It would appear that there is absolutely no limit to
the insanity of Democrats when it comes to their continuing effort to convince
the American people that their cockamamie theory that manmade global warming,
aka climate change, aka climate disruption, is the next great calamity to be
faced by mankind. And with fewer people
believing them these days, the claims have now become all the more bizarre. The most
bizarre claim heard to date, came just this week from another Democrat, Barbara
Lee.
And Ms. Lee is another of those in Congress,
together with other luminaries of her party such as Corrine Brown, James
Clyburn, Emanuel Cleaver, Elijah Cummings, Marcia Fudge, Al Green, Eleanor
Holmes Norton, Sheila Jackson Lee, John Lewis, Alcee Hastings, Gwen Moore, Charlie
Rangel, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson and Frederica Wilson to name but a few, who
continues to demonstrate on nearly a daily basis, the fact that she possess a
remarkably minuscule amount of intelligence.
The most recent example of her limited intelligence
came this past Wednesday when she proposed a resolution in the House of
Representatives that claims women will eventually be forced into prostitution
in order to obtain life-sustaining food and water for their families. Lee
introduced House Concurrent Resolution 29, warning that women will be forced
into “transactional sex” to get enough food and clean water, all because global
warming will create “conflict and instability” in the world.
Her idiotic resolution reads in part, “Women will
disproportionately face harmful impacts from climate change.” Lee’s resolution
reads. It continues claiming, “Food insecure women with limited socioeconomic
resources may be vulnerable to situations such as sex work, transactional sex,
and early marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy,
and poor reproductive health.” I’m just
not sure how it is that she thinks such an imbecilic claim will convince very
many skeptics.
Lee’s idiotic little document goes on to urge Congress
to agree on the “disparate impacts of climate change on women,” and goes on to ‘demand’
that Congress use “gender-sensitive frameworks in developing policies to
address climate change.” Lee also
charges that women, who are “often underrepresented in the development and
formulation of policy regarding adaptation to climate change,” are doubtless in
the best position to offer policy ideas.
Not with idiotic ideas like this one!
So once again we see the lengths to which Democrats
will go in their effort to convince us that what they claim to be occurring,
actually is occurring. But might this be
another one of those rare occasions where it depends entirely on what the
definition of ‘is’, is? While Democrats claim
to be big supporters of science, few if any possess any kind of an
understanding of it, because it would seem that, at least in this case, it’s
science that continues to thoroughly discredit their apocalyptic theory.
No comments:
Post a Comment