BY GOLLY, THOSE OWS FOLKS 'ARE' JUST LIKE THE TEA PARTY...NOT!

YUP, OCCUPY FOLKS ARE JUST LIKE THOSE TEA PARTY FOLKS!

Ever since these Occupy slugs first came into being, they have been constantly compared to those who comprise the Tea Party. In fact, any number of slimy Democrats have made the claim that these Occupy Wall Street malcontents have formed what is truly a grassroots movement, while at the same time they claim the Tea Party is nothing more than astro-turf, a creation of rich conservatives. So we now have the “Occupy” crowd assembling in Philadelphia through July 4th for a “national gathering” and, despite the usual claims of non-violence and tolerance, a wave of video and social media has revealed quite the opposite. This group of parasites has no interest whatsoever in the betterment of society, their primary goal is to get as much for themselves as possible while expending the least amount of energy to get it. It’s easy to do nothing more than protest, but it’s much more difficult to work toward the making of genuine improvements that will benefit all.

On the movement’s website, the event is to run from June 30th to July 4th. The Occupy movement will convene the Occupy National Gathering in the vicinity of Philadelphia’s Independence Mall for a week of direct actions, movement building and the creation of a vision for a ‘democratic’ future. The National Gathering will kick off with a massive march with Healthcare-Now! in solidarity with their fight for the ‘right to health’. On July 5th it will conclude by joining Guitarmy for a 99 mile march from Philadelphia to Wall Street in Lower Manhattan. However, like countless other Occupy events that claim to be tolerant and nonviolent, the national meeting seems to be more of a lesson in hating police officers and the government than “movement building” and “creating a vision” for the future. This idiotic little gathering makes the differences between Tea Party and Occupy all the more stark. These groups are the polar opposites of one another.

HANNITY 1...OCCUPY WALL STREET MORON 0....

OK, I WAS WRONG, THEY ARE JUST LIKE THE TEA PARTY…NOT!

In what is yet another very clear indicator that these pathetic sleaze balls that make up these various Occupy crowds are nothing but a bunch of lazy malcontents with way too much time on their hands, word now comes that Occupy Wall Street-inspired protesters are eyeing a new target...Target. And dozens of other companies as well. In what is nothing more than one more attempt by the left in this country to drive our economy a little further into the ditch, a campaign under the name "Occupy Black Friday" is busy trying to enlist supporters to boycott just about every major retailer, and quite a few mid-sized ones, the day after Thanksgiving. And in their effort to cause as much of a disturbance as possible, these "protesters" are casting a pretty wide net and urging as many people as possible to demonstrate against the nation's top retail stores. "The idea is simple, hit the corporations that corrupt and control American politics where it hurts, their profits," the group's Facebook page reads, describing Black Friday as the "one day where the mega-corporations blatantly dictate our actions." Ya know, every time these morons open their mouths, be it in front of a television camera or anonymously on some website, they prove better than I ever could just how ignorant and uninformed they really are.

But the retailers are closely monitoring this so-called mini-movement, as they have a lot riding on the volume of sales. And they warn that a blanket boycott has the potential to end up hurting local communities. "Retailers, regardless of their size, are an important part of the community, and they employ friends and neighbors of that community across the country," said Joseph LaRocca, a senior adviser to the National Retail Federation specializing in loss prevention. He said retailers have security plans in place and will "work through" any protests and disruptions that occur this weekend. While warning that boycotts could hurt workers, LaRocca said that retailers are preparing for a "very busy day" and weekend, and that it doesn't yet appear the Occupy Black Friday push will turn into a massive boycott. As of Tuesday afternoon, the group's Facebook page had about 1,250 simpleton supporters. Brian Dodge, spokesman with the Retail Industry Leaders Association, said his group is monitoring the protest to see whether it grows in popularity going into the weekend. "At this point, we're not sure" what kind of impact it will have, he said. "Retailers, they prepare for lots of contingencies every day and certainly on Black Friday." It's just one more thing that retailers, who may already be struggling, to waste valuable resources on.


Some retailers have earned the ire of customers and workers for planning to open at midnight after Thanksgiving. But the Occupy-inspired protest does not appear to be based on any particular policy of the targeted stores other than the fact that their profits are substantial enough to place them in the top 100 list. The planned boycott comes as unemployment hovers at 9 percent and the economy struggles to crawl out of recession. On Tuesday, the Commerce Department revised its third-quarter estimates to show the economy grew at just a 2 percent rate between July and September, instead of the 2.5 percent rate initially estimated. Retail sales have been on the rise lately, and companies are hoping Black Friday will be the jolt the industry needs. According to a study conducted for the National Retail Federation, as many as 152 million people are planning to hit the stores this weekend -- up from 138 million people who said as much last year. A post on the Occupy Black Friday website claims the campaign is not an attempt to punish "small businesses or hardworking people." "We must make a distinction between the businesses that are in the pockets of Wall Street and the businesses that serve our local communities," the site said. This holier than though attiude espoused by this bunch of losers really ticks me off.


According to the little cadre of miscreants over there at Occupy Black Friday, these so-called "offenders" are identifed place such as Whole Foods, Trader Joe's, Burlington Coat Factory and GameStop. The group is urging people to take their pick, either "occupy" the stores, or boycott them. "Any holiday shopping we do this day will be at independent shops to support local economies and the 99% as a whole!" the group's Facebook page says. Is this not some of the most idiotic drivel you've ever heard in your entire life? And these are the same lowlifes who garner a substantial amount of support from the Democrats in Congress as well as our stellar president, Barry "Almighty" in their attempt to further sabotage our very fragile economy. And we also have some imbecile by the name of Tony Boicourt, who is I guess the co-founder of the Facebook page, who has said that he's urging people to boycott 'mega retailers,' which oftentimes only hire seasonal workers during the holidays. "If everyone were to just start buying local, or American, more jobs would be created here helping the U.S. economy rather than creating mass jobs in other countries that these huge retailers use for cheap manufacturing," Boicourt wrote in an email to FoxNews.com. Does this idiotic realize how stupide he sounds? Apparently not.

FOX NEWS FRIDAY SMACKDOWN…COLMES VS. GALLAGHER...

I’ve never really been a big fan of liberal commentator Alan Colmes, even when he was appearing with Hannity, when, on the occasion, he would sound like the voice of liberal reason. But mainly I’ve never been a fan is because I’ve always felt he did nothing more that to regurgitate DNC talking points and would say whatever he felt he needed to, true or not, in his attempt to perpetuate them. And to be honest, I really don’t know all that much about conservative talk show host Mike Gallagher, I read a book by him, but I’ve never had the opportunity to listen to his show. Anyway, these two got into what can only be described as a shouting match Friday on Fox News after Colmes , in typical liberal fashion, likened the Occupy Wall Street movement to the Tea Party.

Fox News host Megyn Kelly kicked off the segment asking Colmes whether he thought it was time for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and others to take back their praise of Occupy Wall Street in the wake of violent episodes that have dominated headlines about the movement. Colmes, as usual, launched into the conversation by spewing the typical liberal talking points in that he denounced the instances of violence, saying the media “of course wants to focus on the small number of people who are causing disruptions.” Which media outlets, other than Fox News, have given any of violence all that much air time? Colmes went on to say that there’s an “overwhelming number of people who are doing this the way it should be done.”


Gallagher responded by saying that the Democrats “have been in bed with these folks” since the movement started and he hasn’t heard a single Democrat “denounce these lawless thugs.” Of course, Colmes, ever the dedicated liberal, shot back saying, “Mike you are smearing the entire group of people and condemning them…based on the actions of a few” he said. “[You're] losing sight that in fact the Tea Party and the Occupy Wall Streeters have a lot in common.” “How dare you?! How dare you?!” Gallagher blasted back, calling it a “scurrilous comparison.“ ”Are you kidding me Alan?…You cannot compare the Tea Partiers to these bunch of lawless degenerate thugs. They’re thugs, they’re anarchists.” Colmes and his fellow liberals are desperate in their efforts to somehow connect the two groups.


You can’t argue with either Gallagher’s description of these Occupy Wall Streeters, nor the enthusiasm with which they were delivered. We’ve continued to heard from everybody from Barry “Almighty” to Van Jones how these disgusting miscreants so closely resemble the Tea Party and like Gallagher, I heard enough! Anybody with half a brain can see that these tow groups are polar opposites. And Gallagher was also right in his stating that the Democrats ‘have been in bed’ with this group of parasitic degenerates, with them even receiving encouragement from the president. Colmes didn’t seem to say much about that aspect of things, focused more on attempting to make the point that more similarities exist than differences.

AND NOW, MORE FROM OBAMA'S FORMER "GREEN CZAR"...

Van Jones, I'm sure you all remember him, has now offered up a prediction for those of us who have been watching all of this Occupy Wall Street movement nonsense. The sleazy Mr. Jones says, “You haven’t seen anything yet.” Barry's former “green jobs czar," an ardent supporter of the Occupy movement since its inception, said in an interview with the Communist News Network (CNN), that the movement is ready to evolve into the areas of politics and policy-making, much like the Tea Party did in 2010. Again with comparisons to the Tea Party. When looking at any of the images of these various OWS group, one sees no similarities with the Tea Party crowd.

“You’re going to see an evolution now as you go from protests, keep the protests, but now expand into politics,” Jones said. “And if you thought there was an earthquake in 2010 when the Tea Party moved into politics, wait until this 99 percent movement moves over into politics. You haven’t seen anything yet.” So in what was nothing more than a very thinly veiled threat, Mr. Jones seems to be telling us that we had best be preparing ourselves for what is sure to be an escalating of what we have already been witness to. So is he trying to intimidate us, telling us that we need to be very wary of these crowds of lazy malcontents?


Jones said the movement is “going to be recruiting 2,000 candidates to run for office now under this 99 percent banner“ as Occupy Wall Street enters ”phase two.” From what I've seen of those who make up these groups of parasites, it seems like a rather shallow gene pool from which viable candidates could be recruited. But hey, what do I know? However, in looking over the names of prominent members of the Democrat Party, generally speaking, the intellect is pretty low and the level of arrogance is pretty high, so maybe Jones is right. But I think it safe to say that he'll have a pretty difficult time finding candidates who will have any level of mainstream appeal.


Describing things as only a true believing leftist can, Mr. Jones said, “Phase two, you move from anger to answers. You move from pointing out the problem to pointing out the solutions.” He added, “What you’re going to see now is you have the Occupy movement at the center, that’s the beating heart.” Jones said despite New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s eviction of protesters from Zuccotti Park, “you can‘t put toothpaste back in the tube and you can’t evict an idea.” “This movement is about much more than just one park or one tactic and one city,” he said. Ya know, again with the attempt to intimidate. It's all these goons understand.


Asked about the violence that has plagued parts of the movement, Jones said any violence associated with Occupy Wall Street “whether it’s street violence or police violence, needs to be called out and has been called out and denounced.” He added, however, that there has been more violence outside the demonstrations than inside, and that Occupy groups should be given “credit for having been overwhelmingly peaceful.” “And most of the people who have been hurt — unfortunately, whether you’re talking about the veteran who was put in a coma or the reporters that were hurt yesterday — were hurt by our law enforcement,” he charged.


Asked by CNN anchorette Suzanne Malveaux asked the esteemed Mr. Jones if he might consider becoming a leader or spokesman for the outspokenly “leaderless” movement, Jones said no. “We’ve learned that leader-centered movements don’t work. This is about a leader-ful movement. It’s not leaderless. It’s leader centric. It’s leader-ful,” he said. You know, guys like this character think they're just so much smarter than the rest of us. They really think that we don't see what's being attempted here. They're still trying to paint this thing as being some sort of "grass roots" enterprise. And it isn't, no matter how much clowns like Jones wish it were so.

A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION…

It was over this past weekend, that we learned that faux Rev. Jesse Jackson made a rather odd comparison. He stated that he sees some very obvious similarities between Occupy Wall Street protests and the nation’s civil rights movement. But his comments, which sought to offer support for those individuals taking part in the demonstrations and who continue to rail against the current capitalist system, also drew the ire of Martin Luther King Jr.’s niece, Alveda King. As was reported by numerous outlets, old Jesse told demonstrators, “Do not let difficult times break your spirits. In all things, keep your eyes on the prize. Renew your faith, keep your hope alive and victory is assured.” He continued, “Only when the foundation shakes does everybody make an adjustment.” Finally adding, “The people are saying we need economic justice, we need shared economic security. We are free but not equal.” The typical level of gibberish we continue to hear from this fraud.



Jackson’s comments caused Ms. King, the director of Priests for Life African American Outreach, to respond with strong words for the supposed civil rights leader. “I believe that Rev. Jackson is doing a disservice,” King said yesterday on Fox News. “My uncle, the whole [civil rights] movement, was founded in prayer, in crying out to God in a peaceful movement. And this [Occupy] movement is not peaceful.” She continued, claiming that Jackson needs to “revisit his 20th century history.” “They wanted something that would give them solutions, something that would make things better, and what they’re doing now, Rev. Jackson knows that this is not the model that my uncle and my father, Rev. A.D. King, upheld,” she said. In addition to making these statements, King went on to claim that she believes that the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) is involved in the protests. I think that most think that’s occurring.


Jesse “The Extortionist” chose an interview that appeared later Politico to shoot back, claiming that Occupy Wall Street is, indeed, tied to the civil rights movement. “The mass appeal of economic justice [and] economic security is a critical civil rights issue of our time,” he said. “It is a crying out for economic security because the wealth gap, the income gap, the insured gap has gotten so very wide.” Jackson also went on to say that if Martin Luther King, Jr. were alive today, that he would be among the protestors. “Dr. King planned to occupy the mall in Washington, and planned to engage in civil disobedience to get … Washington to get their priorities straight,” he said. Like all Democrats, Jackson loves nothing more than to go about the rewriting of history in what is nothing more than a pathetic attempt to provide some basis for his ridiculous and idiotic claims. Somehow, if I think if Rev. King were alive today I fell relatively certain he would have some rather unkind words for Jesse “The Extortionist” Jackson.

SHOW ME YOUR FRIENDS AND I'LL TELL YOU WHO YOU ARE…



This is one of those lines that I'm sure all, or at least most, of us, at one time or another, have heard as we were growing up in homes all around the country. Perhaps mothers have drawn this wisdom from the Bible and Proverbs 13:20: “He who walks with wise men will be wise, but the companion of fools will suffer harm." Excellent words to live by but that are, more often then not, simply ignored.

Anyway, besides having been a very good rule of thumb to have paid some level of attention to during the last election, many folks, very obviously, didn't. And it is also an excellent way to cast aside all of the nonsense having to do with this Occupy Wall Street being, in any way, some sort of a "grassroots" enterprise. Either way, various new and information outlets have presented details on the people inside the Occupy Wall Street "movement" as well as those believed to be supporting it not only with money, but also with material goods (sleeping bags, non-perishable foods, etc.), organizational skills, and even storage space. They have named names from the White House to the American Nazi Party and have shown the various connections to several unions (like SEIU, UFT, and TWU) and pointed out the organizers like the Working Families Party and ACORN.


So while I cannot, in any way, claim credit for the assembling of the following list, what I can do is to spread the word as best I can regarding just who it is that is behind these continuing protests. Protests that have been described by so many as being similar in nature to the Tea Party. And I ask you to consider the recently posted Official list of Occupy Wall Street’s supporters, sponsors, and sympathizers put together by intrepid blogger Zombie.


“Local” supporters:
Communist Party USA
The American Nazi Party
Revolutionary Communist Party
Black Panthers
Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan
CAIR


Some big names in the political world have also lent support to the cause:
President Barack Obama
Vice President Joe Biden
Nancy Pelosi


International Leaders and Governments:
Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei
Hugo Chavez
Revolutionary Guards of Iran
The Govt of North Korea
Communist Party of China
Hezbollah


So after now having gone over the above list I should think that it becomes readily apparent that this bunch of Occupy Wall Street losers is in no way something that can even remotely be described as being something that is "grassroots" in nature. “As each new controversial endorsement has appeared over the last month, OWS supporters have dismissed them one by one as ‘isolated examples’ that don’t reflect any overall trend toward extremism,” writes Zombie. “But when viewed in aggregate like this, it becomes much more difficult to dismiss any individual endorsement as an aberration; instead, an undeniable pattern emerges.” Zombie has sourced the list with links back to evidence of participation or support of the Occupy Wall Street movement. It will be regularly updated.


Remember all of the "astro turf" comments made by old "Stretch" Pelosi and any number of Democrats during all of those town hall discussions that took place regarding Obamacare? Kinda funny that when we actually do have demonstrations that fit quite nicely into what Ms. Pelosi defined as being "astro turfing," she has been remarkable silent in drawing any such conclusions regarding these Occupy Wall Street malcontents. On the contrary, she's busily claiming this time around that these Occupy Wall Street demonstrations represent democracy in action. Now this level of hypocrisy would normally, and in all likelihood, embarrass most people, but I think it very safe to say that old Nancy and just about any other Democrat you'd like to name, are about as far removed from being considered normal people as you can possibly get. So I don't think that there's much chance of any embarrassment happening here.

OCCUPY WALL STREET PROTESTORS = TEA PARTY DEMONSTRATORS?

Nope, I just don't think so!  None of what's going on here, the taking of dumps on door steps, the spitting on military folks, the vulgarity, the drug use, the petty thievery, or the threats of violence, none of it was seen from those who made up the Tea Party gatherings. 

PART 2 OF CEO PETER SCHIFF AND OCCUPY WALL STREET MORONS

CEO PETER SCHIFF TAKES ON OCCUPY WALL STREET NUTS!

The audio on this is a little hard to hear every once and a while. But you can hear well enough how Mr. Schiff successfully makes his points.

OCCUPY WALL STREET AIN’T NO TEA PARTY…

Anybody who thinks the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations in New York, Washington, Los Angeles and elsewhere across the country sprang up spontaneously, either hasn't been paying attention, is dumb as a post, is a scum sucking Democrat, or more specifically, is a member of Team Obama 2012. Aided and abetted by all manner of endless gee-whiz coverage from the liberal state-controlled media conglomerate, what the Occupy Wall Street movement actually represents is nothing more than a carefully planned and well executed campaign by left-wing activists to take American politics "to the street." The aim, of all this continuing, and very fawning, coverage is nothing more than an obvious attempt to assign to this “movement,” some level of undeserved credibility. There are continuing attempts being made from within the media, and without, to compare these malcontents to those who comprise the Tea Party. But no such similarities exist. Because the objective for this supposed “movement,” is nothing less than to bring about the end of American democracy and replace it with something that can only be described as a mobocracy, which in itself, makes it about as different from the Tea Party movement as is possible. There are those now choosing to expose this “movement” to a little closer scrutiny, and in the process some interesting connections that coming to the fore. We find there are major left-wing activist groups and labor unions pump money, media and volunteers into the movement and are integrating the street demonstrations with their own programs.



There are any number of Democrats, as well as Democrat supported organizations, desperate to describe this movement as being completely spontaneous and as “grass roots” in nature. MoveOn.org which is just one example, put out a recent email fundraising appeal earlier this week that said "in addition to providing all the support we can to #OccupyWallStreet, at MoveOn we're scrambling to launch a huge campaign to make Wall Street pay. We're organizing mass meetings in hundreds of cities ... And we're helping organize two major national days of protest in November." Grass roots? Spontaneous? No, I don’t think so. Also among those offering up support to this “movement” are any number of unions seeking to reap some political advantage from it, such labor organizations as the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Communications Workers of America, United Auto Workers, and the Writers Guild of America, East. Such obvious and politically motivated involvement can be made to very easily contradict the idiotic efforts being made by everyone from “BJ” Clinton to Barry “Almighty” himself. Supporters are only to happy to make the claim that these people have legitimate grievances and are, unlike those described as “Tea Baggers,” taking part in something that is uniquely American. Additionally they repeatedly make the claim that these “protesters” are using tactics that are no different that those used by the Tea Party folks.


A question asked by many since the demonstrators first occupied New York's Zuccotti Park is why is that Mayor Michael “Mr. Mom” Bloomberg has taken such a hands-off approach regarding the whole ridiculous exercise in stupidity. Well, I think the answer to that is pretty obvious. He’s just another Democrat and therefore is willing to take the chance that these people can be used in such a way as to eliminate the Tea Party “effect” and that the dimwit “radicals” involved this “movement” can be harnessed in such a way as to improve Democrat chances of victory in 2012. However, the official explanation for the mayor’s rather lackluster approach to the whole thing is the blatant fabrication that attempts to convince us that Mayor Bloomberg's hands are tied by the fact that the park is privately owned. But there’s a little more to that story too, because, you see, Zuccotti Park is owned by Brookfield Properties, one of the directors of which happens to be Bloomberg's girlfriend, at least according to the Atlantic Wire. Then there is also the fact that Brookfield Properties is a subsidiary of Brookfield Asset Managers, which has another subsidiary, the Brookfield Renewable Power Co. The latter owns Granite Wind Power Co. in New Hampshire. Granite recently received a $167 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy under Barry “Almighty's” economic stimulus program. And who is it that is among BAM's stockholders, none other than George Soros. My, my it sure is a small world, isn't it!


Helping to prove that this so-called “grassroots movement” has no resemblance to the Tea Party, is the fact that the list of infamous activists involved, either actively or from the sidelines, in the Occupy movement reads like a Who's Who of the Radical American Left. Former Students for a Democratic Society Weather Underground bomber, and very close associate of Barry “Almighty,” Bill Ayers posted the initial statement of the Occupy demonstrators on his blog. Wade Rathke, an ACORN founder and former SDSer, praised the movement and helped organize the Occupy New Orleans demonstrations. Another former ACORN leader, Maude Hurd, is a leader of the Occupy Boston demonstrators, who have been particularly aggressive in confronting local authorities. Then there's Service Employees International Union's (SEIU) Stephen Lerner, a frequent Barry White House visitor and yet another former ACORN leader, who is among the chief Occupy organizers. One of Lerner's favorite tactics is to organize "home visits" by demonstrators at the private residences of targeted corporate executives and government officials. During a conference of left-wing activists earlier this month, Lerner promised to "terrify Washington" with such tactics. We wonder if he discussed any these matters with the community organizer-in-chief during one of those many White House visits. All this and we’re still expected to believe that this group of radical rabble rousers, these anarchists, are all part of a movement that just spontaneously sprung up all on its own with no outside interference. I may have been born at night, but it wasn’t last night.

AGAIN WITH THIS NONSENSE THAT OCCUPY WALL STREET PROTESTERS = THE TEA PARTY

TEA PARTY FOLKS?  NOPE, NOT EVEN CLOSE!!



I'm guessing that these scumbag Democrats think if they make the comparison enough times and it is then repeated in the state controlled media even more times they can make this little premise of theirs finally stick with the American people. But honestly folks I think most people see that there is no comparison, whatsoever, that can be made between these two groups, not one. Despite that fact Barry "Almighty" continues to say the Occupy Wall Street movement was born of many of the same sentiments that led to the tea party movement. “I understand the frustrations being expressed in those protests,” Barry said in an interview with ABC News. “In some ways, they’re not that different from some of the protests that we saw coming from the Tea Party. Both on the left and the right, I think people feel separated from their government. They feel that their institutions aren’t looking out for them.” Blah, blah, blah.

It's a load of crap, and he knows it. It's just more Barry game playing. For one thing Tea Party folks want LESS government, these parasitic malcontents down on Wall Street want MORE, much MORE. An obvious fact that separates the two groups and one very clearly being ignored by Barry as he made the comments in an interview with ABC News correspondent Jake Tapper set for broadcast on the network’s “Nightline” program tonight. The network released excerpts from the interview conducted in Jamestown, N.C., where the president was making a stop on his three-day, taxpayer funded, bus tour to promote his economic proposals. Barry said his proposals to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans and close some corporate loopholes can help restore a sense that “everybody gets a fair shake but we’re also asking a fair share from everybody.” Doing so will help dissipate some of the anger expressed by demonstrators, he said.


Even Barry's own rationale for these bonehead Occupy Wall Street goofs, exposes the difference between these and the Tea Party folks. The Tea Partiers are fed up with the subsidizing of the leeches in our society who pay absolutely ZERO in income taxes. That's what's not fair here. That 47 percent of the households in this country who enjoy a free ride at the expense of the rest of us. And very few if any of these malcontents currently traipsing around are actually unemployed, they're just all pissed off because they're expected to work. I read something somewhere that I thought was hilarious, I guess of these morons are whining because the got their expensive electronic gadgets ripped off. That is just too funny. And anyway, if they were really poor and unemployed how is it exactly that they were able to come these very same expensive little toys. Thank God for mommy and daddy. They must be oh so proud!