see any evidence of
collusion. Do you?” It was then that
Camerota had to admit that she does not, and she said, "Nope." Sununu then replied, “Okay. So that should
end your reporting right there. You should put an exclamation point after your
‘no’.” But, of course, Camerota then
went on say that the Robert Mueller investigation has just begun, and Sununu
remarked that the FBI has been investigating for seven months, along with
recently launched congressional investigations.
Sununu then said, “Okay. Can I ask a question? If Mueller comes out and
says that my version is correct and yours isn't, how much crow are you going to
eat?”
It was then that Camerota, not known for being
particularly bright, replied, “Governor, I don't have a version of events. I
asked –.” Sununu said, “Of course you
do. The whole half hour [of CNN] I listened to is a version.” Camerota of course objected to his assertion and
made the claim that CNN is only asking questions, and Sununu remarked that no
wrongdoing, no error had been identified.
Camerota then claimed that Sununu viewed the investigation as “silly,”
and he said no, the story and investigation are “politically motivated by folks
trying to rationalize a horribly run Democratic presidential campaign.” And he’s right!
Our once ‘mainstream media’ has now become so
dishonest and so corrupt that most now see it as having morphed into what is
nothing more than a purveyor of propaganda and as our primary source of ‘fake
news’. If our liberal ‘news’
organizations, both broadcast and print, report a story, we the
"deplorables" have now become conditioned to simply ignore it. Hence, the liberal media, the leftist political
agendas, Democrats, snowflakes, etc, have become taboo when it comes to
electability and honesty among the majority of conservatives. In short, even the common person now has the
media’s number. And it’s zero.
No comments:
Post a Comment