When looking from the outside in it’s easy to make
the assumption that the Republican Party, at least within the confines of the
Washington beltway, is far from having its act together. As evidenced by its inability to make good on
its promise to repeal and replace Obamacare and the passage of yet another
wasteful spending bill that accomplishes nothing more than to grow the
government. Our problem, which is very
much in need of being corrected come the 2018 election, is the fact that currently
it’s only roughly 60 out of the 238 Republicans in the House that can in any
way be considered as conservative. And
things are even worse over in the Senate.
But to make the claim that the Democrat Party is anything other than a
party headed in multiple directions at the same time takes naïveté to a whole
new level.
And it is none other than Nancy Pelosi, who I can
only assume must be suffering from what can only be described as a rather
severe case denial, who refuses to acknowledge just how severely fractured her
Democrat Party truly is. And it was when
she was recently asked by ABC’s Jonathan Karl to grade the Democrats during the
first 100 days of President Donald Trump’s administration, Pelosi responded,
“In terms of unity, 100 percent unified.”
To which Karl shot back asking her, “Two-thirds of the American people say
the Democratic Party is out of touch … Isn’t the Democratic Party a bit of a
mess right now?” Pelosi responded, “No,
it isn’t.” However, there are those
within her party, and even in the left leaning state-controlled media, willing
to point out just how divided the Democrats are.
For instance, it was just last month recently
appointed Democratic National Committee Vice Chairman Keith Ellison took it
upon himself to blame former president Obummer for his party’s 2016 losses and
not being a “better party leader.” And according
to The Hill, while speaking at an event at the University of Minnesota, Ellison
said, “Look I’m a great fan of President Obama … But Barack Obama could have
been a better party leader, and I think the fact that he wasn’t put his legacy
in jeopardy.” The devastation that took
place in the Democrat Party across all levels of government is really nothing
short of staggering. I won’t bore anyone
by repeating the numbers, but the Democrat Party is now a shell of its former
self and it’s all because of the man who so many had once viewed as being the
second coming.
And then we have she who is the left’s progressive
darling, Elizabeth Warren, who has also criticized Obummer’s “giant bling
spots” in his communication with “most Americans.” And it was ‘Crazy Old’ Liz who, in a recent
interview, said, “I think President Obama, like many others in both parties,
talk about a set of big national statistics that look shiny and great but
increasingly have giant blind spots.”
And she went on to say, “That GDP, unemployment, no longer reflect the
lived experiences of most Americans.”
Liz also said she was “troubled” that Obummer received $400,000 to
address a Wall Street conference on health care this fall. This all coming from someone who has on any
number of occasions revealed herself to be little more than a complete
fraud. A trait that seems to bother those
in her home state very little.
And there’s the geriatric socialist, Bernie Sanders,
who represents a prime example of the division between the Democrat Party’s
Establishment and progressive wings. He
too has blasted Obummer about his rather “distasteful” Wall Street speech. Speaking with the Communist News Network (CNN)
just last month, Sanders said Obummer’s decision to take that opportunity was
“not a good idea,” and that he was “sorry President Obama made that choice … I
just think it is distasteful — not a good idea that he did that.” Weren’t these boobs paying the least amount
of attention over the course of the last eight years, or were they just turning
a blind eye because at least there was a Democrat in the White House. Obummer is simply proving himself to be the
kind of guy that most of us on the right always knew him to be.
However, the party’s weakness becomes most evident
when examining the tension that now seems to exist between DNC Chairman Tom
Perez and Sanders. Just this week, the
DNC snubbed Sanders and his supporters, arguing that the party did not owe them
a “fair” 2016 primary process. Can you imagine?
The Washington Examiner reported, “DNC lawyers argue that they don’t owe
anyone a fair process, and that the rules in their charter are basically not
binding in court. In fact, if they
wanted, DNC attorney Bruce Spiva argued, they could choose their nominee in a
smoke-filled back room and it still wouldn’t be legally actionable.” So why is it that any reasonably intelligent
individual chooses to tolerate such arrogance?
Or are they simply willing to overlook such behavior for what has become
a growing list of ‘freebies’?
DNC Chair Tom Perez has also contributed to the
party’s divisiveness by making pro-life Democrats feel unwelcome in the party. In a statement last month, Perez said, “Every
Democrat, like every American, should support a woman’s right to make her own
choices about her body and her health,” adding that “every candidate who runs
as a Democrat should” share the “Democratic Party’s position on women’s
fundamental rights.” In response, the
Nebraska Democrat Party’s Chair Jane Kleeb called Perez’s comments
“deplorable.” According to The Atlantic,
Kleeb said, “Tom Perez put every Democrat who is leading our party at the
nationwide and statewide level in a very difficult position” by issuing a
statement “that is now being interpreted as him saying he does not accept
pro-life Democrats in the party.”
As for Pelosi, members of her own party have called
her “out of touch” with her Democrat base.
And in a 2016 interview with CBS News’ Face the Nation, Pelosi said, “I
don’t think people want a new direction.”
And just this past November Rep. Cedric Richmond criticized Pelosi,
suggesting her proposals to empower junior members of Congress, by making
certain positions available only to lawmakers who have served fewer than three
or four terms, while she and Reps. Jim Clyburn and Steny Hoyer remain in their
current posts, could decrease the Congressional Black Caucus’s power while increasing
her own. Richmond wrote, “The reality is
that, from the perspective of the CBC, some changes may be beneficial while
others may have severe unintended consequences that could diminish our power as
a caucus within the Democratic Caucus.”
I think we can all agree that if there is one thing
on which the Democrat Party stands united, it would the deep level of hatred that
they have for America. A hatred, I dare
say, that is possessed by nearly every single individual who identifies as a
Democrat. There is that old adage, which
I’m sure most as familiar with, which says, “Those who fail to learn from
history are doomed to repeat it.” And I
only bring it up in an effort to point out how there are essentially eight
levels of control which must first be successfully obtained before one is able
to create a Socialist/Communist state.
And what I find to be rather striking, and more than a little
frightening, is that there is a very clear similarity that exists between these
eight levels of control and what has been consistently laid out in the platform
of the Democrat Party, and for decades.
And if you don’t believe me, then compare for
yourself:
1. Healthcare: “Control healthcare and you control
the people.”
2. Poverty: “Increase the poverty level as high as
possible.” Poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are
providing everything for them to live.
3. Debt: “Increase the National Debt to an
unsustainable level.” That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will
produce more poverty.
4. Class warfare: “Divide the people into the
wealthy against the poor. Racially divide.”
This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the wealthy
with full support of the voting poor.
5. Welfare: “Take control of every aspect of their
lives” (Food, livestock, housing and income).
6. Education: “Take control of what people read and
listen to (news media), along with control of what children learn in school.”
7. Religion: “Remove faith in God from the
government and school.”
8. Gun Control: “Remove the ability to defend
themselves from the government.” That way you are able to create a police state
- total local control.
Pelosi is too narcissistic, senile or perhaps
demented to look around and see that she has become irrelevant. Perez is so far to the left he can't stand up
straight. And then there’s Ellison, a known
Moslem and a vocal supporter of the Moslem Brotherhood. Sanders is 100% a Socialist as is Warren. The Marxist, Socialist/Progressive Democrat
Party wants nothing more than to destroy the Union. Democrats and their judges choose which parts
of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights they will obey. Obummer the community agitator operated the very
same way. Their goal remains to get the majority
of American citizens completely dependent on government. Leading to an
Oligarchy destroying the sovereignty of American citizens. And it’s RINOs like Paul Ryan who are in
lockstep with these very same vile Democrats.
Now where I do agree with Pelosi is when it comes to
how the Democrats, unlike Republicans, ALWAYS stick together, no matter what.
The Republicans rarely work together and are just as likely to work with Democrats
as they are with anyone in their own party.
Proof of that is seen in the recent spending bill just passed in the
House where more Democrats voted in favor of it than did Republicans. And it’s the Republicans who are in control
of House. Which provided us with yet
another perfect example of how the Republicans were elected based almost solely
on their false promises, and then almost immediately flip over to become Democrats
once safely in office. Come 2018
conservatives must band together and get rid of many of these RINOs as possible
and replace them with likeminded leaders.
And where Democrats are like pit bulls, who hang together
and hang onto their focus, Republicans tend to be more like squirrels trying to
decide whether or not to run across the road. And it’s even while in the minority that the
Democrats have now chalked up three substantial victories: the blocking of two attempts
at an immigration freeze in court and now this budget ‘deal’. Make no mistake, they are starting to rally.
Vetoing the bill and raking up the wrongly adjudicated decision in the Supreme
Court, AND looking for some body shots to Democrats is now in order. Sadly it looks to me as if the president is
allowing the Democrats to appear stronger than they are, hopefully there will
come a point where they will get a little overconfident reach for something he
chooses not to allow them and WACK! We
can only hope.
No comments:
Post a Comment