Some of our more esteemed Democratic senators, in an attempt to shove through gun control, are offering an amendment to the cybersecurity bill currently being debated. The proposed ‘amendment’ would limit the purchase of high capacity gun magazines for some consumers. Shortly after the Cybersecurity Act gained Senate approval to proceed to filing proposed amendments and a vote next week, ‘Little Chuckie’ Schumer, that dim bulb Democrat from New York, and one of the sponsors of the gun control amendment, came to the floor to defend the idea of implementing, what he called, “reasonable” gun control measures.
The amendment is being sponsored by your standard cadre of all-star Democrat loons. You know, folks with names like Frank Lautenberg, Barbara Boxer, Jack Reed, Bob Menendez, Kirsten Gillibrand, Chuckie Schumer and Dianne Feinstein. Supposedly, S.A. 2575 would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition with the exception of .22 caliber rim fire ammunition. The amendment is, apparently. identical to a separate bill sponsored by Lautenberg. Feinstein happens to be the sponsor of the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004.
According to these Democrats, so skilled in deceiving the public, the proposed amendment would only affect sales and transfers after the law took effect. Chuckie defended the Brady law and assault weapons ban on the floor Thursday evening, perhaps in preparation for the coming fight with Republicans and gun rights activists. Chuckie also suggested that both the left and right find common ground. “Maybe we could come together on guns if each side gave some,” Schumer said. He suggested that Democrats make it clear that their goal is not to repeal the Second Amendment. Bullshit, that’s exactly their goal! And they have no intention to ‘give’ anything!
“The basic complaint is that the Chuck Schumers of the world want to take away your guns,” ‘Little Chuckie’ said of the argument made by gun lobbies. “I think it would be smart for those of us who want rational gun control to make it known that that’s not true at all.” Of course that’s true. Chuckie is simply lying, in an attempt to hoodwink people. ‘Chuckie’ also tried to rationalize the point that it would be reasonable for the right to recognize that background checks on those buying guns is necessary, as called for in the Brady law. He also said average Americans don’t need an assault weapon to go hunting or to protect themselves. My statement to this clown is, “SO WHAT!”
“We can debate where to draw the line of reasonableness, but we might be able to come to an agreement in the middle,” Chuckie said. “Maybe, maybe, maybe we can pass some laws that might, might, might stop some of the unnecessary casualties … maybe there’s a way we can some together and try to break through the log jam and make sure the country is a better place.” Look, I think experience tells us that slime like Chuckie have no desire to compromise, nor to honestly debate, nor to ‘give a little’. The bottom line here is that people simply cannot be trusted and we cannot afford to give them an inch out of fear that they’ll end up taking a mile.
So next week the Senate is expected to debate and vote on proposed amendments to the cybersecurity bill. Republicans had better stand firm against this idiotic amendment as well as any others that may find their way into the debate. As I have said before, the fact that these pathetic creeps have now successfully seized our healthcare, that act has only served to emboldened them to now go after our guns. And while this supposed amendment sounds pretty harmless on its face, it is but the first step toward that very slippery slope, at the bottom of which we will find ourselves being forced to forfeit that which the Constitution guarantees to us. We must tread very lightly here!
No comments:
Post a Comment