It would appear, ladies and gentlemen, that what we
have here is yet another whiny-assed, sniveling, shit-bag of a Democrat who
doesn’t seem to like it in the least that the other team has finally decided to
take advantage of the opportunity to play the game using the same rules that he
and his team so often use. I know, hard
to believe, right? Apparently, the only
ones who are allowed to manipulate that system to their advantage are the
Democrats. I know, weird right?
Anyway, it’s in this particular case that we have
Chris Coons, douche-bag Democrat from Delaware, who experienced a recent
meltdown, of sorts, and making the rather idiotic and, needless to say,
hypocritical claim that Senate Republicans have “a commitment to
obstructionism” by refusing to hold hearings to replace the late Supreme Court
Justice Antonin Scalia during this presidential election year. And yet it’s Coons own party that has, so
often, done the very same thing.
What prompted Coons to come so unhinged was a
statement issued shortly after Scalia’s death, in which Mitch ‘The Spineless’
McConnell said that “the American people should have a voice in the selection
of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled
until we have a new President.” And it’s
those of us who are responsible for Mitch being in his current position that
saw nothing wrong with the position that he has, at least for now, taken.
But Coons apparently saw things a bit differently,
blasting McConnell’s decision, and going so far as to call it part of some
grand scheme by Republicans to obstruct Barry “Almighty”. He said, “What they’re about is
obstructionism, preventing this president, who was elected in 2012, from
filling out the fourth year of his term.
A key part of being president of the United States is being able to
nominate ambassadors and senior executive position nominees and judges and
justices.”
And then as if trying to prove just how much of a
moron he really is, he went on to say, “And to prevent the president from
having any opportunity to fill this vital vacant seat in the U.S. Supreme Court
for the entire rest of the year suggests a commitment to obstructionism that is
sadly a repeat of a lot of what we’ve seen from the Republican-controlled
Congress during the first seven years that President Obama has been the chief
executive of the country.”
Apparently Coons is in need of being reminded that
the Republicans were not in control of either chamber of Congress when Barry
“Almighty” was first elected seven years ago. The GOP won the House in 2010,
and did not command a majority in the Senate until after the 2014 mid-term
elections. Coons also characterized Republicans’ refusal to consider any
Supreme Court nominee this year as “a new low” in their dealings with the
president. This coming from a guy whose
party sets a “new low” every single day!
And then Coons went on to add, “To have a
Republican-controlled Congress, House and Senate, refuse to take up the
president’s budget, for example, which just happened last month, to refuse to
even allow the director of OMB to testify about the president’s budget, was I
thought a new low in terms of suggesting both disrespect for the president and
an unwillingness to engage with him.” I
bet the people of Delaware are so proud of this boob!
Anyway, Coons then went on to say, “But
unfortunately, this step, refusing to hold any meetings or hold any hearings
for the nominee, I would spread that dysfunction into the third branch of government,
into the very highest court, and into our judicial branch.” And I thought it rather amusing how it is
that a member of the political party that is so well-known for the constant
setting of all new lows, actually had the gonads to accuse the Republicans of
doing so.
But then, such are the imbeciles that get elected by
those who so proudly identify themselves as being Democrats. Because this moron obviously doesn't recall,
or simply chooses not to, how it was when ‘Dingy Harry’ Reid blocked nearly
every single Bush nominee. But you see,
that's what is great about the information age. We can google everything, they can
run but they can’t hide anymore. The
thing is, you have to want to spend the time looking, it’s all there.
But look, let’s be honest here, I think it is fair
to say that Mr. Coons is acting as little more than ‘Dingy's’ lackey. And isn't it interesting how it’s the
Democrats who are always able to sing quite the different tune whenever the
shoe happens to find its way to be on the other foot. Or, how they can so conveniently forget how
the Democrats blocked Eisenhower's nomination in his last year in office, and
then tried to block G. W. Bush's as well.
And I think we are all very familiar, or at least we
should be, with Democrat election year rules: 1) Don't confuse the Democrat
base with facts, 2) Blame the political opponents for your failures, 3) Hide
behind the state-controlled media, 4) Appeal to the "compassion" of
uniformed people that actually believe anything a Democrat says and 5: When
your lies and crimes have been exposed repeat rules 1-4. And eventually it all seems to works for
them.
So what we have here, in the person of Mr. Coons, is
someone following their rules. And am I
the only one who finds it rather interesting how it is that the narrative
changes depending on who's in power.
Barry “Almighty’ and ‘Slow Joe’ Biden, both were advocates for waiting
for the newly elected president to appoint Supreme Court justices during
election year. The spin coming from
those in the Democrat Party is never-ending.
And yet people continue to fall for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment