Apparently our old friend, “Dingy,” Harry Reid, thinks that by his ignoring the Tea Party he can just make it go away. So the question has been asked, does Harry Reid think that all he has to do is to simply wait out the Tea Party? His statements made thus far would seem to indicate that he seems to think that he can. But you have to wonder if, from the perspective of most Democrats, the Tea Party is such a racist bunch of terrorists who are singularly responsible for such events as the recent downgrade of our dead, would he really be wanting it to go away? Those folks who comprise the Tea Party have been repeatedly blamed by the Democrats, including our pathetic president, for every ill that has befallen this country and they have pretty much be called every derogatory name in the book. And why is that exactly? Because they see the government as being too big and too expensive to operate? Or, because they see their government as being too intrusive? Nope, not according to “Dingy.” No, the rationale for all of the name-calling and baseless accusations, I fear, is much more sinister. It’s all nothing more than a petty attempt to marginalize these people and nothing more, to cast these patriots as being nothing more anti-government rabble-rousers and fanatics. It’s all about trying to silence the voices of opposition, it’s how sleazy characters like “Dingy” and Barry “Almighty” operate.
Let’s face it, old “Dingy” Harry, and his fellow Democrats, have been desperate in their attempts to blame everything that ails Washington and the nation on the Republicans, and especially conservative Republicans. He slammed the GOP for its refusal to go along with tax increases as part of this month's debt-ceiling deal, saying hard-core fiscal conservatives are making it impossible to strike a long-term deal that slows the growth of the national debt. "(Senate Minority Leader) Mitch McConnell has done a good job bringing the country to a standstill," “Dingy” said. Old “Dingy” fails to mention, however, that in the two years that we essentially had one party rule in Washington, a historic level of spending was undertaken. And it now seems more than a little hypocritical on the part of “Dingy” to place any amount of blame for our present mess, on those who are trying to do nothing more than to rein in some of that budget-busting spending. But no, from “Dingy’s” perspective it is all the fault of those who refuse any willingness to spend more who are truly at fault here. These people are being accused of being “extreme” or “far out of the mainstream” for no other reason than because they see a government that is out of control. It is always those who oppose Democrat policies who must be viewed as being the enemies of the Republic.
According to “Dingy” the reason Republicans have now drawn such a deep line in the sand on tax increases is, of course, because of a rabid Tea Party movement. The populist uprising that was born out of the pure frustration arising from Washington's costly eagerness for bailouts which achieved critical mass after it was the Democrats, led by “The Three Stooges,” Barry, “Dingy” and “Botox” Nancy, who decided to start spending like no government ever before. The faux “stimulus.” The ObamaCare overreach. Budget deficits that made President George W. Bush look like a rookie. As a direct result, Democrats were tossed from office in record numbers last November. That groundswell is also now very active in shaping the 2012 campaign. But old “Dingy” doesn't really expect it to last, he sees this Tea Party thing as nothing more than a passing fad that he’ll have to tolerate for only a very short time. "The Tea Party was the result of a terrible economy," he said. "I've said that many times, and I believe that." "That (the Tea Party) will pass. They will lose a number of seats next year." Let’s not forget that “Dingy” has amassed his considerable power by never underestimating his adversaries. And he has been known to throw out strategic fibs to create a little misdirection every now and again. WHAT, “Dingy” would lie to us? Oh no, say it isn’t so!
Old “Dingy” has made very apparent his arrogant nature by his making the point on more than one occasion, and therefore leaving an indelible impression, that as long as he's leading the Senate Democrats, the Tea Party agenda is dead on arrival in his chamber. What a guy! In exchange for a modicum of reduced growth in federal spending, “Dingy” said someone is going to have to pay more. There will be no reductions and entitlement reforms without tax increases. He singled out the rich and oil companies as especially deserving of punishment. I don’t really detect a very compromising tone there in “Dingy’s” rhetoric. And who besides leftist Democrats talk about punishing private businesses. Oh, that’s right, silly me, Democrats don’t compromise, that’s for schleps. Perhaps old “Dingy” is still savoring his November re-election victory over Tea Party darling Sharron Angle. Perhaps he's completely oblivious to the number of Democrats, in both House and Senate races, sprinting to the right to boost their 2012 chances. Perhaps it's just wishful thinking. But there's no way the Tea Party is going away, certainly not before the 2012 elections, and certainly not when the national debt is projected to shoot past $20 trillion before the end of the decade. Anyone who minimizes the Tea Party by extension minimizes the massive spending problems that created it in the first place. But then you see, “Dingy” really sees no problem with our present rate of spending, because in the end it accomplishes just what he and is cohorts in the Democrats are trying to bring about.
It should come a no surprise that old “Dingy” rationalizes that problems such as our failing economy and high unemployment are all the fault of the Republicans. He, as does Barry “Almighty” continually harp on the fact that George W. Bush is responsible for the country's spending and America's economic woes. After all, Bush inherited a projected $7 trillion budget surplus from Bill Clinton. (Never mind that Clinton served his final six years over a Republican-controlled Congress. They had nothing to do with that period of spending restraint.) While there is no denying that Bush did little to rein in the fat-and-happy Congresses that shoveled out the pork during his first six years in office, he has been out of office for nearly three years now. But what the deficit spending of George W. Bush did do is that it resulted in incalculable political damage in that it allowed corrupt Democrats to portray themselves to the right of Republicans on fiscal policy and falsely run as conservatives in 2008. But budget deficits under Bush were in the $100 billion to $400 billion range, mostly related to the post 9/11 wars. The Barry administration, working with a Democratic House and Senate its first two years, set the course for budget deficits of more than $1 trillion into the distant future. Barry is on course to pile up more debt in three years than Bush did in eight. So let’s lay off blaming Bush for Democrat largesse.
As much as “Dingy” and Barry wish t weren’t so, it can no longer be denied that this country's debt problem and its struggling economy is now wholly own by the Democrats. Also as despite their efforts to portray it as being something else, the 2012 election will, in fact, be a referendum on Barry “Almighty” and “Dingy” Harry, not Bush. The Tea Party must see to that. Because as much as “Dingy” would love to continue to blame our current economic and fiscal calamity that we have in this country on Bush and the Republicans, the fact of matter is that it can be traced directly to the twisted philosophy of “Dingy” and his fellow Democrats, devoted Keynesians who see the only problem as being one in which the failed “stimulus” just wasn't big enough. "I had $100 billion in infrastructure development in the bill, but I needed three Republican votes. Arlen Specter, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins made me get rid of it." If he’s trying to convince me that these three RINOs were in anyway Tea Party supported, he’s more of a dishonest idiot that even I thought. These three are about as far removed from demonstrating the desires of the Tea Party as is every single Democrat. Even though I was a Democrat before I was a Republican before I was a Democrat again Arlen Specter is gone, we’ve still got the other two morons to contend with.
Much to the chagrin of old “Dingy” and his fellow Democrats, including, of course, Barry “Almighty,” I think they are all going to be more than a bit disappointed if they think that the Tea Party folks are going to simply fade away anytime soon. We want our country back, and we will settle for nothing less. And until we are successful in our attempt to wrestle control of away from these corrupt politicians like “Dingy” and Barry, we are very much here to stay and have no intention of going anywhere. It will not be us who will be made to go quietly off into the night but, instead, it must be those who are seen as being so desperate in their efforts to destroy our country. It is they who must be forced into the wilderness until they are able to achieve the proper level of respect for the power granted to them by “We the people.” They must learn to abide by our Constitution as it was written, not as how they wish it had been written. These Democrats are a very dangerous bunch and they are very much in need of being reeled in. They have lost their respect of the people and are very much in need of being taught a lesson.
No comments:
Post a Comment