ELIZABETH WARREN, HEARING ‘THE DONALD’ IN HER HEAD???

You know, I can’t help but wonder what it must be like to be a Democrat in 2016 and know that all of your hopes for maintaining control of the White house are now riding on someone likely Hitlery Clinton.  Because I gotta tell ya, you can say what you want about Trump, but at least he’s not currently under investigation by the FBI and he doesn’t have a potential indictment, no matter how unlikely, hanging over his head.  Which, I guess brings me now to the esteemed senior senator from ‘The Bay State”, Elizabeth Warren and her rather bizarre preoccupation with ‘The Donald.’

Warren has had this fixation about Trump for some time, but things appear to have moved on to what is now a whole new level.  A level where she simply can’t bring herself to stop talking about, or apparently thinking about, the presumptive Republican nominee, Donald J. Trump.  And whether it’s in her public statements or her rather idiotic comments made on social media, these days the woman Donald Trump has dismissed as “The Indian?” is talking about little else, and she’s not hiding the fact that she is scared at the prospects of a Trump presidency.

And it was recently, at the Massachusetts Democrat convention, which I’m sure was a rather bizarre gathering to say the least, that Warren was heard to say, “Now, we’ve talked for a long time about important elections, when John Kerry took on W, when Obama fought McCain — very important races.”  She went on to say, “But today, we have something new, a presidential contest that isn’t just important; it’s downright scary. And we all know the reason why: the big, loud — and I mean loud — elephant in the room, Donald Trump.”  She’s so witty, don’t you think?

Anyway, Warren went on to say, “Could any of us have imagined that people all over the United States would be begging Mitt Romney to run for president?”  she then told the room full of Democrats, “Come on, okay, and look, it’s some of you begging him, too, right? It’s okay. You can admit it. You’re among friends here.”  And a quick review of her Twitter account shows just how fixated she is on Trump. Forty-five of her last forty-seven tweets to her more than 450,000 followers were either directly tagged at Donald Trump or were obviously referring to him.

And something that makes very clear just how far left the Democrat Party has now moved, many actually consider Warren a leading candidate to be Hitlery’s running mate.  Would that not be the socialist ‘Dream Team’?  A team that, if elected, would easily bring about the demise of America.  Now while America, over the course of the last 7 years has been reduced to being little more than a laughingstock, electing these two inept morons would only serve to make matters worse.  It’ll be bad enough if Hitlery is elected without a Warren-like vice-president.

And let’s face it, what candidate besides Trump would have the guts to call Warren, Pocahantas, The Indian, or goofy. I mean can you picture a Bush or a Kasich or even a Christie saying that?  I laugh every time I think about it.  And he seems to have gotten into her head on a pretty significant level.  But he also seems to have gotten into head of many of those who comprise our political talking heads, and it’s getting rather amusing to hear them make excuses for their wrong choices.  Most just can't get over the fact their guy, or gal, didn’t win.

And let’s be real, the only ones, and I mean the ONLY ones, who want Romney to run again are Democrats and the #nevertrump crowd because he’d be a pretty easy electoral target.  Let’s face it, he had his chance, and he demonstrated that he just doesn’t possess the willingness to do what needs to be done in order to win against these sleazy, scumbag Democrats.  Which is why, I think, he’s so jealous of Trump. Because if there is one thing that Trump has made pretty clear, it’s that he isn’t afraid to go at them, Warren included, head on.

Over the course of the last several decades I’ve lost count of how many times I wished that those on my side would approach this game called politics just a bit more like how it is that those on the other side approach it.  And now that someone on my side, more or less, is doing just that I’m not about to get all squeamish about it.  Because if I’m going down, I’d much rather at least go down swinging than just lying down.  Those on the left have never shied away from doing or saying whatever they felt needed to be done or said because, as they say, elections have consequences.

If anything, Trump is managing to prove at least one major truism:  That being, we don't need Humility in a leader now!  America is, quite literally, being destroyed from the inside by the most ridiculous Marxist/Racist Nannybots imaginable, those who hound us constantly in their attempt to force us into accepting their ridiculous and perverted ideas. Tranny bathroom privileges are but the most recent on a long list of many.  Leadership in America is simply a dishonest, pathetic union of Liars and Dissemblers because they know there is no one held accountable.

We don't need a quiet, humble multicultural bowl of oatmeal. What we need is a guy who’s willing to do what’s needed, to put a fist in their mouth, figuratively speaking of course, one who will tell them to lead, follow or get the F out of the way so somebody else can; and one who does not bend to whiners who claim " What if", every 7 seconds. Someone with the ego and the willpower to put rampant leftist lunacy in its place, and do it without apologizing.  While I haven’t been on the Trump train from the beginning, there is a reason he has come to be the last man standing.

ALAN GRAYSON, YET ANOTHER SOURCE OF EMBARRASSMENT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA…

Well it would seem that we here in Florida have yet another source of embarrassment that can now be added to what is already a pretty impressive list that includes several illustrious individuals that we have chosen to represent us in Washington.  So to a list that already includes such notables as Corrine Brown, Debbie Wizzerman Schultz, Alcee Hastings, Bill Nelson and Frederica Wilson, we can add none other than Democrat congressman Alan Grayson to that list. 

Grayson has always been known as being not much more than your basic loudmouth turd-ball with a reputation for never being able to make all that much sense.  And he recently made that point all that more clear went on a profanity-laced tirade in an interview with a reporter who dared to point out the hypocrisy of Grayson’s idiotic comments by asking him why it was that he kept his cash in offshore tax havens.  Democrats are never supposed to have such questions of them, it’s a rule.

Grayson, as you may remember, was a staunch critic, as well as a very vocal one, of then-Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney for holding money in off-shore accounts, and once demanded the IRS investigate every single Fortune 500 company to uncover their “offshore tax havens.”  But in an interview with the Tampa Bay Times’ Adam Smith, it was Grayson who was confronted with evidence that his own corporations were incorporated in the Cayman Islands, a notorious tax haven.

Grayson was, needless to say, less than happy to be challenged on the point when contacted by Smith, calling it “some stupid, bullshit story… You want to write shit about it, and you can’t because not a single dollar of taxes has been avoided.”  He pretty much showed his ass saying, “Are you f*cking kidding?”  He continued saying, “I set up a fund that might solicit foreign investors… I have no present intention of soliciting foreign investors. Your perception issue is bullshit.” 

You’ll notice that whenever such claims are made about Democrats, they’re somehow always said to be bullshit.  Democrats must never be made to play by their own rules. Grayson then actually went on to ask, “This is a whole ‘nother level of bullsh*t… Are are you some kind of shitting robot? You go around shitting on people?”  A Lexis Nexis search confirms that Grayson is the first sitting Congressman ever to demand to know whether or not a reporter at a major newspaper is a “shitting robot.”

But you know, whether we’re talking about Democrats or Republicans, is this really the type of behavior the American people should expect from their elected public officials?  Wasn’t it Barry, the leader of Grayson’s own party, who not that long ago was complaining about a lack civility?  Or was that nothing more than typical Barry rhetoric aimed only at his opponents and not at members of his own party?  And that Grayson was able to finagle his way back to Congress says much about modern day Democrats.

FILE THIS ONE UNDER ‘A’ FOR…ABSOLUTELY HYSTERICAL!!!

Just when I thought I’ve heard everything from our stellar members of Congress, along comes one of those folks to prove me wrong. And in a big way. Because at a time when my daughter spends far more time in school, roughly 180 days, than do members of Congress actually spend at work, some seem to think themselves underpaid. Now keep in mind that these supposed servants of the people now bring in $174,000 a year, plus some pretty impressive benefits. But according Rep. Jim Moran, a Democrat who’s finally retiring after 23 years, that's simply not enough. He’s kidding, right? Apparently not, he’s dead serious!

So it was then, that in a recent interview this boob said that members need bigger paychecks because, he said, they have to maintain two residences, one in their home district, and one in Washington. He said, "I think the American people should know that the members of Congress are underpaid." He went on to say, "I understand that it's widely felt that they underperform, but the fact is that this is the board of directors for the largest economic entity in the world." Right, and if these people were to perform the same way in the private sector as they have in the public sector, every damn one of them would have been fired a long time ago!

Moran made note of the fact that some members live out of their offices to save money while others have little apartment units. He said, "Our pay has been frozen for three years and we're planning on freezing it a fourth year." Congressional salaries have not seen a bump since 2009, and yet we continue to have quite a number of folks who have managed quite well, having no trouble at all in being able to increase their net worth substantially since first being elected. Moran says he'll bring up the issue in an amendment to a bill to garner attention to the issue, but he assumes it will not pass. I dare them to try sneaking that one past us!

It was the host of "Face The Nation", senile old Bob Schieffer who was apparently in complete agreement with Moran, although he did have a slightly different take on things. While saying he thinks that congressional pay needs a "complete overhaul," he also said, "I propose that they be paid by the hour, just like most government workers." He added, "But they would only be paid while they're legislating." And then we had that doofus, David Gregory, the host of "Meet the Press, who said, "When Congress does so little, as it's done in this Congress ... you're not going to get a lot of sympathy." They don’t deserve what they’re getting now.

As far as I’m concerned these folks are considerably overpaid for the amount of actual work that they perform. Actually how things ought to operate is for these people to have some sort of a fulltime job that’s outside of government with their position in Congress either being performed for free or for some very nominal salary. Being in Congress should not be their only source of income nor their only employment. Or how about this, perhaps if these clones were once again to actually start working for the people and not solely for themselves and if, say, they were to agree to term limits, then we might be in favor of at least ‘considering’ a raise.

But you know, it’s not just members of Congress who are grossly overpaid for the amount of work they don’t do. Something else that REALLY pisses me off is the fact that our waste-of–skin president is making $400 grand, plus plenty of lavish perks, every single year. And it seems like all we’re paying this dumbass to do is to: go on family vacations, ruin our economy, seize control of our healthcare, jet around to fundraisers, gut our military, balloon the size of our government, bankrupt our country, and make America the laughing stock of the entire world. So we’re paying this guy nearly half a million bucks a year to destroy our country?

WHEN DEMOCRATS ATTACK…A RODEO CLOWN???

Now I'm sure most of you, by now, have heard about the horrific act recently committed by a rodeo clown at Missouri State Fair. An act so horrific in nature and one that we are suppose to view as being yet another example of the type of racism that remains so prevalent in America. An act that consisted of nothing more than wearing a mask that bore the likeness of Barry "Almighty." I am curious though about how many of these very same thin-skinned Democrats who are now so aghast over the actions of a clown, would be laughing hysterically if the mask the clown had been wearing was perhaps a likeness of Bush or even Reagan? I would venture to guess that it would be most of them. At the very least, I’m quite sure, there would be none of them who would claim to see even the slightest thing wrong with the clown's behavior.

But it would seem that when it comes to our "Dear Beloved Leader", Barack Hussein Obama, the same guy who kids are now saying prayers to, well then, such an act must be seen as nothing other than what it most assuredly is, and as something not to be tolerated in any way, shape, manner or form! But Barry, as much as he would like it to be and many of his 'followers' see him as, is not a God. He is our president, and really not a very good one. And there is nothing special about him. And if anything can be said in respect to his being black, it's that it has allowed him to get away with things that no white president could have ever hoped to get away with. And isn't it a bit ironic, that the political party that claims to be so tolerant is actually quite intolerant, especially of those who disagree with it?

I guess it can now be safely assumed that our sense of humor is one more thing, on a very long list of many, that we have now lost and for no other reason than that we now have a egomaniacal president who happens to be black. And apparently a couple of Democrats from the state where this horrific incident occurred are of the opinion that what has been committed here borders on being something akin to blasphemy. Claire McCaskill and William Lacy Clay were among the politicians who condemned the rodeo clown who wore the mask of Barry and asked the crowd if they wanted to see the president "run down by a bull." I can only assume that Clay, who is black, is another one of those paranoid blacks who sees a racist behind every bush, or mask. McCaskill, on the other hand, is simply a sleazy opportunist.

The egregious incident that has the panties of so many Democrats in quite the bunch, took place at the Missouri State Fair over this past weekend. Our esteemed Mr. Clay thought it important enough to issue an idiotic statement condemning this disgraceful act. He stated that in his opinion the act showed "an ugly face of intolerance." He went on to say, "I am amazed that in 2013, such hatred, intolerance and disrespect towards the President of the United States could take place at the Missouri State Fair. Our fair is supposed to showcase the best of Missouri, instead, it showed an ugly face of intolerance and ignorance to the world." Sorry, but I'm just not making the connection, here, of how we get from a comedy routine by a clown all the way to the "ugly face of intolerance and ignorance."

And of course not to be out done, McCaskill also released a statement of her own on Sunday calling the performance "shameful." "If what’s being reported is true, then it’s shameful and it’s unacceptable," her statement said. "The State Fair is funded by taxpayer dollars, and is supposed to be a place where we can all bring our families and celebrate the state that we love. But the young Missourians who witnessed this stunt learned exactly the wrong lesson about political discourse-that somehow it’s ever acceptable to, in a public event, disrespect, taunt, and joke about harming the President of our great nation. Missouri is better than this, and I expect someone to be held accountable." Yup, by all means, let's tar and feather the poor clown because he chose to make fun of Barry "Almighty."

Ya know, I think it fair to say that this over-the-top response to what was nothing more than an attempt at humor, can be used to further demonstrate just how far things can be said to have deteriorated in this country. And now word comes that the rodeo clown responsible for the performance has been permanently banned from the Missouri State Fair. Come on, really? People, what have we allowed ourselves to be turned into? Comedians, which clowns are by their very name, make fun of political 'leaders' all the time. And when it's a conservative or a Republican everybody always gets a good laugh. But somehow when it's a Democrat, and a black one to boot, we're all supposed to be far more respectful, even reverent. Sorry, that just ain't happening. Especially not with this guy!

AT WHAT POINT DOES LIBERAL IGNORANCE BECOME DANGEROUS???

Appearing on Fox News last night, we had someone who, while described as being a Democrat Strategist, was either remarkably naïve or, quite simply, demented. Obviously someone who was released from her padded cell a little early, Zerlina Maxwell actually tried to argue that preventing rape is really as simple as "telling men not to rape women." The focus of her argument, and the basis for her insane remarks, was that women should not be able to use guns as a means of self-defense. And in so doing she seemed to be willing to take her ignorance into uncharted territory. I simply don't understand these liberal women who seem to be perfectly content with allowing themselves to be used for nothing more than to further a political agenda.

Host Sean Hannity began by slamming the "ignorant politicians" in Colorado for trying to remove a woman’s right to use a firearm to defend herself against an attacker via recent gun control legislation. "I don’t think that we should be telling women anything," Maxwell said. "I think we should be telling men not to rape women and start the conversation there." To which Hannity said, "Criminals are not going to listen to that." But not to be deterred, Maxwell replied, "You are talking about it as if there is some faceless, nameless criminal, when a lot of times it is someone that you know and trust." Is that not some of the most ridiculous logic you've ever heard in your life? It makes no sense.

Hannity pointed out that "evil exists in the world" and women need to know that these situations unfortunately occur. "We can prevent rape by telling men not to commit it," Maxwell said, again repeating the same bizarre claim. Instead, Maxwell, who oddly enough is a rape survivor herself, said she wants women to "not be in this situation." She added that if you "train" men not to be rapists, we can prevent rape. And then she made the same idiotic comment that I've heard so many times I want to scream. She actually said, "If firearms were the answer, then the military would be the safest place for women and it’s not." Any doubts about just how stupid she might be, were wiped out by her making that statement.

I have a daughter and if she were to want to carry a gun I'd go out and buy it for her. And I'd teach her how to use it against anyone who would wish to do her harm. And frankly to hear such utter nonsense coming from a black woman, seems to me, to be all the more crazy. Personally if my daughter were ever to find herself in the position of being raped by some black dude I have no trouble whatsoever with her shooting the guy's balls off. And I'd expect her to do just that! I guess Ms. Maxwell would rather become nothing more than just another statistic. Women need an equalizer to use against those who choose to prey on them. And a Glock 9mm neatly tucked away in the purse fills that need quite nicely.

Remember all of that talk during the last presidential campaign about how it was that the Republicans had declared war on women? And how many women, do you suppose, fell for that nonsense and how many just might end up losing their right to defend themselves because of their gullibility and who they chose to vote for? These women actually voted for those who have not only declared war on women, but who also seem to view women as being nothing more than necessary collateral damage needed if they are to finally be able to erase the Second Amendment once and for all. And mind-numbed little robots like this bimbo, Maxwell, appear to be only too happy to do their part in the Democrat's ongoing propaganda campaign.

WHO, BESIDES A PATHETIC DEMOCRAT, THINKS THIS WAY???

 

 

As conditioned as I thought I was to hearing all manner of silly and rather pointless rhetoric spewed daily by those on the left, I recently heard something that left me feeling somewhat sad. You see, according to Rep. Jim McDermott, a very progressive DEMOCRAT, it has now become the responsibility of the government, and no longer of families, to make sure that grandma and grandpa are taken care of in their old age. McDermott was appearing on C-SPAN at the time he uttered what I see as being yet another example of how we, as a people, are loosing, or have lost, our collective soul. McDermott uses as the premise for his opposition to cuts in Medicare, the fact that the government program paid his own parents' medical bills: "Now we have a Medicare program, where my father -- and my father lived to 93, my mother to 97 -- and my brothers and sisters and I did nothing for them, except pay their taxes."

 

McDermott said there is no reason to cut Medicare benefits for senior citizens, even though spending will escalate as millions of Baby Boomers come into the program: "So we simply have got to deal with the fact that the population is going to mean more spending," he said. "It's not that spending is out of control." Every time I hear some Democrat make such an idiotic statement I can't but wonder what it is that these people WOULD consider as being spending that's "out of control." Then of course it comes to me! That would be anytime that we send our military folks out in harms way for the purpose of defending our homeland, or anytime we need to ensure that we have the necessary weaponry, and thus the capability, to fight off what seems to be a growing list of countries, thanks to folks like McDermott, here, and of course our brilliant president, who relish the opportunity to do us grave harm.

 

He said Republicans want to raise the retirement age, essentially for no other reason than to save taxpayer dollars. And, he asks, what would seniors do then? Proceeding to answer his own question, he then says that they would do what they did before Medicare -- which is "turn to their children" to pay their medical bills. And then this doof, McDermott, proceeded to use as his example, his own grandmother. He said, "When I grew up, my grandmother had four daughters, and she spent three months with each one of them. And she had no Medicare, she had no Social Security. And she lived with her daughters. And we took care of her. I mean, I got thrown out of my bedroom. My bedroom became grandma's bedroom, I slept on the couch in the living room, because that's the way families took care of their seniors before 1964." And most were glad to do it! It was what families were expected to do.

 

And then in sounding like he was actually bragging about the fact, and really quite proud of himself, he said, "Now we have a Medicare program, where my father -- and my father lived to 93, my mother to 97 -- and my brothers and sisters and I did nothing for them, except pay their taxes." This idiot went on, "One year, we gave my mom a Christmas gift, a hearing aid. A hearing aid cost about $800, a lot of money. So all of us chipped in and we bought my ma a hearing aid. That was her Christmas gift...Medicare doesn't cover that." Finally he said, "And so as you get older and lose your hearing, good luck, you're on your own. That's what we say to seniors with their hearing problems. And my view is, that we're a better country than that. We can find a way to do it and make the system more efficient." And yet Democrats never take any actions to stem the losses to fraud that amounts to Billions of dollars every year.

 

McDermott very confidently claims that Democrats are "going to find the money to cover all the senior citizens in this country under the Medicare program at 65." Speaking in vague generalities as Democrat most of ten do, he said there are "all kinds of ways" to save money in the Medicare program, "but it doesn't mean taking benefits away from senior citizens." Worst case, I suppose, would be that we cold expect Barry to simply print some more money. And besides, I'm sure tops on the list when it comes to determining ways to come up with more money for entitlements, is how much more can be cut from our military and national defense. That's usually where hacks like this claim that cuts can always be made. Because, honestly, how important is that in the big scheme of things. It's much more important to make it easier for folks to slough the caring of their parents off onto the rest of us.

 

So, am I really the only one here who sees it as being more than a little sad that this screwy mentality seems to have now become so prevalent in America these days? And that we would actually hear a toad like McDermott bragging about how it was that he and his siblings willingly turned over to the government the care of their elderly parents is absolutely mindboggling. And who in their right mind would even consider such a thing. Ya know, I would think that it must take a pretty high degree of selfishness to see it as being ok to leave the care of ones parents up to an incompetent government. It just seems so unfair, somehow. Personally, I don't want the government anywhere near my mom, who is now 81, especially in this new age of Obamacare when it’s now very likely that she'd be told that, sorry, she's just too old for that knee replacement of that hip replacement or that breast cancer surgery. Sorry!

 

But such a statement, especially coming from someone in government makes the point, more clearly than I ever could, of just how far, and really as a country, it is that we have now allowed ourselves to be talked into perceiving such behavior as being totally acceptable. Many of us seem quite content with our now gutter existence, morally speaking, that has now been created for us by the likes of this clown McDonald. In the old days it was the desire of most folks to stay as far away as possible from any government interference in their lives. Handouts were seen as something to be avoided. These days, more and more people damn near crave the government's encroaching farther and farther into their personal lives. Frankly, I just see it as being a little sick not to want to take care of the parents who were there to take care of me. I owe them that. I dunno, maybe I'm just too old fashioned and not as enlightened as folks like this pond scum McDonald.



AND NOW WE HAVE ANOTHER BIG PLUS FOR LIVING IN THE "WINDY CITY"

 

 

Well, if you're one of those who are 'lucky' enough to reside in Chicago, besides now living in what is the murder capital of the universe, 506 homicides in 2012, you now have something new to contend with. It's being reported that the city police are now in the process of changing their response time to 911 calls. You see, starting this week, the cops who folks are supposed to be able to rely on, because the Democrats want to leave residents unable to protect themselves, will no longer be responding in big to such trivial things like criminal damage to property, vehicle thefts, garage burglaries, or other crimes where the suspect is no longer on the scene, and the victim isn’t in immediate danger. The stated rationale is that the move will supposedly free up the equivalent of 44 police officers a day for patrol duties. Somehow 44 cops in a city the size of Chicago just doesn't sound like much.

 

Jim Williams, who is I guess is and enterprising reporter for a local TV station, went seeking out some Chicagoans to get their perspective on this latest development and he found some who think it’s the wrong move for the police. On one block where burglars broke into a home on Christmas Day, Carmen Curio has a strong opinion on the city’s new 911 response plan. "I think that’s ridiculous. I think if there’s a burglary, they’ve got to come. It’s what we pay for. They have to come," she said. Ald. Nick Sposato (36th) said the constituents in his Northwest Side ward pay high property taxes, so it’s not asking too much for a police visit after a traumatic break-in. "People are upset; they want to talk to a police officer. They want to know something is being done to prevent this in the future," Sposato said. Ok, these folks voted for Rahm "Dead Fish" Emanuel, right? What did they expect?

 

Chicago's Police Supt. Some clone by the name of Garry McCarthy, insisted crime prevention "in the future" happens when officers are on patrol, not when they're tied up taking reports at the scene of non-violent incidents. He said, "I don’t mean to be flippant here, because I’ve been the victim of a burglary at least three or four times." Then this dope then went on to say, "I’d rather have the officer on street, where he can prevent the shooting." Police said they will still respond to 911 burglary calls as long as the suspect is still at the scene, or they’re if they're convinced that the criminal can be arrested right away. If they're convinced? Ok, so how does some terrorized homeowner go about trying to convince the cops that the bad guy is still on the scene without potentially putting themselves in danger trying to determine that? What an idiotic idea!

 

Sounding more like he was patting himself on the back, more than anything else, McCarthy said, "You’re upset; you’re violated. It’s happened to me. So, you’ve got to weigh it, and I’m making tough decisions." Droning on about his ability to make the tough decisions, he said, "I’m making a tough decision, but I’d rather have that officer on the street, doing something to prevent the next shooting than – honestly – making somebody feel better, because they’re responding rather than talking to them over the phone." But is he making those decisions for no other reason than as way to deal with Chicago's financial woes. McCarthy said Chicago police respond to 70 percent of 911 calls, compared to 30 to 50 percent in other cities. Police said officers will always take information about crimes at district stations, or over the phone – even if officers don’t respond in person. Whoopee!

 

Oh to be an imbecilic city dweller! Ya know, they vote for those who are nothing more than 'in your face' Socialists, and then they have the nerve to whine when their city proceeds to fall in all around them. Let's face it, the conditions in the majority of our cities all across our land is a direct reflection of those repeatedly put in charge to run them. They are bastions of liberalism so, therefore, how can anyone be surprised by how they turn out? And with all of these various rat experiments now taking place in this country, and nearly all of them arriving at the same conclusion, that socialism never works, wouldn't you think that that would be enough to demonstrate to any reasonably intelligent person, that the direction in which Barry is now taking us, will ultimately end in the same way, but only on a much grander scale. This plan of Barry's is not going to end well except for Barry and others like him. The rest of us will be pretty much goners.



SOMEONE REALLY OUGHT TO TELL ALCEE THAT NOBODY LIKE’S A WHINER…

 

 

Impeached Federal Judge and now Congressman Alcee Hastings, is another one of those pathetic member of the Democrat Party from here in Florida, that makes us all so proud. And apparently old Alcee has a bit of bone to pick with Barry "Almighty." You see, Alcess has recently come out and accused Barry of ignoring and disrespecting black groups that were crucial to his winning re-election in November, including the Congressional Black Caucus, black newspapers and historically black colleges. Man, you gotta be kiddin me, right? Just what that hell else does this pathetic old fart think that Barry ought to be doing ‘for’ blacks?

 

The 76-year-old fossil said the Congressional Black ‘Bonehead’ Caucus sent over to the White House a number of names of those perceived as being qualified for possible cabinet picks, but I guess Barry didn’t agree because it seems that their list was kinda ignored. Both Barry and his administration have been criticized of late, particularly in recent weeks, for what’s been called a lack of diversity in key posts. You know, it’s funny, but despite all the claims of being the champions of diversity, recent history would seem to indicate that the most lily-white, male-dominated administrations are always Democrat while the actually the most diverse one are Republican.

 

Anyway, old Alcee made his complaints known to the National Newspaper Publishers Association just last week saying that, "The black caucus of Congress then sent 61 names to the White House." Hastings went on to say, "Time went by. Not one of that 61 was selected – not one." Hastings said the Congressional Black Caucus also had to pressure Barry’s campaign to advertise more with black newspapers. Of the $1 Billion the campaign raised, just $1 Million was spent on black newspapers — and that was up from the initial plan of $650,000, he said. Well, gee, I can see why Alcee is so unhappy,

 

"If I was president of the United States, there is no way in hell that I would raise a billion dollars and don’t spend but a million dollars with people who probably had as much to do with my becoming president as anybody," Hastings charged. First of all, lets all give thanks for the fact that he’s not the president. And second, it’s always easy for someone to claim what they’d do as president when they’re not president. He then proceeded to accuse Barry of not spending enough money on historically black colleges, and said it took nearly a year before he appointed a single historically black college graduate to his administration.

 

"It was nine months into the administration before he appointed a single person, not just at the cabinet level…none in his first nine months of his administration was from a historically black college," Hastings said. You know, this just goes to prove the point that no matter what, you just can’t make blacks happy. They’re given everything on a silver platter, they don’t really have to work for anything, you can’t fire them without being call a racist, and yet we’ve got mealy-mouthed morons like this goof bitchin because the black guy in the White House hasn’t done more. Give me a break!



MORE IDIOTIC NONSENSE FROM THAT IDIOT FEINSTEIN...

NOW, ABOUT THAT CLAIM OF TURNING TEXAS BLUE...

You may, or may not, remember, because it wasn't something that would make a lasting impression, how a couple of weeks back that San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro, the guy the Democrats kinda see as being their version of Marco Rubio, and his brother, Rep. Joaquin Castro, made the point that they see a lot of blue sky in Texas’ future. Very blue, politically speaking. The twin brothers went so far as to actually predict on "Face the Nation," that Republicans will come to lose their iron grip on Texas and that within two presidential election cycles, the currently "red" state will shift from a GOP stronghold to being dominated by Democrats.


These two, supposed prominent, Texas Democrats also said that Barry "Almighty" and Congress should tackle the economy, education, immigration reform and gun laws this year. Well Barry certainly is attacking the gun laws issue, and recently wasted $1.6 Million of the taxpayer's money to go make a speech ion immigration in Las Vegas. "It’s changing. It’s going to become a "purple state" then a "blue state" because of the demographics, because of the population from folks coming from outside Texas," Julian Castro said. Joaquin Castro agreed, but added that "it’s going to take a lot of work from Democrats to lay the infrastructure for change, we are very busy working on that now."


But if these two clowns are serious about trying to turn Texas purple and then blue, they might want to take a gander at a just-released poll of Lone Star State voters that found 67 percent of Republican respondents actually support the impeachment of Barry "Almighty." Now I suppose you could argue that that's to be expected, what might be of greater concern, at least for liberals is the fact that the poll was conducted by the left-leaning Public Policy Polling (PPP). And in the crosstabs, PPP broke this down by party affiliation with Democrats opposed 83 percent to 12 percent, Republicans in favor 67 percent to 18 percent, and Independents opposed 54 percent to 32 percent.


Now I do think it somewhat amazing, actually, that even 12 percent of Democrats seem to support Barry's impeachment. Also quite interesting was the racial breakdown concerning this issue with Whites supporting impeachment 48 percent to 41 percent, Blacks opposed 80 percent to 15 percent, and Hispanics opposed 58 percent to 30 percent. Again, it's strikes me as being quite amazing that 15 percent of Blacks would support his impeachment. It was also fascinating to see the breakdown by age as people older than 65 supported impeachment 46 percent to 38 percent, folks 46 to 65 opposed 46 percent to 42 percent, and people 18 to 45 opposed 66 percent to 27 percent.


So I guess if you live in Texas, the older you are, the more likely you want Barry impeached. Something else to consider is that 56 percent of respondents were women with 44 percent men. As women were far more likely to oppose impeachment (53 percent to 36 percent) than men (46 percent to 41 percent), a more equal sampling of the sexes would have found a greater percentage of Texans supporting impeachment. So I'm not saying that the bold claim made by the Castro boys can't actually come about, I am saying that they may be underestimating the amount of that it might take them to actually achieve some level of success. Texans are a unique breed, and have a tendency, regardless of race or gender, to march to the beat of their own drum. God love 'em.

OBAMA SAVED MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF JOBS? REALLY?