BRAIN-DEAD HAGS FROM THE HOUSE SEEM NONE TOO HAPPY WITH JOHN MCCAIN…

PART I

 

PART II

 

PART III

 

PART IV

 

 

It would seem that several Democrat hags from the House, unhappy with the way he has characterized the statements made by our less than impressive U.S. Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, attacked Sen. John McCain as a racist, a sexist. They said that his criticism of U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice amounted to mugging and battering. "There is a clear, a clear in my opinion, sexism and racism that goes with these comments that are being made by, unfortunately, Sen. McCain and others," Congressional Black Hag Caucus chairmoron Rep. Marsha ‘Fudge’ said in a press conference Friday on Capitol Hill. "And I strongly stand by that statement." Personally, if I was McCain, I’d laugh right in this idiot’s face.

Ms. "Fudge" said that Republican critics of Rice, including McCain, had never called a man "unqualified" or "not bright", referring to comments he made on CBS’ This Morning program Thursday. "All of the things that they have disliked about things that have gone on in this administration they have never called a male unqualified, not bright, not trustworthy. I don’t recall it ever happening," ‘Fudge’ said. During the same press conference, another rather dim bulb by the name of Gwen Moore who was, I guess, compelled to throw in her two cents worth by saying that McCain and other "men" should not be allowed to "attack" or "batter this woman," Rice. "What unmitigated gall for these men to attack the permanent representative to the United Nations Susan E. Rice," Moore said. What a bunch of bunk!

"We all understand that all of us have been disappointed in one way or another about the results of the election – but to batter this woman because they don’t feel they have had the ability to batter President Obama is something that we, the women, are not going to stand by and watch."  Moore said that because of his criticism of Rice, she no longer considered McCain a "gentleman." Gee. I’ll bet that brings a tear to his one good eye. She muttered on, "There was a time when I regarded Mr. McCain in particular as a gentleman. I am sad that this is not one of those moments," she said. Sure she did. This imbecile wouldn’t recognize a gentleman if he bit her on her big ass. And I’m with McCain here, sometime you just got to call a spade, a spade!

And as bizarre as this sounds Rice is now reported to be on the short list to be nominated to replace Hitlery Clinton as Secretary of State, and on Wednesday, and McCain has said that he "will do everything in my power to block her (Rice) from being the United States secretary of state." Rice stirred up controversy when she told a what were actually lies to a series of Sunday talk shows on Sept. 16 describing the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, five days earlier as a "spontaneous reaction" to an online video clip denigrating the Prophet Mohammed. U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the attack, which was subsequently dubbed a terrorist attack two weeks after it occurred.

McCain told Fox News: "Susan Rice should have known better and if she didn’t know better, she is not qualified. She should have known better." Referring to Rice on "CBS This Morning," McCain said the ambassador was, at the least, guilty of "not being very bright, because it was obvious that this was not a 'flash mob' and there was additional information by the time she went on every news show in America." Graham, on CBS "Face the Nation" on Sunday, had said of Rice: "I think Susan Rice would have an incredibly difficult time getting through the Senate. I would not vote for her unless there’s a tremendous opening up of information explaining herself [on Benghazi] in a way she has not yet done." Both of these men, of course, are right!!