.

.
Showing posts with label 'Slick Willie' and Hitlery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'Slick Willie' and Hitlery. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

‘SLICK WILLY’ CLINTON…GOES ON THE STUMP FOR HITLERY…


It was while out stumping for his ‘wife’ in Saginaw, Michigan this past Monday that ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton, one of only two American presidents ever to have been impeached, took it upon himself to disparage as best he could those of us who have chosen to support Donald Trump in his effort to defeat Hitlery when it comes to choosing who it will be that replaces Barry “Almighty.”  And old ‘Slick’ actually went so far as to paint us all as being people blinded by “resentment” and “fear.”  The old ‘Slickmeister’ said, “When I saw Hillary in that debate…every American who watched it, unless they were just so knotted up with anger and resentment” saw a clear contrast in the candidates’ experience.  The alleged rapist went on to say, “If you’re mad then it doesn’t matter.”

And in using much the same tone as Barry once used in describing those bitter clingers who cling to their religion and their guns, ‘Slick’ went on to mock those ‘angry Americans’.  And in doing what I guess was his best impersonation of them, he said, “I’m mad about immigration, I’m mad about trade, I’m mad because my wages aren’t going up.”  And he went on to do his best in an effort to paint the divide in the country as a battle between “the voters of Hope vs. the voters of fear.”  He said, “Most of the anti-immigration feeling in America is in places that don’t have a lot of immigrants. We’ve got to stop fighting over this.”   He noted that the election should not be about “insults, tax evasion, abuse of the family foundation or whatever” because that’s not what matters to regular people.

Isn’t it ironic that here we have one of the skilled practitioners of that most toxic of political tactics, the politics of personal destruction, whining about Trump’s insults and accusations regarding Clinton’s foundation as being little more than a slush fund.  Let’s be honest here, shall we, there is no one who practices the dark arts of personal destruction quite like the Clintons.  One could go so far as to say that Hitlery has actually perfected the procedure.  The politics of personal destruction as we know, is a liberal tactic of demonizing the opposition.  And while the term was made popular by ‘Slick’ during his impeachment trial in the 1990s, the tactic was first employed by Teddy ‘The Drunk’ Kennedy during the 1987 confirmation hearings of Robert Bork when he was nominated to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court.

‘Slick’ said, “The Democrats have a pretty good argument. I made it four years ago for President Obama.”  And he went on to say, “Is this a change election? Yes it is, and it should be.  But the question should be: what are we going to do?  What kind of change do you need?…Do we want anger or answers?  Do we want resentment or empowerment? And do we want to reach the world with walls or bridges?”  ‘Slick’ claims that this election is all about "change", but change from what, exactly?  The policies of the president who he helped to get elected, twice?   And then it was to rather mild applause that ‘Slick’ said, “That’s it. That’s the whole thing.”  And then he said that we can’t “put everyone in manufacturing” because “every year, fewer people can produce more stuff.”

Anyway, then it was along toward the end of his rather meandering and typically longwinded rant that ‘Slick’ made what was a rather bizarre reference to the Civil War, paraphrasing a friend who is a Lincoln expert who explained one of the reasons Lincoln went to war. ‘Slick’ said, “In the North there was no power elite, there was no slave labor, it was the greatest opportunity for people who started out poor to get into the middle class. We’ve got to do that again.”  Now I know old ‘Slick’ is supposed to be some sort of political genius, but I gotta tell ya, for the life of me I can’t quite figure out where exactly it was he was going with that.  He talks about no power elite, no slave labor, and since I’m not a Democrat, try as I might, I just wasn’t able to connect the dots here.   

I’m all for putting America first with fair taxing policies, stopping the pay for play of that the Clinton's are known for, giving ALL Americans a fair chance instead of the few chosen by the Clinton's, restructuring trade agreements to make them fair to ALL Americans, rebuilding the military so hated by the Democrat Party, making government abide by the people's desires rather than allowing the government to dictate to the people, restoring law and order to a currently lawless regime, developing a coherent foreign policy rather than buying off foreign governments, restoring respect to the office of the president, and many more common sense ideals. Anyone thinking of voting for Hitlery has no morals, ethics, and must be educationally deficient!!  It should be such an easy choice this November!

And remember how it was that Hitlery said, "I'll put Bill in charge of the economy!"   But let’s not forget how it was that our little housing bubble from a few years back was brought to you by something called the ‘Community Re-Investment Act’, another wholly-owned little Democrat scheme which was begun during the days of Jimmy Carter and made so very much worse by the ‘Slickmeister’ and his trusty sidekick, Janet Reno.  It was this fiasco that essentially forced banks into loaning money to folks knowing full well they would never be able to pay it back, and all under the guise of affordable housing. They told banks that if they didn’t as they were told they would be sued for unfair banking practices.  And it’s Hitlery who continues to blame the banks for the financial crisis of 2008.

And while most are more likely to remember ‘Slick’s’ sexcapades there in the Oval Office, few likely remember how it was that the Red Chinese were allowed to easily acquire satellite and missile technology from American companies during the first treasonous Clinton administration.  That was his truly impeachable offense.  And I fear what could be the result of future acquisitions that I’m sure would be encouraged to take place in another Clinton administration.  You see these people are allowed to run things as they please with complete impunity. It is the same with that thing with Barry “Almighty.”  Barry runs his mouth 24/7 and now threatens that he will continue to speak freely when his term is over.  So go ahead Barry, and any reasonably intelligent folks will pay you very little attention.

And for all of those folks who just can’t bring themselves to vote for Trump, I thought I would take this opportunity to let them know what it is that they will be voting for by either sitting this election out or by voting for the pothead, Gary Johnson.  Because not voting for Trump, is a vote for: 1) Sanctuary cities. 2) Bankrupting future generations. 3) Appeasing Islamic terrorists. 4) Bankrupting Social Security.  5) Illegals invading our country.  6) Low income housing forced into our suburbs.  7) Controlling our healthcare.  8) No religious freedom.  9) Homosexual marriage.  10) Low paying part-time jobs. 11) The releasing of thousands of felons. 12) Abortions with no restrictions.  And 13), Flooding this country with Muslim terrorists.  And for all that all you gotta do is stay home on Election Day. 

When all is said and done at this gathering in Michigan, how many of those on attendance actually had a clue about what it was that old ‘Slick’ was actually talking about?  If he made the argument that it was a change election four years ago, then isn’t it fair to say that he was basically admitting that Barry screwed things up in his first term.  And since he's again making the same argument that this is a change election, then isn’t he saying that Barry really screwed things up in his second term.  Hitlery’s entire campaign has been that she's running for Barry’s third term and will continue with his same screwed up policies.  I’m thinking that ‘Slick’ has gone round the bend and, apparently, so has Hitlery.  Does anybody truly want Hitlery as our president with the ‘Slickmeister’ serving as her chief advisor?

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

‘THE SLICKMEISTER’ GOES STUMPING FOR HITLERY…


It would seem that ex-president ‘Slick Willie’ Clinton is either losing it, or might simply be having a little fun Barry “Almighty’s” expense.  Neither, or so it has been said, is likely to be good news for wife, Hitlery.  ‘Slick’ hit the campaign trail on behalf of his wife yesterday up in Spokane, Washington, and quickly started throwing some darts at Barry's supposed legacy.  And what he said actually kind of contradicted at least some of what Hitlery has said as she has busied herself trying to tie her campaign to what she has referred to as being Barry’s ‘many’ accomplishments.

'Slick' came out swinging as he said, "If you believe we can rise together, if you believe we've finally come to the point where we can put the awful legacy of the last eight years behind us and the seven years before that where we were practicing trickle-down economics, and no regulation in Washington, which is what cause the crash, then you should vote for her."  Meanwhile ‘Slick’s’ aides were also pretty quick to ‘clarify’ that the perceived ‘insult’ was not intended but rather was, "referring to the GOP's obstructionism and not President Obama's legacy."  Ya, sure it was.

But what seemed to be kinda strange is the fact that it wasn’t all that long ago, just this past February to be exact, that old ‘Slick’ seemed to be singing quite the different tune when making a reference to what has transpired over the course of the last few years.  You see, it was then that the old ‘Slickmeister’ said, "I think President Obama deserves a lot of credit for doing what he did with one hand tied behind his back because a lot of the people that elected him in 2008 didn't show up in 2010; that's our fault."  So which is it there, Billy Boy?  Feast, or famine? 

During his speech 'Slick' it was pretty obvious what he was up to.  Which was, of course, to tear down Barry in what was an effort to try to boost his loser of a wife.  But it was in telling those assembled for this campaign rally that Hitlery can help America "rise together" and "put the awful legacy of the last eight years behind us," that he was right about one thing.  The last eight years have been pretty much of a disaster, economically, financially and internationally.  And I’m not quite sure how electing Hitlery we increase our odds of making the next four years any better.

'Slick' said, "I literally from the time I met her 45 years ago until we talked yesterday, she is the best change maker I have ever known."  And he went on to say, "She always finds a way to make something good happen, to make people feel empowered, to buy people into the process, to make democracy work the way the framers intended for it to work.”  And I find myself wondering if he’s talking about the same Hitlery that the rest of us have been forced into tolerating for the last 25 years.  Because the two would seem to bear absolutely no resemblance to one another whatsoever!

'Slick' said, "Now if you don’t believe we can all grow together again, if you don't believe we're ever going to grow again, if you believe it's more important to re-litigate the past, there may be many reasons that you don't want to support her."  He went on to say, "Because she's the only person who basically has good ideas, will tell you how she's going to pay for them, can be commander-in-chief, and is a proven change maker with Republicans and Democrats and Independents alike."  With Hitlery there would be NO change, only more of the same!

And in his boosting of Hitlery I thought it odd, and a tad bit dishonest, that as part of his shtick regarding the last eight years, ‘Slick’ made the claim that it was a lack of regulation that brought about the housing crash of 2008.  Odd because he knows full well what brought it about and dishonest because he knows that it was he himself who played a critical role in making it happen courtesy of the Community Re-Investment Act that Jimmy Carter signed back in 1977 and that he then proceeded to make worse.  So what it was, was too much government involvement not too little.

But hey, if there is anything that we know about these two pathetically sleazy characters, or should know, it’s that they never let the facts get in the way of an attempt to portray themselves as being something other than what they are.  And while the trail of slime that these two have left behind stretches back for decades there are still people who seem to be only too happy to vote for her and would still vote for him if the opportunity was to ever present itself.  And the very last person who we need trying to pick up the pieces after eight years of Barry, is Hitlery!