Much the
same way that he told us, over 30 times, that we would all be able to keep our
doctors if we so chose, Barry is now busy telling anyone stupid enough to believe
him how it is that he really has no intention of trying to take guns away from
law-abiding citizens. And that the ONLY
purpose behind his recent announcement of executive actions the supposed
purpose of which is to make it more difficult for criminals to buy weapons is simply
to make ALL Americans SAFER. And if
you’re stupid enough to believe any of that then I have some prime ocean front
property in Arizona that I can let you have real cheap!
And so it
was then during last night’s idiotic little town hall meeting/program
"Guns in America" broadcast on the Communist News Network (CNN) that
Barry said he would be happy to meet with the National Rifle Association (NRA),
but that the conversation would have to be based on "facts and truth and
what we're actually proposing, not some, you know, imaginary fiction in which
Obama is trying to take away your guns."
But it was by making such a stipulation that Barry essentially disqualified
himself from taking part. Because, as
well know, anything Barry says on the topic of guns is neither true nor
factual.
It was
during this obviously staged event on CNN that Barry put forth the patently
dishonest claim that the ONLY reason gun sales spike every time he makes a gun
control proposal is not because he intends to go on a gun grab, but because the
NRA has convinced its members that that is what he is in fact doing. That is profitable for gun manufacturers,
Barry said, and "It's a good advertising mechanism, but not
necessary." But if his intent is
not to carry out what he describes as being some sort of gun grab, then why is
it that he so obviously chooses not to enforce thousands of laws already on the
books?
And
according to Barry, “Part of the reason this ends up being such a difficult
issue is people occupy different realities.” Barry used the example of rural
areas where hunting and sport shooting are common and inner city areas where
gun violence is rampant. He said,
“There’s the reality that there are neighborhoods around this country where
it’s easier for 12- and 13-year-olds to purchase a gun, and cheaper, than to
buy a book.” Just who is it that Barry
thinks is selling guns to 12 and 13 year olds?
Now while there may be Democrats out there who are stupid enough to
believe such drivel, not many others will.
And then
it was Barry, in a New York Times editorial published just before the event, who
called on voters to not support candidates who are against new gun-control
measures and said he’ll follow suit.
Barry wrote, “I will not campaign for, vote for or support any
candidate, even in my own party, who does not support common- sense gun
reform.” And he went on to say, “And if
the 90 percent of Americans who do support common-sense gun reforms join me, we
will elect the leadership we deserve.”
No, what we deserve are leaders who abide by the Constitution instead those
spending their time trying to circumvent it!
Barry
goes out his way to the claim that the NRA has worked to whip up fear among its
members that every mass shooting means the government will come for guns. And
he cited their absence at his town hall, claiming he’s willing to debate NRA
leaders. On Tuesday, in announcing his
actions, Barry said he recognizes the Second Amendment rights of gun owners. He
said, “It’s there written on the paper. It guarantees a right to bear
arms.” And he said, “But I also believe
that we can find ways to reduce gun violence consistent with the Second
Amendment.” He claimed the gun lobby has
been “holding Congress hostage.”
Meanwhile,
Nancy Pelosi, leader of House Democrats, recently came rushing to Barry’s defense
saying he moved to expand background checks because Congress has failed to move
on legislation to tighten a law that allows some gun sellers to do business
without putting buyers through a criminal background check. It was during a news conference that Pelosi
said, “How many more years does Congress have to refuse to act?" But I
seem to recall that Democrats did nothing to enact new gun control laws back
when they held substantial majorities in both the House and Senate. Instead, their focus was Obamacare!
And
while I’m quite sure that Barry would like to have us all believe that a
majority of the American people actually do side with him in his endeavor, it’s
just the opposite that seems to be true.
You see, it’s a majority of Americans who actually oppose his continuing
use of executive powers to enact everything from new immigration policies to
his more recent effort to enact his new gun control initiatives. And Americans don't believe that Barry’s
controversial move will reduce, in any way, the number of mass killings that
have rocked the nation in recent months.
So says a new Rasmussen Reports.
And it’s
according to the Rasmussen poll of 1,000 likely U.S. voters that 58 percent of
Americans say the government should only do what the president and Congress come
to agreement on in gun control matters.
Only 34 percent of those surveyed believe the commander-in-chief should
take action alone if Congress does not approve the initiatives he has
proposed. Rasmussen also found only 21
percent believe Barry's executive order, which extends federal government
oversight of gun sales, will reduce the number of mass shootings. Another 59
percent disagree, and 20 percent said they are not sure.
Those
polled were quizzed on the need for additional gun control — and the results
were sharply divided. Some 45 percent believe the United States needs stricter gun
control laws, but 50 percent disagree. However,
most have long believed the government needs to do a better job enforcing the
gun laws already on the books. The new poll also found 79 percent of voters
believe it is more important for Congress and the president to work together to
achieve what's best for the country rather than to stand for what they believe
in. But they tend to blame Congress more
than the president for preventing that from happening.
Look,
the bottom line here is that anyone who is foolish enough to actually believe
that Barry, and the Democrat Party as a whole, has anything in mind other than the
complete disarming of the American people, is beyond naïve. And not only that, but it’s these very same people
who seem to have absolutely no problem, for whatever reason, in acting as
willing accomplices, only too happy to help the Democrat Party remove what is
truly that last of defense against absolute tyranny. And it is in that way that they truly do represent
that which can only be described as being a very clear and present danger to the
rest of us.
No comments:
Post a Comment