LIBERAL LOON NOAM CHOMSKY, “AMERICA VIOLATED INTERNATIONAL LAW”

NOAM CHOMSKY...CERTIFIED AMERICA HATER



According to that proverbial liberal nutjob and professional America hater, Noam Chomsky, apparently U.S. leaders violated international law regarding their pursuit and eventual successful elimination of Osama bin Laden. In a piece for Guernica, our esteemed Mr. Chomsky wrote: “It’s increasingly clear that the operation was a planned assassination, multiply violating elementary norms of international law. There appears to have been no attempt to apprehend the unarmed victim, as presumably could have been done by 80 commandos facing virtually no opposition—except, they claim, from his wife, who lunged towards them. In societies that profess some respect for law, suspects are apprehended and brought to fair trial.”

Like that fat slob of a moron Michael Moore, Chomsky clearly believes that bin Laden was an “unarmed victim” in what occurred about a week ago, and was deserving of a “fair trial.” Bizarrely, Chomsky identifies bin Laden and the others who perished alongside him as mere “suspects,” and he goes on to claim that the U.S. has never furnished the necessary evidence needed to definitively pin the terror attacks of 9/11 on bin Laden and his cohorts. This guy gives a whole definition to traitor. The level of vitriol that continues to spew reveal his level of hatred for his country. The very same country which allows him to say such inflammatory, and essentially untrue things, and to make a tidy little profit for himself while doing so. He, and those who believe his nonsensical drivel, epitomize the meaning of pathetic.


Chomsky seems to be under the rather misguided notion that bin Laden’s involvement in Sept. 11 is unsubstantiated, that if anything he may a been a bit player, contributing only in a very small way to the events that took place that very dark day. But we’ve known about bin Laden’s fatwa (declaration of war) against America since at least 1996. And, in a 2004 video release, bin Laden, himself, took credit for his involvement in the attacks. But hey, it gets worse. Because according to this boob Chomsky, George W. Bush’s crimes “uncontroversially…exceed bin Laden’s.” So, according to this screwballs the imagined “crimes” committed by George W. Bush to defend this country far out weight the actual horrific crimes committed and carried out by bin Laden. If this doesn’t prove that this guy is certifiably a kook, well then, I guess nothing will.


But if this absurd assertion isn’t enough, Chomsky also attempts to gain reader sympathy for the Pakistani government saying, “We might ask ourselves how we would be reacting if Iraqi commandos landed at George W. Bush’s compound, assassinated him, and dumped his body in the Atlantic.” This comparison is more than a little perplexing, considering the fact that bin Laden was a wanted fugitive who has never been considered a national leader in Pakistan. George W. Bush was an American president. The idea that the Bush assassination he outlined mirrors, in the slightest, bin Laden being found and rightfully murdered in his non-native Pakistan should be a tough sell to anyone with half a brain. If protecting one’s nation is a crime, then labeling George W. Bush “guilty” is certainly appropriate. But sadly, according to liberal kooks like Chomsky, America should not be allowed to defend herself because she is guilty of inflicting so much pain upon the world. So following Mr. Chomsky’s rather twisted logic to its natural conclusion, any leader who strives to protect her should therefore be judged as being a world criminal.