If the Democrats want to continue to bring up the
question of legitimacy regarding the fact that Trump is about to be inaugurated
as the 45th president, then maybe the time has come for us to focus the bright
light of truth on their candidate in an effort to determine the legitimacy of
her candidacy. Because the Democrats
really have no one to blame for the fact that their seriously flawed, and
hopelessly corrupt, candidate lost the election. And the sooner they are able to come to grips
regarding that fact, the sooner they can, as a party, get back on the road to
recovery. But if Democrats continue to
console themselves by claiming Donald Trump’s election is illegitimate, then
I’m afraid they’re going to accomplish very little for themselves or the nation
unless they take the time to consider some of their own faults, including the
top-to-bottom corruption of their party and their willingness to continue with
their outdated political strategy. So
how was Hitlery illegitimate?
1.
The Democrats’ rigged primary: Democrats should begin
by accepting the obvious truth that theirs was a rigged primary process. The
party’s key leaders, and not the party’s voters, picked and then promoted
Hitlery, meaning she was secretly coronated before the primary process even began. Her rival Bernie Sanders never had a
chance. The “nomination” contest was pure
theater designed to make Sanders voters accept Hitlery. His voters ought to be furious at Sanders for
playing along with this farce, which he most certainly did. When Party elders shriek about nefarious
Russian interference in the election process, they’re simply attempting to
distract attention away from what the leaked DNC emails actually said, and the
fact that we now know those emails were 100 percent genuine, despite Democrat
statements to the contrary. One of those
shrieking claims came from Donna Brazile, who was directly involved in
doctoring a primary debate by leaking questions to Hitlery.
2.
The Democrat super-delegate system: Then there’s the openly rigged element of the
Democrat primary, the super-delegate system. It’s a political instrument
specifically designed to shut down insurgencies and make the interests of
Democrat voters secondary to the judgment of the party elites, and the powerful
lobbyists who manipulate them. Hitlery
was chosen by special-interest donors who had already spent a fortune currying
favor with her, as demonstrated by the instantaneous collapse of the Clinton “charities”,
the very instant the Clintons had no more favors to sell.
3.
The Democrat money machine:
Building up a massive campaign war chest was the paramount concern of
the Democrats in 2016, because, or so they and their many media allies thought,
it would give them an unbreakable headlock over the public debate. Hence ‘Slow Joe’ Biden was told he couldn’t
afford to get into the race, and the same for Marty O’Malley. Their financial kneecapping allowed Hitlery
to suck up hundreds of millions in campaign cash, some in legally questionable
ways, even as she railed against the influence of money in politics.
4.
The media was part of Hitlery’s campaign: It’s fun to watch Democrats wail about
Russian spies using WikiLeaks to influence the election, when it’s clear the
state-controlled media was able to downplay the actual contents of those emails
enough to keep most voters completely in the dark. And while there were certain conservative
outlets that did everything they could to report those revelations, their
effort paled in comparison to the influence wielded by the state-controlled
media. The same state-controlled media
that was an active participant in the rigged primary scandal. Those leaked emails from the DNC and Hitlery
campaign chief John Podesta reflected very, very poorly on the press. That’s something Democrats could fix –
there’s no reason for illegitimate behind-the-scenes coordination between their
candidates and the media. Democrat
voters should now demand an end to the incestuous relationship between the
media and Democrat politics because it has become such a liability. Sure, it’s helpful to have the media in your
hip pocket, but the value of that advantage is severely degraded when the
public knows about it, and has lost faith in the establishment press as a
result. Worse, the media enabled a weak, out-of-touch candidate like Hitlery to
capture the party’s nomination.
5.
The law was bent and broken to keep Hitlery in the game:
Democrat voters also should be questioning the legitimacy of Hitlery’s
nomination because the rule of law was corrupted to preserve her political
viability. But let’s face it, since when
do Democrats actually care much about the rule of law especially when doing so
could end up hindering their favored candidate from getting elected. That said, her candidacy should have ended
when the email server story broke. And
oddly enough the Barry highly politicized Justice Department did Democrats no
favors by staving off indictments that would have taken Hitlery out of the
game, or by slow-walking the email investigation until her replacement became
prohibitively difficult. Barry perfected
tactics for dragging scandal investigations out until they became “old news,”
but they miscalculated and prolonged Hitlery’s email scandal until it blew up.
Before they began howling about Russian espionage,
Democrats were busy pushing the narrative that FBI Director James Comey
sabotaged Hitlery’s election hopes by speaking at length about her “extremely
careless” actions when he announced no charges would be recommended, and then
kneecapped her again by reviving the Hitlery investigation briefly during the
final days of the campaign. As with
their narrative about WikiLeaks, Democrats are complaining that Hitlery was
“sabotaged” because people revealed the truth about her. So what they’re saying is that their
presidential candidate could only win if damaging facts were concealed, false
media narratives were perpetuated, and special exemptions from the law were
granted to her. That sounds like the very definition of an ‘illegitimate’
candidacy.
6.
Democrats try to hack the electorate: We might also
challenge the legitimacy of a political strategy that relies so heavily upon
using immigration to hack the demographics of the American electorate. Before Hitlery’s defeat shocked them into
silence, liberal analysts were beginning to churn out a fresh wave of “Emerging
Democrat Majority” pieces about how native-born GOP voters would never win a
national election again. One of the
reasons Democrats subjected the Electoral College (EC) to one of their
post-election tantrums is that the EC makes it harder for them to hack the
presidential vote with mass immigration. That’s the true significance of the
observation that Hitlery’s popular-vote “victory” came entirely from one state,
California.
The Democrats’ strategy for winning seems to have
been based on their decision to downplay the economic concerns of struggling
Americans in favor of outreach to immigrants, racial subgroups, gays,
professionals, unmarried women, and other element of the hoped-for ‘Emerging
Democrat Majority.’ If Democrats didn’t
believe they had a reserve army of immigrant voters for Hitlery, might they
have instead nominated ‘Slow Joe’ or Sanders in an effort to win ordinary
Americans to their side. Amusingly, if those immigrants didn’t exist, American
voters’ incomes would be higher, and there likely would have been fewer disgruntled
Americans who would have been angry enough to shift their votes to the GOP’s
candidate.
So in an effort to sort of sum things up, I think
it’s fair to say that everything about Hitlery’s nomination, as well as her campaign,
should now be called into question by every rank and file member of the
Democrat Party. Democrats need to
realize just how corrupt their party really has become and get to work in
trying to reform it before they lose again in 2020. Because short of completely ignoring the
Constitution or persuading the military to install their next candidate, they
likely will lose. As Barry would say if
the shoe was on the other foot, reforming the Democrat Party is the
‘legitimate’ thing to do. As for the
Republicans, they know that there are many other techniques that Democrats use
to hack the electorate, including the Democrats’ control over the media and our
education systems. That’s why
Republicans need to get to work hard and fast in an effort to disable all of
them, permanently, because they have a sworn duty to protect the legitimacy of
our election process.
And I think we can all agree that those responsible
for essentially 'installing" Barry as president in 2008 by refusing to properly
vet him, are the very same ones who did all they could to rabidly defend
Hitlery in 2016. They knew who he really
was then, and are still working to keep quiet who they know him to be today! And yet they foisted him upon the rest of us,
not once but twice, and continue to brag about that fact to this very day! And they worked just as hard to foist Hitlery
upon us despite being very well aware of just how corrupt she truly is. Sadly, rank and file Democrats seem to have
missed completely the fact that it has been their own Party leadership, as well
as the liberal media, who have continually rigged the game against them. The fix was in, in 2016, from the very
beginning and the truth about the blatant dishonesty of their candidate was kept
from the voters. As Democrats like to
claim, they are the "champion" of the little guy, yet they really
DISDAIN the little guy.
No comments:
Post a Comment