Remember Barry “Almighty’s” National Security
Adviser Susan Rice? And yes that would
be the very same Susan Rice who repeatedly lied to the American public about
the September 2012 attack on the Benghazi consulate and how it was supposedly direct
the result of some YouTube video. And
yes, that was also the same national security adviser who would later
reclassify her “lie” as “in some respects, not to be a hundred percent
correct.” Well no shit! Now I’m pretty sure that you’d be
hard-pressed to find anyone in our state-controlled media, either then or now, who
would not chose to defend Ms. Rice regarding her making such an obviously false
claim. And I’m quite sure that had she
been a Republican demands for her to be fired would have been front page news
and broadcast nonstop on nearly every network.
Now as we fast forward a few short years, ironically
we now have that very same Susan Rice who has now seen fit to advise President
Trump not to lie because it could put America’s security at risk. But I guess the same couldn’t be said at the
time when she lied five times about what it was that brought about an attack
that resulted in the death of four American including our ambassador. Anyway, it was in an op-ed for The Washington
Post that Rice took it upon herself to complain that Trump’s “false statements”
about wiretapping represent a “disturbing pattern of behavior that poses real
and potentially profound dangers to U.S. national security." You can’t make this stuff up. So the woman used by Barry and Hitlery to
spread false information on a terrorist attack is now warning President Trump
about putting out false information?
Rice wrote, "When the American people question
the commander in chief's statements, his ability to harness public support to
confront a national crisis is undermined.”
And she went on to say, “The foundation of the United States' unrivaled
global leadership rests only in part on our military might. It is also grounded
in the perception that the United States is steady, rational and fact-based.” She said, "To lead effectively, the
United States must maintain respect and trust. So, when a White House
deliberately dissembles and serially contorts the facts, its actions pose a
serious risk to America's global leadership, among friends and adversaries
alike.” And then she, “The United
States' words matter." So are we to
assume that back in 2012 words didn’t matter so much, at least as long as your
boss was up for re-election?
It was in those now-infamous interviews, Rice, who
then served as ambassador to the UN, said that the attacks were spontaneous and
not pre-planned. She also asserted, even though she knew it was a lie, that the
catalyst for the attacks was a YouTube video criticizing the Islamic prophet,
Muhammad. She was lying when she said, “Based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of
the present, is in fact it began spontaneously in Benghazi, as a reaction to
what had transpired hours earlier in Cairo, where of course as you know there
was a violent protest outside of our embassy, sparked by this hateful
video.” And she continued the lie when
she added, “We do not have information at present that leads us to conclude
that this was premeditated or pre-planned”
But it was in the months that followed it became
clear, despite the best efforts of the state-controlled media to keep things
under wraps, that members of Barry’s team, including Hitlery’s State
Department, knew immediately after the attacks occurred that they were
pre-planned and that the video played no role in what transpired. But by then the election was over, Barry had
been safely re-elected, and as far as Democrats were concerned it was old news
in no need of being investigated. And
those in our state-controlled media were quick to side with the Democrats, and to
make the claim that any investigation into finding out what happened was
nothing more than a witch hunt. After
all, all is fair in politics, right? As
long as the right team wins! And of
course, the ‘right’ team would be the Democrats.
Actually, when it comes down to being between
President Trump and Susan Rice, there’s only one proven liar between them at
this point. And I’ll give you three
guesses as to which one is the liar and the first two don't count. And on another note, I know I am likely
stating the obvious here but I think we all know exactly what nearly any politician,
at any level of government, with a "D" after their name is, a
liar! But, we also need to be willing to
accept the fact that a huge chunk of the Republicans are just as big a part of
the "swamp" as the Democrats are.
Pay close attention. They have
been exposing themselves with their words as well as their actions, and this
faux attempt at repealing Obamacare is just the most recent example of that. They lie to get votes and then when safely in
office it’s back to business as usual.
Regarding Trump’s comments about which Rice felt
compelled to comment about, as it turns out they were much closer to being true
than were the comments Rice repeated nearly ad nauseam about the deadly Benghazi
attack. In fact Trump has been deemed to
be 99.5% correct. It was earlier this
week that O'Reilly, on Fox, asked Peter King: "Would I be wrong in saying
that the Obama Administration Surveilled the Trump transition team." To which King responded by saying, "I
would say from all I know you are at least 99 and a half percent accurate and
probably 100 percent." So there it
is. King is a member of the House
Permanent select Committee on Intelligence.
Now who is it that thinks our old buddy Barry is the least bit worried
about going to prison? And anyway, he
has a get out of jail free card, he’s black.
Democrats, like Rice, inhabit an alternate universe,
where everything is the opposite of what it is in the real world. What are lies
to us is "the truth" to them', when one of them tells a lie the rest
just unquestioningly back them, party before country. Always! I wish I could find their Koo-aid and guzzle
some because it would be a hell of a lot easier getting through this life if I
were a flaming idiot like the rest of them.
This is a prime example of the Democrat Party. It’s perfectly acceptable
for them to behave unethically or to even break the law, but nobody else can do
that. I am so tired of these two faced
people who speak to us as if we’re too stupid to recognize what’s really going
on. I guess I keep waiting for that day
when those we send to Washington will come to recognize why it is that we
really send them there.
It was a Time Magazine column back in 2014 that
said, "National Security Adviser Susan Rice said Sunday she had no regrets
about statements she made in 2012 on the attacks at the U.S. mission in
Benghazi, Libya, saying her talking points were reflective of what she knew at
the time and were not intended to mislead the American public." So in 2014, she lied about the lie. Because her
comments were most definitely intended to mislead because of the proximity of
the attack to the 2012 election. Everyone
in the loop knew that story was bogus before she even hit the weekend news
shows. But because she’s a Democrat and
telling the truth might have come to have an adverse effect on the re-election
bid of Barry “Almighty”, so once again the ends seem to justify the means.
But look, let’s just cut to the chase here, shall
we. Because the bottom line here is that
Rice is a Democrat, so what else could we possibly expect from her? Lying is part of what it means to be a modern
day Democrat, for them it’s become a way of life. And while Republicans tend to eat their own
on almost every issue, Democrats are always in lock step no matter what the
issue, no matter the damage their lies may have on the American people. In a way I guess I may prefer the fact that Republicans
tend to eat their own as a way of getting the issues out into the public and in
debate to the way the Democrats tend to operate which, more often than not, involves
lying to the people (you can keep your doctor) and how it is that all Democrats
remain in lock step in their effort to advance their progressive/anti-America
agenda.
In the repeal of Obamacare, I see Republicans debating what is and isn't good for the people, but during the original Obamacare ‘debate’ I didn't see any Democrats discussing what was or wasn't good for the American people. I prefer debate over a 60 seat majority in the Senate to pass whatever they want. While I would like nothing more than to see the Republicans gain a 60 seat majority in the Senate in 2018, I very much doubt that will come to pass. Thus far into our new president’s first term our congressional Republicans continue to demonstrate their ineptness. Our current leadership team continues to make clear that they are in way over their head. They whined about being unable to get things accomplished because they had no power, but what happens when you give the power? Absolutely NOTHING!
No comments:
Post a Comment