.

.

Thursday, February 29, 2024

WHERE, OH WHERE, HAVE ALL THE JOURNALISTS GONE???


It would require spending only the very briefest amount of time watching any of our cable or broadcast ‘news’ programming that would almost immediately cause one to question just where it might be that all of our bona fide ‘journalists’ have now gone. Because most of those that we see today, while they may claim to be ‘journalists,’ are really nothing more than mere ‘political commentators,’ aka opinion makers. These people see their sole purpose in life as doing all that they can to affect, or to somehow impact, the political opinions of those who have tuned into watch. In short, these people are nothing more than propagandists, and should be viewed as such.

And while they may certainly view themselves as experts on the important issues of the day, they most certainly are not. And we mustn’t allow ourselves to be fooled into believing that they possess the ability to discuss intelligently anything even remotely connected to our Constitution, because it’s on that topic that they are particularly ignorant. Which of course brings me to none other than Rachel Maddow, member of one of the least credible ‘news’ outlets in all of cable new, MSDNC. It was just this past Wednesday, during a broadcast of MSDNC’s “All In,” that Maddow experienced what was a bit of a major meltdown again inspired by President Trump.

You see, it was then that Maddow claimed that the Supreme Court taking the case to decide whether President Trump is immune from prosecution was nothing more than a craven attempt to help the former president. Maddow said, “The cravenness of the court is evident in what they are doing with the pacing here. You know, putting this off for seven weeks and sitting on it for two weeks for no reason. Obviously, pushing all of the cases that they can push to a point where Trump will be standing for election before any of us have heard the verdicts in any of those cases. Got it. It is the timing. It is the idea that the immunity thing is an open question."

She continued her little tirade, saying, “Is presidential immunity and open question? What is the most famous pardon in American history? Gerald Ford for pardoning Richard Nixon once he was resigned and a former president. Why did Gerald Ford pardon him? As a result, occurring before his resignation as president of the meeting as a result of stuff he did while president, quote, Richard Nixon has become liable to possible indictment in trial and whether or not he shall be prosecuted depends on findings of the appropriate grand jury and discussion of the authorized prosecutor.” The irony here is priceless. As is the hypocrisy and the lack of self-awareness.

She added, “The idea that this is an open question, and it might be that a former president can never be tried for something that he did because he was president when he did it is disproven by a plain reading of American history and the whole justification for Richard Nixon being pardoned in the first place. The idea that it has to be taken up is them saying that the sky is green. I think even for the non-lawyers among us to be able to say, this sky is not green even on our worst day. This is BS, and you are doing this as a tactic to help for political friend, partisan patron.” She is clearly psychotic, and has been driven quite mad by her hatred of one man.

And she said, “For you to say that this is something the court needs to decide because it is unclear in the law is fragrant bullpucky and they know it and don’t care that we know it. That is disturbing about the future legitimacy of the court.” Meanwhile Letitia James can run her election campaign on “getting Trump,” suing him and now boasting about going after his assets and no one on the left blinks an eye. And what is just so telling is that these idiots never seem to understand the Constitution. I still remember how they all defended Clinton and Obama. The entire “get Trump” no matter what is just more evidence that these left-wing nuts have lost their minds.

And I’m sure dimwits like Maddow will disagree, but Democrats simply cannot compete in a legitimate election, and it’s they who have become our primary national security threat, and the primary threat to this country’s ability to maintain the process by which we choose our leaders. The purpose of the courts is not to make it possible for Democrats to circumvent the legislative process. For decades, Democrats used the courts to create law without going through the legislative process of passing bills that are then signed into law. For example: Roe v. Wade was never a law, Democrats simply acted as if it was law. There was never legislation written.

So what, exactly, is even her point? That the Supreme Court is helping President Trump because all of a sudden he has no immunity, the same immunity that every other president, Democrats included, have had before him. What does she call herself as a member of this ‘fake news’ media that has been created to perpetuate that which is nothing more than propaganda. It’s a double-edged sword except they expect to use it like a club while President Trump has to be 100 percent within the law. Of course, this story upsets them, they never look past their nose. Liberals never look at the big picture, it would force people like you to look at themselves.

The wider President Trump’s lead grows over the mentally challenged Joey, the more mental cases, like Madcow, will freakout and make asinine charges in pursuit of not having to use hankies on election night. Maddow is symptomatic of many mainstream media journalists who actually think that they run the country. But in this instance, her desperation to achieve her political goals sort of jumps the shark. She appears to be telling the Supreme Court what to do, and how to decide things, much like Chucky Schumer standing on the steps of the Supreme Court and threatening the Justices. But he’s a Senator and she’s nothing more than a two bit reporter.

Maddow, being the extreme far left lib that she has always been, will not accept anything from the Supreme Court short of a total loss for President Trump. She was demanding that those on the far left have their way in how the country was to be run and how we were to conform under her leftist rule. This woman is one of the most dishonest, corrupt and unethical persons in all of the ‘fake news’ media! Clearly such traits are seen as resume enhancers when seeking a job in today’s ‘fake news’ media. If that were not the case Maddow would likely be employed somewhere where her most repeated phrase of the day would be, “You want fries with that?"

The Court is actually doing the entire country a huge favor, these nasty political disputes aren't supposed to be decided in the courts, they’re to be settled at the ballot box. Taking this lawfare off the board as quickly as possible helps everyone, even the Democrats who have disgraced themselves with their ghoulish judges, hack AGs and lying trashy DAs. These leftist freaks will at this point say and do anything to keep President Trump from office. We need to keep in mind that from now until November the Democrats will be on a holy tear with all manner of lies and innuendo! Democrats and those in the ‘fake news’ media, will be on a full on lying “blitz."

And finally, the only thing craven is how our weaponized DOJ, corrupt prosecutors and judges are continuing to rip our Constitution to shreds. What we have here are prosecutors and judges that are clearly neither the best nor the brightest that the law profession has to offer, and these verdicts will easily be overturned. The left knows this, but they don’t care, they just want a quick kangaroo conviction before the election. They couldn’t care less if these verdicts get overturned after the election. The problem is that these cases are so weak, and the people involved are so low rent that most will not achieve their election interference goals in time.

No comments:

Post a Comment