Well yet again I’m feeling that sense of being
abandoned by those whom I thought were on my side and on the side of preserving
what’s left of my country. But
apparently I was wrong again. This
so-called “Freedom Caucus” is apparently less interested in freedom that it is
in politics as usual. And even though at
the end of a meeting that took place yesterday in the U.S. Capitol Ryan had failed
to earn the group’s endorsement, he still walked out having received the
group’s support.
And it was after making all manner of promises
including promising members a return to regular order, changes to the steering
committee that decides committee assignments centralizing power in the
Speaker’s office and even promising to give up the Speaker’s five votes on the
committee and an end to retaliation against Republican members who vote their
conscience that Paul Ryan was able to convince enough of the group’s members
into supporting him.
He also reiterated his promise made in the full GOP
conference on Tuesday that there would be no amnesty bill under Barry
“Almighty”—which most notably did not extend to the next president—and an end
to the crisis-to-crisis style of
governance under outgoing Speaker John Boehner. Ryan also promised more
“regional representation” rather than representation centralized in the
Speaker’s office. Lots of promises of
which very few, I expect, will be kept.
However, the many promises came with two significant
strings very firmly attached: first, those present couldn’t tell the public
what just happened because, Ryan argued, it would infuriate the other side of
the House GOP conference. And Ryan would get what he wanted with significant
changes to a House rule that was put in place back in the early 1800s by
Founding Father Thomas Jefferson, America’s third president and the author of
America’s Declaration of Independence.
That would be the rule which allows any member to
offer a “motion to vacate the chair” as a privileged resolution—allowing
members to, if a Speaker is out of control, as Boehner has been, remove a
Speaker from power. Ryan wants to severely undercut the power of rank-and-file
members to hold a Speaker accountable with a motion to vacate the chair. So he
wants to keep members from being able to use it whenever necessary, just in
case they should come to feel betrayed.
So, heading into the meeting with Ryan, on
Wednesday, there was near-unanimous opposition to him in the House Freedom
Caucus. And there were many outlets reporting that it was “unlikely” that Ryan
would receive the endorsement of the Freedom Caucus. Every member except two opposed a Ryan
Speakership—and they were agreeing to the meeting simply to be fair. But when
Ryan made all these promises, it seems that most members chose to believe him
at face value.
Ryan made all these nice-sounding promises to the
members on the condition, that they surrender the only two ways they have to
enforce such promises: going public, or kicking him out of office down the
road. Several of the members worry that
Ryan is untrustworthy and dishonest, especially given the misleading nature of
the way he has sold Republicans in the past on Obamatrade, “doc fix,” the
budget deal he cut with Democrat Patty Murray and immigration to name just a
few.
But if they do come to vote for Ryan, and then he
chooses not to deliver all those things that were promised, the Freedom Caucus essentially
becomes politically irrelevant. I
suppose some would argue, including myself, that by choosing to support him by
any measure is nothing short of a capitulation and therefore they have already
made themselves irrelevant. Ryan is not
the man for this position that has already been so badly squandered over the
last 5 years. What’s needed is a
conservative!
No comments:
Post a Comment