The New York Slimes, that provider of even less
useful information than is ‘The National Enquirer’, now appears to be actively
encouraging voters in those states where gun control on the ballot to vote for
stronger regulations and all under the guise that more gun control equals less
crime and therefore a safer populace.
Meanwhile, gun-controlled Chicago is nearing 600 homicides for 2016
alone. According to ‘The Slimes’, “analysis”
from George Soros-funded Center for American Progress shows that “gun fatalities
in states with weaker laws are three times as high as in those states with
tougher restrictions.” Based on this, the paper calls for voters in
“California, Maine, Nevada, and Washington” to support gun control measures
that will be on the ballot next month.
But something that ‘The Slimes’ fails to mention,
because it would likely damage their argument, is that California is already
one of the most gun-controlled states in the union. It has comprehensive background checks —
which eliminate a “gun show loophole” or “online loophole” — a waiting period
on gun purchases, firearm registration, and gun confiscation laws, yet it also
had the May 23, 2014, Santa Barbara attack, the December 2, 2015, San
Bernardino firearm-based terror attack, the June 1, 2016, murder-suicide on the
gun-free UCLA campus, and the October 8, 2016, high-profile shooting deaths of
two police officers in Palm Springs. So
once again we have an argument being advanced by this rag of a newspaper that’s
completely devoid of any logic or truth.
And it’s another very blue state, Washington, that
also has comprehensive background checks — the very checks which Hitlery, Gabby
Giffords, and ‘Nanny Mike’ Bloomberg-funded gun control groups pursue as being
key to American safety. Yet our nation’s
most recent mass shooting took place in Burlington, Washington, on September
23. Five innocent lives were taken in Cascades Mall. On July 30, three
innocents were shot and killed at a house party just north of Seattle, and in
late February, the AP reported a gunman killed four people then himself in
Belfair, Washington. It’s as if these
people don’t even bother to do the slightest amount of fact-checking regarding
what’s really going on in places where strict gun laws exist, before opening
their big, fat pie-holes. Oh, that’s
right, they don’t!
Ironically, much of the momentum for gun control
continues to come from the December 14, 2012, attack on Sandy Hook
Elementary. Even now, new laws are being
pushed under the guise of preventing such an attack, and ‘The Slimes’ says a
total of eight states have passed “universal background checks” — the same
thing as comprehensive background checks — as a way to keep a Sandy Hook-like
attack from occurring. But if the
examples of California and Washington state teach us anything, it is that
comprehensive background checks offer no hindrance whatsoever to determined
attackers. All that they offer is very
much a false sense of security. Because
as has been said before, repeatedly, criminals don’t volunteer for background
checks, only law abiding citizens must.
In fact, I think it’s worth remembering that
Connecticut was ranked 5th in the nation for most stringent gun controls when
the attack on Sandy Hook occurred. The
Brady Campaign Against Gun Violence lauded Connecticut for 5th “toughest” laws
in 2011, and in 2012, Adam Lanza, the shooter involved, circumvented every one
of those laws by stealing his guns and carrying out a heinous crime in a
‘gun-free’ zone. Nevertheless, ‘The
Slimes’ contends that more gun control will ultimately make us all safer. Now I suppose if you’re some mentally
challenged Democrat, stricter guns and ‘gun-free zones’ make a lot of
sense. But it’s best to keep in mind
that if something makes sense to a Democrat then it’s highly likely that
there’s going to be some pretty dire consequences for the rest of us.
Meanwhile, as mentioned earlier, homicides in
gun-controlled Chicago so far this year are approaching 600 following another
weekend of firearm-related death and mayhem. The Chicago Tribune reports that
“at least 35” people were shot and wounded and another five were shot and
killed between 6 pm Friday, October 7, and the morning of October 10. “Four
people were shot within six blocks of each other over one hour Sunday
night.” The weekend’s violence brings
the total number of homicides in the city to 578 year-to-date. The Tribune also reported there have been a
total of 3,368 shooting victims between January 1 and October 11, 2016 — that
figure includes fatal and non-fatal shootings.
There were 2,988 shooting victims for the whole of 2015.
Violence in gun-controlled Chicago set a record in
August 2016 with 472 people shot and 90 people killed, and that was according
to ABC News. It was the deadliest August
in two decades and it came on the heels of the deadliest July since 2006. ABC News also reported “nearly 12” people, on
average, were shot every day in Chicago between January 1 and September 1. And yet the call for even stricter gun laws
has persisted despite the fact that it has been consistently shown that
stricter gun laws do absolutely NOTHING to reduce gun violence. When you make it increasingly difficult for
law-abiding citizens to possess a firearm, allowing them to defend themselves, all
you are really doing is to make those citizens little more than sitting
ducks. It’s a policy that makes zero sense.
It’s in the long term that should the American
people ever be forced to give up their weapons, while at the same time the
state is not, that’s when the American people become defenseless and the state
really gets to work. And once the state
has its boot on your neck it will crush the life out of you. Those who hold all of the power know full
well that the biggest obstacle to their sinister plans is a well-armed free
American public. If I was a cynical
person I would guess that Democrats need to load about 80 million Americans
onto trains for their final solution of bringing in 100 million foreigners that
will be slaves to the Democrat Party for the next 100 years, if not
longer. There is no other way to load
that many people onto trains for the final solution but to take all the guns
away first.
But in the short term, gun control has little to do
with the level of violence that’s occurring because it’s 100% a demographic
problem. Just look at the population make up of Chicago and that should tell
you why there is so much violence. Use a
global map that shows global rates for violent crimes, you will notice a direct
correlation, the darker the population gets, the higher the crime rates go. It's a cultural problem not a race problem.
Take for example Nigerian Americans who excel in the US. They are West African, which is where most
African-Americans come from, and routinely outperform most other ethnic
groups. Most of the problems can be
traced back to failed social programs, mass media and constantly being told no
matter what you do, the man will hold you down.
This is the environment that has been created by the Democrats and that has continually allowed them to harvest what can only be described as being election gold for decades. If black Americans were to ever actually assert themselves, Democrat power in this country would be brought to an end. And it’s obvious that those in the Democrat Party realize this because of their efforts to open the floodgates to illegal immigration. These are the folks who are essentially their electoral failsafe should the lightbulb ever go off in the heads of enough blacks and they suddenly realize how it is that the Democrats have been playing them for fools for over 50 years, if not longer. Now I’m not saying that that’s ever going to happen, but the Democrat Party must be of the opinion that it might.
No comments:
Post a Comment