A NOTE TO THE PALESTINIANS…AS YOU SOW, SO SHALL YOU REAP…

Let me start by saying that there is nothing special about the Palestinians that should cause them to expect to be immune from Israeli retaliation. Also, that there is no separating the Palestinians from Hamas, just as there was no separating the German people from the Nazis. Because just as the Palestinians choose to support Hamas, it was the German people who chose to support the Nazis. And so when it comes to the retribution now being meted out against Gaza, the Palestinians, just as the German people before them, are the ones who have placed themselves on the receiving end of repercussions for the actions they condoned. Payback, as they say, is a bitch.

But, as we all know, or at least should, Democrats being what they are, they always see things just a bit differently than do most normal people. And I can’t be the only one to have noticed just how it is that the Democrats have this rather uncanny knack of being totally clueless regarding any topic that they may asked to make comment on. And with that said, it was during an appearance on this past Monday’s broadcast of MSDNC’s “Morning Joe,” that New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, in discussing her recent trip to Israel said that one reason for the trip was to help bolster the resolve to “free the Palestinians from the stranglehold of Hamas."

Hochul said, “New York City has more Jews than Tel Aviv and Jerusalem combined, 2.2 million. So, everybody knew somebody. Everybody had experienced real pain, and I needed to go there and let people know that we stand with Israel.” She said, “We condemn the terrorist act of Hamas. And I needed to see and bear witness and tell the stories upon my return, to strengthen our resolve, to eradicate evil in places in Gaza, and free the Palestinians from the stranglehold of Hamas. I’m concerned about innocent Palestinians, but what Hamas did on October 7 will go down in the annals of history as one of the worst terrorist attacks in terms of the scale of the population."

She said, “I met the refugees from one community, and I went to that place one mile from the border, Joe, and a population of 700. This is a kibbutz.” And she said, “These are basically — if they were in the U.S., they’d probably be — some of them would be hippies. These are peace-loving people, peace activists, they lost 70 of their own residents, 10% of the population slaughtered that day, and many were taken hostage. I needed to see that, talk to the leaders about our own hostages, but also just to give comfort to people who, in turn, were trying to give me comfort. It was something I’ll never forget.” But I have no doubt that she has likely already forgotten.

And as Gaza elected Hamas, New York elected Hochul, you cannot protect people from themselves. Hochul says, “We need to free the Palestinians from Hamas.” She doesn’t seem to understand the concept of a ‘people's war.’ Hamas represents the sentiment of those in Gaza who have been voting for them for decades, and who have been supporting Hamas terrorism the entire time. Hamas has not radicalized that sentiment, because the Gaza population was radicalized for decades long before Hamas. What Hamas has done is to militarize the sentiment of those who live in Gaza. And it has done it with their active support, including providing Hamas with recruits.

Hochul is a governor, and not a very good one, and therefore has no opinion on the events taking place in Israel. It would seem to me that the first female governor of her state should focus more on fixing her state, following the U.S. Constitution and keeping criminals locked up instead of releasing them back onto the streets. Then, maybe, her opinions on the affairs of a foreign country at war might warrant being listened to for more than a minute. Even then it’s doubtful. Hochul should fix the self-inflicted problems in her state. She should worry about her dangerous state and the animalistic behavior going on in New York City, which very much resembles Gaza.

It has been made painfully clear to anyone who has been paying attention that those who follow the twisted cult that is Islam are essentially indoctrinated from childhood to hate those are described as being infidels. They elected Hamas. They teach their children to hate Israel and Jews in school. They support all manner of terror against Israel and opinion polls, as well as every bit of anecdotal evidence available, say this is true. They partied all over the world, celebrating the murders and abductions of Israeli children. They were easy to identify because they were waving Palestinian flags. There is no “saving them from Hamas,” because they ARE Hamas.

Hochul is a fool. She’s either incredibly naïve or incredibly dishonest. Being a Democrat, I think we know which. It should be pointed out to Hochul that if she can separate the stripes from a zebra, then she might be able to separate Palestinians from Hamas. Also, how is it that none of the Arab nations are neither trying to protect the Palestinians nor stop Hamas. A coincidence? I think not!! If you actually could “free” the Palestinian people from Hamas, nothing would really change. Hatred of Israel is ingrained in these people. It’s like getting rid of Cuomo and replacing him with someone like Hochul, there was no perceivable improvement.

Personally, I think Hochul is attempting to do nothing more than to make excuses for these people, which in the long run will only allow the violence to continue. Her claim that Hamas somehow has a “stranglehold” on otherwise innocent Palestinian people is ludicrous. And I only say that because I watched as Palestinian protestors all over the world, far beyond the reach of Hamas, celebrating what Hamas did, these atrocities committed in the name of Allah. Hamas is part of a Moslem war against humanity. The atrocities Hamas committed on Israel must end. Hamas is evil. And there is now way to ‘fix’ evil. It needs to be eradicated, exterminated and obliterated!!!

Hochul, as is the case with every other Democrat, needs to understand what is the truth is regarding those who reside in Gaza!!! But how do you make one understand that has no interest in even trying to understand. Look, the Palestinians chose to vote for these Hamas terrorists, and like those who voted for Democrats, they are now getting exactly what they voted for!!! Even after all that has taken place, on both sides, if elections were held in Gaza and the West Bank today Hamas would likely win easily. The Palestinians have never failed to elect the most corrupt and disingenuous leaders over the years. It’s fantasy to assume that they would do anything different.

Palestinians have been offered their own state five different times since 1948, they've refused each and every time. They want what will never happen, the Israelis out of the entire region. You don’t negotiate with people like that. And to be honest, I’ve seen no evidence the Palestinians want to be “free” from Hamas. These are the same people who danced and celebrated in the streets, passing out sweets on 9/11 as our people died and the buildings fell and a plane full of patriots fought and died. There may be a few “Palestinians” who don’t believe in the violence, but when Israel turns Gaza into a parking lot, they can take it up with the Devil.

What the governor refuses to understand, as do most on the left, is that there is no such thing as a Palestinian. And second, the minute Israel pulled everything and everyone out of Gaza, the people of Gaza went out and elected Hamas to run the government. And rather than giving hope, to be a doctor or an engineer, they teach their young that killing oneself in the name of Allah is somehow honorable. And no amount of wishful thinking will bring an end to the madness. And it’s only a matter of time before this hate spills back into the U.S. again. And it is our Left-wing lawmakers, judges and DAs that only serve to expedite the threat to this country.

MANY IN THE ‘FAKE NEWS’ MEDIA QUICK TO POINT FINGERS AT ISRAEL…

Yup, by golly, if there is one thing you can count on in this ever-changing world of ours, it’s that the folks on MSDNC can always be counted on to twist ‘news’ on some of our most important issues of the day to the point where it becomes absolutely worthless and is of virtually no use to anyone. Any information provided by any of those on this supposed ‘news’ channel is only meant to confuse and to distract, and never meant to actually inform. Take for instance MSDNC’s recent coverage of the Hamas attack on Israel on Saturday. And it was then that MSDNC host Ayman Mohyeldin argued that the attacks on Israel were essentially brought on by Israel itself.

You see, it was Mohyeldin who argued that the attacks are due to “people who have been living in Gaza,” being “blockaded, besieged, decimated economically and politically.” And host Ali Velshi interrupted to say that Israel’s behavior is “why they voted for Hamas in the first place.” Mohyeldin stated that “if you do not have some kind of mechanism that delivers justice for Palestinians, you are never going to have peace in the region. That’s what this is about. And I wrap up with a central point about, when we look back at the Oslo Accords, this was supposed to be the beginning of a two-state solution. The fundamental equation of Oslo was land for peace."

Mohyeldin went on to say, “And anyone who saw that unfold at the time, and looks at it now, tells you that, fundamentally, that is flawed. The Palestinians were not seeking land. Israel was seeking peace, but the Palestinians were seeking freedom. The very nature of the equation by which we have been looking at this conflict, the narrative of which we have been trying to understand what is happening has not been accurate. So, we are not able to accurately solve the problem, because we don’t actually understand what the reality is on the ground. Most Americans do not understand what does it mean to be living under occupation?"

And Mohyeldin continued by saying, “What does it mean for 70 years to be dispossessed of your land, to be dispossessed of your self-determination? What does that ultimately mean for the people who are willing to go out and carry [out] these attacks? Why would anyone, why would anyone –.” And it was Velshi who then cut in to say, “Why would you make a war with Israel, which you know has military might that’s ten times yours, or 100 times yours?” Mohyeldin responded, “Exactly. Why are you going to war with a nuclear-armed country? … [T]here was this equation of deterrence that Israel wanted to impose on all of its neighbors."

He said, “And it can, because when you are fighting conventional wars, countries will be afraid of nuclear weapons. But the people who have been living in Gaza, blockaded, besieged, decimated economically and politically, have nothing to lose. So, ultimately, when they’re making these kinds of calculations –.” Velshi again cut in to state, “That’s why they voted for Hamas in the first place.” And Mohyeldin said, “They have described them as nihilistic movements, and ultimately, when you see what you’re doing today and the consequences that Palestinians in Gaza are going to pay the price for, you have to wonder."

And so we have another huge lie coming from MSDNC, and pretty much the ‘fake news’ media as a whole! The truth is that Israel has bent over backwards to keep peace with Moslems living within their borders, and yet every chance they get these same Moslem folks living in Israel take nearly every opportunity to stab Israel in the back! These practitioners of this supposed religion of peace continue to demonstrate that they are never to be trusted. They’re like wild animals who, even though you may think that they are somewhat domesticated, you never know when that inner switch will get flipped and you’ve got a real fanatic on your hands.

This guy Mohyeldin is either terminally naive or is blatantly dishonest. Hamas has made their feelings abundantly clear by declaring many times that Israel has no right to exist. On top of everything, it is the west that supports Palestine. Palestine had a chance, similarly to Israel, to make its territory flourish. It seems that the Palestinians are a lazy bunch and all they’re able to accomplish is the training of terrorists. Palestine should not receive a penny of foreign aid until it is able to show the world that it has the right to exist and can form a workable government. And if they refuse to abandon their terrorist ways the only option is to wipe Hamas off the face of the Earth.

Now the fact is that the Palestinians could have had a state decades ago going all the way back to Jimmy Carter. But they, the Palestinians, during every peace accord that has ever been attempted, refused to recognize Israel as a state. That’s why there has never been a solution. They didn’t call Yarar Arafat the godfather of terrorism for nothing. Their pure hatred of Jews is sickening. And Hamas and Palestinians are the same, pure evil. The peaceful religion of Islam is on full display. The Islamic faith is one of the most violent and purely evil ‘religions’ in history, and in the world of today it is simply is the most violent and most evil ‘religion’ in existence.

Israel gave up the Gaza Strip to appease the Palestinian terrorists. Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, and they left behind fully functioning hydroponic farms that grew crops in the desert. And just what was it that Palestinians chose to do? Well, they chose to completely destroy them because they were built by Jews. This is the kind of people, and the level of fanaticism, that Israel is fighting. Hatred that has been so instilled, that these religious fanatics, these religious terrorists, would rather cut their nose off to spite their face. Hamas doesn’t want peace and it never will. It wants the total destruction of Israel. There is no justification for the attacks.

Sadly, too many Jewish Americans continue to fund, and vote for, the party that hates them. Which is a mystery that I’ve never been able to unravel. They worship FDR, who denied entry to European Jews fleeing the Holocaust, and they don’t criticize the antisemitism within the Democrat Party. They suffer constant attacks in New York City, yet they still vote overwhelmingly for the party that does nothing to stop it. I’ve worked with those in the past who were somehow convinced that the greatest danger to Jews is somehow the Christian right, and not Moslems. And there came a point when I decided that I couldn’t deal with someone so blind and so stupid.

To be perfectly blunt, the Palestinians have no claim to the land. The Israelis have been giving up land for peace for decades, since it was first formed as a result of the Balfour treaty, which, by the way, gave them significantly more land including land in Jordan. Israel chose to take less land. The Palestinians who claim to own the land were nothing more than nomads of Jordanian dissent that were not allowed to repatriate to Jordan when the Balfour Treaty was signed. These so-called “Palestinian” people never lived in the land, prior to the Israelis. This was done as a wedge issue by the powers that be. Too many are ignorant of the region’s history.

MSDNC spews nothing more than disinformation, misinformation, mal-information, Communist Orwellian Newspeak and obfuscation. It is nothing more than propaganda vehicle for the corrupt, criminal Democrat Party’s anti-American, anti-Semite, anti-Christian, anti-God, anti-rule of law, anti-democracy, anti-civilized society, anti-sanity agenda. And may I say that no sane, intelligent, informed person should be the least bit surprised, or the least bit taken aback, by the fact that MSDNC covers for the corrupt criminal Democrat Party’s continuing funding of murderous global terrorism in general, and murderous terrorist attacks on Israel in particular.

And perhaps something else that we should consider is if Hamas was able to penetrate Israel’s heavily fortified borders, just imagine how many thousands of terrorists Joey and the Democrats have allowed to enter the U.S. through the southern border with virtually no fortifications. See what happens when you let your guard down when the enemies are at the gate. Notice how so many crossers are military age males? We are going to reap what the Democrats have sown soon. We’ve allowed armies to come into the country and when they strike, they will be attacking like Hamas did, in our homes. We had better be prepared to defend our families or we will wish we had.

Here’s the thing, Israel doesn’t need or want our opinion, advice or assistance, they must do their duty as they see fit to defend themselves, their families and their country. You and I don’t have to like it, condemn or condone it. It is Israel’s business. The most important rule of warfare is to fight to win. If you don’t have that attitude, don’t enter into the fray. As we have learned ever since WW II fighting by rules of engagement created by White House lawyers serves to not only prolong wars but virtually assures defeat. The U.S. has spent far too much in both blood and treasure courtesy of doctrines based in the philosophy of “winning hearts and minds.”

LUNATICS PROTESTING AGAINST ISRAEL...ABSOLUTELY CRAZY

DAYLIGHT: THE STORY OF OBAMA AND ISRAEL...

A movie that reveals Barry's rather questionable stand on Israel.  Where he says one thing, but his actions demonstrate something much more sinister, even ominous.  Because just like everything else, he continues to lie about his support for Israel.

OBAMA DELIVERS TO MR. NETANYAHU AN ULTIMATUM

Man, don't you just love the arrogance of this guy. But then after all, he is BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, the all knowing, all seeing God-like figure who we should all consider ourselves fortunate to have walking among us, and as such he commands complete obedience and total submission from all those who seek to come before him in search of his worldly advice and guidance. Give me a freakin break! Let's be honest here, Barry has demonstrated any number of times that he hates Israel nearly as much as he hates America. In that end, unlike 'most" previous U.S. presidents, he fits in remarkably well with those who are actively working to bring about the demise of the Jewish State. So it should now come as no big surprise that, at least according to a Israel Radio report from Sunday, the United States, read as Barry "Almighty," has now provided Prime Minister Netanyahu with what is, by anyone's definition, an ultimatum regarding any renewing of negotiations with the Palestinians. According to this ultimatum, Mr. Netanyahu has to decide within a month whether he agrees to accept Barry "Almighty's" proposal and resume talks based on 1967 lines. Don't do it Mr. Prime Minister, don't allow yourself to be railroaded into a position that does not bode well for the survival of your country.

An ever-increasingly belligerent Barry apparently feels that he can now dictate his rather twisted views to a leader of another sovereign nation, a sovereign nation for which those twisted views would almost certainly have some pretty dire consequences. How dare Barry presume to essentially blackmail any leader regarding how they conduct the national security of their country. Unlike Barry, there are still some world leaders who take seriously the responsibility of safeguarding their nations against outside attacks. So it becomes very obvious very quickly on whose side in this fight Barry is on, and has been for some time. And as such, Barry apparently now feels very comfortable in pressuring Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to accede to his proposal to resume Israeli-Palestinian peace talks on the basis of his idiotic May 19 speech. An Israeli source who spoke recently with senior officials in Washington said the Americans were very frustrated with Netanyahu’s behavior, feeling that he was impeding America’s efforts to keep the Palestinians from unilaterally seeking UN recognition of a state in September.


Mr. Netanyahu’s personal envoy, a Mr. Isaac Molho, spent last week in Washington, where the Americans presented their proposal for resuming talks on the basis of Barry’s speech. Specifically, Barry’s simplistic plan calls for negotiating over borders and security first, while deferring issues such as Jerusalem and the refugees until later. It also calls for the borders to be based on the 1967 lines, with mutually agreed land swaps. The Americans apparently told Molho that in order to provide the U.S. with some leverage to use in any attempt to block European initiatives such as France’s proposal for an international peace conference in Paris, they must have something concrete to offer, like Mr. Netanyahu‘s agreement to negotiate on the basis of Barry’s speech. If Mr. Netanyahu were to agree to that he would essentially be guilty of dereliction of the duties which he was elected to perform regarding the safeguarding of his country.


Now it should go without saying that information regarding the U.S. "proposal" was also provided to chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat, who said the Palestinians would resume talks on this basis. DUH! Sure, why the Hell wouldn't they agree to resume talks under those conditions, they'd be stupid not to. Because if Netanyahu does agree to this lunacy, then the playing field will have been tilted in such a way as to definitely favor the murdering Palestinians. What leader in his right mind would kowtow to such an obvious know nothing as Barack Hussein Obama regarding any matter that has even the slightest to do with the very survival of his country? And what makes Barry think that he has anywhere near the requisite stature as the leader of a shrinking free world, no thanks to him, to even make such an insane demand? It's laughable! What's exactly makes him think that he can essentially read the riot act to Mr. Netanyahu? The absolute gall of this man.


An Israeli source who maintains close ties with both senior U.S. officials and people close to Mr.. Netanyahu said that Washington‘s, really Barry being infantile, frustration began with Netanyahu’s trip to Washington last month, when he publicly fought with Barry and then refused in an address to Congress to endorse the president’s outline for talks. The Americans were now speaking very harshly of Netanyahu, said the source. Ya know, one does not normally expect this level of juvenile behavior to be emanating from the White House. But it is, sadly, what is typically seen anytime the current resident of the Oval Office happens to be a scumbag Democrat. Speaking of Mr. Netanyahu, “He’s asking us to protect him in September, but he isn’t giving us any tools with which to help him,” the source quoted one American official as saying. “Instead of helping us, he’s making it harder for us.” Blah, blah, blah. Whoever said that trying to maintain some level of stability in the World was easy. What's important here is that the lone democracy in the entire region be treated with dignity and respect and not arm twisted into a scenario that poses a threat to its very survival.


As a result, American officials complained, Barry was unable to get Britain and France to commit to opposing a unilateral Palestinian move when he visited Europe last month. One cannot help buy wonder just how aggressive Barry and his team were in their attempts to persuade Britain and France. I would hazard a guess that any attempts were pretty weak. “The Americans need Israel inside, but Netanyahu isn’t there yet,” the source said. “To date, from the American and European perspective, Israel hasn’t given anything.” That is such a very obvious crock of BS. European diplomats said Netanyahu’s speech to Congress was viewed in Europe as one long “no” and had thus increased European distrust of him. “We want to hear Netanyahu say he‘s willing to negotiate on the basis of Obama’s speech and that he’ll discuss borders based on the 1967 lines with land swaps,” said one diplomat. The one individual not worthy of any level of trust in Barry "Almighty." To trust him is to do so at your own peril.


Since the barren talks with Molho last week, the White House has been upping the pressure on Netanyahu. On Friday, Steve Simon, who heads the U.S. National Security Council’s Middle East desk, told American Jewish leaders that Netanyahu needs to reply within a month to the U.S. proposal for restarting talks. The White House knew this remark would both be conveyed to Netanyahu and leaked to the American and Israeli press, thus making its displeasure public. This is definitely the crybaby administration. It's either their way or the highway. The behavior of this president when it comes to Israel, is nothing short of appalling. He's doing nothing more than throwing Israel under the bus to appease his rag-headed buddies. Israel is Barry's sacrificial lamb. This sentiment is nothing new for Barry, having exhibited pretty much the same mentality as a candidate back in 2008. And it has always struck me as being somewhat odd that so many Jews voted for this guy who essentially wants nothing less than to take whatever action he sees as being necessary in his endeavor to ensure that Israel is wiped off the face of the planet.

HAVE YA HEARD? OBAMA'S COMIN OUT WITH A NEW BOOK, IT'S CALLED "HOW TO FU*K OVER A FRIEND and SMILE WHILE DOING IT!"

“The United States believes that negotiations should result in two states, with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan, and Egypt, and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine,” Barry said in his speech at the State Department. “We believe the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states.”

This week the seventh meeting took place between Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and our "Supreme Leader," Barry "Almighty" since Barry took office, and the two men are now facing what can accurately be described as a turning point in their relationship. A relationship that, I think it fair to say, has never been warm. By all accounts, they do not trust each other and from Mr. Netanyahu point of view, with good reason. Barry has told aides and allies alike that he does not believe that Mr. Netanyahu will ever be willing to make the kind of big concessions that will lead to a peace deal. What Barry, like most progressives, fails to understand or realize, which is but one thing on a very long list of many, is the fact that the Palestinians aren't after concessions. Arafat squelched that myth a long time ago when he was literally handed everything that he supposedly wanted by then Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Miraculously, Arafat turned him down, and then promptly started an Intifada. Barak, touted as "Mr. Security," proceeded to withdraw unilaterally from South Lebanon, creating a vacuum very soon filled by Hezbollah, and then worked with Bill Clinton to prepare a complete withdrawal from virtually all of Judea and Samaria. Barak then proceeded to loss control of the government to Ariel Sharon in what was essentially a landslide.


Fast forward to today and for his part, Mr. Netanyahu has complained, and rightly so, that Imam Obama has now pushed Israel too far, a point driven home most recently during a furious phone call with Hitlary Clinton on Thursday morning. The call took place just hours before Barry’s anti-Israeli speech, which was specifically designed to undercut Mr. Netanyahu's visit. Barry's speech, a segment of which begins this post, was one which the prime minister reacted very angrily to, and deservedly so, regarding Barry’s asinine plan to endorse Israel’s pre-1967 borders for a future Palestinian Terrorist state. The boundaries that Barry endorsed Thursday as Israel’s future borders would leave the country, at its narrowest point, only nine miles wide between “Palestine” and the Mediterranean Sea. By declaring that the Palestinian terror state should border Jordan, Barry furthermore implied that Israel should not retain possession of the strategic Jordan Valley, the strip of land immediately to the west of the Jordan River. A succession of Israeli governments, both right and left, together with generations of top military officers, have argued that a military presence there is essential for the future security if Israel.


Sometimes inaccurately called the “1967 borders,” the lines referred to by Barry, a fact that I'm sure he must be aware of, are actually the 1949 armistice lines that were in place up until the June 1967 Six Day War. By the time the fighting ended, Israel had captured the entire West Bank, including eastern parts of Jerusalem from Jordan; the Gaza Strip and Sinai Peninsula from Egypt; and the Golan Heights from Syria. The demonstrably indefensible boundaries held by Israel between 1948 and 1967 prompted Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban’s famous remark in 1969 to the effect that those borders evoked the Nazi extermination camp at Auschwitz. “I do not exaggerate when I say that it has for us something of a memory of Auschwitz,” Eban was quoted as saying. “We shudder when we think of what would have awaited us in the circumstances of June, 1967, if we had been defeated; with Syrians on the mountain and we in the valley, with the Jordanian army in sight of the sea, with the Egyptians who hold our throat in their hands in Gaza. This is a situation which will never be repeated in history.” This is the environment what Barry wants to return Israel to. His hated of the Jewish state could not be more obvious.


When it comes to these men being able to trust one another, I think very fair to say that of the two, Mr. Netanyahu has the much better reason not to trust Barry than Barry has to distrust Mr. Netanyahu. The last-minute furor highlights the discord as they head into what one Israeli official described as a “train wreck” coming their way, that being, a United Nations General Assembly vote on Palestinian statehood coming this September. Mr. Netanyahu, at least according to close associates, is desperate for Barry to use the diplomatic muscle of the United States to protect Israel from the vote, not only by vetoing it in the Security Council, but also by leaning hard on America’s European allies to get them to reject it as well. Apparently, Barry has indicated that he will certainly do the first, but as he has demonstrated so many times before, can you really take him at his word. THAT'S A BIG NO! Especially with he continuing propensity for telling rather outrageous lies. Besides, it still remains unclear how far Barry would be willing to go to in any effort to persuade Britain, France and other American allies to join the United States in rejecting the move, particularly as long as Mr. Netanyahu continues to resist endorsing the pre-1967 lines.


Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League and a friend of Mr. Netanyahu’s, recalled that after the first meeting between the two men, Mr. Netanyahu had told him that he had been impressed with Barry’s intellect, and that the American presidency “was his to lose.” An impression that would indicate that Mr. Netanyahu made not be the judge of character that he thought he was. But things very quickly went downhill after Barry officially took office and, within months, called for a halt in Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank. Slamming the dictates of Barry, Mr. Netanyahu refused, handing the new president his first foreign policy humiliation when Barry had to abandon the demand in the face of Israel’s refusal to comply. Compounding the problem, Mr. Netanyahu delivered a fiery speech to a pro-Israel lobbying group in Washington declaring that “Jerusalem isn’t a settlement, it’s our capital.” A furious White House promptly shoed just how childish it can be, by then denying Mr. Netanyahu all the trappings of a presidential meeting with Barry the next day, even refusing to allow photographers to take pictures of the two men in the Oval Office, as is usually the case for meetings with foreign leaders.


Things got so bad between the two leaders, Mr. Foxman recalled, that Mr. Netanyahu “told me, ‘Abe, I need two hours just alone to talk to him.” Late last year, Mr. Netanyahu got his two hours at the White House with Barry, a meeting which, both American and Israeli officials say, helped clear the air. “The relationship now is very cordial,” a senior White House official said. These clowns must have a very interesting definition for "cordial" because Barry's behavior toward Mr. Netanyahu has always been one of very thinly veiled disdain, an arrogance that has him coming off as someone trying to bully someone that is smaller and weaker. But the easing of tensions came to and end this spring when, Israeli and American officials said, Mr. Netanyahu got wind of Barry’s plans to make a major address on the Middle East, and alerted Republican leaders that he would like to address a joint meeting of Congress. That move was widely interpreted as an attempt to get out in front of Barry, by presenting an Israeli peace proposal that, while short of what the Palestinians want, would box in the president. House Speaker John Boehner issued the invitation, for late May. And we are all very well aware that Barry is notoriously thin-skinned.


So it was then that White House officials arranged Barry’s speech on Thursday to make sure that this time around Barry went first. “You get so many reports that Bibi is playing politics in your backyard that eventually you’ve got to draw the conclusion that there’s nothing there to work with this guy,” said Daniel Levy, a former Israeli peace negotiator who is now a fellow with the New American Foundation, referring to Mr. Netanyahu by his nickname. Administration officials said that they were determined not to allow Mr. Netanyahu to get out in front of Barry. In a statement after Mr. Barry’s speech on Thursday, Mr. Netanyahu’s office pointedly said that the prime minister would raise his concerns about Barry’s language about the pre-1967 borders during Friday’s meeting. “While there were many points in the president’s speech that we appreciate and welcome, there were other aspects, like the return to the 1967 borders, which depart from longstanding American policy, as well as Israeli policy, going back to 1967,” Michael B. Oren, Israel’s ambassador to the United States, said in an interview.


Also now jumping onboard this crazy train and adding a little more fuel to what is now the sizeable fire created by the insane proposal advocated by Barry in his Mideast speech, was that imbecilic blast from the past, none other that former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski. Apparent, Mr. Brzezinski is of the opinion that Barry's speech was far too “timid, adding that it cannot generate international support for the peace process. Old "Bonehead" Brzezinski also said Friday while on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that, left to themselves, the Israelis and the Palestinians will not resolve their decades-old issues. No shit there Sherlock! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to determine that when you've got one side that genuinely wants piece and the other side wanting nothing more than the annihilation of the other side, that peace is going to be a pretty hard commodity to come by. “I thought I heard a speech which was trying to initiate movement on the peace process, a peace process that is stalemated, but, a rather timid initiative in my mind, which as a result is not likely to mobilize the kind of support that is needed to move the process forward,” said Brzezinski, who was Jimmy "Peanut Brain" Carter’s national security adviser during the 1978 Camp David Accords that led to an Israel-Egypt "peace treaty." “I think if we are going to have peace in the Middle East, we have to face two basic realities, fundamental realities: First of all, the parties to the conflict, the Israelis and the Palestinians, will never resolve it by themselves — the differences between them are just not bridgeable by themselves,” Brzezinski said. “Secondly, the issue in the Middle East is not just security for Israel, or rights for the Palestinians — it’s also fundamental American national interest — and that has to guide American policy. “So, I approve of what the president did, but I wish he had gone further, because if he had, he would have been able to mobilize much more support from among the Israelis, the Palestinians and the international community,” he said. So here we have someone who dates all the way back to the 70's and is someone that clearly reveals that this dangerous agenda toward Israel is far from being anything new.


So what I fail to understand is why it is that a very substantial number of those in the Jewish community continue to insist upon supporting people who exhibit this type of warped mentality. It just leaves me scratching my head. The one political party that has always been more than eager to throw Israel to the Arab wolves is the one party that a majority of Jews continue to reliably vote for. It simply makes no sense to me. Oddly enough, according to pollster John Zogby, despite the uproar over Barry's support for Palestinian demands that Israel return to its 1967 borders, he predicts that Barry won’t suffer significant defections from Jewish voters at the polls in 2012. Zogby noted that Democrats traditionally enjoy a 75 percent to 25 percent advantage in the Jewish vote. The lone exception was Ronald Reagan’s re-election bid in 1984. He says that it will take more than a little friction with the current leadership of Israel to change that dynamic. “Israel is extremely important to American Jews. But so are traditional liberal stances, particularly on social issues." So there you go, the Jews in this country are now cheerfully furnishing the rope with which Israel will get hung, or is that hanged. And they are apparently very happy to do so. Nice!


Sadly we now have a man who is supposed to be the leader of the free world but who has instead continually chosen to abdicate that responsibility. The most recent example of this is his very cheerfully throwing of one our staunchest allies on the planet firmly under the proverbial bus. This most pathetic of men, most disgusting of men, this man whom we elected, represents the complete opposite of all that this country has stood for, for over 230 years. He has repeatedly turned on our friends and kowtowed to our enemies, the whole time having a smile on his face. This cannot be allowed to stand, and this sad situation that we brought upon ourselves by electing this man is something that must be reversed in 18 months. His time in office will forever remain a stain on this country that will be a constant reminder of what voter ignorance can bring about. And it will be very difficult to get passed all that he has done to the reputation of our great country. He has committed, and continues to commit, crimes against freedom. We must purge ourselves of this malignancy in 2012, or risk becoming mired down in the sewage that will most assuredly be the legacy that Barry leaves behind for us.