Since day one of Barry’s first setting foot into the
Oval Office we have continued to hear about how, whenever something bad is said
to have happened, it’s never to be considered as being his fault. Whether it’s running guns to Mexico, or the
IRS continuing to give conservative groups a hard time, or the DOJ deciding to
go after reporters, or the fact that four Americans were left to be butchered
in Benghazi, or the fact that five terrorists were swapped for a deserter named
Bergdahl, the list goes on and on. And
no matter how bad the screw up, nothing is ever Barry’s fault. Somehow he finds about everything like the
rest of us do, from the news.
And now we’re hearing from White House Spokesmoron
Josh Earnest about how the kind of "rhetoric" now coming from
"multiple candidates on the Republican side" is not only
"contrary to our values," but is also, apparently, putting Barry
“Almighty” in a mighty tough spot. Sorry,
but whatever the “tough spot” that Barry might now find himself is no one’s
fault but Barry’s. It’s certainly not
the fault of those who are doing nothing more than to point out the lunacy that
continues to emanate from this White House.
And if anyone is spewing rhetoric that’s contrary to our values, that
would Barry “Almighty”, as well as the two candidates on the Democrat side.
Earnest said, "Their (Republicans') rhetoric is
also counterproductive when it comes to protecting the American people. And
that's a significant problem, particularly when you're the commander in chief and
you are on the hook. You are the one that's primarily responsible for the
safety and security of the American people.”
He went on to say, "And the suggestion on the part of some of these
Republican candidates is to marginalize certain communities in a way that could
be counterproductive to our national security." Well, the “certain communities” being talked
about here just so happen to be the very ones from which these murdering thugs
spring from.
It was in his most recent stupid weekly radio
address that Barry said Americans must fight Islamic terrorists, not only in
the air, but through "the power of our example," including "our
openness to refugees fleeing ISIL's violence." To which Republican Donald Trump responded
to, on Monday, by describing Barry's open-door policy toward refugees as
catastrophic. He said, "And it's
going to lead -- I mean, you talk about downfall. This could lead to the
downfall of the greatest nation on Earth."
Now I’m no Trump supporter, but it is hard to disagree with what he says
about allowing more of these people into our country. It’s reckless to the point of being
absolutely insane.
And at some point a reporter asked Earnest to
respond to Trump's criticism. To which
Earnest responded by saying, "His comments don't actually represent the
facts of the situation." And he
went on to say, "The fact of the matter is that individuals who enter the
United States through the refugee program are subjected to more intensive
scrutiny than any other individual trying to enter the United States.
Typically, takes between 18 and 24 months for an individual who is entering the
United States for the refugee program. The reason for that, is individuals who
are seeking to travel to the United States as refugees are subjected to
in-person interviews.” That’s bunk!
And according to Earnest, “They are subjected to
background checks, their names are run through a variety of databases that are
maintained by the U.S. military and the United States intelligence
community.” He said, "These
individuals are required to submit biometrics and biographical information, so
that information can also be used to vet them. All of this is critical to our
national security to vet them." Now
I could have sworn that it wasn’t very long ago that we all heard the head of
the head of the FBI telling members of Congress that there was simply no way to
vet all of those who Barry was allowing to enter into our country in what are
huge numbers.
Earnest noted that the U.S. takes in more refugees
through a United Nations program than any other country in the world, and he
said Americans should be proud that their country is viewed as a safe
haven. So we should be proud of the fact
that we’re allowing thousands of people into our country, most of whom possess
no desire whatsoever to become one of us, and at least some of whom desire to
see just how many of us they might be able to kill? And I’m sorry, but the involvement of the
United Nations only serves to make me feel far more nervous. This is insanity in its most pure form, and
is placing Americans at risk for no other reason that politics.
Earnest mentioned the State Department's recent
declaration, made under pressure, that Islamic State terrorists are committing
genocide against Christians and other religious minorities in the Middle
East. He said, "There was a
hullabaloo in the Republican Party...about whether or not the State Department
would conclude that genocide -- acts of genocide -- were being carried out by
ISIL in Iraq and in Syria. Are Republican suggesting that somehow, we should
turn our backs on people that we have now concluded are fleeing genocide in
their own country? Is that what they're
suggesting?” Well, Barry is certainly
turning his back on the Christians being killed!
Earnest said, "So they're suggesting that
somehow, we should be tough on ISIL, and that we should protect people who
might be victims of genocide, but we shouldn't let them in the United States
even after they've undergone two years of intensive background checks?” He added, “That's not right. That certainly
is not what our values entail and it's why I continue to believe -- and
Secretary Kerry and the president have both commented -- that the -- that these
kind -- this kind of rhetoric from the Republican Party is counterproductive to
our national security and flies in the face of the values that our country hold
dear."
But how many of those that Barry is continuing to
allow into this country have undergone two years of background checks,
intensive or otherwise? I would argue
that none have. And yet they are allowed
to continue to stream in. This is one
area where I am in complete agreement with Donald Trump. There must be a moratorium on those allowed
to come here from the most screwed up part of the world. And what’s wrong with creating some sort of ‘safe
haven’ right there in their own homeland, one where they can be kept safe and
one that does not expose Americans to the violence that comes along with many
of these same people?
Another one of the reporters present asked Earnest
if Barry ever gets fired up when he hears Republicans say these things. Earnest said, "His response, I think, is
rooted in the fact that as the commander-in-chief of the United States, that
his top priority is to keep the American people safe." What a crock of shit. It’s obvious to anyone on the outside looking
in that Barry doesn’t give a squat about keeping the American people safe. His top priority to allow as many of these
fanatics into our country as possible.
Personally I don’t care if Barry gets fired up or not, he has placed
this country in even greater danger than we were in before 9/11. AND ALL ON PURPOSE!
No comments:
Post a Comment