It just never seems to end with this guy. Here we have yet another exmple his blatant hypocrisy, and this one really ticks me off. Because while this worthless 'piece of dog squeeze of a president', that we're now saddled with for yet another four years, is expending every effort to disarm we the American people, at the same time he also signs a bill that will provide to him round the clock 'armed protection' that will last for the rest of his freakin life. Now would it be crass of me, or even slightly disrespectful, to hope that it's a rather short life? Probably, but I'm gonna do it anyway. So here's to hoping he leaves this world, under purely natural circumstances, the day after he leaves office. I'd say before that, but just the thought of having 'Slow Joe' as president is too scary to even contemplate. It just that it never seems to end with this guy. This, what's good for me, isn't what's good for you, mentality of his is maddening.
So despite his now very aggressive gun control agenda that could possibly threaten to disarm the American people, Barry "Almighty" has seen fit to sign a bill that would afford him 24/7 armed Secret Service protection for life. According to Yahoo News, "The legislation, crafted by Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, rolls back a mid-1990s law that imposed a 10-year limit on Secret Service protection for former presidents. Bush would have been the first former commander in chief affected." And, you know, I think what really pisses me off about this new bill, which I guess is a re-instatement of a 1965 law, is that it will now cost American taxpayers additional Millions of dollars by requiring presidents to be protected for life as well as their children up to age 16. So even after this jerk is long gone, I'm still gonna be get stuck covering his bills.
I mean the irony here is too hard to miss, even if you happen to a brain dead liberal. Here we have Barry "Almighty" seeking to surround himself with several armed men at a time and for the rest of his life, while simultaneously working to disarm we the American people hopefully through some form of strict gun control legislation or, if unable to succeed by that route, by then attempting to enforce it unconstitutionally by way of executive decree. It's quite typical behavior for Barry, and should come as no surprise. After all this is how this thug operates and it also represents the height of his hypocrisy. But let's face it, like I said this is not the first time that Barry has lauded the notion of responsible Americans using firearms to protect himself and his family while concurrently eviscerating that very same right for the American people. So, yes we have been down this same road before with Barry.
If we look back we'll see that it was during an ABC Nightline interview broadcast on December 26, and recorded before the Sandy Hook shooting, that Barry said one of the benefits of his re-election was the ability "to have men with guns around at all times," in order to protect his daughters. In addition, the school attended by Barry's daughters in Washington D.C. has no less than 11 armed security guards on duty at all times, yet the idea of arming teachers and school officials to prevent further tragedies has been dismissed by gun control nuts who want school campuses to remain "gun free zones" where victims are disarmed and shooters are free to carry out their rampage unimpeded. The continuing hypocrisy of gun control advocates who feverishly work to create victim disarmament yet surround themselves with armed men remains rampant among perceived as being our political and social elite.
As was reported as recently as last month, despite in the same year calling for "Mr. and Mrs. America" to "turn in" their guns California Senator Dianne Feinstein, author of a draconian bill set to be introduced later this month that would treat gun owners like sex offenders, admitted to carrying a concealed weapon for her own protection after she was threatened by a terrorist group. Other prominent gun control advocates such as Mayor Michael ‘Nanny’ Bloomberg have also aggressively pushed to disarm Americans while themselves employing armed bodyguards at all times. Michael Moore, another vehement proponent for gun control, also has armed bodyguards, one of whom was arrested for carrying an unlicensed weapon at in New York’s JFK airport back in 2005. But what can you expect, he's just another big, fat dumbass liberal who sees himself as being better than the rest us.
There was a White House petition created at the end of last month that calls for making the White House and all federal buildings gun free zones. "If the government believes gun free zones are a solution for citizens, the same standard should apply to government servants and employees," states the petition, which currently has over 12,000 signatures. Obviously, these government types view themselves as being a bit more important than the rest of us. Which they, and I hate to be the one to tell them, most definitely are not. If you ask me the only place that should be a totally gun free zone is any government building regardless of it housing local, state or federal government employees. What gives them the right, or makes them more deserving than our kids, to now be able to spend their day in a place that has them protected. Don't our kids deserve to be kept at least as 'safe' as do these overpaid servants of the people?
So despite his now very aggressive gun control agenda that could possibly threaten to disarm the American people, Barry "Almighty" has seen fit to sign a bill that would afford him 24/7 armed Secret Service protection for life. According to Yahoo News, "The legislation, crafted by Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, rolls back a mid-1990s law that imposed a 10-year limit on Secret Service protection for former presidents. Bush would have been the first former commander in chief affected." And, you know, I think what really pisses me off about this new bill, which I guess is a re-instatement of a 1965 law, is that it will now cost American taxpayers additional Millions of dollars by requiring presidents to be protected for life as well as their children up to age 16. So even after this jerk is long gone, I'm still gonna be get stuck covering his bills.
I mean the irony here is too hard to miss, even if you happen to a brain dead liberal. Here we have Barry "Almighty" seeking to surround himself with several armed men at a time and for the rest of his life, while simultaneously working to disarm we the American people hopefully through some form of strict gun control legislation or, if unable to succeed by that route, by then attempting to enforce it unconstitutionally by way of executive decree. It's quite typical behavior for Barry, and should come as no surprise. After all this is how this thug operates and it also represents the height of his hypocrisy. But let's face it, like I said this is not the first time that Barry has lauded the notion of responsible Americans using firearms to protect himself and his family while concurrently eviscerating that very same right for the American people. So, yes we have been down this same road before with Barry.
If we look back we'll see that it was during an ABC Nightline interview broadcast on December 26, and recorded before the Sandy Hook shooting, that Barry said one of the benefits of his re-election was the ability "to have men with guns around at all times," in order to protect his daughters. In addition, the school attended by Barry's daughters in Washington D.C. has no less than 11 armed security guards on duty at all times, yet the idea of arming teachers and school officials to prevent further tragedies has been dismissed by gun control nuts who want school campuses to remain "gun free zones" where victims are disarmed and shooters are free to carry out their rampage unimpeded. The continuing hypocrisy of gun control advocates who feverishly work to create victim disarmament yet surround themselves with armed men remains rampant among perceived as being our political and social elite.
As was reported as recently as last month, despite in the same year calling for "Mr. and Mrs. America" to "turn in" their guns California Senator Dianne Feinstein, author of a draconian bill set to be introduced later this month that would treat gun owners like sex offenders, admitted to carrying a concealed weapon for her own protection after she was threatened by a terrorist group. Other prominent gun control advocates such as Mayor Michael ‘Nanny’ Bloomberg have also aggressively pushed to disarm Americans while themselves employing armed bodyguards at all times. Michael Moore, another vehement proponent for gun control, also has armed bodyguards, one of whom was arrested for carrying an unlicensed weapon at in New York’s JFK airport back in 2005. But what can you expect, he's just another big, fat dumbass liberal who sees himself as being better than the rest us.
There was a White House petition created at the end of last month that calls for making the White House and all federal buildings gun free zones. "If the government believes gun free zones are a solution for citizens, the same standard should apply to government servants and employees," states the petition, which currently has over 12,000 signatures. Obviously, these government types view themselves as being a bit more important than the rest of us. Which they, and I hate to be the one to tell them, most definitely are not. If you ask me the only place that should be a totally gun free zone is any government building regardless of it housing local, state or federal government employees. What gives them the right, or makes them more deserving than our kids, to now be able to spend their day in a place that has them protected. Don't our kids deserve to be kept at least as 'safe' as do these overpaid servants of the people?
No comments:
Post a Comment