'SLOW JOE' BIDEN AND HIS DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR...

In ordinary times I doubt that I'd even be wasting my time talking about this because it would be too ludicrous to imagine. But sadly, as we all know, this age of Barry "Almighty" is anything but ordinary times. What I'm talking about here is the fact that word now comes to us that 'Slow Joe' Biden is actually busy laying the groundwork for a 2016 presidential campaign, with confident supporters going so far as to assure him that he would defeat Hitlery Clinton in a Democrat primary.

According to the Wall Street Journal, 'Slow Joe's' political allies, who must be folks on some really good shit, are already making campaign plans and 'Slow Joe's' official itinerary now has him traveling to some of the early-primary states. "There's definitely a path forward for him" even if Clinton decides to run, said Larry Rasky, an aide on Biden's presidential campaigns in 1988 and 2008. Wouldn't it be nice if that path was to lead him directly over a very high cliff. Just wishful thinking.

Anyway, "Slow Joe's' camp is said to be exploring the formation of a political action committee which would then allow 'Slow Joe' to lavish key Democrat candidates with donations in an effort to gain some early support. 'Slow Joe' is also planning to attend Democrat political events in Iowa and New Hampshire. Despite the assurances of Biden's inner circle that he could clinch the nomination, polling in New Hampshire shows Hitlery leading the pack with more than 50 percent support.

And I guess it was during some interview earlier this year where he sat down with GQ magazine, that 'Slow Joe' made it known that, yes, he is seriously considering another presidential run. "I can die a happy man never having been president of the United States, but it doesn't mean I won't run," Biden said. Man is that a nightmare scenario, or what. I can't even bring myself to imagine a president Biden. I'm sure nothing would make him happier, but that's far from what this country needs.

Officially, those close to 'Slow Joe' are downplaying the election, and say he is focused on his current job. "Any talk of other future plans is complete speculation," an aide said. 'Slow Joe' turns 74 two months before Inauguration Day, and, if elected, would be the first president older than 70 to take office. He would be more than four years older than Ronald Reagan was when he took his first oath of office. And let's face it, after having watched this guy in action, is he presidential material?

But as I previously mentioned, these are far from being ordinary times, by any stretch of the imagination. And a contest between 'Slow Joe' and Hitlery would be nothing more than a contest to see who it is that could give the most away, both here at home and internationally. And with a populace that, the near majority of which, has now become firmly addicted to all manner of government goodie, the chances that a 'Slow Joe' presidency could actually become a reality, couldn't be better.

There's little doubt that those who are interested in nothing more than in seeing how much they can get for nothing, will vote for the Democrat candidate no matter who it is. And as we found ourselves after "BJ" Clinton, we, as a country, are now once again in desperate need of some adult supervision. And 'Slow Joe' is anything but an adult. He's the equivalent of your senile old grand-dad that you visit on the weekends. And as such, the last place we need to find him is in the Oval Office.

It would seem that with the electing of Barry, not once but twice, the priorities of the American people have shifted. Because, instead of choosing to elect a leader whose main goal is to make sure that we do all that we can to maintain a stable and prosperous country that we can then handover to those who come after us, we seem to be perfectly content to elect those who are only too happy to bury future generations under a mountain of debt so that we can then sit back and do nothing.

Such is the scenario that would seem to make a 'Slow Joe' presidency all the more likely. We've become nothing more than a nation of parasites, with fewer of us everyday even seeing the slightest thing wrong with that. We've apparently decided that it has become perfectly acceptable to enjoy the fruit of our child's labor while that child is still in diapers. Kinda gives a whole new meaning to being selfish. Is this really where we are a nation? If so, am I the only one who sees that as being more than just a little sad?

DAVID 'RAT-BOY' PLOUFFE...

Well this past Sunday we were again provided with an opportunity to witness that which former senior White House adviser, and that perennial slime bag, David Plouffe does best, to mock anyone who choose to oppose the policies of Barry "Almighty". He ridiculed Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus' statements Sunday that the GOP is "drastically changing its approach to politics." Plouffe, who appeared on ABC's "This Week" following Priebus, said it's going to take a lot more than the hiring of 157 field workers to win the presidency.

"They don’t have a product to sell, so you can hire 10,000 people," Plouffe said. "To win the presidency in 2016 … they have to grow their vote amongst the Hispanic community, suburban women, younger voters, the growing Asian community …" In other words, pretty much the same groups of people who have come to make up what is essentially our parasite class that has been the primary recipient of the majority of taxpayer funded, Democrat giveaways. Folks who have decided to selfishly sell their future as well as the futures of their kids.

He said he sees Republicans as continuing to dig in their heels on both immigration reform and Obamacare. "Until immigration reform gets done, the Republican Party is not going to be heard," Plouffe said. "They're not rehabilitating. They're doubling down." So I guess, to his typical way of thinking, until Republicans agree to cave on demands for amnesty, and bring themselves to agree to the fact that Obamacare is the greatest thing since sliced bread, they'll make no headway. Plouffe is a con artist, busy selling to the American people nothing more than a bill of goods.

Regarding Obamacare, Plouffe said the Republican rhetoric surrounding the legislation will backfire. "I think the Republican Party, by the way, is going to pay a big price three or four years down the road because what they've said about Obamacare's not going to come to pass," he said. "It's not going to kill the economy. I think they've sort of set themselves up with a very dangerous trap door here." To make such an idiotic statement is to simply deny reality. Support for Obamacare, if you can call it that, has been falling since it's passage.

And then we were also just oh so blessed to hear from that resident nut job from Minnesota, Keith Ellison, who naturally agreed with Plouffe about the Republican Party's outreach efforts. "At the end of the day, the Republican Party has to talk about how they're going to solve problems for Americans," Ellison said. "You’ve got to stand for something, and they stand for obstruction." I guess that would be the very same problems created by Barry and the Democrats that have resulted in nothing more than a national catastrophe when it comes to our economy.

And despite what these two pathetic losers would like us all to believe, I disagree with their argument that the Republicans are behaving as nothing more than obstructionists. Sadly, it's the Republicans who have now, by default, become what is the last line of defense for this country, against the effort currently underway by Barry and the Democrat to destroy it. I say sadly because, to my way of thinking, Republicans have done precious little to obstruct enough of Barry's socialist policies and have compromised far too often.

Losers like the two sleazy characters mentioned above, are forced into spreading their socialist propaganda out of what is essentially nothing but fear. Because if a majority of the American people were ever to finally snap out of their entitlement trance, and granted the chances if that lessens with each passing day, these guys and their party will be the ones being made to face a day of reckoning. So they work to convince anyone who is stupid enough to believe them that it's the Democrats who are out there fighting for the little guy. Which is nothing but a lie!

Because the drive here is to eradicate what used to be considered the middle class and to replace it with what is a dependent class. And effort to do just that have been underway since day one of Barry being our president. Those of us who stand against the increasing amount of government interference into our lives are viewed by scum like Plouffe as being the enemy. And those few politicians who stand with us are painted as being anti-gay, anti-minority and anti women, when guys like Plouffe and Barry are anti-America. Remember, it's all about priorities, folks.

THE RETURN OF SANDRA FLUKE...

Well apparently the ‘Official Slut’ of the Democrat Party was able to make some time in what must be her very busy schedule of constantly being on her back, to bob to the surface just long enough to make an appearance on MSNBC. Now I’m sure you all remember Ms. Sandra Fluke, that former "reproductive justice" advocate at Georgetown Law School. It seems that she has now decided to put all of her vast knowledge acquired from spending what must have been years staring at a ceiling, to good use, embarking on a new mission. That being, getting more women to run for elective office.

In what was a brief interview on MSNBC Friday morning, the brilliant Ms. Fluke was asked by, what must have been, one of those stellar 'journalists' there at MSNBC, aka Barry propaganda headquarters, to provide some political insight. Specifically, whether she thought Republicans are remiss in not asking more women to run for office. Now I must admit that I had absolutely no clue that her expertise was so vast. I assumed that it was pretty much limited to possibly being able to recommend various sexual positions that would provide the greatest chance of achieving the best outcome.

In responding to the question, Ms. Fluke said, "I think there are a variety of concerns about how we get women into office." She then went on to say, "It's not only about asking women, which is something we need to do -- but also about making sure that the party leadership and those in elected office are looking for women to succeed them." What a genius, right? Hey here's a concept, how about we focus solely on finding the most qualified people that we can, regardless of their gender, to run for office? People who are genuinely interested in getting our country back on track.

Fluke, obviously a very liberal Democrat, said she hopes the Republican Party succeeds in getting more women to run. "We need to have women representing diverse ideological perspectives," she said. "But in terms of the voter base -- they're not going to get the majority of women's votes until their policies change." After her appearance on MSNBC, Fluke was heading off to San Francisco where she was scheduled to appear at an Emily's List luncheon for a panel discussion on women in politics. Man, wouldn’t you have loved to been a fly on the wall for that one! That must have been hilarious.

Joining her during in what was this silly little MSNBC skit was, of course, none other than Texas State Sen. Wendy Davis, the Democrat who it's being rumored is planning on making a run for governor of Texas. Now her main claim to fame, and perhaps her only claim to fame, stems from pretty much nothing more than her little episode from earlier this summer. That of course being her 11-hour filibuster in defense of all things, "abortion rights." And also I heard that she recently posed for a spread in Vogue, although, personally, I would have thought Monster Magazine as more appropriate.

Fluke told MSNBC on Friday, "If we truly want to have a democracy, we have to make sure that our government looks like our population. And right now it doesn't." It should come as no surprise, I suppose, that she hailed Hitlery Clinton as being a positive role model for female leadership: "We see what a difference it makes internationally, the message that we send to the world, when we have women in leadership." But I'm thinking that, maybe, she should have looked for a little better example than 'Benghazi Hitlery' to bolster her argument. Just sayin. Hitlery ain’t much of a leader.

Look, I'm all in favor of finding more women to run for office. But at the same time I do not think that gender, like race, should play a part in determining any candidate's qualifications. After all, haven't we learned anything from the disastrous results you get when you elect someone whose only qualification for office is that he's black? What we need to focus on is the electing of the most qualified conservatives that we can find. And it shouldn't really matter what race they are nor should it matter what gender they are. The country is going down the tubes and liberalism is what's to blame!

THE JOKE THAT THE NAACP HAS BECOME...

Well ya know, it would seem to me that the National Association for the Abortion of Colored People (NAACP) becomes just a little bit more of a joke with each passing day. It would also seem that those in charge long ago made the conscious decision to alter the group's mission to one less about civil rights and much more about leftist political advocacy. These days it operates like most other front groups that operate under the umbrella of the Democrat Party. It also, some time ago, demonstrated that it's very comfortable with throwing black folks under the bus in exchange for being able to maintain a seat at the DNC table. The bad thing, at least for those very same black folks, is that they still haven't yet figured that out.

Anyway, the most recent example that makes very obvious the decline that this once venerable organization continues to experience, was demonstrated by the calls that came from its Missouri chapter demanding that a federal investigation be launched into the rodeo clown who donned a Barry "Almighty" mask at the state fair last week. It was then a Texas Republican congressman, acting as the voice of reason, who stated that such calls are both misguided and blatantly hypocritical. U.S. Rep. Steve Stockman, who has since invited the clown who wore the mask to perform in Texas, said the request for probes into the incident by the Justice Department and Secret Service are "silly" and should be ignored. I have to agree!

Stockman went on to say, "A rodeo clown is really a nominal thing and it hurt no one." Adding, "They didn’t speak out when George Bush was being portrayed as a murderer. To become relevant again, they need to become more of an honest broker and not have contrived anger." Stockman said the NAACP would better serve its constituents by focusing on ways to decrease unemployment among the black community. But to focus on such things, there must first be in interest in such things. He also noted that the national civil rights group was silent after a July incident on a Florida bus where three black teens beat a fellow white student. We shouldn't be surprised, that's the way this group operates nowadays.

"It’s really patently false that they’re angry at this, but not angry at other issues," Stockman continued. "There has to be some consistency." And while Stockman did say that he thinks it’s unlikely federal officials will investigate the matter, with a racist like Holder running the Justice Department, and another racist in the Oval Office, one can never be too sure about such things.. And he made the point saying, "We can’t get the Justice Department to look at Benghazi, so it would be ironic that the Justice Department would investigate a clown." Going on to say, "They should focus on their member’s needs rather than theatrics." Still, the rodeo clown has been widely condemned for his supposed off-color act.

And then it was on Wednesday that yet another brilliant White House spokesmoron, this time it was Josh Earnest, said the rodeo clown incident was "not one of the finer moments" for The Show-Me State. "I haven’t heard about the president’s reaction or if he had one," Earnest told reporters. "I can tell you as a native Missourian, it was certainly not one of the finer moments for our state and not the way I like to see our state depicted in the news." Big freakin deal. And if Barry was anywhere near being an adult, he would have come out publically right away and said, come on folks, let's not take ourselves too seriously, here. But I think we can all agree that that this punk ain't gonna being doing anything like that.

Stockman said widespread reports of Saturday’s bull riding event at the Missouri State Fair in Sedalia was an example of what he calls "pop news," or silly distractions that take us away from serious issues facing the country. And Barry, I'm sure, is just loving this, because it takes attention away from yet another one of his costly vacations, and his rather idiotic blunder regarding his inept handling of the events in Egypt. But still, the clown has been permanently banned from future state fair events and, as stupid as this sounds, subsequent performers must now undergo sensitivity training. Messages seeking comment from Justice Department and NAACP officials were not immediately returned Thursday.

And to be perfectly honest here, I was really kinda shocked to hear Jehmu Greene, a Fox News contributor and a supposed Democrat strategist, in demonstrating what was one her rare moments of sanity and of actually being fairly lucid, say that she actually agreed with Stockman’s take that the call for a federal probe was unwarranted. It’s far from the first time a sitting commander-in-chief has been mocked, she said. "Absolutely it is misguided," she said during an appearance on Fox News. "The NAACP has jumped the shark on this one." Usually this nut is all for investigating any incident no matter how racially insignificant. But she may yet change her mind.

So anyway, it's pretty sad, but this is where the NAACP is at today. And it kinda makes you wonder if the majority of blacks see it the same way, or if they even care anymore. Whenever I see any of these supposed NAACP 'leaders', and I use the term rather loosely, strutting around in their $3000 suits, I can't help but wonder what it is that your average black guy sees. Does he really see someone who's on his side and out there fighting for him? Because that certainly isn't what's taking place. Oh, these race baiters say all the right things, I suppose, but it's a whole different story when they get behind closed doors. It's then that they become willing accomplices in making sure that the Democrats maintain the dependency class that's so crucial to they're being able to win elections.

A TALE OF TWO CLOWNS...

AGAIN WITH DISGRUNTLED MUSLIMS...

IN THE NAME OF ISLAM

In what, to me at least, would appear to be the perfect opportunity to round up a good chunk of the Muslim population here in this country and send them back to that part of the world fondly referred to as the 'armpit of the planet', is something that's now being planned by some outfit who calls itself, The American Muslim Political Action Committee or AMPAC for short. Reminiscent of "Calypso Louie's" Million Man March a few years back, it seems that this rather bizarre little group is planning what it calls a one million Muslims march to Washington D.C. and it's scheduled to take place, no less, on September 11th. The timing of the march ranges from being seen as simply tasteless to blatantly disrespectful, considering the fact that it is scheduled for the anniversary of the worst domestic massacre in American history perpetrated in the name of Islam.

This idiotic group of rag heads, AMPAC, ups the tasteless quotient even more by going so far as to actually issue a list of "demands" for the American government:

"We at AMPAC (American Political Action Committee) are planning an historic event for 9.11.13 where one million Muslims will march to Washington D.C. and demand that our civil rights be protected by our government.

We are demanding that laws be enacted protecting our 1st amendment . We are asking President Obama to fulfill his promise from his first campaign for Presidency of a transparent government. Lastly we are asking for the release of the 9/11 commission report to the American people."

The group seems to rationalize the date chosen for their march by claiming that the media has been lying to the American people with regard to the role Islam played in the 9/11 attacks:

"On 9.11.01 our country was forever changed by the horrific events in New York. The entire country was victimized by the acts done on that day. Muslim and Non Muslim alike were traumatized but we as Muslims continue 12 years later to be victimized by being made the villains. To this day every media outlet and anti Islamic organization has committed slanderous and libel statements against us as Muslims and our religion of Islam.

Yet our Government either sits idly by and does nothing to protect our freedoms or it exacerbates the problem with its constant war on terrorism in Islamic countries, congressional hearings on Islam in America, and its changes to the NDAA law.

These lies told to the American population has made it impossible for us to do true Dawa. Why do we have to defend our religion while doing Dawa? Why can’t we just share the perfection of the Quran and the beauty of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (SWS)?"

Look, I really have very little sympathy for these people. Their supposed religion of peace preaches nothing but violence and is based almost entirely on violence. And it is responsible for the death of more of my fellow countrymen than I care to count. And to this day I still remember watching Muslims dancing in the streets as 3,000 of my fellow Americans lay dead and dying all because of 19 Muslims. It would be quite different if these people wanted nothing more than to come to this country for the purpose of enjoying the freedom and opportunity that it still provides. But the bottom line here is that is not why far too many of them come here. Their purpose for coming here is far more sinister, and it needs to be recognized as such. They simply do not view the principles of our constitutional republic as being compatible with the requirements of their so-called religion.

And let's be honest here, shall we? These people can claim all they want that they are somehow being targeted unfairly and made to unnecessarily defend their religion. But if they do in fact feel that way, it's their own fault. And very little has been said that can, in any way, be considered as slanderous or libelous in making references that point out that which represents the greatest source of violence to be found anywhere on the planet. That would, of course, be Islam and those who practice it. And then these people come to this country and somehow feel that they should be able to operate under their own set of laws, ignoring the fact that that's just how this country works. In this country there is no one religion that takes precedence over any other religion and if these people refuse to accept that fact, then they should be made to leave and never return. It's just that simple!

JUNIOR AND THE MRS. HEAD OFF TO PRISON...

Jesse Jackson Jr. was sentenced today, to two and a half years in prison after pleading guilty to scheming to spend $750,000 in campaign funds on such things as TV's, restaurant dinners, an expensive watch and other costly trinkets. His wife received a sentence of one year. Junior, the son of a rather shady character in his own right, Jesse 'The Extortionist' Jackson, had been a Democrat congressman from Illinois, the most corrupt state in the union, from 1995 until he resigned last November. According to court papers in the case, Jackson used campaign money to buy such items as a $43,350 gold-plated men's Rolex watch and other such niceties that your basic best dressed negro will be wearing this year.

And in what demonstrated the fact that she very obviously had no clue to whom it was that she was speaking, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson said that as a public official Jackson was expected to "live up to a higher standard of ethics and integrity." Junior is just one more Democrat who seems to think that the law does not apply to him. After prison, Junior will be spending three years on supervised release and will complete 500 hours of community service. Jackson's wife, Sandra, was also sentenced Wednesday to a year in prison for filing joint federal income tax returns that understated the couple's income. Court documents showed that she spent $5,150 in campaign funds on fur capes and parkas.

Junior had pleaded guilty to the criminal charges back in February when he admitted that he and his wife had used campaign credit cards to buy 3,100 personal items worth nearly 600 grand from 2005 through April of last year. Items that included $60,857 for personal expenditures at restaurants, nightclubs and lounges; $16,058 for personal expenditures at sports clubs and lounges; $5,814 for alcohol and $14,513 for dry cleaning. Individual campaign credit card purchases included a $466 dinner for two of "a personal nature" at a restaurant; a washer, dryer, range and refrigerator for the Jacksons' Chicago home; multiple flat-screen televisions, Blu-Ray DVD players and DVDs for their Washington, D.C., home; and a five-day health retreat for one of Mrs. Jackson's relatives.

On Wednesday, Jackson said he hoped his wife would get probation and that if that wasn't available then he would gladly serve her sentence for her. "Give me her time," he said. Gee, now ain't that touching. Jackson also asked to serve out his time in Alabama, saying, "I wanted to make it a little inconvenient for everybody to get to me." So what now, is he trying to be seen as some kind of martyr, or is he trying to grease the skids for his next campaign upon his eventual release? I'm sure his days in public office are far from being over. This little stint behind bars will most likely be seen as a resume enhancer as it usually is with any Democrat. And as we have seen so many times in the past, there is pretty much nothing that will keep blacks from voting for other blacks. Remember drugee Marion Barry?

Under federal sentencing guidelines, Junior could have gone up the river for 46 to 57 months, but of course with Junior being a Democrat and black to boot, the government recommended the lower end of that, 48 months. Jackson's lawyer, Reid H. Weingarten, worked to continued the scam of Junior having some mental condition by writing that the former congressman's mental health might worsen under the stress of incarceration. Jackson has supposedly been treated for depression and bipolar disorder. But I think most folks are able to recognize that as being nothing more than a scam perpetrated by this pathetic loser. A loser who really had everything, but it just wasn't enough! Maybe if he had paid closer attention to how his old man does things, he wouldn't have got busted.

JOHN KERRY-HEINZ IMPLIES INTERNET TOO DANGEROUS FOR US COMMON FOLK...

Apparently our less than impressive Secretary of State, John Kerry-Heinz, who I believe spent a VERY brief, yet VERY personally rewarding time in Vietnam, seems to be of the opinion that the internet makes it just a bit to easy for us common folk to keep somewhat of an eye on him and his sleaze-bag cohorts there in Washington. What he actually said was that it "makes it harder to govern." Now I ask you, what Democrat alive today has even the slightest bit of interest in actually ‘governing?’ Anyway, it was while speaking to State Department personnel at the U.S. Embassy in Brasilia, Brazil, on Tuesday, that Kerry-Heinz was heard to say that "this little thing called the Internet ... makes it much harder to govern." He also said that "ever since the end of the Cold War, forces have been unleashed that were tamped down for centuries by dictators."

"I’m a student of history, and I love to go back and read a particularly great book like [Henry] Kissinger’s book about diplomacy where you think about the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and the balance of power and how difficult it was for countries to advance their interests and years and years of wars," Kerry-Heinz said to a gathering of State Department employees and their families. Ok, let's be real here, shall we, the only thing that this boob is a student of, is how best to get rich quick without having to actually work for your money. And that would be, of course, to move in on some rich widow and to then simply ‘acquire’ her millions of dollars that were actually earned by someone else. But I digress, Kerry-Heinz continued blabbering, "And we sometimes say to ourselves, boy, aren’t we lucky." From whose perspective might he be speaking from, I wonder.

He went on to explain his rather idiotic point by saying ,"Well, folks, ever since the end of the Cold War, forces have been unleashed that were tamped down for centuries by dictators, and that was complicated further by this little thing called the internet and the ability of people everywhere to communicate instantaneously and to have more information coming at them in one day than most people can process in months or a year." So I'm not sure whether, in this particular instance, he views that as being a good thing, or a bad thing. I mean, isn't a good thing when people can gain for themselves information that will assist them in getting rid of a dictator? But as we all know, guys like Kerry-Heinz view people possessing information, especially information that they themselves have not either played a part in creating or been allowed to manipulate, as being a very dangerous thing.

Then Kerry-Heinz got to what I guess was his real point, saying, "It makes it much harder to govern, makes it much harder to organize people, much harder to find the common interest." Adding, "and that is complicated by a rise of sectarianism and religious extremism that is prepared to employ violent means to impose on other people a way of thinking and a way of living that is completely contrary to everything the United States of America has ever stood for. So we need to keep in mind what our goals are and how complicated this world is that we’re operating in." So what's this moron really saying here? I mean, I think that we have all known, and for some time now, that Barry and his team of thugs have been quite determined in their efforts to find a way to restrict our access to the internet. And their motives for doing so are questionable to say the least.

So judging by his comments here, I would think it safe to say that Kerry-Heinz is far from being a big fan of this creation of Al Gore's remaining so easily accessible to we the common folk. The desire here, to place limitations on that access, is not based, as Kerry-Heinz would like us to all believe, on anyone's being better able to combat the rise of the sectarianism and religious extremism to which he refers. Instead it's to work toward the goal of being able to keep the American people as much in the dark as is humanly possible about what it is that their government, and therefore corrupt politicians, like himself, might be up to. The internet serves at being the primary source of information for a great many people, myself included. Information that the American people can then use to hinder, as best they can, the style of governance currently being employed by those we have in power.

IT'S TIME TO SEND LINDSEY GRAHAM TO THE HOME...

If there is one thing that I think we can ALL agree on, it's that sissy-boy Lindsey Graham long ago exhausted whatever little usefulness he may have at one time provided to the fine people of South Carolina. And also the time has now come for him to find another way to while away his time, and preferably a way that does not include his being anywhere near Washington. And I trust this time around the people of his state will do the right thing.

Having said that, it would now appear that Lindsey has now picked up a third GOP primary challenger in the person of state Sen. Lee Bright. Now I heard Mr. Bright on Glenn Beck's radio show just last night as I headed home from work. And I have to say, he sounded like a pretty reasonable and intelligent fella, which already puts him light-years ahead of Graham. But I have been fooled before, so I still want to find out a little more about him.

And although I missed it, apparently he also made an appearance last night, Tuesday, on Fox Business Network's "Lou Dobbs Tonight." It was during an interview with Mr. Dobbs that Bright said the two-term Graham has lost touch with South Carolinians. I think that's putting it quite mildly. Personally, I think Graham has lost touch with reality. He's been a member of any number of 'gangs' whose purpose it was to assist in undermining our Constitution.

In assessing Graham's performance, Mr. Bright, very correctly pointed out that he, Graham, is not showing leadership on conservative causes. And he didn't come back to South Carolina during the August break, instead choosing to go to Egypt, "running around with [Sen. John] McCain acting as a community organizer for the Muslim Brotherhood." I think we all know why Graham chose to spend time with "The Maverick" instead of with his constituents.

McCain and Graham recently toured Egypt as the country attempts to form a new government after the military ousted its elected president after a year in office. The senators called on participation by the Muslim Brotherhood even though ousted president Mohammed Morsi was a member and tried to institute strict Islamic law. They also called for Morsi's release from prison and for the Muslim Brotherhood to renounce violence. Right, like that's going to happen.

Over the years 'The Maverick" and "The Sissy-Boy" have become quite the butt-buddies, to the point where many wonder why they simply don't make it official and switch parties. It's quite obvious that, in their hearts, they are both Democrats. What they both most definitely are not, is conservative. They claim to be, but as that old adage says, actions speak louder than words. And that is most definitely the case when talking about these two RINOs.

IGNORE THE 'GLOBAL WARMING' PROPAGANDA…

Well, it would seem that despite what you might be hearing of late from geniuses like John Kerry-Heinz and other 'climate change' zealots, global warming does not seem to be the problem that they claim is it. And apparently the boys over there at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the same ones who keep getting wrong the number of hurricanes, are also cheerleaders of the global warming craze, especially if their recently released report, "State of the Climate in 2012", is any indication of where they stand on the issue. This silly little report of theirs states that "worldwide, 2012 was among the 10 warmest years on record."

However, upon actually reading their report you find that it "fails to mention [2012] was one of the coolest of the decade, and thus confirms the cooling trend," and that's pointed out in an analysis by climate blogger Pierre Gosselin. "To no one’s surprise, the report gives the reader the impression that warming is galloping ahead out of control," writes Gosselin. "But their data shows just the opposite." We've known for sometime that this entire global warming nonsense was nothing more than a scam to wreak as much havoc as possible on our capitalist system and in the process to make some folks, like Al Gore, very, very rich.

Although the NOAA report noted that in 2012, "the Arctic continues to warm" with "sea ice reaching record lows," it also stated that the Antarctica sea ice "reached a record high of 7.51 million square miles" on Sept. 26, 2012. And the latest figures for this year show that there’s been a slowdown of melting in the Arctic this summer as well, with temperatures at the North Pole well below normal for this time of year. Meteorologist Joe Bastardi calls it "the coldest ever recorded." But you wouldn't know that if you were only listening to people like liberal politicians and the majority of those in our state-controlled media.

The Associated Press' over zealousness on the issue, put those folks in the position of having to retract a photo it released on July 27 with the caption, "The shallow meltwater lake is occurring due to an unusually warm period." AP ended up admitting in a note to editors "In fact, the water accumulates in this way every summer." And then went on to add that the photo was doubly misleading because "the camera used by the North Pole Environment Observatory has drifted hundreds of miles from its original position, which was a few dozen miles from the pole." Guess they saw it as being no harm, no foul.

NOAA also reported that the "average lower stratospheric temperature, about six to ten miles above the Earth’s surface, for 2012 was record or near-record cold, depending on the dataset" even while the concentrations of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, continued to increase. "Even with all this data manipulation, the trend is down as shown by this Hadley global plot," writes Joseph D'Aleo, former director of meteorology at The Weather Channel. So even with massive data manipulation these scammers still can't successfully create the illusion that the earth is, in fact, getting warmer. Because it isn't!

"Last year was the 8th warmest but 7th coldest since 1998. They explain it away with the predominance of La Ninas or a solar blip, but say it was the warmest decade nonetheless, so stop questioning us," D'Aleo said. And then on August 7th, the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten quoted Irish solar expert Ian Elliott predicting that lower levels of sunspot activity over the next few years "indicates that we may be on the path to a new little ice age." So things are completely the opposite from what we're hearing from so many on the left including buffoons like John Kerry-Heinz who continue to call for drastic action.

"If you think scientists just couldn’t get any more incompetent, then think again. NOAA scientists even appear to believe that cold events are now signs of warming," Gosselin points out. "When one carefully reads the report, we find that the NOAA findings actually do confirm precisely what the skeptics have been claiming all along: 1. The Earth has stopped warming, 2. The climate models exaggerated future warming [caused by] CO2 climate sensitivity is much lower than we first thought. And yet they can still bring themselves to urge that action be taken to avert what these zealots refer to as being the next great cataclysm.

WHEN DEMOCRATS ATTACK…A RODEO CLOWN???

Now I'm sure most of you, by now, have heard about the horrific act recently committed by a rodeo clown at Missouri State Fair. An act so horrific in nature and one that we are suppose to view as being yet another example of the type of racism that remains so prevalent in America. An act that consisted of nothing more than wearing a mask that bore the likeness of Barry "Almighty." I am curious though about how many of these very same thin-skinned Democrats who are now so aghast over the actions of a clown, would be laughing hysterically if the mask the clown had been wearing was perhaps a likeness of Bush or even Reagan? I would venture to guess that it would be most of them. At the very least, I’m quite sure, there would be none of them who would claim to see even the slightest thing wrong with the clown's behavior.

But it would seem that when it comes to our "Dear Beloved Leader", Barack Hussein Obama, the same guy who kids are now saying prayers to, well then, such an act must be seen as nothing other than what it most assuredly is, and as something not to be tolerated in any way, shape, manner or form! But Barry, as much as he would like it to be and many of his 'followers' see him as, is not a God. He is our president, and really not a very good one. And there is nothing special about him. And if anything can be said in respect to his being black, it's that it has allowed him to get away with things that no white president could have ever hoped to get away with. And isn't it a bit ironic, that the political party that claims to be so tolerant is actually quite intolerant, especially of those who disagree with it?

I guess it can now be safely assumed that our sense of humor is one more thing, on a very long list of many, that we have now lost and for no other reason than that we now have a egomaniacal president who happens to be black. And apparently a couple of Democrats from the state where this horrific incident occurred are of the opinion that what has been committed here borders on being something akin to blasphemy. Claire McCaskill and William Lacy Clay were among the politicians who condemned the rodeo clown who wore the mask of Barry and asked the crowd if they wanted to see the president "run down by a bull." I can only assume that Clay, who is black, is another one of those paranoid blacks who sees a racist behind every bush, or mask. McCaskill, on the other hand, is simply a sleazy opportunist.

The egregious incident that has the panties of so many Democrats in quite the bunch, took place at the Missouri State Fair over this past weekend. Our esteemed Mr. Clay thought it important enough to issue an idiotic statement condemning this disgraceful act. He stated that in his opinion the act showed "an ugly face of intolerance." He went on to say, "I am amazed that in 2013, such hatred, intolerance and disrespect towards the President of the United States could take place at the Missouri State Fair. Our fair is supposed to showcase the best of Missouri, instead, it showed an ugly face of intolerance and ignorance to the world." Sorry, but I'm just not making the connection, here, of how we get from a comedy routine by a clown all the way to the "ugly face of intolerance and ignorance."

And of course not to be out done, McCaskill also released a statement of her own on Sunday calling the performance "shameful." "If what’s being reported is true, then it’s shameful and it’s unacceptable," her statement said. "The State Fair is funded by taxpayer dollars, and is supposed to be a place where we can all bring our families and celebrate the state that we love. But the young Missourians who witnessed this stunt learned exactly the wrong lesson about political discourse-that somehow it’s ever acceptable to, in a public event, disrespect, taunt, and joke about harming the President of our great nation. Missouri is better than this, and I expect someone to be held accountable." Yup, by all means, let's tar and feather the poor clown because he chose to make fun of Barry "Almighty."

Ya know, I think it fair to say that this over-the-top response to what was nothing more than an attempt at humor, can be used to further demonstrate just how far things can be said to have deteriorated in this country. And now word comes that the rodeo clown responsible for the performance has been permanently banned from the Missouri State Fair. Come on, really? People, what have we allowed ourselves to be turned into? Comedians, which clowns are by their very name, make fun of political 'leaders' all the time. And when it's a conservative or a Republican everybody always gets a good laugh. But somehow when it's a Democrat, and a black one to boot, we're all supposed to be far more respectful, even reverent. Sorry, that just ain't happening. Especially not with this guy!

LIKE OBAMA REALLY CARES WHETHER WE ‘APPROVE’...OR NOT...

Ok, so once again we're being told that Barry's approval rating has gone a little further into the crapper as if somehow it's supposed to have an impact. As I have asked every time he manages to hit yet another new low, so what? Does anyone seriously think it really matters to him? And remember now, many of these very same Americans who now have such a low opinion of Barry are some of the very same ones who are already going bonkers over Hitlery Clinton. And she's just as much of a leftwing ideologue as Barry is. But anyway, despite his facing a series of scandals, phony or otherwise, involving everything from the IRS to the NSA, in addition to the growing unpopularity of Obamacare, Barry is likely to be no more bothered by his dismal job approval rating than he is by a cloudy day.

Gallup's daily tracking survey, which just between you and me seems to be more than just a little pointless, on Saturday had Barry with a 41 percent approval, which was a 7-point drop from just the day before. His disapproval rating was at 50 percent on Saturday. His approval rating rose 1 percent on Sunday to 42 percent. And if we look at Real Clear Politics' (RCP) and their average of recent polls, we would see Barry's approval sitting at 43.6 percent and his disapproval at 51.1. And on the economy, the numbers get a little worse. RCP's average of polls shows 42.2 percent approve of Barry's job performance while 53 percent disapprove. On foreign policy, the president garnered 44 percent approval, 47.6 percent disapproval. But again, who really thinks this concerns him in the least?

And on the topic of Obamacare, it was on this past Sunday that we heard from Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Reince Priebus who made the claim that it's members of Barry's own party who are now beginning to distance themselves from his signature healthcare law as they head into 2014. Although that differs from what we heard from Jimmy "The Tea Party Is Racist" Clyburn. Because, you see, according to old Jimbo, here, the Democrats passed Obamacare with the specific purpose in mind of being able to run on it in 2014. At least that’s what he's said. But as Priebus also said in Sunday's appearance on CNN's "State of the Union," "If this was such a great idea, then all of these senators who are vulnerable in 2014 would have voted for it, and they didn't."

So while the media has continued to focus on what it describes as being Republican divisions over tactics, according to Priebus, it's the GOP that has "total unanimity" on getting rid of Obamacare. It's the Democrat Party, he said, who are fighting amongst one another over whether to keep Obamacare in place. Still, while some Republicans from the Tea Party wing are calling for defunding Obamacare in the 2014 fiscal year budget, most party leaders say that will force a government shutdown, and the public will blame Republicans. But Priebus noted that 30 Democrats voted against Obamacare. The true division is on Democratic side, he argued. He said it was "very obvious" the delay in the employer mandate is about getting Democrats elected. Only time will tell whose right here.

A Fox News Poll conducted Aug. 3-5 on Obamacare saw 31 percent of respondents say "it’s going fine," while 57-percent said, "it’s a joke." Barry doesn't fare much better when it comes to the debate over the recent intelligence leaks by NSA turncoat Edward Snowden. When Fox News pollsters asked about the Justice Department looking at reporters' records, for instance, 59 percent considered it a "serious situation." The same percentage considered the IRS targeting of conservative groups to be "serious." Sixty-nine percent thought the NSA surveillance of Americans was not a "phony scandal," while 78 percent didn't think investigations into the changes in talking points on the Benghazi attack were phony. So that kinda shoots down the phony scandal theory.

Finally, despite Barry's continuing attempts to shift talk to the economy with a series of speeches in recent days, a Fox News poll found that 71 percent of voters say that Barry isn't saying anything new and would prefer to see him stay in Washington to work things out with Republicans. A Pew Research Center poll in mid-July found confidence in an improved economy is lagging. Four in 10 said it will take a long time for the economy to get back on its feet. But as Barry has proven time and again, he couldn’t care less about anything that the American people may be saying, and even less about what they may be thinking. He's got his job for another three and a half years, and there's really nothing that they can do about that. The arrogance, here, knows no bounds!

THE UNBELIEVABLY INCOMPETENT MR. KERRY-HEINZ...

Maybe I'm just not enough of a 'worldly' person, but for the life of me I simply cannot figure out what perpetuating the myth of "global climate change" has to do with executing the foreign policy of the United States. Am I missing something here? Am I just not seeing the big picture? The reason I ask is because in reiterating a theme that he presented just two weeks ago at an Iftar dinner celebrating the end of Ramadan, if his attending such a gathering wasn't bizarre enough, our less that brilliant Secretary of State John Kerry-Heinz, on Thursday, repeated his description of "global climate change" as being a challenge to our responsibilities as the guardians--safe guarders of God's creation."

First of all, I think most will agree in finding it rather hypocritical that this pompous old windbag would even attempt to lecture us on the care of what we all recognize as being God's creation. I mean, let's face it, when it comes to the life of an unborn child, that most wondrous of all of God's creations, it seems to matter very little to Mr. Kerry-Heinz if that life comes to what can safely be described as a rather horrific end, even if that end comes within mere minutes of it entering into this world. And yet, he wishes us to believe that he is somehow so concerned for our planet. When making these idiotic remarks, Kerry-Heinz was speaking at an event announcing the creation of the State Department's Office of Faith-Based Community Initiatives.

"I'm convinced that all of you will agree," said Kerry-Heinz, "that one of the toughest challenges that we face in terms of global diplomacy and relationships around the world between peoples nowadays, from sectarian strife to the challenges of many intractable, frozen conflicts, to the challenges of simply understanding people--one people to another--or even monumental challenges like the sectarian strife that we see tearing countries and regions apart, as well as the enormous challenges of things like global climate change, which really is a challenge to our responsibilities as the guardians--safe guarders of God’s creation." Like I said, I'm just not seeing what one has to do with the other.

Kerry-Heinz made a similar statement at the State Department's Ramadan Iftar Dinner on July 24. It was then that Kerry-Heinz said, "For many of us, respect for God’s creation in almost every scripture really demands and translates into a duty to protect and sustain God’s first creation." Kerry-Heinz went on to say, "Our response to climate change ought to be rooted in a fundamental sense of shared stewardship of the earth that emerges from that tradition." Such language as this where he refers to God and to scriptures, coming from someone like Kerry-Heinz is really nothing short of nauseating. Like all Democrats, he is rather selective in his "use" of religious imagery.

After having watched this incompetent boob operate since coming on the job, rarely have I seen someone so in over his, or her head. Like Barry, inept doesn’t even begin to describe his lack of being able to perform even the most minimal responsibilities of his position. Where the focus is supposed to be on administering, and attending to, the foreign policy of our country, Kerry-Heinz's focus seems to be on everything but. We hear him talking about gay marriage and climate change far more than we hear him talking about any actual important matters of state. He has no more aptitude for the job that his predecessor possessed, and our country is far more worse off because of the both of them! He antics would be funny if their consequences weren’t so dangerous.

WE ARE DESPERATE FOR ‘REAL’ LEADERSHIP…

Well now, here’s something that should come as absolutely no surprise to anyone who’s the least bit familiar with the courage of our GOP House leadership. And I use the term ‘leadership’ very loosely here. You see, as the fall’s fiscal drama nears, there is a group of conservative lawmakers who are urging our stellar Republican leaders to use Obamacare as a bargaining chip. Behind the scenes, they’re warning Speaker John Boehner and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell that unless the president’s signature law is defunded, they won’t support a "continuing resolution" to fund the federal government. But as is usually the case, our limp-wristed, cowardly and impotent leadership would rather do just about anything than fight. Maybe I’m just not as smart as they are, but rarely, anymore, to I understand the logic of their decisions. Everything seems to be based around surrender.

This budget debate is said to have caused some tension within the ranks since many Republicans are uncomfortable, to put it mildly, with any talk about a shutdown. It was in recent interview that House majority leader Eric Cantor clarified what he sees as being the House’s strategy. "No one is advocating a government shutdown," he said. He also proceeded to throw a little cold water on the "defund or shutdown" rallying cry. Cantor said, "In order to avoid a government shutdown, we need 60 votes in the Senate and 218 votes in the House to pass a continuing resolution." And proceeded to further explain, "To get 60 votes in the Senate, you need at least 14 Democrats to join Republicans and pass a CR that defunds Obamacare. Right now, I am not aware of a single Democrat in the Senate who would join us. If and when defunding has 60 votes in the Senate, we will absolutely deliver more than 218 votes in the House."

And as he was trying harder to convince himself than he was the rest of us, Cantor said, "Repealing Obamacare remains the goal." He continued, "as is doing everything we can to protect people from its harmful effects here and now, like delaying the mandate for people, not just big business." But apparently, at least for the moment, connecting government funding to that effort isn’t likely part of his plan. And why not? Just once I wish the guys on our team would decide to play this game the same way that the Democrats do. You can’t make nice and hope to achieve your goal of ridding Americans of the Obamacare albatross that has been placed around their neck. You have to FIGHT using every tool at you’re disposal, and if you’re afraid to do that, well then, maybe you ain’t the guys for the job! Our leadership teams appears to be nothing more than a bunch of eunuchs in need of a healthy dose of testosterone.

ARE WE ON THE VERGE OF GETTING SCREWED AGAIN?

As if I needed any less reason to support Paul Ryan as he seems to have now set his sights on being able to successfully navigate an amnesty bill through the House, it seems that the arm of the Mark Zuckerberg-backed immigration reform group that focuses primarily on supposed conservatives, is going on air in Milwaukee with a pro-reform spot and is specifically defending our Mr. Ryan. Now I gotta tell ya, anytime you have guys like Zuckerberg out there defending these supposed conservatives, little alarm bells should be going off in your head. And you need to be paying attention to them, because they're trying to tell you something!

Apparently, according to some source whose business, job or hobby it is to track the air waves, this bogus little group of Zuckerberg's with the even more bogus, innocuous sounding, name, Americans for a Conservative Direction, bought roughly $350,000 worth of TV ad time and targeted it squarely toward Ryan’s district. Now to put that into better perspective, that's almost double the amount that the anti-immigration Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) is spending on 30-second spots accusing Ryan of backing "amnesty." Which is exactly what he's doing! He apparently wants to be the House version of Rubio.

The spot being run by Zuckerberg's group begins with a picture of Ryan and says, "Amnesty? Not a chance," and goes on to say the House budget chairman is looking at a "conservative solution" to the issue of immigration. It then focuses on more muscular pieces of the reform effort such as increased border security, E-verify and items like back taxes charged to illegal immigrants already in the country. The buy runs from Friday through Sept. 3 on both cable and broadcast networks. Now this should really call into question Ryan's calling himself a conservative if folks like Zuckerberg are coming to his defense.

Ryan and his RINO buds have been working quite feverishly to push through the House a version of what's being referred to as comprehensive reform which is really nothing short of amnesty. And as we heard earlier this week from Luis Gutierrez, a Democrat from Illinois, he's confident of already having 40-50 Republicans ready to vote for his amnesty bill. So it looks like the American people are once again poised to take it in the shorts yet again. Now I know Boehner has said that there would be no vote on any bill that did not have a majority of Republicans onboard, but do YOU trust him to stick to that 'promise'?

　
Look, I'm just getting so tired of being told to shut up and take it like man. And I'm not going to take it anymore. This whole notion of amnesty benefits no one but the Democrat Party, in that it will essentially create millions of brand new Democrat voters. So I'm just not understanding why it is that so many who call themselves conservative are in such an all fired hurry to make that into a reality. And if this drive is successful any hope of ever being able to rid ourselves of Obamacare will likely go up in smoke. We need to be on the phone and sending nonstop emails to our folks in the House. This effort must be STOPPED!!

ALEC "THE BOOB" BALDWIN COMING TO MSNBC...

Apparently the powers that be over there at MSNBC, otherwise known as "Obama Central", have now come up with what they must think is the cure for their ratings continuing to be in the cellar. And what might that be you ask? Well, apparently it has now been learned from a senior source in the cable news industry who has some knowledge of MSNBC’s programming, that none other than liberal loudmouth and assaulter of photographers, Alec Baldwin is getting his own weekly show in MSNBC’s primetime lineup. Now, you may remember that Alec's attempt at talk radio on "Air America', was less than impressive, but maybe this gig will go a bit better for him. But let's hope not.

According to sources, the so far untitled show will air Fridays at 10 p.m. ET and will feature a large dose of Baldwin’s idiotic liberal politics. The gig would make sense, considering Baldwin’s long history with NBC. He starred on the network’s imbecilic little sitcom 30 Rock for seven years, has frequently hosted Saturday Night Live, and hosted the network’s American airing of 2007′s Live Earth concert. Most important, Baldwin’s insanely liberal and sophomoric political views make sense for a network that has become what is essentially nothing more than a cheering section for Barry "Almighty". And yet they still seem to wonder why it is that they continue to have low ratings. Go figure!

The MSNBC 10 p.m. hour is currently occupied by "Low-Rents" O'Donnell, but this moron is only on Monday through Thursday. So this new Baldwin program will not replace any of the network’s primetime talk shows, just the Lockup prison documentary series that airs Friday evenings. Source insists its a done deal but there is no question MSNBC is not quite prepared for an announcement. Yet. Look, I think we can all agree on the fact that what MSNBC does is about as far removed from journalism as you can possibly get. And bringing douche bag Alec onboard only serves to make that all the more clear. Their product is now, and pretty much always has been, nothing more than pure Democrat propaganda.

So now joining what has become recognized as being the little MSNBC freak show of Sharpton, Matthews, O'Donnell, Maddow, Scarborough, Bashir and Schultz we'll, apparently, soon have yet another leftist freak in the person of Alec "The Douche Bag" Baldwin. Gee, I know that's enough to make me want to start tuning in. I think I've seen two movies that this dope was in, 'The Hunt For Red October' and 'Beetlejuice," both of which I actually enjoyed. But that was before I realized what a flaming loon he is. These days I watch nothing that he's in. He's not funny, and he's really not even all that bright. He's just loud and obnoxious and I guess that's enough for MSNBC, as it is for most liberals. You don't have to be bright, you just need to be loud.

Ya know, it really doesn't take genius to be able to recognize the fact that it's liberal policies that have destroyed this country. But what it does take is a willingness to look, to reason, and to think for oneself. You have to be willing to spend the necessary time and energy to filter through all of the propaganda that is constantly being spewed by what passes, today, for our mainstream media, of which MSNBC considers itself to be a contributing member. If we choose to accept at face-value all of the garbage that we're being told, then there truly is no hope for us. While we must listen to them in order to know what it is that they are up to, we must also be able to recognize them for what they are. LIARS!

WHERE DO THESE MORONS COME UP WITH THIS STUFF?

Ok then, just when you think you've heard the most idiotic thing you could ever hear come out of the mouth of some black politician, along comes John Lewis, Democrat from Georgia, to prove you wrong. And, actually, in a pretty big way! Because this moron has now gone so far as to actually compare National Security Agency (NSA) leaker Edward Snowden to Gandhi and Martin Luther King. Sorry John, but try as I might, I just ain't seeing the connection here. When I look at Snowden, the last thing I see is someone like a Gandhi or a King.

This blatantly idiotic statement came during an interview with the UK Guardian that was published on Wednesday, in which this doofus, Lewis, actually made the claim that this Snowden clown was following in the footsteps of others who have engaged in non-violent civil disobedience. Lewis, like so many others that make up the membership of that rather bizarre little group, the Congressional Black Caucus, is rather famous, or infamous, for saying some pretty outlandish, and pretty idiotic, things, but this one has to take the cake.

"In keeping with the philosophy and the discipline of non-violence, in keeping with the teaching of Henry David Thoreau and people like Gandhi and others, if you believe something that is not right, something is unjust, and you are willing to defy customs, traditions, bad laws, then you have a conscience," Lewis said. "You have a right to defy those laws and be willing to pay the price." What the Hell is he talking about? His cockamamie analogy just don't make no sense. But making sense isn't really what folks like him are known for.

And then, as if somehow it means something, Lewis noted that is what "we did" during the civil rights movement and mentioned he "got arrested 40 times during the sixties. Since I've been in Congress I've been arrested four times. Sometimes you have to act by the dictates of your conscience. You have to do it." Obviously this senile old fart has been in Congress a bit too long. And so what if he's been arrested four times. I guess, like most blacks, he must see that as being some kind of a rather perverse badge of honor. I'm less than impressed!

Lewis also said the federal government similarly spied on and targeted Martin Luther King. "We had that problem during the height of the civil rights movement," Lewis said. "People spied on, and got information on Martin Luther King Junior, and tried to use it against him, on the movement, tried to plant people within different organizations--that probably led to the destruction of some of those groups." Yup, you're right there, John. But you know what, those folks who were doing the spying were actually none other than DEMOCRATS! So there!

He, and many like him, are the primary cause of things being the way are in this country today, and why things have gotten to be so upside down. And no, I'm talking about his being black, what I'm talking about is the fact that he's a flaming, America hating, liberal. People like him make me sick. They are determined to wreak as much havoc as they possibly can in their effort to tear down this country. These clowns are scum of the highest order. And they prove that point just about every time they open up their big fat mouths!

GAG ME WITH A SPOON!!!

Come on, Barry. Do you 'seriously' expect us to view you as being some kind of a cross between Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King? Sorry to disappoint, but if we're being honest here, which I know you would appreciate, you much more closely resemble a cross between, say, a Neville Chamberlain and an Al Sharpton. But, be that as it may, that apparently won't stop Barry "Almighty" from attempting, once again, to somehow use the memory of Dr. King for his own political purposes. Barry's little speech will mark the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King's "I have a dream" speech and will be given from the very same steps there at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington. Once again, however, what we will be witness to is yet another attempt by Barry to be much more than he actually is and something that he most definitely is not.

So it is then that on August 28 this event in Washington will take place on the exact spot where Dr. King delivered his famous address on the same day back in 1963. Somehow, though, if I was black, which I am not, I think I'd be viewing this whole thing as being nothing more than the pathetic charade that it is, and as yet another example where we see Barry trying to compare himself to Dr. King. Barry, as we are constantly reminded of, is the first black president, well actually the second, I guess, if you count "Slick Willie", and will, we're told, speak about the half century that has passed since the "March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom," which culminated with remarks by the Atlanta pastor and civil rights icon. Which is something that Barry, quite literally, has very little, if any, connection to other than he happens to be black.

It was in 1963 that Dr. King spoke in front of 250,000 people, explaining his wish for better relations between black and white Americans. His words, which had a great effect on blacks and whites alike, were engraved on the steps of the monument where he spoke. Lyndon Johnson, who took over when John Kennedy was assassinated just four months after King spoke in Washington, signed landmark civil rights laws in 1964 and 1965. Something that he would have been unable to do were it not for the strong support he got from Republicans in Congress, because members of his own party were very firmly against both pieces of legislation. Which is a fact that far too many blacks today conveniently choose to ignore, in exchange for the near countless freebies that they now receive from the Democrats.

This disgusting demonstration by Barry only serves to prove, once again, that this guy certainly does have a rather overly-inflated opinion of himself. And proves the point of how he's nothing more than a blatant political opportunist. And what's really kinda sad is that Barry is something that Dr. King most definitely never was. Barry is a racist, and the worst kind of racist, which makes his 'tribute' to Dr. King all the more distasteful, even bordering on slanderous. Barry can compare himself to Dr. King until the cows come home, but he's about as far removed from King as a black man can possibly get. And I have a feeling that if Dr. King were able to see how creeps like Barry, Sharpton and Jackson insist upon using his name, and in the manner that they do, he'd be more than just a little disappointed.

WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE HERE, PEOPLE?

So now, as those of you who have paying attention already know, our illustrious members of Congress, as well as, it seems, their just as illustrious, and grossly over-paid, staffers, will not now be losing their very substantial health-care subsidies, the cost of which is covered by we the taxpayers, when Obamacare is implemented because of a little exception proposed Wednesday by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). So these crooks get to dodge that very big bullet which the rest of will still be forced to take right between the eyes.

You see, under the current system, the government, really the taxpayers, covers most of the cost of health-care premiums paid by members and their staffers. But because of an amendment to the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, proposed by Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, that said that members and staff must enter into the exchanges or be covered by insurance "created" by law, those subsidies were kinda thrown into question. So I guess Sen. Grassley was pretty confident that this pond scum would be looking for a way to exempt themselves. And he was right!

So the potential existed that staff members were likely to lose their subsidies, which then led to fears of what was hysterically referred to as a "brain drain" from the Hill would occur if staffers left as a result of the increased costs. A brain drain? Seriously? You gotta be kidding me! I mean, doesn't something normally have to actually exist before it can be drained? I mean, I think it’s pretty safe to say that the collective brainpower of those on Capitol Hill is pretty weak at best. After all, this is the freakin brain trust that has gotten this country into the shape that it is! Just sayin!

But never fear staffers, for here comes Barry here riding to your rescue while the rest of us get screwed. Because last week, when Barry came to the Hill to meet with pretty much the same pathetic bunch of Democrat shmucks who 'passed' this debacle, he informed them that, by golly, he was going to be getting personally involved to sort out all the confusion. And it wasn’t too long after that the White House said that OPM would issue some new guidelines this week. Well, those guidelines have now been released, and they're really quite the scam.

You see, these new guidelines will now allow for members, and their supposed too brilliant to lose staffers, to retain their rather extravagant little taxpayer funded subsidies received from the government, an exception in exchange for giving up "premium tax credits" that they would otherwise be eligible for under Obamacare. "The amount of the employer contribution toward their Exchange premiums is no more than would otherwise be made toward coverage under the [Federal Employee Health Benefits Program," the OPM release notes. Well ain’t that sweet?

But then the shit starts to get a little deep with the effort to somehow defend this indefensible action with the claim that this is really no different that what's available to average Americans. You see, some dope by the name of Jon Foley, who’s the OPM Director of Planning and Policy, actually said in a statement "These proposed regulations implement the administrative aspects of switching Members of Congress and congressional staff to their new insurance plans, the same plans available to millions of Americans through the new Exchanges."

So I ask you all again, "Where in Hell is the outrage here?" Why aren't people flocking into the streets in droves? Am I the only one who sees this as being completely unsat! That these same lying scumbags who shoved this disaster down our throats should not now be permitted to escape, or circumvent, the same requirements that the rest of us are going to be forced to comply with should be seen as being unacceptable. They created this monster, so therefore, they should be made to suffer its consequences right along with the rest of us. They may think that they are somehow better than us, but they are not!

THE LIES AND THE LYING LIARS WHO TELL THEM...

Well apparently, there are liars and then there are LIARS. And if being made to tolerate this president and his corrupt little gang of socialist miscreants has shown us anything over the course of the last few years, it's that they are a very capable bunch when it comes to altering, or creating their own unique version of, the truth. They make the Clintons look like a couple of amateurs, and they are both highly skilled when it comes to their ability to lie about nearly anything and everything.

But I gotta tell ya, when White House 'Spokemoron', Jay Carney, said there is "no question" that al-Qaeda is on the run, even though U.S. outposts remain closed due to terror threats throughout the world, I could tell they were serious about taking things to a whole new level in their willingness to lie to the American people. And when asked, on Tuesday, if he actually stood by that cockamamie declaration, our favorite 'Spokesmoron said, very confidently, "We do stand by that."

And then the boob went on to further his imbecilic claim by saying, "There's no question that core al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan has been severely diminished. It's leadership decimated and there's no question it's on the run." Adding, "For many years now, it has been less organized and less capable of coordinating attacks on a scale that it was able to do, most notably on 9-11." Finally saying, "And that remains the case." What planet does this creep come from, exactly?

Carney’s blatantly idiotic comments came while on Air Force One headed to Phoenix where Barry was scheduled to give yet another one of his patently false, campaign style jobs’ speeches. At the same time nineteen of our diplomatic posts remain closed in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia due to an unspecified threat from al-Qaeda and its affiliates. It's like, just because these boneheads have declared that the 'War on Terror' is over, we're supposed to believe it. But sadly, that is just not the case here.

As you may recall, Barry based much of his reelection campaign on the fact that "Bin Laden is dead, GM is alive," often going so far as to say that the terrorist group has been decimated. It was on September 28, 2012 that Barry said, "We said that we would go after al Qaeda, and they are on the run and bin Laden is dead." Now while Barry was quite right in making his claim that someone was in fact on the run, he was wrong in stating who that someone is. Because it seems to be US!