ISN’T ALL OF THIS “RACE STUFF” GETTING TO BE JUST A LITTLE OLD?

Never one to be the least bit shy about throwing around all manner of baseless accusations of racism, we once again have that dim bulb extraordinaire, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, Democrat, who on Friday was busy accusing Newt Gingrich of using, of all things, racial “code words.” Code words? Excuse me, but isn’t that more than just a stretch, even for our favorite nitwit, Ms. Jackson Lee? And just what does this imbecile bases her idiotic use of her “code word” accusation against Gingrich? Why nothing other than his calling Barry “Almighty” the “food stamp president” and saying schools ought to hire children to do janitorial work. Both points, which I thought, Gingrich made himself abundantly clear on, regarding what it was that he meant and neither of which had the slightest thing to do with anyone’s race. Now I suppose you can choose to give to Ms. Jackson Lee the benefit of the doubt, after all she’s black and I’m not. But history tells us that people like her manage to see the tint of racism in just about everything. They seem to derive some sort of sick pleasure in throwing around such accusations for none other than political purposes. They see it as a way to manipulate that certain segment of the population more susceptible to such rhetoric. They feel completely justified in making such claims, claims that have no basis in fact, but that should be taken as fact because it is a black that’s making them.



Her comments came in response to a question about remarks she made on the House floor Wednesday, when she said there are “candidates like Newt Gingrich who want to throw fuel and matches and fire to develop sort of an explosiveness in this country” and there are “underlying suggestions” to calling Barry the “food stamp president.” Look, the only ones possessing even the slightest interest in, as Ms Jackson Lee says, developing “an explosiveness in this country” are Ms Jackson Lee and her fellow Democrats. Telling, of all people, MSNBC’s Martin Bashir Friday, that “These are code words. It’s inappropriate.” But she wasn’t done yet. Going on to say, “Let me say that the code words, as far as I’m concerned words that generate and signify race.” Jabbering on, “Telling us that a janitor who makes $37,000 would be in a better position to give his job up so that the children of the poor in New York…can pick up a broom and work. To say children in New York should “pick up a broom and work…is a code word to, if you will, portray poor children and poor school districts that they have seen no one work legitimately.” She finished her rant saying, “I think Mr. Gingrich should be ashamed of himself and we should not want to win at any cost. Let’s bring the country together. Let’s not destroy Mr. Obama. Let’s talk about helping the American people.” Her comments are the ones that should be deemed as being “code words.”


The toxic comments of Ms. Jackson Lee came just a few days after we heard from that other genius of the Democrat Party, ex-president Jimmy Carter. He essentially leveled similar charges against Gingrich, saying that there was a “subtlety of racism” to his comments about food stamps and welfare. Ok, Jimmy, what the hell does that mean? Ya know, these slimy Democrats are great at throwing around incendiary accusations of racism, it’s always used in such as way as to attempt to hoodwink blacks in this country who continue to buy into that line of malarkey. And you have to give Democrats credit, because it’s been working for them for decades. Blacks fail to realize that the problems that that are forced to endure here in the 21st century are, sadly, pretty much self-inflicted. It is they who have insisted upon hooking their wagon to a political party that has done nothing more than to keep them impoverished and very firmly attached to the government teat. A political party that has been instrumental in the decimation of the black family where there is few father figures, or stable male role model. That fact then, in turn, has had a chain reaction, of sorts, that has more blacks dropping out of school, who therefore can’t a find job which in turn increases the chances of winding up in prison. And still it’s the Republicans who are called racists. So you tell me, does that make sense?

DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ...YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP!

Ah, tis election season. That wonderful time that comes upon every couple of year. A time when there are more words are spoken without anything ever actually being said. So, if you follow politics, you’ve probably already seen a lot of interviews where the interviewee refuses to answer any and all questions and instead goes on and on about unrelated topics, spewing only standard talking points. If those interviews frustrate you, there was one that occurred on Fox and Friends just this morning that would have had you pulling your hair out and screaming at your television. The interview/discussion took place between the show’s hosts and DNC Chair Debbie Wizzerman Schultz. In fact, the interview was so frustrating that interviewer and Fox host Brian Kilmeade was even caught rolling his eyes during it. When Kilmeade or fellow host Steve Doocy would ask Ms. Wizzerman Schultz a question, she would either not answer, or would go off on some weird tangent, responding only with an attack on Mitt Romney. And then both proceeded to take some underhanded shots at each other. Really. It got that bad. And at one point it looked like Kilmeade was ready to end the whole thing and walk away.

WE'RE GOING BROKE TRYING TO GO GREEN...



Just two days after Barry "Almighty" blocked construction of a major oil pipeline, we have some nincompoop from his administration coming out and touting its efforts to expand domestic production of renewable energy. Agriculture Secretary and resident dunce, Tom Vilsack, announced Friday that his agency has approved a $25-Million conditional loan guarantee to build a 55,000-square-foot biorefinery plant in Iowa. The Fiberight facility will produce cellulosic ethanol by converting municipal solid waste and other industrial pulps into "advanced biofuels," or so said the the news release. "This project is another step the Obama administration is taking to support production of a new generation of renewable fuels, in order to build an active biofuels and biomass production industry in every region of the country," said Vilsack. "Investments in renewable energy create jobs and reduce America's dependence on foreign oil." What a freaking crock!

This project that was so enthusiastically promoted by this moron is expected to create, now get this, a whopping 38 jobs and somehow manage to save another 16 jobs as well. By contrast, expansion of the Canada-Texas Keystone XL pipeline would have created thousands of jobs with some estimates being as high as 22,000. Although many Democrats dispute that number. Well, hells-bells, I get it now. Makes total and complete sense to me now. After all, why go with a project that has the potential to create upwards of 20,000 jobs when you can go with one that you know will create 38? And, and, save another 16 to boot. Boy howdy, I'm just so damn glad we got this team in charge of things. Otherwise I might be a little worried. This is INSANITY! That there is anyone in this country who will admit that they plan to vote for Barry again is, is, well, I don't know what it is. Other than we must have one humongous moron class in this country!


So anyway, the USDA news release notes that Americans import "just over half (60%) of our transportation fuels," and it says the U.S. "can do more to meet the President's goal of reducing our net fuel imports by one-third by 2025." Proponents of the Keystone XL pipeline also say that the U.S. can do more to reduce fuel imports. “Until this pipeline is constructed, the U.S. will continue to import millions of barrels of conflict oil from the Middle East and Venezuela and other foreign countries who do not share democratic values Canadians and Americans are privileged to have,” said Russ Girling, TransCanada’s president and chief executive officer, in a statement on Wednesday announcing that his company will reapply for a Keystone XL permit. At Secretary Vilsack's direction, we have the USDA saying it is working to develop the national biofuels industry, producing energy from non-food sources in every region of the country. Nutty? Yup!


It's very plain to see here, that the taxpayers are once again getting the shaft. Nothing is being done here at home to reduce the price at the gas pump, while more and more of our hard earned money is being wasted on fanciful fuels that may never even reach the marketplace. It's already been proven that between production and transportation, more energy is expended in getting a gallon of ethanol to market than is spent on producing a gallon of gas. And ethanol destroys your car's engine. This whole green crap is nothing more than a pipedream and a cockamamie scheme by Barry "Almighty" to justify his having allowed the price of a gallon of gas to go from $1.83 when he came into office to nearly $4 gallon. This adminstration simply has no interest in drilling anywhere. What other country on this entire planet, possessing such vast energy reserves as the United States, would simply sit on them, and leave them untapped? NO ONE!!!

JUST ANOTHER LAME EXCUSE FOR AN ATTEMPT MADE AT CHARACTER ASSASSINATION...

Well I'm sure many of us are of the opinion that one of the more memorable exchanges, if not "the" memorable exchange, from Thursday’s debate in South Carolina came during the opening minutes of the first round. That specific moment when pompous ass, faux journalist and, in this instance, debate moderator, CNN’s John King took one on the chin, so to speak, after choosing to make his very first question of the evening to Newt Gingrich about his ex-wife’s accusations about him wanting an open marriage. Those of us watching know what ensued, Newt pretty much let this supposed impartial "moderator" have it right between the eyes. And rightfully so. Guys like this King fella are always only too happy to give every sleaze-bag Democrat that comes along, a pass. How many times was Teddy Kennedy ever asked about the young girl that he murdered? Or how many times was old "Slick Willie" asked about his many little indiscretions both in and out of the White House? Not once. So like Chris Wallace and Juan Williams who came before him, King got a little taste of what should be common practice when one chooses to ask an obvious biased and completely irrelevant question like the one that was asked of Newt.



Anyway, so now we‘re getting, as Paul Harvey used to say, the rest of the story. Or at least what's supposed to be King’s side of the little discussion that took place on national television. His version of things came to us courtesy of a little recap of the evening's events which was essentially nothing more than an exercise in stupidity. King sat there with his buddy and fellow CNN, Andy Cooper, of Anderson Cooper 180 fame. So, King provided his explanation of why it was that he asked the question with him going so far as to describe a conversation that he claims to have had with Gingrich afterward. “I had a conversation with the Speaker after and said, ‘Look, you’ve moderated these debates, this is one of those damned if you do, damned if you don’t,” King said. “It is a story that is making the rounds in the campaign. Is it an issue I’m happy came out in the last 48 hours of the South Carolina primary? Of course not.” Ya know this guy is just so full of SHIT! That's the thing with those in our state-controlled media today, they actually think that we're stupid enough to believe this type of garbage. Ya know, for these guys to think that anybody really cares about what they think, about anything, is just absolutely absurd.


And in what I'm sure must have been his best demonstration possible of his sense of shock and disbelief regarding how Gingrich chose to responsed, and how he simply couldn't believe it, little Andy Cooper then proceeded to ask King if he had had any inclination that Gingrich might chose to respond in the way that he did. King, sounding ever the objective "journalist" that he views himself to be, said, “I knew he was going to challenge the question.” Going on to say, “I’ve been covering politics for 25 years — I understood that if I asked the question he was not going to be happy with it and he was going to turn on me.” Finally adding, “It was my judgment, my decision, and mine alone. If we’re going to deal with it, let’s deal with it up front, let’s not try to sneak it somewhere into the middle of the debate,” he added. What judgment? Pathetic creeps like King continually try to explain away their obvious biases in such a way that has them only doing their job. This is what passes for "journalism" in the supposed "mainstream" media of the 21st century. The only judgment demonstrated by this moron was in how he could best go about to perhaps goad the others to into effectively participating in a dog pile on Gingrich.


Now while the question this jerk posed to Newt was the big question of the night, it was far from being the only idiotic point that this jerk, King, tried to pull off during the "debate." Nearly as stupid as the question asked of Newt, was the question that he put to Gov. Romney that he release the last 12 years worth of his tax returns. While Romney's response was far from being very forceful, the question very clearly demonstrates, and in very stark terms, the blatant hypocrisy of our state-controlled media. Because when is the last time that any of us remember when some media moron, like this dolt King, asked Barry tp produce the last 12 years worth of anything? What little credibility those in our state-controlled media still possess is very rapidly drying up. They're doing their best to make themselves simply irrelevent, as they have become what is nothing more than the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party. Guys like King and this twerp Cooper, bent themselves into pretzels all through 2007 and 2008 in their effort to bury whatever dirt was out there on their boy Barry. And there was a lot of dirt to bury. And they the have continued in that tradition for the last three years, with them walk around with their chests all puffed out and crowing, "See how important we are?"

NEWT BLASTS MODERATOR ASKING ABOUT EX-WIFE...

WITH OBAMA, EVERYTHING BOILS DOWN TO POLITICS…EVERYTHING!

In a decision that does nothing if not to very clearly demonstrate Barry's hypocrisy, as well as the lack of any seriousness whatsoever, when discussing efforts to make this country more energy independent, Barry on Wednesday rejected outright the "controversial" Keystone XL pipeline because the 60-day deadline imposed by Republicans did not allow adequate time to review an alternate route through an ecologically sensitive area in Nebraska. Controversial? To whom? His environmental wacko buddies? Barry wants gas prices to be as high as possible, as evidenced by the fact that he has expended zero effort to keep it where it was when he first entered the Oval Office, $1.83 per gallon. Barry is determined to use "climate change" nonsense as a way of manipulation and of garnering for the government even more control over our lives. He wants to be able to dictate to us what we drive, where we drive and how we drive.

It was left to some schlep Deputy Secretary of State, by the name of William Burns, to actually make the announcement, albeit on Barry's behalf, because once again our gutless president wanted to avoid there being any chance that he might be called upon to actually defend yet another "decision" based entirely on politics. The project, if pursued, would have, when completed, carried oil from Canada's carbon-heavy tar sands to refineries on the Gulf Coast. TransCanada, the company seeking to build the $7 billion, 1,700-mile pipeline, will be able to reapply with a new route avoiding an ecologically sensitive area of Nebraska, sources told National Journal. And had Barry given the green-light, approximately 20,000+ jobs would have been created. A number that Democrats dispute. And yet, San Francisco Democrats have made the claim that a 1.7 mile subway extension will support 37,000-43,000 jobs. So let's see, 1.7 miles versus 1700 miles.


In his idiotic statement on Wednesday, Barry, courtesy of Mr. Burns, declared that a February deadline set by Congress would not allow for a proper review of potential harm from the $7 billion Keystone XL project. “As the State Department made clear last month, the rushed and arbitrary deadline insisted on by congressional Republicans prevented a full assessment of the pipeline’s impact, especially the health and safety of the American people, as well as our environment,” Barry said in the statement. “As a result, the Secretary of State has recommended that the application be denied. And after reviewing the State Department’s report, I agree. ” Now you would think that all, or most, of that "environmental study" crap would have been done some time ago. But I'm sure that all manner of foot dragging has been taking place in an effort to force it out past the next election.


Put much more simply, Barry has demonstrated once again just how petty and juvenile he really is. This action is nothing more than an attempt to strike back at Republicans by saying no because of their forcing him to decide on the project in just 60 days. Republicans in Congress and on the campaign trail promptly painted the decision as a rejection of thousands of American jobs purely for political reasons. And that's exactly what it was. A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, decried the news. “President Obama is about to destroy tens of thousands of American jobs and sell American energy security to the Chinese,” said Brendan Buck. “The president won’t stand up to his political base even to create American jobs. This is not the end of this fight.” Well, I suppose we'll just have to wait and see about that. I've heard tough talk from the Speaker before only to disappointed later as he caved at the last minute.


Texas Gov., and still presidential candidate, Rick Perry also jumped on Barry's decision and made a very good point. "The president's focused more on the next election than on the next generation." Again, a statement that sums up Barry's actions perfectly. Look, it really boils down to the fact that what our "community agitator" of a president is trying to do here is to essentially attempt to thread a needle between two important segments of the Democrat kook base that remain split over the pipeline. On one hand he has the labor unions that support the project for the jobs it would bring, and on the other hand he has environmentalist wackos who oppose it for the supposed "adverse" impacts that development of tar-sands oil could have on the environment. So once again instead of demonstrating any level of actual leadership, Barry once again does nothing more than to vote "present."


Barry’s decision should not have come as a big surprise to no one, and no one should have really been the least bit shocked by it. Knowing Barry as we all do, we should all be very aware of his desire to do everything in his power that make gasoline more and more expensive. White House spokesman Jay "Dim Bulb" Carney and other senior officials, like always, did their best to place the blame for Barry "decision" on the Republicans. Their rationale this time around was to claim that the Republicans’ 60-day deadline, which was included in the payroll-tax deal Barry signed into law last month, did not give the administration enough time to appropriately review the project plans. The State Department announced last fall that it would postpone a decision on the permit while an alternate route was developed that would avoid Nebraska's Ogallala Aquifer, which supplies water to millions of people. Just one lame excuse after another.


The timing of the announcement was said to be somewhat of a surprising. Especially since the administration actually had until February 21 to decide. But then again, the Wednesday announcement does make some political and economic sense. It allows Barry "Almighty" to go on the offense before Thursday’s debate between Republican presidential candidates in South Carolina and before his own State of the Union address next Tuesday. It also comes before public anger could grow if gasoline prices continue their upward climb in the weeks ahead. “This is the last day to own this issue on their terms,” said Kevin Book, managing director at ClearView Energy Partners, a Washington-based energy consulting firm. “The administration gets to explain their choice before it gets explained for them." Republicans, either in Congress or in the current batch of candidates, should work to keep the politics of this issue well out in the forefront.


Now the administration, as well as Barry’s reelection campaign, will seek to do damage control with Republican attacks. It must also submit within 15 days a report to Congress detailing why it rejected the permit. Which, if they're being honest can be summed up in just one word, POLITICS. But the issue will not be dropped by congressional Republicans. GOP leaders in both chambers are already mulling other legislation that could take the decision on the pipeline completely out of Barry’s hands. If that is in fact an option, then they should expedite the taking of any action that would make that a reality. They have also said any such maneuver could likely be included in the longer term payroll-tax deal Congress has indicated it will pass by the end of February. Now let's see if the GOP possesses the requisite backbone to make that happen. As we've seen before, GOP House members are very good at talking, but not very good at following through.


What Barry's essentially saying here, by the taking of this blatantly political action, is to Hell with the American people! The Hell with they're paying more and more for energy and the Hell with those looking for a job. He knows better, or so he would have us believe, but as they say, actions speak louder that words. Especially when one's actions are as transparent has his regarding the killing of this jobs creating project. It would appear that the only job in which Barry has any interest is his own. And he's only to happy to sacrifice anyone and everyone as he goes about the thwarting any attempt made to remedy the plight of this middle class. The very ones struggling to make ends meet as Barry goes off on any number of extravagant vacations or plays an endless number of rounds of golf. He claims that the GOP is out of touch with middle class America, but from where I'm sitting it's Barry whose really out of touch, with the entire country.

A SENILE JIMMY CARTER GOES LOOKIN FOR ATTENTION...

Ex-president Jimmy Carter, that senile old fool who simple refuses to go away, has once again demonstrated just how far around the bend he has gotten himself. He latest episode came about when he said that there’s a “subtlety of racism” to Newt Gingrich’s comments about food stamps and welfare while out on the campaign trail in South Carolina. Referring to the most recent GOP presidential debate in which Gingrich received a standing ovation for defending his comment calling Barry “Almighty” the “food stamp president,“ “Bonehead” Carter, that sage and elder “statesman” of the Democrat Party, said the former House Speaker is choosing his words carefully to appeal to ”right wing” voters in the South.


So what this moron is essentially saying is that all of us on the right possess this same “subtlety of racism.” Carter said, “I think [Gingrich] has that subtlety of racism that I know quite well and that Gingrich knows quite well, that appeals to some people in Georgia, particularly the right wing,” Carter said in an interview on CNN’s “Piers Morgan Tonight” set to air Wednesday.
“Really?” Morgan asked. “And you think he’s doing it deliberately?”
“He knows well the words that you use, like welfare mamas and so forth, that have been appealing in the past in those days when we cherished segregation of the races,” Carter said. “He’s appealing for that in South Carolina.”
“That’s a pretty serious charge to level at Newt Gingrich, that he’s being racist,” Morgan said.
“I wouldn’t say he’s racist, but he knows the subtle words to use to appeal to a racist group,” Carter explained. “When you emphasize, over and over and over, welfare and food stamps and ‘why don’t the black people get jobs‘ and ’if I’m president, I’ll make sure they turn toward a work ethic, rather than an ethic of welfare and food stamps,’ that’s appealing to the wrong element in South Carolina.”


Who thinks this way?  Other than, of course some twisted, and perverted, progressive/socialist Democrat. And sadly, it’s all nothing more than pure propaganda that’s being strategically preached to a specific segment of the population that’s just stupid enough to believe it. The same people who, back in the early 60s, hitched their wagon to the Democrat Party and 50+ years later are none the better off for having done so. And Carter himself, I think it very safe to say, is stuck in time somewhere back in time around the Civil War. His brain is turning to mush as he continues to, apparently, be under the misguided impression than anyone outside the Democrat party or the state-controlled media gives a rat’s ass what he thinks or has to say about anything. He should do us all a favor and just…

SLEAZEBAG JERRY SPRINGER DEFENDS OBAMA...

Don't you find it interesting how those on the left always consider telling the truth and reporting the news is always considered as bashing. Barry "Almighty" is an unmitigated disaster so of course most of news that we hear about him is therefore negative. I watch Fox daily, although not as much as I used to, and they do not, in any way, shape, manner, or form, constantly “bash” Barry. Mr. Springer is dead wrong and he is a classic example of how the left operates, insult and attack the other side or the messenger instead of having an honest debate.  If there is anyone currently being bashed, it's any and all of the GOP candidates in what seems to be just about every media outlet on the planet.  Springer comes across as a whiner. 

MORE TALKING OUT THE ASS, THIS TIME FROM OLD STENY HOYER...

In a previous post I wrote about the exceptional ability possessed by what seems is a majority of Democrats that seems to enable them to talk out of their ass. I specifically mentioned Pelosi ,and Barry, as being the most skilled, but I'd like to add another highly skilled practitioner of the fine art of ass-talking. And that individual is (drum roll), none other than that proverbial old gasbag himself, Steny Hoyer. You see, it was just this week during one of his little weekly get togethers with members of the state-controlled media, otherwise known as the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party, that old Steny said that back in December there just were not enough Democrat votes for raising taxes on wealthier Americans as part of the "compromise" that resulted in extending the payroll tax cuts for 2 stupid months. Actually, the whole fiasco was less a compromise than it was a cave by the House Republican leadership, but I think we all recognize that fact. Anyway old Steny said, Democrats didn’t insist on that [higher taxes for the wealthy] in December,” Hoyer said at his weekly press briefing on Monday. “That is – I think – what we think is the wisest way to proceed but obviously in the Senate they don’t have a majority for that proposition.” Of course not. The only solution to our current fiscal mess identified by boobs like Steny always involve the hiking of taxes.



I'm sure we all remember that silly little exercise in stupidity, referred to as "compromise," this past December that resulted in the payroll tax cuts being extended for two months and the disappointment I think most of us felt because our House leadership demonstrated their lack of possessing anything that would even remotely resemble a spine. They caved after Senate negotiators determined they could not reach a "compromise" with obstinate Democrats on a year-long extension before the tax cuts were set to expire on Dec. 31, 2011. Now Congress has until the end of February to negotiate an extension for the remainder of the year or payroll taxes will rise on every working American. Both Republicans and Democrats support extending the tax cuts through 2012, leaving only the details of how to offset them left to negotiate. Steny said there would be a compromise of some kind but would not comment on just what Democrats might be "willing to accept" in terms of spending cuts to offset the lost revenue. “Obviously, a compromise will have to be reached [but] I’m not going to go into the possibilities – the conferees are going to have to work on that. Obviously, whatever we do has to be paid for [offset] and we want to see the middle class tax cut extended through December 31,” he said. Sure they do, he's just talkin out his ass again!


Now I have an interesting little concept that I'd like to present to old Steny and his fellow socialists there in Congress, even though I'm fairly confident that they probably won't like all that much. Anyway, here's what I'm thinkin, how about we just STOP all of the crazy, wasteful spending! We stop giving away taxpayer money that we don't have, won't have and can never possibly earn! Now of course if this current rate of spending is nothing more than a means to an end for Steny and his comrades, like, say, a way to advance their seeking a way to destroy this country and its freedoms, then I guess we can't count on them working to curb the spending. Somewhere along the way I must have missed what can only be described as being the demise of the Democrat Party, that point in time where guys like "Scoop" Jackson and Sam Nunn were replaced by a bunch of power-hungry Progressive Socialists/Marxists who care only about themselves, the acquisition of political power and the destruction of our country. And those who think absolutely nothing of going out and lying to us on, what is, a daily basis. Is there any wonder why they want the American people to be not only uninformed but disarmed as well? They see the Constitution as being an impediment to their mission, that's why they hate all that it stands for and constantly ignore it.


Before long, we the people will be that last line of defense, the only thing standing between the Democrats and the drive to destroy our country. What worries me though, is how many of will be willing to make that commitment and stand up to these political hooligans. We are being "invaded" from within, by these sleazy characters who are desperate to convince us that they have only our best interests at heart. It's just more of they're continuing to talk out their ass. Democrats are busy eroding every means we have of defending ourselves against a government that is growing more powerful and intrusive with each passing day. Someday I have a difficulty time determining who it is that represents the bigger threat to our country, Muslim extremists trying to blow us up from the outside, or Democrats trying to destroy us from the inside. Even worse there are times that it crosses my mind that they may even be allies in the effort to bring down America. Barry and his communist leaning minions continue to wage war against anyone who dares to enforce the law. It seems to be the only war that they have any interest in. People like Hoyer, Van Hollen, Pelosi, Durbin, Schumer, Napolitano, Holder as well as Barry "Almighty' himself, just to name a few have no respect whatsoever for the Constitution and everyday violate their oath of office.


Democrats have always been the ones who have been busy leading the war against this country. But in recent years they have become much more aggressive in their efforts, culminating with the election of Barack Hussein Obama. Its obvious that their plan is to impoverish each and every one of us and then enslave us to an all powerful government until we eventually get to the point where we are completely unable to fight back. And anyone who thinks that Barry "Almighty," is anything other than a committed and very determined enemy of this country hasn't read his books. All one has to do is to actually read his words! Look at the kind of people he's surrounded himself with not only today, but in the past. Look at the list of those who he calls his heroes! Then you have these idiots like Hoyer who go around spouting off a bunch of lies in his defense! The worst part is the number of our rights that Barry and company have now managed to destroy and in a very short time! And yet there still remains a substantial number of morons who will gladly vote for him again. IT'S AMAZING! Trust me when I say, there is much more to come. And the anemic resistance the Republicans are offering up is paltry at best and at worst nonexistent. You know, those morons who suggest that we should hand complete control of our government over to the Democrats so as to reduce "gridlock" have no idea what they're asking for.

CHRIS MATTHEWS, UNHINGED...

Old Chris is doing nothing more than grabbing at straws here.  Anything he can come up to bash Newt, he's gonna try. He just doesn't like him.

NO ONE TALKS OUT OF THEIR ASS BETTER THAN NANCY...

Nope, when it comes to being able to talk out of your ass, no one, or nearly no one, can do it any better than our current House Minority Leader, "Old Stretch" Pelosi. This unique ability of hers was most recently demonstrated in a recent exhibition when she stated that conservative Republicans have not yet rallied behind presidential front-runner Mitt Romney because they don’t believe he can beat Barry "Almighty." I hate to contradict "Old Stretch" here, but it seems like most of the polls that I've seen don't quite agree with her opinion on this matter. “If the far right thought that Romney could win, they might be more enthusiastic about him,” she said in an interview with Politico. “But they question what he stands for, and they don’t think he’s going to win. So what’s the sell? I’m not sure he knows what he stands for, and that makes it harder too.” I'm curious about something though, just who is it that "Old Stretch" is so desperate to convince, exactly?



"Old Stretch," who was successfully used as a piñata by Republicans running for Congress in 2010, voiced confidence that Romney can’t beat Barry. “He’s not going to be president,” she said. Well, Hell's bells, then we might just as well call the whole thing off! Right? The former House majority leader took a swipe at the other GOP presidential candidates too, saying they’re “not exactly what you would call the first-string of the Republican Party.” Ya know, does anyone on our side give a flip about what she has to say? About anything? Anyway, "Old Stretch" also seems to think that there’s a pretty good chance that Democrats will capture the 25 seats needed to regain control of the House in November. She’s actually aiming to pick up 35 seats and cited six states as particularly important: Illinois, New York, California, Texas, Florida, and Arizona. Now again, that notion seems to fly in the face of most information that I've read. From what I've read, the GOP is expected to hold the House and maybe even increase their numbers in that body.


Now while "Old Stretch" is pretty darn talented at talking out her ass, she is far from being the only Democrat possessing such a useful skill. Because when it comes to being able to talk out of one's ass, while Nancy may be one of the absolute best, right there with her, leading the whole pack of ass-talkers, we also have none other that our "Dear Beloved Leader," Barack Hussein Obama. We have seen the evidence of that on any number of occasions, going all the way back to before he was even "elected." We all witnessed the most recent example of this talent of his, of course, when he went out and was making all manner of claims regarding just how it is that his stellar little administration has made, what he described as, "substantial progress" in embracing outside ideas on how best to “solidify” the economic recovery. I'm curious though, just how is it that this shmuck defines progress? Or for that matter, how does he define substantial?


It was his ability to talk out of his ass, and very clearly, that was once again very clearly demonstrated by the comments he recently made to his jobs council. Comment s in which Barry sought to show that his administration was taking very seriously the recommendations of the broad panel of business leaders. He spoke of success in streamlining the permitting processes and cutting regulations. And he hailed his own attempt to get more power from Congress to shrink the cost of government. Cutting regulations? And I'm not sure how his usurping power from Congress is supposed to shrink the cost of government, that's just more of his talking out his ass again. Another area where Barry spends a goodly amount of time talking out his ass is when we hearing doing his best to assure members of his Council on Jobs and Competitiveness that their proposals are not gathering dust. Because in actuality, Barry is determined to do nothing more than to get as many people as possible firmly addicted to the government.


So I'm sure that between now and November 6, we're going to see a near endless flow of examples coming from Barry, and any number of Democrats, standing out there and demonstrating this unique ability that they all seem to possess, of being able to talk out their ass. While they all possess the ability, what they don't all possess is the same skill level. And it's far from being only liberal Democrat politicians who possess this capability. If you spend any amount of time listening to any of those clowns who view themselves as being the Hollywood elite, you'll very quickly recognize that they too possess this skill. Likewise with the majority of those faux journalists out there in the state-controlled media, they too are very skilled in demonstrating this talent. It's like this people think we're too stupid to recognize the fact that they're doing nothing more that talking out of their ass. They're convinced we'll believe them no matter which orifice they're using to bullshit us.

FILE THIS ONE UNDER: YOU JUST CAN’T MAKE SOME PEOPLE HAPPY….

Apparently there was a recent guest who appeared on some program over there at MSNBC with the title, “Now with Alex Wagner.” This guest, someone named Joy-Ann Reid, was rather displeased with what she described as being some blatantly racist behavior by Mitt Romney. Ms. Reid is someone who writes for the some NBCUniversal-owned website called theGrio.com, and is very obviously someone who possesses some very deep-seated race issues of her own. Anyway, during what I guess was some panel discussion, this moron came out and suggested that Mitt Romney is racist. And what exactly did this moron base her accusation against Mr. Romney? Why, it was an action considered to be so deplorable as to be sufficient for there to now be an outcry demanding his removal from the field of GOP candidates. What has this loon so worked up is the fact that Mr. Romney had the nerve to help out a struggling African American woman he met while on the campaign-trail by giving her money from his own wallet. "It galls me,” Ms. Reid fumed. “I don’t even like to watch it. I felt like it plays into every sort of patronizing stereotype of black people. Oh, here’s this little lady, let me give her 50 bucks.” This bitch has absolutely gone round the bend.

So who was this poor unfortunate soul that Mr. Romney saw fit to assist here and the one against whom Ms. Reid claims that Romney very clearly demonstrated his inner racist tendencies? Well, she was a woman by the name of Ruth Williams. When asked about the whole scenario, Ms. Williams said she was praying for divine guidance regarding how she would pay a late electric bill when she happened upon the Gov. Romney's tour bus. It was after talking to Mr. Romney regarding her current troubles, he reportedly gave the woman approximately $50 to help her pay the electric bill. But rather than consider the instance in its full-context here, this racist idiot, Reid, went apoplectic. She was appalled by what she considered to be such an obvious act of condescension toward this black woman. Ms. Reid, apparently was in a state of shocked disbelief that no one else seemed to be as offended as she, least of which was Ms. Williams, the recipient of the $50. Ms. Reid saw fit to launch into what can only be described as being a tirade when she appeared on “Now with Alex Wagner,” appearing with her fellow panelist, some guy by the name of Ari Melber work works over at "The Nation." The heart of the "discussion" seemed to center around the actions of Mitt Romney.


So what follows here is Ms. Reid's opinion regarding her preception of Mr. Romney's typical and, rather unseemly, behavior that she found to be so offensive: "As an African-American woman, it galls me. I don’t even like to watch it. I felt like it plays into every sort of patronizing stereotype of black people. Oh, here’s this little lady, let me give her 50 bucks. I mean, this is the guy who offered a bet of $10,000 on stage, you know, to another candidate, but, you know, here, let me lay off 50 bucks on this woman. And I think it plays into that conservative meme that you don’t need actual programs that the government puts in place to help people in need, we’ll just give them charity. The church will take care of them, I’ll give them 50 bucks." So there you have what it was that caused our poor Ms. Reid to become so offended and insulted. Personally what I would find insulting, if I were black that is, is the amount of destruction that the Democrat Party has rained down on the black community. I think it safe to say that that has played a significant role in Ms Willaims' present predicament. Just how have any of those government programs mentioned by this loon, succeeded in helping out Ms. Williams? Obviously, they haven't, but they have, I assumed, managed to keep her firmly on the Democrat plantation.


Mr. Melber, at least initially, strangely came across as sounding like the voice of reason here as he argued that Romney was simply faced with the emotional decision of wanting to help someone in need. Melber began, “When I worked for campaigns and candidates, you often have these events and people stand up and they don’t have policy questions, they raise their personal problems. And so they talk about how they can’t pay this bill, or they went down to this government agency and had a problem, and, it’s a very difficult thing for candidates because you sort of say, well, if this is a case worker issue, you should talk to someone in my office or let’s send some letters to the agency. There’s that technocratic response. And then there’s the human, heartfelt response, which is, someone’s hurting and they need help.” But it wasn't too long before his leftist sensibilities apparently kicked in as he went on to say, "And the society needs to help them and that’s usually through government. And so, the point I have here is, I think Mitt Romney’s response — he gave this woman cash — was, she needs help. Right? The problem here isn’t just giving the cash, although, your criticisms are on point, the problem is that that’s not how he legislates, because they want to oppose the payroll tax cut. They want to oppose unemployment insurance for people who are between jobs. They basically have a policy that they can’t even defend one-on-one because he feels so bad saying no, which was his government response to her." So he managed to turn what I think was an act of kindness by someone in the position to help out a fellow citizen, into something poltical that he claims give a very clear indication of how Mr. Romney would govern.


So, bottom line here, was this act nothing more than patronizing act on the part of Mr. Romney or was he merely placed in a position where he genuinely felt he needed to help the struggling Ms. Williams. If faced with the same set of circumstances and you were in Romney’s shoes, what would you have done? But you know what, none of the people on this particular panel program give a rats behind about Ms. Williams or her plight. It's seen as nothing more than one more opportunity to bash Republicans. And that this idiot Reid was somehow able to find her way on to this MSNBC program in the first place should really come as no surprise. After all, a little peak into the background of Ms. Wagner reveals the fact that in the past she has worked for the Center for American Progress which is nothing more than yet one of the many front groups sponsored by Democrat sugar-daddy, George Soros. As for Mr. Melber, he currently is employed by The Nation, a publication that's described as a periodical devoted to politics and culture, and is self-described as "the flagship of the left. So once again it is very clearly demonstrated that, if you are serious about gaining for yourself information that is actually considered as being useful, you really shouldn't waste your time watching MSNBC.

WORKING TO IMPLANT THE MYTH OF "CLIMATE CHANGE"…

Those devoted followers of what is essentially that new secular religion, referred to as "climate change," say that the fight against global warming will require the calling into action of increasingly younger soldiers if there is to be any chance of successfully advancing the cause. And so it is then that a group that calls itself the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), some nonprofit, crackpot group that denounces intelligent design and supports an evolution-only curriculum in the classroom, that will now expand what it sees as being its mission to include climate change. This organization is nothing more than a rather odd assortment of supposed scientists, anthropologists and others that is now turning its attention to climate change, and will soon mount an aggressive campaign seeking to bring this nonsense to a school near you if it isn't there already. Their desire is to "teach" to the nation’s schoolchildren that climate change is very real and has as its source, human activity, even though that is far from having been proven. The disciples of this rather twisted religion feel completely justified in their efforts to shove it down the throats of our kids. Their little heads are now to be filled with all manner of highly dubious "climate change" garbage.



“For 20 years, we’ve helped teachers cope with what we can only describe as societal or political problems in teaching evolution. They’re running into the same opposition in teaching climate change,” NCSE Executive Director Eugenie Scott said. And just how, exactly, has little group "helped" teachers? Ms. Scott droned on saying, “We worry, because of our experience with evolution, that basic science is going to be compromised as a result of this political and ideological opposition. Good science needs to be taught.” What a bunch of ideological hogwash. Is this lunatic serious? The attempts that these clowns, like the esteemed Ms. Scott, continue to make in their effort to justify the brainwashing of our kids just never quite ceases to amaze me. What, exactly, makes them right and everybody else wrong. This climate change nonsense has repeatedly been shown to be nothing more than a hoax and at the same time a very purposeful attack on capitalism perpetrated by those on the left. It has been, and continues to be, thoroughly debunked, and yet we have people like this idiot, including our "Dear Beloved Leader," who absolutely insist that it is taking place and advocating the need to combat it, no matter the cost. How you combat something that doesn't exist?


Critics point out important distinctions between the defense of evolution and the promotion of climate change, since the latter carries more obvious and immediate policy implications. These global warming alarmists call for quick implementation of a broad range of federal policies to combat climate change, such as Barry "Almighty's" proposed “cap-and-trade” legislation. Although that measure is on hold, Barry's EPA stands at the ready to once again circumvent Congress, and therefore the will of the people, and implement by decree that which cannot get through the normal legislative process. In addition, the European "Socialist" Union has already put into place a law which requires all airline companies to pay for their carbon emissions during flights in and out of Europe. Officials at the United Nations, that bastion of anti-Americanism, have even called for a global tax on carbon dioxide emissions. Naturally, Ms. Scott maintains that the NCSE wouldn't be so bold as to advocate for teachers to push liberal policy solutions to climate change, but others fear that students will be targets of political indoctrination. Look, if experience tells us anything it's that liberal propagandists like Ms. Scott, will use any and all methods at their disposal in their attempt to manipulate and indoctrinate our children.


“If you say it’s man-made, you must be implying some solutions. [Climate change] is taught to promote a particular political point of view, and that’s the problem,” said Kathleen Porter-Magee, senior director of the High Quality Standards Program at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a Washington-based conservative education think tank. “It’s very different than the evolution debate. The whole evolution versus intelligent design debate very much relates to the issues of separation of church and state. Climate change is different because it doesn’t touch on that at all. It comes from an environmentalist perspective.” Ms. Porter-Magee said such efforts essentially amount to “the politicization of curriculum.” And she is 100 percent right! Even if schools don’t explicitly call for cap-and-trade or similar measures, she said, students could be bombarded with strong subliminal messages to take action against climate change. I think most of us would agree that it is not the job of teachers in our public school system to do anything other than to actually "teach" our children a sufficient understanding of the basics required for them to eventually become self-sufficient members of society. And yet they feel justified in taking certain liberties when defining what it means to "teach."


It's common knowledge that that which can be defined as pure propaganda, is already being peddled to school leaders in the form of supposed textbooks and other learning materials that seem to be geared toward younger and younger students. In fact the University of California at Berkeley, the loon capital of the country, currently operates the website globalwarmingkids.net, a subsection of its climatechangeeducation.org initiative. On this website, instructors can order “Global Warming for Young Minds,” a handbook aimed at 6 to 10-year-olds. It also offers “Let’s Stop Climate Change” DVDs, in which a hippopotamus named Simon encourages children to take action against global warming. Now while principals, superintendents and school boards retain the final say about what their students are taught, that fact doesn't really provide me with a warm and fuzzy. Because let's face it, knowing as we do that our public school system has morphed into what is today nothing more than a system of government sponsored indoctrination centers, are we really that confident that this crap will not make it into the hands of our kids? Very few teachers today actually teach, most see their role as being one that has them perpetuating a warped political philosophy that promotes the "common good." And those of us with children in these schools know how well that has worked out.


And we can always count on judges to muck things up even more, such as when a school board in Dover, Pa., voted in 2004 to require that biology classes teach creationism alongside evolution. Naturally the issue ended up before a federal judge, Judge John E. Jones III, a George W. Bush appointee, who ruled that intelligent design, by its nature, is a religious theory and its teaching in classrooms violated the First Amendment. “There is no comparable provision for climate change. It’s not unconstitutional to teach bad science,” Ms. Scott said. “I don’t see any legal recourse, as we have with the First Amendment for [the teaching of] evolution.” So I'm supposed to understand here that the "bad science" to which Ms. Scott refers, is the science that states climate change is not occurring, or if it is, it is not caused by humans. Anyway, I think we can safely assume that the NCSE, along with any number of other fringe groups, will soon embark on a public relations assault and if it is successful, climate change skeptics could be made to look like the crazies and most likely targeted for their beliefs. Many already have faced persecution with their reputations being destroyed and their lives left in ruins for no other reason than they chose to speak out against this continuing charade. Once again those speaking out must be silenced by any means necessary.


Frankly, I think it safe to say that today the single most dangerous environment for our children is, without a doubt, our public school system. And not only because of any potential violence that may occur there, but because no significant amount of actual learning is taking place there. Our kids today are "taught" such things as the "significant contributions" homosexuals have made to our country, but not about George Washington, the Founding Fathers or our Constitution. They're taught that America has been responsible for some of the world's worst atrocities through either sheer exaggeration of actual facts or the use of outright fictional accounts. There is nary a mention of all the good this country has done and how many people are living in freedom today because of this nation and the bravery of the soldiers it has sent into battle to protect those from tyranny. Climate change is far from being proven, and therefore should not be a topic of instruction, unless taught in the context of a fair and balanced discussion of it as a theory proposed by some and discounted by others. If this nonsense is going to be taught, then students should be allowed to arrive at there own conclusions free of they're being directed toward the outcome desired by their supposed teachers.

BILL MOYERS, OBVIOUSLY JUST ANOTHER GEORGE SOROS STOOGE…

The esteemed Mr. Moyers has been described as everything from an American journalist to a public commentator, whatever the hell that is. I’d love to see what the job description for that. Anyway, in providing a little background on Mr. Moyers, he served as White House Press Secretary for the creator of the “Great Society,” LBJ from 1965 to 1967 which should give you some ideal of just how far out there on the left he resides and worked as a “news” commentator on television for ten years. Mr. Moyers has had extensive involvement with public television, producing all manner of leftist/progressive documentaries and what he refers to as being “news” journal programs. And, apparently, he has gone on to win any number of highly prestigious awards and honorary degrees, which should really not come as all that much of a surprise since he works to spread the same type of propaganda espoused by the givers of those awards and degrees. He has become well known as a trenchant critic of the U.S. media. Since 1990, Moyers has been president of a group called the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy (SCMD). And it should come as no surprise that he currently lives in that bastion of leftwing lunacy, New York City.

Now I can already hear you asking, just what is this Schumann Center for Media and Democracy? It sounds pretty harmless. Well it’s not! This group states that its purpose is “to renew the democratic process through cooperative acts of citizenship, especially as they apply to governance and the environment.” However if you take a good look at its grant-making, you’ll see that it is directed heavily toward organizations whose values are anti-corporate, anti-free market, and anti-capitalist. SCMD deems the United States a nation rife with economic injustice; the remedy it prescribes is a socialist, redistributionist economic model. In offering up the rationale for his taking part in this group, Mr. Moyers puts it this way, “A profound transformation is occurring in America. Inequality is greater than it's been since 1929. Forty years ago, the gap in terms of wealth between the top 20 percent and the bottom 20 percent was 30-fold. Now it's more than 75-fold. Such concentrations of wealth would be far less of an issue if the rest of society were benefiting proportionately. But that's not the case. Middle-class and working people have to run harder and harder just to stay even, and our social stratification has become alarming.” If this doesn’t tell you something about the philosophy of this guy, nothing will.


SCMD is also a major supporter of radical environmentalist organizations whose goal, as writer Mr. Michael Berliner explains, is “not clean air and clean water; rather, it is the demolition of technological/industrial civilization.” What’s more than little ironic here is that at the same time that it’s plotting against them, the Center is heavily invested in the numerous corporations that it classifies as environmentally unfriendly. So essentially, it exploits, as a wealth-generating vehicle, the very capitalist system which it blames for having created a host of environmental ills. The watchdog website UndueInfluence.com characterizes such an investment strategy as "using capitalist investments to destroy capitalist society." For instance, at the very time when Moyers hosted a March 2001 program condemning the chemical industry, SCMD held large investments in chemical companies. Similarly, while Moyers has hosted programs advocating a reduction in America's dependence on foreign oil, SCMD has earned immense profits from its investments in gas and oil companies. The Center’s investment portfolio contains tens of thousands of shares in such companies as Exxon Mobil, Conoco, British Petroleum, Royal Dutch Petroleum, Ford, Keyspan Energy, Pioneer Natural Resource Company, Royal Dutch Petroleum Company, Dow Chemical, Dupont, Shell Oil, Shell Transportation and Trading, and General Motors.


But anyway, enough about this anti-American group that Mr. Moyers is a part of. I only use it as a way to illustrate just how much of a leftist/progressive this guy really is, and from which end the political spectrum he spews his leftist pabulum. Also to prove that you can never simply take at face value anything that he says. One such example, and the one which this post was written to point out, is when Mr. Moyers just last Friday said that billionaire leftist and certifed loon, George Soros has “been the victim, of course, of Glenn Beck and the right-wing, the Fox News assassins.” Moyers made his idiotic comments in a discussion with Huffington Post founder, and fellow left wingnut, Arianna Huffington, during which he also praised Soros, whom Moyers also said is “deeply troubled by the Orwellian power of the right-wing in this country today.” So here he is, in his own words:


BILL MOYERS: “I’ll tell you somebody you could, you should go for, because he has given more thought to this than almost anyone I know: George Soros, believe it or not. George Soros, whatever you think about his wealth or his politics, George Soros was next to Vaclav Havel I think the most catalytic agent for helping to bring down the Communist government behind the Iron Curtain because he, he gave everybody who wanted one an equivalent of a Xerox machine, and so they could get the message out. And he is deeply troubled by the Orwellian power of the right-wing in this country today. He talks about it. I was on his board for a several years, and I’m off now that I’m back on the air, but I was on his board, and he is deeply troubled. He is a great devotee of the open society, the society that does change because it listens to itself, and learns from its experience. He’s been the victim, of course, of Glenn Beck and the right-wing, the Fox News assassins. So he’s thought a great deal about the Orwellian idea, and he said it has arrived in this country. It is here, part of the permanent, a permanent characteristic of American democracy which is therefore self-suicidally bent because of the power and force of propaganda. He’d be somebody I know would write you a really good piece for that.”


The fact that anyone, anywhere can bring themselves believe any of this drivel very clearly demonstrates the level of success the left in this country has been able to achieve in the brainwashing of our citizens. Because under “normal” circumstances anything that this guy, along with airhead Arianna, would have to say would have been sufficient for them to be laughed off the stage. The fact that they weren’t in this case, and never are, is a very clear indicator of just how much trouble this country is in. These people are nothing more than today’s useful idiots, used by the likes of George Soros in their efforts to completely unravel this country. And apparently Mr. Moyers is only to happy to act in that capacity. I can only assume that he hates this country as much as Soros does. I simply do not understand people like Moyers, because in what other country on this planet would he, one, be able to say some of the things that he says, and two, be paid a lot of money to say them. The American people are going to need to come to grips with what it is that’s being perpetrated against them and be a little more willing to take a closer look at people like Moyers. People need to be willing to question the things they’re told, and not be so eager to simply accept out of hand what these people are telling them, about anything.

OUR MISSION IS CLEAR, OUR TIME IS NOW…OBAMA MUST GO!

Ok, I must admit that I'm more than just a little confused here. The reason for my current state of confusion has to do with what would normally appear to be some rather conflicting information. You see, while many elements of our society appear to be shifting ever-further toward the left end of the political spectrum and at an ever-increasing rate of speed, a recent Gallup poll released just this past Thursday would seem to indicate just the opposite. You see, according to this survey, conservatives continue to make up the largest political segment in the country, outnumbering liberals by nearly two-to-one. So I find myself asking, if that's so, then just what the Hell is going one here? Are liberals simply that much smarter in how they go about executing an agenda that's specifically designed to destroy our country than we conservatives are in how we go about trying to prevent them from doing so? If that's the case, then we had better smarten up and quick, or we'll be living in a country that will soon be completely unrecognizable to us. We can't afford to wait, we've already wasted far too much time.



The recent Gallup poll to which I refer seems to show that 40 percent of all Americans now identify themselves as being conservative; while 35 percent see themselves as moderate; and 21 percent view themselves as liberal. The figures are essentially no different than they were back in 2010 and conservatives have outnumbered both moderates and liberals for three years running now. According to Politico, "Conservatives began outstripping moderates in 2008, and the percentage of moderates has declined steadily over the last two decades, from 43 percent 1992 to 35 percent in 2011. In fact, both self-identified conservatives and liberals have risen in number since the early 1990s, indicating a growing polarization in American politics. While self-identified conservatives dominate the Republican Party, making up 71 percent, the Democratic Party is more split – 39 percent of Democrats view themselves as liberal, and 38 percent consider themselves moderates." So you would think that the numbers would be there for us to put the brakes on this leftward slide, and yet the slide seems to continue be accelerating unhindered.


It might be worth noting here that, at least according to the poll’s findings, independents are mainly moderate (41 percent), but veer more towards conservatism (35 percent) than liberalism (20 percent). Look I don't buy any of this "moderate" or "independent" crap. And at some point very soon, these supposed "moderates and/or independents" are going to have to get off the fence and make some sort of commitment regarding their willingness to fight for the survival of our country. What seems to be playing out here is a scenario the likes of which would have had the guys in the Alamo whipping Santa Ana's army or Custer's 7th Cavalry coming out on top over the Indians in the battle at Little Big Horn. Now does that make any sense to anyone? Other than some boneheaded liberal of course. Personally I think it is now well past the time for us to start flexing our conservative muscle and work toward the ridding ourselves of Barry "Almighty" and getting Congress back on the "right" side of the important issues. What we need to do this year, is to build upon what was accomplished in the election of 2010.


But as we have seen, many on our side either didn't get the message that was so loudly sent that day in November 2010, or they simply chose to ignore it and us. So essentially what we have now been forced to do is to take matters even more into our own hands. And make no mistake here, it's not only Democrats who have proven themselves to be the speed bump regarding our being able to reclaim our country, there are plenty of guilty Republicans as well. We have guys like John McCain and Lindsey Graham, and of course lets not forget the girls from Maine, to name only four. There are many more than just these four "moderates," and what we need to now be focusing in on, is the replacing of them at our earliest opportunity. We no longer really have the luxury to fool around and wait for them to see the light. This coming election could very likely prove to be our last chance to make a stand. And if there really are all those conservatives out there, there would not be a better time than November of this year for them to find their voice. Because you know what they say, "Like sand through an hourglass, so are the days of our lives."


(The Gallup poll was conducted with 20,392 respondents and allows for a margin of error of plus or minus one.)

OBAMA THREATENING US WITH EVEN MORE CHANGE…GOD HELP US!

In what has been described, by those who like to talk about such things, as being an attempt by Barry to give his re-election a jump-start, we see him having recently held some "hometown" fund-raisers and rallies. At one in particular, he told the 500 or so cheering fans in attendance, “Everything that we fought for is now at stake in this election.” He repeated the message at more intimate gatherings in private homes in Lake View and Kenwood. He fired up the troops in his very first visit to his national headquarters in the Prudential Building. And he even stopped in to his own home for 20 minutes at the end of the night before flying back to Washington, D.C. He hopes the fund-raisers bring in more than $2 million for what he told donors would be a “close race.” He went on to tell those assembled, “If you’re willing to work even harder in this election than you did in the last election, I promise you, change will come. God bless you Chicago, I love you!” he told the faithful who had gathered at the UIC Forum after some singer by the name of Janelle Monae had sufficiently warmed them up.



His “neighbor,” some clown named Stuart Taylor, who is, I guess, an executive with Bear Stearns, if you can believe that, actually told Barry, “Our message to you on behalf of everyone gathered here is very simple and that is: We’ve got your back, despite what you might hear or read.” Is that not one of the most hilarious things you’ve ever heard? But Barry's friends all cheered. This doofus Taylor, went on, “If you look around the room, these are people who were there for you going way back,” Taylor said. “We’re here for you. We’re no less enthusiastic this time around than we were the last time.” Our "Fearless Leader" flew to Chicago on Air Force One, courtesy of the taxpayers, with senior advisor Valerie Jarrett and outgoing chief of staff Bill Daley, who has decided to leave the White House earlier than planned. “I want to say a special word about a friend of ours, a man who has done extraordinary work for me and performed extraordinary service for our country over the past year, Bill Daley,” Obama said at the first event of the night at UIC. “As much as I will miss him in the White House, he will be an extraordinary asset to our campaign. He’s going to be helping us win in 2012.”


Barry then went on to list all the promises that he claims he's now made good on. You know, the ones like his acquisition of our entire health care system; his decision to allow gays to serve openly in the military and, of course, his bringing the troops home, albeit, just a bit too early. Milestones all! He also, of course, took the time to list the issues that he says his Republican opponents were wrong on. Things like education funding, environmental protection and, of course that ever present one, worker rights. Barry slammed his GOP opponents without mentioning their names saying, “When you’ve got the top Republican saying his No. 1 priority isn’t creating more jobs, solving the health care problems; it isn’t making sure were competitive in the 21st century, but it’s to beat me — then you know things aren’t on the level,” Barry said. “They’ll fight with their last breath to protect tax cuts for the most fortunate in America, but they’ll play political games with tax cuts for the middle class.” It was all nothing more than the same old broken record stuck on the same note and playing over and over and over, until you just want to scream.


Playing to this crowd of losers, Barry said, “I’ll be honest with ya: I wouldn’t mind popping over to the United Center — I think the Bulls are playing tonight. They are off to a fine start. You might have heard the Dallas Mavericks came to the White House on Monday to celebrate their championship. I told them to ‘Enjoy it — because the Bulls will be here next year.’” Barry joked about having to return to these donors so often to ask for money. “This will be my last campaign,” Barry assured them. He quoted former federal appellate justice and Clinton White House Counsel Abner Mikva: “Being friends with a politician is like permanently having a child in college: Every year another tuition check. But I’m finally graduating.” I can't swear that his ever-present teleprompter was anywhere in the vicinity, but since he never opens his mouth without it, I can only assume that it had to there somewhere. But then maybe not, I'm sure this was considered as being a very "friendly crowd, where there was really little chance that anyone would be holding him to account if there was something that might accidentally slip out.


Going back to what he said about, “that we fought for is now at stake in this election,” actually what's really at stake here is not so much everything that Barry has "fought for," what's actually at stake this time around is the survival of our country. We simply cannot afford four more years of this guy. Hell, we haven’t been able to afford the first three years of him being the Oval Office. Four more years of this kind of spending and we'll be toast. And what about all of those promises that h claims to have made good on? How have any of those “promises kept” made the lives of average Americans any better than they were before? Who among us is better off today than we were before Barry arrived to rescue us? He has us spending our grand children’s money and expects us to appreciate al that he has done “for” us. But look at all that he has been successful in doing to us! He has reduced us to roughly the equivalent of some third rate European country at best and some impoverished banana republic at worst. Is the future he envisions for us the same one that we not only envision for ourselves, but for children? Think about it!

AND NOW, EVEN MORE FROM THE DUMBEST BITCH ON THE PLANET...

And yes, ladies and gentlemen, I am once again talking about none other than the stellar Chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, Ms. Debbie Wizzerman Schultz. You know, every time I think I’ve heard this dim bulb say the dumbest thing that I’ve ever heard, damn if she doesn’t come up with something even dumber. It’s amazing! Now you would think that there would be somebody, anybody, standing by whenever she gets the urge to open her pie hole and suggest that maybe, just maybe, she should just shut the hell up. The most recent example of this moron's miniscule brain power came about when she chose, once again, to malign the Tea Party as she went about reminding a New Hampshire audience of the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords a year ago. I can only assume that Ms. Giffords, being a fellow Democrat and all, cares very little if she is used in such a way by Ms. Wizzerman Schultz.



"We need to make sure that we tone things down, particularly in light of the Tucson tragedy from a year ago, where my very good friend, Gabby Giffords, who is doing really well, by the way,” was shot, said Rep. Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla. "The discourse in America, the discourse in Congress in particular . . . has really changed, I'll tell you. I hesitate to place blame, but I have noticed it take a very precipitous turn towards edginess and lack of civility with the growth of the tea party movement." This type of behavior is nothing if not very typical those in Ms. Wizzerman Schultz’s party. But to tell you the truth, I’m just not sure who is left to buy this cockamamie drivel being spewed by Ms. Wizzerman Schultz anymore! I mean, where is it today that you hear the most hateful, angry, vile and incendiary rhetoric coming from today. Certainly not from anyone on the Right, and that includes the Tea Party. Listen to anyone on MSNBC or NPR, and that’s just the tame stuff.


So I can only guess that all of foul language and behavior spewed by those losers who comprised that supposed grassroots movement referred to as Occupy Wall Street is to be considered by Ms. Wizzerman Schultz as being totally acceptable. She made the charge that Tea Party members have disrupted town hall meetings and added, "When they come and disagree with you, you're not just wrong, you're the enemy." Now I could be wrong, but it also seems that I remember something about some rather sizeable, and more than a little unseemly, crowds in Wisconsin and Ohio not all that long ago. Crowds that were made up of nuts who were 100 percent liberal, unionized public employees. And when you place these loons next to the Tea Party folks, the differences are pretty stark, with the Tea Party folks coming out looking pretty tame. And the Tea Party folks always clean up after themselves, unlike those destructive slobs on the left.


That's what I love about these wacked out liberals, like Wizzerman Schultz, it’s always, do as I say not as I do. They continue to accuse those on the right of using the same standards, or lack of standards, for conduct. She places ownership of tactics so routinely used by those on the left, with the right. She’s a despicable liar. More often than not every time you see one of these Liberal Democrats on some news show or Sunday talk show, all that they want to is evade actually talking substantively about the issues and descend into what usually is nothing more than a shouting match as they go about trying to shout down of anyone of opposing views. Everything from the destruction of private property and all manner of disruptive tactics, are considered fair play by the likes of Ms. Wizzerman Schultz. And yet she can, and with no problem whatsoever, and while proudly wearing her political hack hat, accuse those who had absolutely nothing to do with the terrible act that she was referencing in an apparent effort to make some sort of political point.

OBAMA DETERMINED TO INFECT OTHERS WITH HIS UNIQUE BRAND OF TOXIC HATRED….

Whenever you listen to Barry, if you’re being honest with yourself that is, you have to wonder, does he actually believe all of the tripe that he’s peddling, or is it all simply nothing more than typical liberal politics? I only ask that because in hearing some of his more recent rhetoric, consisting of some patently false, and rather silly, accusations being made against the Republicans, he appears somewhat desperate in his desire to tap into voter ignorance. I mean, sometimes it's almost as if he just opens his mouth and shit falls out. Barry has now actually come out and accused the Republicans of wanting to make America more like China and of seeking to roll back the minimum wage and of wanting to prevent collective bargaining. And he went a bit further saying that the GOP actually wants to “get rid” of clean air and water rules. I simply cannot believe that there are actually enough people, outside of the loon fringe that forms the mainstay of his supporters, that is, that actually believe such idiotic nonsense. Anyway, Barry made these idiotic comments at a campaign fundraiser held at the Capital Hilton in Washington on the eve of the New Hampshire Republican presidential primary.

So it was then at that same Monday night event I wrote about in the previous post, that Barry really outdid himself when he said, “Republicans in Congress and these candidates, they think that the best way for America to compete for new jobs and businesses is to follow other countries in a race to the bottom,” Barry told a room full of devoted followers and typical Democratic donors. “They figure, well, China pays low wages, we should pay low wages,” he continued. “Let’s roll back the minimum wage. Let’s prevent folks from organizing for collective bargaining in this country. Since other countries allow corporations to pollute as much as they want, why not get rid of the protections that ensure our air is clean and our water is clean.” That’s right, those evil Republicans are perfectly fine with making water and air as dirty and as polluted as possible. Now just how low of an IQ does someone need to have in order for them to believe something as stupid as this. Or, I suppose I could also ask, just how much of a corrput political hack does someone need to be to even make such accusations in the first place? And of course, it should come as no surprise that he included a pitch for his union friends.


At the Monday campaign fundraising event, Barry also set about the touting of what he apparently sees as being his glorious record of accomplishments since coming into office. He talked about such things as his seizure of our health care system, his allowing of gays to now serve openly in the military, his premature withdrawing of U.S. troops from Iraq and, of course, the killing of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Yup, I guess he’s determined to keep milking that bin Laden thing all the way up to the election. On regulation, Barry said he does not want more regulations than necessary, but rather “smart government.” By contrast, he repeated his line that Republicans want a “race to the bottom.” “But I don’t believe a race to the bottom is one that we should be trying to win,” Barry said. “We should be trying to win the race to the top. We should be competing to make sure that we’ve got the best schools in the world, and our workers have the best training and skills in the world, and we’ve got a college education within reach of everybody who wants to go. That’s the race we should be trying to win.” What a bunch of bullshit!


So it's a race to the bottom that the Republicans want, or so Barry says. Can you believe it? And what is it that he sees as being their rationale for such a thing. Personally, I've seen very little evidence that would lead me to believe that that is what they would like to achieve. What I have seen, and what's sorta ironic here, is the fact that Barry seems to not only want a race to the bottom, but currently not only has this country in such a race, but has us well out in front. Look, when Barry first came a struttin his cool self into the Oval Office, the very first thing he did was to set a course for us, as a country, that headed us directly toward the bottom. The second thing he did was to essentially stomp on the gas. It’s Barry, not the Republicans, who favors any kind of a race to the bottom. Barry is a devout socialist, and to make it easier for him to advance his statist agenda, he must first make things so bad that the people are literally begging for the government to step in. He has to completely extinguish any sense of self-reliance or individualism, to erase any hope that we can get through things on our won without the "helping hand" from the government. No, if there is anyone dedicated to a race to the bottom, it's Barack Hussein Obama.


And Barry "Almighty" also smugly touted what he likes to call his “We Can’t Wait,” agenda, which is how he refers to his circumventing of Congress, whenever possible, through the issuance of any number of executive actions. He sees himself as being above having to bother with obtaining any congressional authorization. Specifically, he cited the fuel efficiency standards that were unilaterally imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “Change is the decision we made to stop waiting for Congress to do something about our oil addiction and go ahead and finally raise fuel efficiency standards on cars, and now, by the next decade we are going to be driving cars that get 55 miles to a gallon,” Barry said. “And that is going to help our environment. That will help our economy. That’s going to help consumers.” “But we can’t wait,” he later said. “Whenever this Congress refuses to act in a way that hurts our economy and puts our people at risk, I’ve got an obligation as president to do what we can without them. I’ve got an obligation to work on behalf of you and the American people. I’m not going to let members of Congress put party ideology ahead of the people that they were elected to serve – not when there’s this much at stake.” In what country are we living, the United States or Venezuela?


Finally, I think it very safe to say that if there is anyone in America today who is desperate to make America more like China, that person is…Barack Hussein Obama. It’s certainly no one in the Republican Party. So Barry can just peddle that shit to his fellow socialists because anyone with a brain cell ain't gonna be buying it. Barry says he wants “smart government.’ Gee, talk about your basic oxymoron. There ain’t no such a thing. What Barry wants is an intrusive government, an all-powerful government, a government that is capable of controlling every aspect of our lives. And what, by the way, does the raising the fuel efficiency standards on our cars do for us, especially when it comes to making us less dependent on foreign oil. What we need to be doing is drilling for more oil here at home and not standing by as Canada ships oil to China that could instead be piped to Texas. But that’s something that Barry remains stubbornly opposed to. I listen to all of this stuff, and I’m curious, who is it exactly that believes this kinda of pabulum. I mean it is so far removed from reality, it simply makes no sense. So how is it then that some much of what he says, which can so easily be proven to be false, is being judged as fact by so many?