Rarely have I ever found that actors have any of the
answers to those questions that are truly important. After all, nothing screams intelligence more
than having the ability to read those words that someone else has written while
pretending to be someone other than who you really are. And, pretending to be something you're not, I
guess, makes you an expert on that particular subject. These ‘actors’ have a writer create the lines
for them, they have a director to tell them how to act those words out and
they have costume designers who pick out the clothes they wear while acting out
those words written by someone else.
What exactly is it that actors do based on their own skills? That would, of course, be absolutely NOTHING!
Which brings me to the point of this post. You see, it was in a recent guest column for
the Washington Post that ‘actor’ Robert Redford described the difficulty he had
in getting Hollywood producers interested in his 1976 film ‘All the President’s
Men’. A movie, frankly I have never seen
and never will, and one which revolves around the investigation into former
President Richard Nixon’s Watergate scandal.
And it was in Redford’s guest column that he warns us all that, once
again, 45 years after that politically momentous event, “the truth is again in
danger.” While I would in fact agree
with his overall assessment, where Redford and I part ways is in identifying
who is it that’s the primary offender when it comes to having placed the truth
in such peril.
It in writing his little piece for the Washington
Post that Redford says, “This year marks the 45th anniversary of the Watergate
scandal. Because of my role in the film, some have asked me about the
similarities between our situations in 1972 and 2017.” He goes on to say, “There are many. The
biggest one is the importance of a free and independent media in defending our
democracy.” Bobby went on say, “When
President Trump speaks of being in a “running war” with the media, calls them
“among the most dishonest human beings on Earth” and tweets that they’re the
“enemy of the American people,” his language takes the Nixon administration’s
false accusations of “shoddy” and “shabby” journalism to new and dangerous
heights.”
And it was something that he said that I found quite
hilarious, although I’m not sure he intended it to be, but I’m assuming he
didn’t. It was when he said, “Sound and
accurate journalism defends our democracy. It’s one of the most effective
weapons we have to restrain the power-hungry. I always said that “All the
President’s Men” was a violent movie. No shots were fired, but words were used
as weapons.” As much as I hate to
disagree with Redford’s rather skewed perception of things, the truth is that
today’s ‘journalism’ is neither sound nor accurate! More often than not what’s we’re witnessing
is journalistic malpractice on what is nothing less than an epic scale, to the
point where it more closely resembles propaganda than accurate information!
Like Hillary wasn't, and continues to be, a threat
to the truth. But then according to liberals
the truth is whatever they say it is.
Which begs the question, where was Redford when Hitlery and Barry were
lying through their pearly whites, and the state-controlled media, which
Redford claims is both sound and accurate, was backing them up? Barry blatantly lied about Obamacare, and
Hitlery lied many times over regarding her emails and email server. Barry lied about learning of Hitlery's server
in the news, while he had sent her emails suspiciously using an alias, emails that
we've not yet seen. The Russians might
release all or some of those emails, because they likely got them by hacking
her unsecured server, blackmailing her and Barry as a result.
Redford's desire for "truth" seems simply
partisan, that or he shows his foolish belief in the liberal media without
question. Why do you think he's an
'actor'? He, like all the rest of the
Hollyweird buffoons, has no clue who or what they are. That is why they are
always trying to be someone else. They
are trying to find themselves in being someone else. Fake people, living in a fake reality trying
to convince other folks they are relevant and should be listened to. What they really need to do is first figure
out who they are and quit trying to tell the rest of us how much better they
are than us. Yes, Robert, the truth is
in danger. When the state-controlled
media can declare war on one candidate and then the president, all the while
justifying it.
But the sad fact is the truth is always in danger
whenever our state-controlled media refuses to acknowledge, let alone refuses
to report, that intelligence briefings and evidence is now surfacing that leaves
very little room for doubt that the outgoing administration very likely not
only spied on and ordered up surveillance on the in-coming administration, but
then leaked classified info while unmasking American citizens, and then
disseminated the findings all across the intelligence community. And all for political gain. But those like Redford see absolutely nothing
wrong with that because such actions are seen as being somehow justified
because of whom the actions were taken against.
And in so doing they miss the point entirely!
And ya know, I can’t help but wonder how many of
those out there in ‘Kookville’, aka Hollyweird, actually believe what it is
that they say especially when there is now an overwhelming amount of evidence that
makes it so very clear that what has happened is so very obviously just the
opposite of their incendiary claims. Trump
is actually the victim here, of Barry's surveillance, yet their fanaticism has
truly blinded them. It was Barry, whose
IRS went after common citizens in the Tea Party, and who created the video fall
guy in Benghazi-Gate, and who went after members of the press. And every time they wish to drive home a
point, they are either animated, melodramatic, hysterical or just playing dumb
or maybe not really ‘playing’ dumb at all.
Redford is an jerk. And if you’ll remember, Nixon resigned over
his attempt to cover up the break in.
The break in of the DNC. It was
one party spying on the other party. Politics in its most pure and nastiest form.
What is going on now is the U.S. government spying on private citizens. Do you see the difference? The left only want to subjugate the rest of
us. Not working out so well in Europe is
it? Redford, like most Hollyweird
actors, is a sanctimonious know-nothing blowhard. What’s going on right now is
the exact inverse of Watergate. You have a president, Barry, who illegally
surveilled his political opposition and instead of helping bring this powder
keg story to light the state-controlled media is doing everything it can to
obfuscate and bury it.
Actors, like the vast majority of lawyers, are
little more than professional liars. Add
then when you add into the mix politicians and our many faux journalists and
it’s no wonder that truth is on its last leg.
Lying can now be said to have become a reflex action for those on the
left, like Redford, whenever it is that things don’t seem to be going their
way, politically speaking. And why is
it, do you suppose, that anyone in their right mind would ever think that just
because someone like Redford the actor played a certain part or role in a movie
that would then make him an expert in the field in which was the character he
played? I mean, if he were to play a
brain surgeon, would anyone be seeking him out to perform surgery on them? I doubt it!
And finally, remember when we were told, “If you
like your doctor...you can keep your doctor.”
Or when we were told that the attack in Benghazi was the result of a You
Tube video. Or that raising the debt ceiling
doesn't raise the debt. Was the
political genius Robert Redford concerned with any of those whoppers? Was he at all concerned with Barry's Trillion
dollar deficits? Or with Barry's bombing
of Libya? Or with Barry's spying on
reporters, foreign leaders and presidential candidates? Probably not. Why do actors think they're
experts about something just because they starred in a movie about the subject?
I mean, just because Matt Damon starred
in a space movie that doesn't qualify him to advise NASA on anything. If you
get my drift.
No comments:
Post a Comment