FOX NEWS IS VERY MUCH AT HOME ON THE ‘DARK SIDE’…

Let me just start by saying that one of the best decisions I have ever made was the decision to stop watching ‘Fox News.’ And it has been since that fateful night back in November 2020 that they’ve done nothing to convince me that I might have been a bit too hasty in making my decision. In fact, it’s with each passing day than any number of the supposed ‘journalists’ on the network only serve to confirm the fact that I made the right decision to abandon the network that I had watched practically since its inception. The same network that has now become nothing more than a clone of every other propaganda outlet, virtually identical to both CNN and MSDNC.

Take for instance the recent appraisal of President Trump offered up by a guy who has long fancied himself the guru of American politics, Brit Hume. Hume, who carries the moniker of Fox News Chief Political Analyst, is another of those who has long taken himself too seriously. And it was this past Monday that he referred to President Trump as being a failed president. Hume issued his opinion in response to a video from conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, who suggested that people oppose Trump due to his success as president. Kirk asked. “If Trump was such a failed president, why are they doing everything they possibly can to prevent a second term of Trump?"

Hume responded saying, “Oh, I don’t know. Maybe they don’t want a repeat of a failed presidency. Just guessing here.” Of course, Hume did not elaborate on exactly what he meant by “failed presidency.” Whether it was his handling of the coronavirus pandemic? His handling of January 6? His post-presidency indictments? While President Trump has certainly garnered more than his fair share of critics from the conservative side over the years, only the most strident of the Never Trumpers have referred to his presidency as a “failed” one. Hume didn’t elaborate, nor was he asked to, which is typically the case. They just open their mouth and shit falls out.

So according to Brit, failure must mean achieving secure borders, a strong economy, low inflation, energy independence, no entanglements in senseless wars, taking care of Americans and America first, ensuring fair trade policies, what was essentially peace in the Middle East, or as close to it as we had been in decades and conserving our history, religious freedoms, values and institutions. All Hume accomplished with his idiotic comment was to reveal what is his disconnect with average people, and highlight how President Trump was only bad for DC insiders like himself. Gee, was there some job that Hume wanted that he got turned down for by President Trump?

Now I will admit that I sometimes have reservations about the combative and confrontational nature of President Trump. However, I don’t know of anyone else who has been as effective as he as at revealing the vast number of politicians and bureaucrats who have sold out, and who continue to sell out, American interests to the highest bidder both under and above the table. Fighting back is never pretty. The opposition assumes that by highlighting President Trump’s every action and painting each as wrong in whatever way they can convince and weary voters into looking for someone with a more personable veneer who is more easily manipulated.

Personally, I firmly believe that President Trump is still the best prospect that we have when it comes to getting this country back on the right track. The death by a thousand cuts continually being inflicted upon him, and his supporters, is a torture that good people are often forced to endure at the hands of the power hungry and corrupt. And how is it exactly that if President Trump was a failure how is it that Hume would choose to describe Joey B, and before him Barry O? What’s his term for those two American hating butt wipes? Record debt, deficits, high gas and food prices? A botched withdrawal from Afghanistan? Millions of illegals allowed to pour in?

Hume’s comment is indicative of the entire legacy media establishment; they have been beating this drum since Donald Trump first announced he intended to run. The media have been in lockstep with their attacks against him. When all of the headlines are the same, when the lead stories on the local news are identical, it’s not ‘news,’ it’s propaganda. They all say the same thing over and over again, and the sheeple believe them. Their organized attack on President Trump only proves that everything he has accused the political swamp of, is true, and they are scared of him. To the point where they will stop at nothing in their attempt to silence him.

We’re now being forced to live through what can, I think, only be described as being a classic example of a failed presidency. Joey has been nothing short of a complete disaster on every single level. And yet it’s President Trump who Mr. Hume sees as being a failed president. But let’s face it, with all things considered Hume is really nothing more than just another Fox shill. What President Trump accomplished DESPITE the Democrat, and RINO, interference at every turn is proof of what can be done, and in a single term, despite having to so with little help. Imagine what could have been done had the Democrats, and more of the Republicans, had been onboard.

Imagine how much better America, and the world, would be today if only those who comprise ‘The Establishment,’ aka ‘The Swamp,’ had chosen to work with President Trump instead working with each other to construct all manner of roadblocks designed to prevent President Trump from making good on many of the promises he had made to the American people. Why was so much time, energy and money spent on attacking a man who wanted nothing more than to “Make America Great Again?” Shouldn’t we all want that, especially those who we elect to be our leaders? That they chose to oppose President Trump’s effort says far more about them than it does about him.

And finally, regarding the presidential debates, there is no reason whatsoever for President Trump to debate any of the other declared candidates. His policies are clear, and have been, and he fulfilled his promises as he stated them in his first term despite huge opposition. No need except pride to go and give these others any chance to trash him. We know what he stands for, what he did and what he can do again. Hume and Fox are as out of touch as the radical left when it comes to we the people and President Trump. They hate him. And they are desperate in their efforts to convince enough people to see the man as they do. Beware these people, they mean you no good.

JERRY RIVERS, AKA GERALDO RIVERA, GETS A DEMOTION…

So word has come down that Jerry Rivers, aka Geraldo Rivera, will be departing ‘Fox News’ as a member of the network’s, ‘The Five,’ but he will apparently remain on as a ‘Correspondent at Large,’ whatever the Hell that is. Now I will admit that there was once a time when there is nothing that would have made me happier than this moron’s departure from what was once upon a time my favorite news network. But since I haven’t watched a minute of Fox News in over two and half years now, it’s all rather anti-climactic to hear news of Jerry’s demotion. Because it’s not like it’s going to cause me to start watching the network again. Because it most certainly isn’t.

It was this past Wednesday that the 79-year-old Jerry took to Twitter to share the news of his departure with those who might actually care, saying, “Morning, it’s official, I’m off @TheFive. My last scheduled show appearances are Thursday and Friday June 29th and 30th. It’s been a great run and I appreciate having had the opportunity. Being odd man out isn’t always easy. For the time being, I’m still Correspondent at Large.” The most entertaining aspect of this show were the frequent clashes that place between Jerry and his fellow host Greg Gutfeld. I suppose in that regard Jerry may actually be missed by those who were regular viewers.

Jerry is the template now in use for the direction of programming at Fox News. However, more than likely, they want a younger face with a bit less baggage than Jerry. But make no mistake, that new face will most certainly do nothing to alter the network’s continuing journey to the far left, and will likely bring with a very enthusiastic, boldness to the effort. Jerry has always been a legend in his own mind, but few agreed with his high opinion of himself. Often, he would be given airtime during which he would only babble nonsense cliches attempting to sound smart. He never made a lick of sense, he’s always been more of a carnival barker than a journalist.

And Jerry had the peculiar habit of constantly insulting and threatening those of his fellow Fox contributors who dared point out what a pathetic fraud he was. He likes to play the tough guy when he is fact nothing more than a smug jerk who someday is going to get in the face of the wrong person and end up getting his raggedy old 79-year-old ass flattened. His ego is ten times bigger than his IQ. I’ve never understood why it is that he was held in such high regard by those in the ‘news’ media. More often than not he always sounded like he was simply making things up as he went along and yet those to whom he was speaking would all just nod in agreement.

I never could stand Jerry, but the same can be said about every other Democrat. What’s interesting, though, is that now that Fox is under the control of Democrats that they are doing this. It makes you wonder what their motive might be. Fox’s new leadership has shown that they are so arrogant as to think that they can manipulate their viewers. Maybe firing Jerry was just a childish attempt to make it look like they haven’t gone full leftwing. A small handful of conservatives do remain, most likely due to contract stipulations, but the number is dwindling. But that matters not to me because, as I’ve said, I haven’t watched in over two and a half years and will never watch again.

Frankly, I’m rather surprised that there is much of anyone who watches. Although I believe I read somewhere that Fox recently came in in second place to MSDNC, which is quite an accomplishment in itself. But with O’Reilly gone, Dobbs gone and Tucker gone and left with a cast of sleazy characters like Cavuto, Baier and Roberts, to name just a few, is it any wonder? Now on the odd chance that this was an attempt on the part of Fox, after letting go of their most popular and informative on-air talent, to recover alienated viewers by using Jerry, perhaps, as a sacrificial lamb? Someone needs to tell them that that just ain’t going to work. It’s all too little, too late.

Let’s face it, Jerry has never been capable of being anything more than an annoyance. His not being seen, nor heard, going forward won’t be noticed by anyone. Jerry never quite managed to achieve the level of competence required to be a bona fide journalist. Jerry, like every other delicate leftist, believes that if he can’t somehow control the narrative then he’s somehow a victim. Jerry is anti-gun, pro LGBTQ, pro liberal, pro-open border and anti-America. He’s a creep and a good example of why today’s ‘news’ is not really ‘news’ at all. It’s all phony propaganda from start to finish, the purpose of which is to mislead or to sway public opinion.

And so, Juan Williams’ replacement didn’t fail to live up to the standard set by his predecessor. Just as dumb, and instead of being only a person who spews nothing more than Democrat Party talking point, as Williams constantly did, Rivera would throw in some self-promotion of his less that illustrious history. He is a legend in his own small mind. His tough guy act, is a joke, as was most of his “career.” May he succeed when he decides to be more than second degree, self-absorbed progressive in sheep’s clothing. His career high point was the pushing of the unopened Al Capone vault as some sort of an epic event. It’s been all downhill ever since. Big surprise.

Personally, I stopped caring about what goes on at Fox News some time ago. At this point in time there’s nothing that can be done that would entice me back as a regular viewer. It’s all theater anyway. You have a bunch of trained monkeys, disguised as journalists, reading off a teleprompter. And I can’t help but wonder how those involved in network news can be so oblivious to their viewers. Steadily, their ratings keep dropping, month after month, year after year. And not a single one of them does anything about it. It has to be intentional. There is no way they could care about viewers and revenue. They have to be getting compensated some other way.

FOX NEWS IS, HAS BEEN, AND WILL FOREVER BE…DEAD TO ME!!!

I have not spent a minute watching Fox News since election night 2020. And it has been with each passing day, since then, that they have proven to me that I made the right decision by simply going cold turkey. As I may have mentioned before, it was once upon a time that Fox News was on my TV in the morning and again from the time I got home from work until bedtime. But no more! After all, it’s these days that there is very little difference between Fox News and any of the other cable news networks. No matter what the issue, what’s now heard on Fox News these days tends to differ only slightly, if at all, from what’s being heard on either CNN or MSDNC.

And it was immediately after this most recent deadly shooting that we had Fox once again proving that they are neither fair nor are they balanced. They spewed pretty much the same talking points that were also being spewed by the boobs on those other ‘news’ networks. And does anyone seriously think that any of these supposed journalists actually care about those who were shot? Of course not. But in listening to any of them it becomes very clear, very quickly, that they do care about gun control. Those who died in this most recent shooting are treated exactly as those in every other shooting of this kind. They are a means to an end, nothing more, nothing less.

This time it was Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum who said Tuesday on her show “The Story” that “we have a serious problem in this country” with mass shootings. She said, “Let’s take a look at some of these numbers. We have a serious problem in this country, and we do see these weapons being used in these situations. We have a couple of things going on here, right? We have 30 percent have seriously considered attempting suicide rate among young women in this country. This young woman told a friend on a text that she was going to kill herself, that it was all going to be on the news. We have a serious problem going on in this country, and it has many layers to it."

She added, “We need to have places where families can turn to when they have no more control over their young person and their family. And yes, we need to raise serious questions about whether this person should be able to purchase these guns. We’re saying it’s a number of factors, but you can’t leave the gun out of the picture either.” And it was co-host Jerry Rivers who then added his two cents into the conversation saying, “There are more guns than people in America.” MacCallum said, “We’re doing something wrong. We’re doing something majorly, majorly wrong.” Rivers added, “We can’t let it become something that we shrug off."

MacCallum said, “We already have because, you know what, no one is going to talk about it in three days, and that is where we were, we are as people in this country.” And it was then that Fox host Brian Kilmeade chimed in saying, “Here we are again, in minutes, we’re hearing about the guns are the problem, no assault weapons. Go to your corner, and let’s play politics before we know the facts. We watched the president of the United States make sure it was clear that I want my assault weapons ban. If you don’t get it, you know who is the blame. To me, that is really inappropriate yesterday, along with his remarks about ice cream."

Rivers said, “I disagree. Aside from grieving, Martha, the breathtaking majestic, awesome courage of those cops should be the blueprint from now on. It should have been before this but from now on. Think of Uvalde, think of all of the places where the cops hesitated or Parkland, where bureaucracy got in the way. ‘Go, go, go, let’s go, let’s go,’ that’s what I want from the cops on my beat. I think that the job they did was just awesome.” He added, “In terms of the weapons, what about Tennessee with a constitutional carry? This person could legally assemble that arsenal of seven weapons, including two AR-15s and a sawed-off shotgun."

Rivers went on to say, “For God’s sake, if the Second Amendment shines on this person accumulating that arsenal, then shame on the Second Amendment. I think the assault weapons ban should be in place.” No, shame on you Jerry! You are despicable for shaming the Constitution of the United States. There is nothing more anti-American than that. It’s your First Amendment right to say it, but then you have no respect for that either. You can always move to China or Venezuela. The Second Amendment is not the problem. It hasn’t been the problem for 230 years. The problem, in this instance, is that gender make-believism is a mental disorder as verified by science.

Personally, I like facts, science, and evidence. And they say that 81 percent of the people who play at gender make-believism have personality disorders and 90 percent of those make it onto the autism scale and can’t properly assess consequences. We also know that there is an 87 precent success rate with therapy for curing this gender make-believism disorder. No need for puberty blockers that sterilize these people. No need to mutilate their genitals. No need to encourage them to continue practicing the disorder. Gender make-believism IS a disorder. It can be treated with therapy, and until it is treated, people who practice it should not be allowed to own firearms.

And as anyone noticed how all of these shooters get their guns by somehow subverting the system. And notice how it’s with all of these shooters there have been signs before tragedy struck and no one did anything to stop it. Notice how all of these shooters had mental problems. But the irrational alt-left wants to keep claiming gun owners are responsible, legal owners who don’t do things like this. Mass murderers say flat-out in their manifestos that they deliberately sought out and targeted these ‘gun-free zones’ because they KNEW the victims there were absolutely defenseless. They don’t want resistance. They want easy targets and helpless prey.

This is exactly why the Democrats, and now apparently a growing number of those who would have us believe that they are conservative, are so in favor of these ‘gun free’ zones. They want the murder, and they want the mayhem. Because they are then able to exploit these tragedies, as well as the victims, in their effort to force ever stricter gun laws down our throats. But stricter gun laws will do nothing, to see that look no further than Chicago. The ONLY reason why Democrats are so desperate to undermine the Second Amendment is to disarm law abiding citizens. They want a population that will have no means to resist what they have planned for us.

It’s most ‘developed countries’ that do not allow their citizens/subjects to carry guns for self-defense, therefore most of the gun murders that occur are, by definition, criminals killing innocent people whose government does not allow them the only effective means of defending themselves. And yet it’s these very same countries that are always thrown out as examples by those who support stricter gun laws, when it comes to what it is that they want this country to look like. But those other countries don’t have our Constitution and therefore they don’t have the God given right to keep and bear arms. A minor technicality, I know, but a technicality none the less.

And finally, on the subject of Jerry Rivers. This guy is an ignorant, arrogant, egotistical jerk. Banning assault weapons is a knee jerk reaction that does nothing to address the real issue. If he had a functioning brain, he would know this. The people behind these guns, or any weapon for that matter, are what we need to be looking at. Mental illness which is an ever-growing problem, especially since the pandemic lockdown, is the real problem. But for some reason our fools in power, and idiots like Rivers, are too scared to talk about the real issue. So instead, they continue to come up cockamamie theories that have absolutely no basis in fact. Zero, Zip, Zilch, Nadda!

FOX NEWS…NOT REALLY “FAIR AND BALANCED” ANYMORE…

Now while I did quit watching ‘Fox News’ cold turkey, after they chose to be willing accomplices in all of the chaos surrounding the 2020 presidential election, I do still kinda keep my ear to the ground when it comes to how they continue to prove how it is that they’ve become far more like their competitors in the world of cable ‘fake news’ and much less of the “fair and balanced” network that, while they may still profess themselves to be, most definitely no longer are. And while they may have recently lost ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace to CNN, there was certainly no shortage of those waiting in the wings ready to step in as his Trump-hating replacement.

And case in point would be none other than John Roberts who, has for some time now, made his dislike for President Trump part of his continuing shtick there at the network. Roberts, a Canadian by birth, left CNN to join Fox back in 2011 and remained little more than a second stringer until working his way up to White House Correspondent in 2017. And it was on day one of his being in that position that he wasted no time in letting it be known that he was no fan of our new president. And it’s from there that he was apparently able to finagle his dislike of President Trump into a gig as co-host of something called ‘America Reports’ there on Fox.

And it was very recently that Roberts, in that capacity, again demonstrated, during and exchange with Republican Senator Tom Cotton, that he continues to have very little tolerance for conservatives. It was on Wednesday of this week, during an episode of ‘America Reports,’ that Roberts asked Sen. Tom Cotton if his comment that Supreme Court nominee, now confirmed justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson would have defended Nazis at the Nuremberg Trials was a “bridge too far.” Never mind the fact that it’s the Democrats who cross that bridge pretty routinely, a fact that Roberts is no doubt oblivious to. That simply never even enters his mind.

Anyway, it was Tuesday from the floor of the Senate that Cotton said, “The last Judge Jackson left the Supreme Court to go to Nuremberg and prosecute the case against the Nazis. This Judge Jackson might have gone there to defend them.” Roberts said, “Again, she was in the federal public defenders’ office. At that point, she did not get to pick and choose her clients. This really is a matter of due process, and I’m wondering, why make that link between Judge Jackson and the Nazis and the Nuremberg trial?” Cotton said, “So, John, when she was in the Federal Public Defenders’ office, she was assigned four cases involving terrorists."

Cotton said, “But one of those she was in private practice, and two more matters signed Friends of the Court Briefs, she was advocating on behalf of Guantanamo terrorists. Three cases in which she voluntarily advocated for the terrorists at Guantanamo Bay in which, she accused American soldiers of committing war crimes. I have no patience for it.” Roberts argued, “Right, so you don’t think it was a bridge too far to make the link with Nuremberg and Nazis?” Cotton said, “No, in three separate cases, she was representing, not American citizens charged with a crime entitled to due process under the Constitution, foreign terrorists who had committed acts of violence against Americans."

For Roberts, his weaponized question is all that counts. The answer doesn’t matter. Look, I get it that people deserve to have a defense. But Ketanji Brown Jackson is far from an equal opportunity defender. And does anybody actually believe that she would seek out and defend a January 6 defendant the same way she passionately defended a Moslem terrorist? Or a pedophile? I think we all know the answer to that. She doesn’t believe in an equal “defense for everybody. It’s for some reason that she likes pedophiles. And she clearly hates America. And therefore, she loves our enemies. That is why she is not a good candidate to be a Supreme Court justice.

While Roberts was certainly trying to question and indict Cotton’s discretion, Cotton more than justified his Nazi comparison comments with actual empirical evidence of what she did and is. I share his sentiments about Ms. Jackson, who has no right to be on the Supreme Court based on her prior actions, judgements and radical positions on CRT, pedophilia and her anti-America views to name a few reasons. No, a bridge too far is the fact that the Senate ended up putting this unqualified woman on the Court, not because she is anywhere near qualified, but because she is black female. And that bridge was most definitely crossed when she was confirmed 53 to 47.

So, the question remains, why do conservatives even bother with Fox News? Fox is dead to me, I NEVER watch them, even Tucker Carlson doesn’t make up for the rest of them anymore. I would have thought Roberts would have had better sense than to allow his obvious love for the left to become public. Both Roberts and Cavuto seem to be seeking employment at CNN, MSDNC, or any of the many other ultra-liberal media outlets. Today’s journalists could all disappear tomorrow and they would hardly be missed. Journalism, the profession that was ‘destroyed’ by those who sold out and began peddling nothing but propaganda and in so doing no longer have a purpose.

Bottom line. This first black female justice has shown us just how radical and how lacking in talent the left has become. It’s really not much of a stretch to assume that anyone who would defend a sexual predator, a child pornographer or terrorist would also, very likely, defend a Nazi. But at the end of the day Sen. Cotton’s point, no matter how accurate, mattered not to three RINOs and even less to the Democrats since, as I mentioned previously, this nominee, despite the fact that she is nowhere near qualified, was confirmed to the Supreme Court earlier today. At least Cotton had the gonads to tell it like it really is which is a rare thing for Republicans.

IS JERRY RIVERS, AKA GERALDO RIVERA, PERHAPS READY FOR THE HOME???

Who would have ever thought, back in the beginning, that there would come a day when the network that not only claimed to be ‘Fair and Balanced,’ but actually was, would become unrecognizable to the point where it would be impossible to tell the difference between it and other supposed ‘news’ networks like CNN and MSDNC? But then again, with their current cast of characters I don’t suppose that it should come as that much of a surprise. And it’s one of those characters that is none other than Jerry Rivers, aka Geraldo Rivera. As many already know old Jerry has a habit of shooting off his big mouth and proving he’s nothing other than a raging buffoon.

Anyway, it was on Wednesday that Rivers, the new resident leftwing loon on Fox News’ “The Five,” replacing Juan Williams, accused Republican senators Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley and Tom Cotton of being “nasty” and disrespectful to Attorney General Merrick Garland during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Rivers said, “I have to say, watching Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley, they’re so nasty, so snarly. They make my skin crawl. It really is. The way they were so disrespectful. And Tom Cotton? That attack just now? That doesn’t make Tom Cotton look like a real serious senator. That looks like an ideological warrior trying to score a cheap point."

Rivers went on to say, “I do remember. They were getting back at Merrick Garland, who had nothing to do with the Kavanaugh hearings.” And it was co-host Katie Pavlich who then said, “It makes my skin crawl the calling for the DOJ to be politicized to go after everyday parents for daring to question their school board members that they elect.” And it was Rivers who then whined, “What about children watching the Senate in action? Where is Jimmy Stewart? “as low down and dirty as it gets.” It was Jesse Watters who then piped up and said, “You have not been paying attention.” Rivers declared, “I have been plenty paying attention.” But clearly, he has not.

And isn’t it odd that whenever Democrats asked Garland a question, he knew all the details, but when Republicans asked him a simple question he fumbled and mumbled and said, “I cannot disclose information about this case, or I haven't heard about this happening.” The same lying answers the liars always use, “I don't recall, or blah, blah, blah.” Unreal he claimed he hadn’t heard about the rape of the young girl by the tranny. Now we know why ‘BO’ was so determined to get this Commie on the Supreme Court. He’s toxic to our nation. Hawley, Cotton and Cruz were spot on and showed America what a lying, usurper of our Constitution this creep really is.

And who doesn’t think that parents who pay property taxes that support their public schools don’t have every right to know exactly what their children are being taught? Perhaps those parents who don’t want their kids in public schools should not be made to pay those property taxes and be allowed to send their kids to private schools. Elected school officials need to be held accountable and they should be forced to answer to the parents who are paying their salaries. Rivers is as smart as he is tall. Direct questions, demand direct answers. Garland was not forthcoming. Government no longer respects the limits placed upon it by the Constitution.

And can I just say that the only thing worse than having this guy where he currently is, would be to have him on the Supreme Court. What a nightmare scenario that would have been. Garland’s daughter and son-in-law are in the business of pushing CRT education and publishing materials to push that propaganda in our schools. Garland knows about that case, and he should recuse himself from anything and everything about schools, because of that fact. He is enabling the destruction of children’s minds and self-worth, by promoting CRT through his own family ties. He needs to resign or be forced to resign. The conflict of interest is disgusting.

And he should be aware of why the parents, those he refers to as terrorists, are actually upset. Also, in that case, the father of the rape victim is being made out to be some kind of out-of-control parent they need to be protected from, when in actuality they were vilifying him to cover up for the rape of his daughter. It has direct bearing on the Garland’s DOJ falsely accusing parents of being domestic terrorists. These school boards don’t like the pushback they’re getting, and Garland should know why that pushback is occurring. That’s part of the facts surrounding the case. That didn’t happen in a vacuum and the rape case and cover up are absolutely relevant.

In getting back to Jerry, his ‘outrage’ is seriously selective to say the least. He gets very personal in his objections to words and actions of those who are not his fellow Leftists, but oh-so-general and limited to the specific words and actions of Leftists without ever criticizing those Leftists by name. A curious shading and devious favoring of the Left. For one who so seriously favors the Left, his sanctimony rings pretty hollow. Judge Kavanaugh was raked over the coals and accused of being a sexual predator in front of his wife and children. Asking Garland questions about his job is hardly the equivalent. Rivers and his selective virtue signaling makes ‘MY’ skin crawl!

Rivers apparently assumes that there are those who actually care what he thinks, not realizing that most people view him as a stooge. He assumes that what he has to say is important. However, it’s in my world, that he’s nothing more than a loudmouth. I could care less what he thinks. He turned on MY president, Donald Trump, and made abhorrent remarks about him after claiming that he supported President Trump. Rivers is a fraud like so many others who claim to be Republicans. He can go straight to Hell. He’s no longer credible regarding any topic he may wish to discuss. He spews nothing but nonsense, and he rarely, if ever, makes even a lick of sense.

And so poor little Jerry had his feelings hurt. While Garland is further weaponizing the DOJ and FBI into the strong arm of the DNC, a handful of conservatives finally take a stand and verbally lay into him. Apart from that tongue lashing, nothing else is going to happen because that's all the Republicans can do. The Democrat Party is corrupt and the Republicans are pathetically soft and inept. And where was Rivers when the Democrats disrespected, impeached, assaulted and lied about President Trump, and continue to attack and blame him for everything wrong in America. They never gave him an once of credit for anything he accomplished, pretty much all by himself.

Rivers has a rather nasty temper combined with a big mouth. Garland deserved everything word he got. Jerry hasn’t had anything positive to contribute to anything, since he was kicked out of Afghanistan, during the period of heavy fighting, when he mapped out, ON AIR, in the sand, the location of the 101st Airborne, the military division, with which he was embedded. He has all the brainpower of a No. 2 pencil!!! Contrary to what Jerry would like us all to believe, Garland is a nasty, vengeful, little communist who is owed no respect from anyone. He is a disgusting human being, and one that has no business being in the position in which he has been placed.

What is there to respect? Garland is nothing but your typical arrogant, hypocritical, leftwing bureaucrat who thinks he’s some kind of a genius who has all the answers. I cannot believe that Jerry genuinely believes that Garland would be impartial if he were on the Supreme Court. Garland looked to be a political hack then and he has been proven to be a hack today. We need to be able to trust our government. Many don’t and for good reason. This memo was meant to be a threat to the parents of our children. How un-American is that?  Garland is nothing more than a far-left appointed bureaucratic liberal hack with no concept of the definition of liberty or freedom.

CHRIS WALLACE CONTINUES TO CLAIM HE’S A ‘JOURNALIST’…BUT HE’S NOT!!!

First of all, let me make something perfectly clear. Just because someone has been a supposed ‘journalist’ for a number of decades, it does not necessarily mean that they have achieved any level credibility or trust. Nor does it make one any more credible than someone relatively new to the profession of ‘journalism. Case in point would be someone like ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace. Because it’s nowhere in the entire profession of ‘journalism’ that you will find a more dishonest fraud than Wallace.

And while Wallace continues to view himself as being one who has his finger on the pulse of all that goes on in Washington, in truth he’s little more than a spewer of Democrat Party talking points. Now it was once upon a time that I actually did view ‘Fox News’ as being a viable source of useful information as well as a very credible alternative to those other networks, one of which that still claims to be “the most trusted name in ‘news.’” But that now seems like such a very long time ago.  

And it was just this past Sunday, during the broadcast of “Fox News Sunday,” that ‘Commie Chris’ once again demonstrated the fact that he is less a ‘journalist’ than he is a political hack under the employ of the Democrat Party and may even be on the payroll of the ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden White House. It was then that he pressed former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on the Trump administration’s deal with the Taliban in light of the current chaotic U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan.

‘Commie Chris said, “Critics say that for the U.S. to cut a deal with the Taliban without the Afghan government even in the room was hugely demoralizing and led inevitably to where we are today.” Pompeo responded, “Chris, that’s just simply not true. Go read the deal. Go read the conditions that were built into the deal. I was in the room. I was at the center of working to deliver that.” ‘Commie Chris’ then said, “I just want to ask you one more question about your record, though sir.”

And it was then, in typical ‘Commie Chris fashion, that he went on to say, “You were the first American secretary of state to ever meet with the Taliban, and you talked about how they had agreed to join us in the fight against terrorism.” And ‘Commie Chris’ added, “Do you regret giving the Taliban that legitimacy? Do you regret pressing the Afghan government to release 5,000 prisoners, which they did, some of whom are now back on the battlefield fighting with the Taliban?”

Pompeo said, “You make peace with your enemies.” And he then went on to add, “We didn’t take the word of the Taliban. We watched their actions on the ground. When they did the right thing and helped us against terror, that was all good, and when they didn’t, we crushed them.” ‘Commie Chris’ is emblematic of all that is wrong with the ‘Fair and Balanced’ network and why I no longer watch Fox and have no plans nor interest in ever going back. That network is rife with traitors.

Things have now progressed much too far for me to ever return. These days those who work at Fox have come to more closely resemble their colleagues on CNN and MSDNC and would be too many to list here. It would be easier to list those who have not yet gone over to the ‘Dark Side’. Those would include Carlson, for sure, and to a lesser degree Hannity and Ingraham. Wallace has all the appeal of a venereal disease. Why Fox keeps the little maggot, I'll never know. I've ditched Fox and watch only OANN.

I can only assume that ‘Commie Chris’ must buy into the belief that by ignoring the Taliban they will no longer exist or have credibility even though, in reality, they were credible enough to take back the country. It’s kind of like pretending that the 2020 election wasn’t stolen as long we pretend that it wasn’t. If it wasn’t for fake news, ‘Commie Chris’ wouldn’t have any news to report at all. He no longer seems to care whether what he says is actually true or not. And yet he claims to be unbiased.

And let’s be real, those weren't questions that Wallace hurled at Pompeo, they were Democrat talking points with a question mark at the end. Fox News is doing itself no favors by keeping this moron on the network. Wallace is an absolute idiot and a useful tool of the radical leftist Democrats. I can’t understand where this joker got any credibility as a ‘journalist.’ Whenever the Democrats need defending, this guy pops out of the bushes! As anti-Trump as ever, he’s one of the worst ‘journalists’ on Fox.

What a phony ‘Commie Chris’ is. He continues to call persons he clearly dislikes, “sir”. So condescending. In addition, “critics say” is code for “I say”. What a disgusting little man. Wallace is in the toilet as far as possessing any integrity. Him, Dan Rather, Brian Williams and Chuck Todd are the ones that everyone believes, right? Wallace doesn’t want to admit that the Taliban leaders feared President Trump and consider ‘Creepy Joe’ weak and a fool. Hence the need to defend him.

They’re desperate to somehow make all of this President Trump’s fault, but that dog won’t hunt. All of ‘Creepy Joe’s failures on everything from the border crisis to the economy, to China, not to mention ‘Chinese virus’ restrictions, the idiotic mask policies and our failing energy system, are front and center for all to see. President Trump has been out of office for seven months and yet everything is somehow still all his fault. Seems that all of these folks are singing a very familiar tune.

Blaming President Trump for this? Wallace is nothing if not completely DERANGED. And so are all those at Fox who keep this pathetic loser around. This cesspool of a traitorous network should immediately stop claiming to be ‘Fair and Balanced’ because they are neither. They are doing exactly what they did for the four years that President Trump was in office. Blaming everything on him. President Trump didn’t do this and for Wallace to suggest it’s his or Pompeo’s fault is despicable.

Wallace needs to find a rock and go hide under it, or at least finally come out of the closet and admit he’s a leftist. Sorry, Chris, but you can’t rewrite history in the case of the idiotic way that ‘Creepy Joe’s military and foreign policy nitwits TOLD THE TALIBAN THE TIMELINE of the withdrawal! The Taliban had months to put their plan together, and when our people abandoned the Afghan Army, such as it was, there was nobody there to stiffen the spines of a culture that has no history of a standing army.

So, based on Wallace’s rather twisted “logic,” we’d still be refusing to negotiate with the North Vietnamese, including for securing the release of all our pilots held as POWs in the North, in order to end that war. When you refuse to negotiate and talk with adversaries, you end up with a North Korea situation. We always negotiated with the Soviet Union, too. Wallace is a complete idiot, and Fox News is worse off for having him on there. And I will never again watch any of these dishonest clowns!

NEIL CAVUTO RUSHES IN TO DEFEND TONY FAUCI…

I have watched not one minute of ‘Fox News’ since election night 2020, not one. And, I might add, it has been since that time that they have done nothing that would cause me to change my mind about that. On the contrary, they only continue to reinforce my rationale for keeping them off of my TV. Granted Tucker has not yet moved to the dark side but even he is not enough to bring me back to ‘Fox News.’ He is severely outnumbered by others on the network, those who leave no doubt as to where their allegiance lies. There is now quite the cast of characters, those with names like Baier, Wallace, Rivera, Williams, Roberts and Cavuto, to name only a few.

So the network that I once spent most of my waking hours watching has now been lumped in the rest of those who now comprise our ‘fake news’ media after having essentially reduced itself to what is nothing more than a carbon copy of CNN and/or MSDNC. And it was as recently as this past Tuesday that that was again made very clear. You see, it was then that Neil Cavuto chose to defend the indefensible when he chose to defend one of the biggest frauds the medical field has ever managed to produce when he chose to defend Tony Fauci on his show “Your World.” Cavuto went so far as to describe Fauci as being a good man at his core.

And it was referencing a heated exchange between Fauci and Senator Rand Paul earlier in the day during a Senate hearing, Cavuto said, “I’m not going to replay the bites from earlier today. I think it turned to a circus.” Cavuto went on to say, “But this pile-on on Dr. Fauci, what he knew, when he knew it, whether he had sinister plans and was putting a hoodwink on us. I thought he was thinking in real-time. Didn’t have a handle on stuff. Following it as you were at the time, others. Do you think this pile-on is fair?” And it was another apparent cheerleader of Fauci, Dr. Bob Lahita, who said, “No, I don’t, Neil. I don’t think the pile-on is fair.” Of course not.

And it was Lahita who then went on to say, “Because I know Dr. Fauci is a very professional man.  He’s been the director of the NIAID for years and years and years.”  And he said, “I used to work at the NIH reviewing grants, and I remember Dr. Fauci’s guidance. He’s been around since Moses parted the Red Sea. He is a very ethical, prudent individual. So I trust him.” Cavuto, in trying to be funny, I guess, said, “I think he was providing medical advice for Moses.” Lahita said, “Probably so.” Cavuto said, “I kid there, but the bigger point, he has been vilified to the point that you’d think he was Lex Luthor. I don’t know how productive that is.”

Cavuto added, “What might have been missed and the source of all of this, I get that. But to make him the target of attacks, I think that a lot of this has to go back to his departure from former President Donald Trump at the time. But whatever is behind it, I don’t see it being constructive.” Lahita said, “I agree with you. I remember Tony Fauci back when George H.W. Bush was president. I believe that was Bush 41. He was a point of light in the country. Remember Bush’s thousand points of light? Tony was very, very prominent at that time and very good leader in the biomedical research community. He’s an excellent individual, an excellent doctor.”

Lahita ended his nauseating little rant by saying, “I have known him as a physician for, I guess, it’s been about 40 years or more. And so I think it’s unfortunate that we have to attack an individual who has such an important role in our society.” Let’s be honest, the only thing that Fauci is good at is lying. And he doesn’t do it all that well either. No doctor in his right mind would tell people to wear two masks. What a fraud. The whole ‘scamdemic’ has been a fraud. But that didn’t prevent Cavuto from coming to the aid of Fauci and making his idiotic claim that, “At his core, he’s a good man, a good doctor. We all have to step back, take the chill down.”

So Cavuto thinks the man who lied about his involvement in the killing of millions across the globe, denied many the ability to work and to socialize, kept people from spending time with their loved ones in hospitals and homes for the aged, caused weddings to be delayed, or funerals that saw no way for loved ones to grieve together, caused those with diseases to be denied treatment and lost their lives, caused children to have their education seriously curtailed, and so much more, is somehow a good person “at his core.” Cavuto’s comment only serve to further convince me that ‘Fox News’ is now fully in the tank for the Democrats.

“A good man” does not shift funds to another country when a controversial, and unethical, line of scientific enquiry is shut down in his own country. There is no question that he funded a lab doing experiments that he knew were banned in the US. A good man does not attempt to obscure the truth or divert government funds. He may be “a good man at his core,” but we are judging his actions, and lying to the American people, to Congress, giving hundreds if thousands of dollars to advance gain of function research at a lab with a history of serious safety breaches, and then trying to cover it up. His actions decides being despicable, and are also likely criminal.

Ask the many dead people, first from the AIDS epidemic and now with the ‘Chinese virus’, who were denied the ability to use drugs that might help and were, instead, forced to use medications and methods that killed them if Fauci is “a good doctor.” He is not a practicing physician, what he is is a megalomaniac. If Fauci is what Cavuto calls “a good doctor,” then what would be an example of a bad doctor? This guy participated in a Chinese bioweapons program that produced COVID-19. A good doctor? Fauci has been an administrator for so long, I wouldn’t trust him to put a band-aid on right. A graduate from medical school does not a doctor make!

Fauci has been nothing more than a very well-paid government bureaucrat since the day he left medical school. There is no way he can be considered a bona fide MD and is even less of a scientist. He’s been nothing more than a glorified paper-pusher for the last 40 years. And yet he continues to be portrayed as being the resident expert, the go-to guy on everything related, no matter how remotely, to the ‘Chinese virus.’ He knows what he’s saying is false yet he keeps pushing mass masking because he is now vulnerable as a result of his idiotic ‘virus research’ funding decisions and his collaboration with the Communist Chinese Party. He is therefore a crook.

For hundreds of years, medical professionals have followed a Hippocratic Oath that says, “Do no harm.” Fauci helped promote the development of a virus that killed millions of people. Then he lied to the American people and even lied to Congress in order to help left-wingers and outright Marxists destroy the economy. This little twerp compels free Americans to cover their faces with masks. Far from being heralded as some medica genius, Fauci belongs in prison. As for Cavuto, he has been a rabid NeverTrumper since forever. Like his buddy Chris Wallace, he gets irritated and talks over any guest who tries to say anything positive about President Trump.

The question here is why is Cavuto working to hard to defend the obvious fraud, Fauci? Because Fauci is a good honest man? What kind of a commentary is that? Fauci knows much more than he is willing to openly discuss. And it was during hearing referenced by Cavuto that there was nothing said by Senator Paul that was not true. And yet Fauci claimed Senator Paul didn’t know what know what he was talking about. Seriously? Fauci deflected questions and made this a personal issue about Senator Paul rather than about the origin of the virus. Classic deflection. Cavuto is doing the same. At His Core, Cavuto IS NOT a Good Man. He's a sellout!

JUAN WILLIAMS, THE POLITICAL HACK BY WHICH ALL OTHER POLITICAL HACKS ARE TO BE MEASURED…

There are hacks and then there are HACKS. But it’s now become quite obvious that, in the words of ‘The Highlander,’ “There can be only one,” of whom it can be said stands above all other hacks to become the hack by which all other hacks can safely be measured. And that measuring stick, that gauge to be used, is none other than Juan Williams. And it was apparently on Monday’s thrilling episode of ‘The Five’ on ‘Fox News’ that Williams once again made that fact perfectly, crystal clear.

This time around it was in his making the argument that former President Trump is the one man who really should be blamed for the renewed hostilities between Israel and Hamas. And on what is it that this imbecile bases his most recent idiotic claim? Well, you see, according to our favorite political hack it would be because the peace deals negotiated by President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had “left the Palestinians behind” and that, you see, had led to additional conflict.

Dagen McDowell began the conversation by noting that several prominent young Democrats had spoken out against Israel. Jesse Watters turned the question to Williams, asking whether he believed the party had a problem with anti-Semitism. Williams responded, “Are you kidding me? This conversation is so wild to me. I think they’re like —” Watters interrupted saying, “Well, it’s the only aid that Bernie wants to cut, for Israel?” Williams argued, “Let me finish this point, Jesse.”

Williams said, “You asked the question. I was responding. There are like 23 or 24 Jewish Democrats and two Jewish Republicans.” He argued that the Israelis controlled the situation because they were superior in terms of military strength, calling the conflict a “David and Goliath situation.” He agreed with his cohosts that Hamas should not be firing rockets, but suggested that because Israel’s counterattacks were more effective than Hamas’ rockets, they were the responsible party.

Watters said, “So you’re saying Hamas is bad at terrorism?” Williams replied, “I’m sorry, Jesse. You’re so wrong on this.” Williams then went on to say, “Guess what? This didn’t start because Hamas started it. This started because people were being — the Israeli settlers were coming in Israeli Army forces … Then you get people angry. So much of this goes back to Trump and Netanyahu making a deal with allies.” So, if you attack me with a knife and I pull out a gun and shoot you, that makes me the bad guy?

Williams added, “I’m just saying, they’re going after Iran and Iran’s nukes. Okay, I understand that. But they absolutely left the Palestinians behind, the two-state solution that America had pursued for decades. Just left behind. So the Palestinians feel absolutely voiceless and powerless.” So is what Williams is suggesting here, that because Israel has the Iron Dome system, Israel shouldn’t defend itself or attack the Hamas terrorists, after being attacked by Hamas? How insane is that argument?

It was then that Greg Gutfeld piped up, saying, “I am just sitting here at this table listening to this and I don’t know what is going on.” He said, “We can talk about the displacement. It’s a land dispute that Hamas has used as an opportunity to start this war. If you want to go into that, we’re gonna need an hour to go into it. But don’t spin it like that. If you’re going to use the David and Goliath situation, use it appropriately. This ‘David’ happens to be the one that keeps starting the damn fight.”

It was in making his case bullies don’t always have to be big, Gutfeld said, “The most absurd argument is that the fact that somebody is a superior military force, somehow makes that a war crime? The fact that rockets aimed at Israeli citizens are protected by the Iron Dome but the people sending the rockets aren’t? That’s a war crime?” And he added, “You’re blaming the victim. It’s disgusting.” And let’s face it, it’s Williams, too, who is pretty disgusting. He is clearly a racist and a raging anti-Semite!!!

And I mean who is it that even thinks this way other than, of course, someone whose brain has essentially been eaten away by decades of telling nothing but lies. So it’s Donald Trump, the guy who negotiated multiple Middle East peace treaties and was nominated multiple times for ‘The Nobel Peace Prize because of his efforts and his thinking outside the box approach, who is now the one man who should be seen by all as being most responsible for Israel now having to defend itself from Hamas?

As is always the case, Williams is once again totally oblivious to the fact that it was shortly after ‘Creepy Joe’ resumed aid to Palestinians that these rocket attacks on Israel began. You’d have to be a moron not to know that Hamas always uses whatever aid it gets to acquire more offensive weapons. To be honest, Williams hasn't made a coherent, truthful argument on any subject for as long as I can remember.  So for him to be so completely wrong on this topic, is nothing if not par for the course.

In fact, this is simply a consequence of ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden’s undeniable weakness. Hamas smells blood in the water and has taken advantage of an opportunity that has been presented to it, to flex its muscles, understanding that ‘Creepy Joe’ is nothing more than a paper tiger who speaks incoherently and carries no stick. He will either capitulate to Iran or start a full-scale war. Either way, Hamas wins. If the Palestinians were truly interested in peace all they would need to do is…to stop making war.

Under President Trump we saw the longest period of Middle East Peace in decades, and new peace accords with several Arab countries.  And with ‘Creepy Joe’ in the White House the Middle East is once again on fire and somehow Williams thinks it’s President Trumps fault?  You really have to be pretty stupid to believe this line of reasoning, but then again Democrats never have been particularly bright!  Next he’ll be saying the disaster at the border and inflation are President Trump’s fault as well. 

Clearly the reason Williams is able to remain at ‘Fox News’ has less to do with his intellect than his skin color. Can you possibly imagine the accusations of racism that would follow if they were ever actually to fire him? He was fired by NPR without a peep be uttered in his defense by anyone on the left. But to be fired by ‘Fox News’ would be an entirely different matter. So those who continue to tune in can either listen to his drivel, change the channel or, as I have done, abandon ‘Fox’ for OAN.

YES, JUAN WILLIAMS ‘REALLY’ IS THAT IGNORANT…

In the spirit of full disclosure, yes I voted for Donald Trump, both in 2016 and again in 2020, and yes I was one of the 31 Million Americans who chose to tune into the Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) gathering, this past weekend, for the sole purpose of listening to President Trump’s speech. And yes, I listened to it in its entirety and personally, I loved it. Now as you can well imagine the speech sent heads all over the left to spinning, and especially among those in the Democrat Party. And knowing that, for me, made the speech just all that much better.

And it has been since the speech that I’ve heard all manner of descriptions of it, and they have really run the gamut. But, as you can likely guess, it was one of the nuttier descriptions uttered that came from a guy who fancies himself an expert on such matters, none other than Juan Williams. It was on the Monday following CPAC that Williams claimed that President Trump’s speech was proof that he is “jealous” of *president ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden.  Now I’ve long known that Williams is more than a little delusional, by this most recent claim makes that even more obvious.

Williams provided his blatantly idiotic analysis of President Trump’s speech during a recent episode of ‘Fox News’ “The Five.” And on the subject of the speech, Williams said “It was a rerun. I have heard that speech before,” saying that he hadn’t heard President Trump say anything new. He then went on to criticize President Trump for continuing to claim that he won the 2020 presidential election, and perpetuated the myth that we continue to hear from so many other loons on the left, that it was the root cause of the Capitol riot and division within the Republican Party.

Williams said “Here’s a list of people in the Republican Party to go after, the people who told the truth about not only the election but what happened on Jan. 6. I think he’s promoting, again, you know, more division not only in the country but in the party.” Williams continued, saying, “That’s really difficult because obviously people in the country are worried about more violence coming. That’s why we still have the fencing around the Capitol and all of that.” No, why we still have fencing around the Capitol is because of the Democrats continuing with their political theater.

Williams’ idiotic conclusion was that President Trump is somehow jealous of *president ‘Creepy Joe’ and his success. He said, “It seems to me like he’s jealous. It seems to me like he’s jealous about the idea that Biden is having success. The COVID infection rate, the death rate’s going down. He’s jealous about the idea that the vaccines are getting out.” Williams said, “He’s jealous about the idea that somehow, you know, the rescue package that’s already now passed the House, looks like it’s on its way through the Senate successfully by the end of the week.”

Williams said, “I think he’s just jealous. It’s like it’s coming out of his ears.” And it was Greg Gutfeld who shot back that President Trump had only been questioning the outcome of the elections for three months meanwhile Democrats, including Williams himself, had questioned President Trump’s victory for years. Williams continues to make people wonder just what the purpose might be of having him appear regularly on a show that you would think would require its participants to possess some basic knowledge of the topics to be discussed. But that appears not to be the case.  

Williams must assume that everyone wants to be a demented hand-puppet of the Communist Chinese, who on any given day likely doesn’t even realize that he was ‘elected’ *president, who rarely makes even a lick of sense and who is the laughingstock of the entire world. What a gig it must be a figurehead created courtesy of a fraudulent election that the Democrats perpetrated on American voters. Williams has found his way into that alternative universe where reality, common sense, and truth simply don’t exist. His is a special little universe where only liberals can exist.

So I am curious, how is it that one can accuse a man who spent his life building a multi-billion dollar company, a man who was, because of his love for America, compelled to run for President because he was tired of watching corrupt politicians destroy our country, of being jealous of a guy who spent the better part of his adult life in politics, selling out his country and becoming a multi-millionaire in the process. How is it that makes any amount of sense, and yet, that is apparently exactly what Williams is claiming. And you have to ask yourself, how stupid it that?

That Williams would even purpose the notion that anyone could be jealous of the stuttering doofus who currently occupies the White House is incomprehensible. I can’t help but wonder exactly what demographic Fox News might be trying to capture by continuing to keep this mindless dolt on their network day after day after day. I mean he quite literally makes no sense. Truly, these liberals who seem quite literally consumed by their hatred of Donald Trump hatred will likely go to their grave with him on the brain! They have lost all perspective when it comes to Donald Trump.

‘FOX NEWS’ CONTINUES TO CIRCLE THE DRAIN…

I’ve heard that ‘Fox News’ is now involved in what has been described as being a pretty heavy duty “restructuring” effort and it has been already that some of their more prominent voices have been given their walking papers. Too bad, NOT! But let’s be honest, no amount of “restructuring” is going to fix what ails the network nor reverse the continuing ratings slide. What now needs to be conducted, at the once “fair and balanced” network, would be nothing short of a thorough house cleaning and an effort to refocus on what it was that first caused so many of us to watch.  

Because like so many people, I used to watch ‘Fox News,’ but no more. There seems to be something rather strange taking place, something that would seem to defy all logic, especially if one’s goal is to get people to watch. Why go all in for ‘Creepy Joe’ knowing that it would alienate the very ones you’re trying to attract as viewers? And still after months of crashing ratings they seem to be doubling down on the insanity. Do they really think viewers will all come back? Strange! I watch absolutely nothing on the network anymore, not ‘Fox & Friends,’ not Hannity, not Tucker, not nothing.

One of the network’s primary offenders, if not the MAIN one, when it comes to spewing leftist drivel is, of course, ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace. And once again it was ‘Commie Chris’ who, on Wednesday, heaped all manner of sickening praise on ‘Creepy Joe’s inaugural address. ‘Commie Chris’ said, “I thought it was a great speech. I’ve been listening to these inaugural addresses since 1961. John F. Kennedy, ‘Ask not.’ I thought this was the best inaugural address I have ever heard.” Geez, it sounds to me like perhaps old ‘Commie Chris’ might have felt a thrill running up his leg.

So anyway, ‘Commie Chris’ then went on to say, “Obviously, a lot of this event today, a lot of the president’s speech was colored by the emotion of the fact that exactly two weeks ago, 14 days ago, there was a mob of thugs of insurrectionists, of domestic terrorists on the inaugural stand. Joe Biden was saying democracy prevailed. We were able to get through that. He was talking about how we need to get through that in the future if we are going to be a united country.” So, how dishonest must you be to claim that ‘Creepy Joe’ has any interest, whatsoever, in uniting the country?

Still he continued, “He talked about white supremacy, domestic terrorism. He said we must confront it. We will defeat it. My whole soul is in this, uniting our people. I think it was less an inaugural address and more part sermon, part pep talk, talking directly to the American people, saying, ‘Hear me out. We have a right to dissent peacefully, but our disagreement must not lead to disunion.’ It was a call to our better angels, a call saying, look, we’ve got tremendous challenges, COVID, the economy, racial injustice, climate change, but there’s nothing we can’t do if we come together.”

He added, “There’s one other thing he said that I think especially us in the media must note. He said that there is truth and there are lies, lies that are told for power and lies that are told for profit. I think it was a call to all of us, whether it’s us on the air, on cable or broadcast, whether it’s us on social media, on our Twitter accounts, understanding that we have to deal from facts, from the truth, to hear each other out, as he said, a right to disagree, but not a right to violence.” Well if there is one thing old ‘Commie Chris’ is an expert on, it’s being able to tell a good lie!

And so, in doing that which ‘Commie Chris’ does better than just about anybody else, he further validated his clown credentials. Left-wing hacks, like this guy, have destroyed the network. Roger Ailes is likely spinning. I can’t help but wonder how long it might take for those in charge to finally realize that it’s ‘Commie Chris’ who is likely most responsible for them now being in the ratings gutter. I’m glad Stirewalt is gone, but it’s ‘Commie Chris’ who should have been the first to be shown the door, followed shortly after by Juan Williams. I’ll NEVER go back, unless Trump buys it!

And you know, it was as soon as ‘Commie Chris’ mentioned racial injustice and ‘climate change’ that you just knew he was full of sh!t! And let’s be real, the only people in America facing any sort of racial injustice, and from ‘Creepy Joe’ and his many minions, are…white folks. As for the climate, perhaps ‘Commie Chris’ can explain to me just how the Democrats are able to control the weather by wasting all of OUR tax money. For ‘Commie Chris’ to say this only confirms what I think about him. That he is an anti-Trump hardcore supporter of ‘Creepy Joe’ and the Democrats.

Obviously, it takes very little to impress ‘Commie Chris.’ It’s likely going to be four years of how “everything is fantastic” from those like ‘Commie Chris’ in the ‘fake news’ media, and it will be when ‘Creepy Joe’ so badly screws things up, that they'll then talk about Jill’s dress, ‘BO’s latest new book, or some other pointless and blatantly idiotic story. That’s exactly what they did during the eight years of ‘BO’, everything was awesome on CNN and the like, never a problem and when they really had to cover some bad news, they always found the most pathetic of excuses not to.

And how can one claim to be an objective and unbiased ‘journalist’ and yet still support an illegitimately ‘selected’ president? Even ‘Creepy Joe’ knows that his ‘victory’ was the result of massive vote fraud, and not even for his benefit, but solely for the reason of removing the only president, in my lifetime, who genuinely wanted to rid our government of those players whose only interests were self-enrichment and the betraying of our country. We all know the names of these people, the very same ones who will likely be given prominent roles in ‘Creepy Joes’ administration.

So apparently the plan going forward is one that will be have ‘Commie Chris,’ and the rest of those in the business of ‘fake news’, dealing only with “facts.” But ONLY THEIR facts.  You know, ‘facts’ like the election was not fraudulent, that ‘Creepy Joe’ is not REALLY senile, that his wife is an actual Medical Doctor, that Communist China represents virtually no threat to America, that ‘global warming’ IS an existential threat and that Covid came from some bat, and not necessarily in China. It’s those kinds of facts! And if you dare to disagree, then standby to be censored!  

Look, no amount of fawning over this senile old fart is going to convince ANYONE that ‘Creepy Joe’ won fair and square or is even up to the task of BEING president. There’s simply no way to convince most intelligent Americans that ‘Creepy Joe’ is anything other than what they see before them. He has never had a reputation for being very bright, not even in his much younger days, and it’s a very rare event, whenever speaking in public, that he makes even a lick of sense. And yet, ‘Commie Chris’ and his many colleagues in the ‘fake news’ media persist in telling us how great he is!

FOX NEWS, AND THE DOWNWARD SPIRAL CONTINUES…

It would seem that my decision to ditch ‘Fox News’ was the right one. While I still do not watch it on anywhere near a regular basis, I do peak in every now and again to see if they have yet discovered the error of their ways. And I’m here to tell you they most definitely HAVE NOT, not even close. They continue to spew the same level of nonsense they have been, since before the election.  This time around it was Jedidiah Bila, co-host of “Fox & Friends Weekend,” who, this past Sunday, took an opportunity to criticize Republicans who were planning to object to the Electoral College results.

And her criticism came during her appearance on Fox News’ “Media Buzz,” hosted by Howard Kurtz. Kurtz asked, “Let me get you into this unfolding story about the effort by Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, other Republican senators to challenge the electoral college results. Do you think the media misjudged the seriousness and widespread support in the GOP for this effort even though everybody says it’s doomed to fail?” Bila said, “You know, I don’t think it’s widespread support, to be honest I actually find it really outrageous.” Not widespread? Outrageous? Seriously? What a loon!!!

Anyway, Jed went on to say, “And the reason is that if you look at what’s gone on here, I think the media has actually been pretty fair, particularly the news divisions.” She continued, “This has gone through the courts. Sixty cases have been brought to the courts, oftentimes widespread voter fraud has not even been alleged in court because there simply isn’t evidence to support that. If you look at the evidence that has been shown, it does not support that. There’s nothing that supports that this was rigged or stolen. And I think it’s a very dangerous precedent.” She makes no sense!

She said, “Elections have consequences that I think you have to accept.” She added, “It’s not just me saying that. That’s what the evidence supports, that this was a secure election. You don’t want people to feel that they can just say on a whim, ‘Well, it wasn’t secure,’ based on really nothing and try to overturn the will of the people.” So those who have now presented the massive amount of evidence that leaves virtually no doubt when it comes to the level of cheating that took place are doing so all based on a whim? And we’re supposed to take this bimbo seriously? 

She’s a bobble head and, during the days when I still watched Fox, was someone I had a rather difficult time taking seriously. I have only ever seen her on ‘Fox and Friends’ weekend shows, and she’s never been impressive. She sounds much like a Democrat but insists that she’s an independent. She also monopolizes the conversation while her typical two male cohost tend to sit there and allow her to prattle on. I can’t stand to listen to her, she comes across as if she’s starved for attention. It should come as virtually no surprise whatsoever that this moron is a proud alumni of ‘The View.’

More and more we’re seeing the level of desperation by the NeverTrumpers intensify. In many ways they’re worse than others in the ‘fake new’ media because of their betrayal of their viewers. In my mind those on ‘Fox News’ are turncoats, which makes them worse than the rest of the legacy media. Say what you will about those on both CNN and MSDNC, but they’ve always been pretty much the way we see them today. But those on ‘Fox News’ spent years pretending to be ‘Fair and Balanced,’ and seemed genuine in presenting a viewpoint that could be gotten nowhere else. 

We know only one side cheated and it’s one side that refuses to do an audit. Also, it was one side that broke every law that could be broken and it’s only one side that is busily destroying as much of the evidence as they can. And, it’s one side that has an army allies working desperately to cover up and to hide, as best they can, to keep the evidence of the fraud from ever seeing the light of day. You have to be an absolute fool to think one side won fairly and squarely. And yet Jed says, “There’s nothing that supports that this was rigged or stolen. And I think it’s a very dangerous precedent.”

If this is all a conspiracy and the Democrats have absolutely nothing to hide, then why not satisfy the 70 plus million who believe the fix is so very clearly in and at least listen to the evidence. But they refuse to do that because they don’t want to hear it.  And why don’t they don’t want to hear it? They don’t want to hear it because it’s impossible to refute, and because they know the fraud occurred. Hence the reason for the rush to judgment and why after four years of Trump hating/bashing/phony investigations suddenly they want peace and healing. I don’t think so!!!

It’s pathetic morons, like Jed, who are the ones trying to overturn the will of the people. There is ample evidence that, in key states, the election results are not correct due to illegal interference from Democrat pole watchers, fraudulent ballots, tampered ballots, and illegal ballots that should not have been counted because they were cast in violation of the Laws or Constitution of the State in which they are being counted. I know, logic is hard for the idiots that ‘Fox News’ employs on their news side, but at what point do you start firing people over their sheer stupidity?

Clearly the will of the people was to give President Trump a second term; otherwise, why did the six swing states call a halt to vote counting, all at the same time for no reason. That by itself was unprecedented, and to then kick out the Republican observers and start counting fraudulent mail-in ballots as quickly as possible. Everybody knows the Democrats cheated like crazy, and that the election was very clearly stolen. And yet those like Jed continue to argue that no evidence has yet been presented that would indicate that ‘Creepy Joe’s victory did not fairly win. 

The sad thing about ‘Fox News’ is that they seem to have their own definition of what constitutes being ‘Fair and Balanced.’ Apparently, they think a regular injection of leftwing propaganda is somehow providing to their viewers a ‘Fair and Balanced’ perspective. But perhaps viewers don’t want to hear Fox’s ‘Fair and Balanced’ programming but instead reporting that is both truthful and principled. What a concept! And it was even before the election it was very clear that Jed was starting to veer sharply off to the left with many of her comments on ‘Fox and Friends.’

And I wonder, did this idiot, even once, ever accuse the Democrats of trying to overturn the will of the people during four years of investigations, set-ups, lies, lawsuits, leaking, witness intimidation and impeachment? I don’t think so. And is she even aware of the eyewitness accounts and video evidence of voter fraud and other irregularities? Does she actually believe it was coincidence that battleground states simultaneously stopped counting votes on election night shortly after it was announced that President Trump had a 95 percent chance of being reelected?

And I could be wrong, because I am getting up in years, but I don’t seem to recall Jed criticizing the Democrats in any meaningful way back in 2016 when they challenged some of President Trump's electoral votes. All of this is why ‘Fox News’ is now considered to be dead to some 75 million viewers, including myself. And I doubt, even if they were to ever correct the error of their ways, that I would ever return as a regular viewer. ‘Fox News’ lost a good share of the American people on election night. They stole our voice. And as far as I’m concerned, good riddance to them.