.

.

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

DEMOCRAT PARTY SLOGAN FOR 2020, “THE ONLY ‘GOOD’ BABY, IS A ‘DEAD’ BABY…


Ok, so let’s just say that you are a responsible member of Congress.  And a bill has been introduced to your body (it really doesn’t matter whether it’s the House or the Senate and neither should it matter, for the purposes of this bill, what party you are a member of) the purpose of which is to require babies born alive during an abortion be provided with reasonable medical care and transport to a hospital.  Would you, as a responsible member of Congress, choose to support such a bill? Now I know to most that sounds like a real no-brainer, but if very recent behavior by Democrats is any indication it’s apparently it’s not the no-brainer that most normal people see it as. 

Because it was just such a scenario that recently took place in the U.S. Senate when just such a bill was introduced, and what do you think happened.  Exactly what you’d think would happen, because what took place is that we had Senate Democrats, led by Democrat Patty Murray, block it.  And for those who may be unfamiliar, Nebraska Republican Ben Sasse introduced the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (S. 130) to protect babies who have survived failed abortions.  Sasse went to the floor of the Senate Monday to ask his colleagues to pass the bill by unanimous consent, but that Democrats, as I’m sure Sen. Sasse knew they would, unanimously objected.

Referencing the recent firestorm created by the Virginia bill known rather nondescriptly, as the Repeal Act, introduced by Democrat Delegate Kathy Tran and supported by Democrat Gov. Ralph Northam, Sasse said, “This place fancies itself the world’s greatest deliberative body, but we would be deceiving ourselves if we ignored the biggest debate that’s been happening in America over the last 36 hours. A public elected official — the Governor of one of the 50 states — has been defending a practice that is morally repugnant. The Governor of Virginia has been defending a practice that is repugnant to civilized people across the entire world.”

The Born-Alive Act states that Congress acknowledges an “infant” born alive during a failed abortion “is a legal person for all purposes under the laws of the United States, and entitled to all the protections of such laws.” The bill also states, “Any infant born alive after an abortion or within a hospital, clinic, or other facility has the same claim to the protection of the law that would arise for any newborn, or for any person who comes to a hospital, clinic, or other facility for screening and treatment or otherwise becomes a patient within its care.”  I don’t know about anyone else, but that all sounds pretty reasonable to me and in no way does it sound the least bit extreme.

Under this piece of legislation, health care providers who fail to provide medical care to an infant born alive after abortion can be fined or imprisoned for up to five years, or both. And also according to the Born-Alive Act, the intentional killing of an infant born alive after abortion “shall be punished as … intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.”  How is it that after committing murder against anyone other than the most defenseless among us, you at least go to prison?  Why should anyone who commits such a heinous act be permitted to go scot-free?  And so, it would seem that the new mantra of the Democrat Party is: ‘The only GOOD baby, is a DEAD baby.’ 

And an act that was just as barbaric and which came just prior to the controversy over the Virginia bill, which would allow abortion even moments before birth, it was in New York that 2020 Democrat presidential hopeful, Andy Cuomo, signed a bill into law that denies “personhood” to unborn babies.  Under Cuomo’s law, violence against an unborn child during a homicide is no longer criminally punishable.  So there now seems to a rather disturbing trend that’s now spreading, much like some vile plague as Democrats in Rhode Island and Vermont have also proposed bills that would strip most restrictions on abortion and declare the procedure a “fundamental right.” 

Keep in mind that all of this going on at that same time that we had a recent Marist poll which found 75 percent of Americans want substantial restrictions on abortion, including 60 percent of Democrats and 61 percent of those who identify as “pro-choice.”  So I’m a little confused when it comes to how it might be that Democrats like ‘Little Patty’ Murray can claim what they’re really doing here is in the name of creating a substantial restriction on abortions.  Is it me? Am I missing something here?  I know I’m nowhere near as sophisticated as ‘Little Patty,’ but to the casual observer what the Democrats are advocating here is nothing short of disgustingly grotesque.

What kind of an evil monster would you have to be to take some instrument to a crying baby, one just delivered or who had survived a botched late-term abortion, and use that instrument to snuff out the life of that helpless infant?  And who is it that could use an instrument to crush the skull of a viable fetus who could survive a premature birth? Apparently, Democrats have no moral dilemma in such an act of murder. Incredible!  And how is it that ANY self-respecting physician would allow himself, or herself, to be used by a political party as its weapon of choice against a defenseless baby at the most vulnerable time in its very young life? Disgusting!

But I am curious about something. Remember how it was just a few months back when we had the rather unfortunate situation of having two children die while in the custody of our Border Patrol and how quick Democrats, especially those vying to take on the president in 2020, were in their effort to essentially weaponize the death of those children.  What is it that made the lives of those children any more valuable than the millions of those that Democrats seem so eager to kill? Democrats always tell us how it’s about the children, but which children?  Only those fortunate enough to escape the abortionist?   But sadly, now even those haven’t made it home free. 

So this would appear to be where we are now, as a country, and who is it that could have seen that coming?  Certainly not me!  And while 60 percent of Democrats can ‘claim’ to want “substantial restrictions on abortion”, certainly there is someone who is voting for Democrats like Murray, Cuomo and that moron, Northam, in Virginia.  After all, there is still a requirement for obtaining higher office, having won an election.  Hell, it’s only 25 percent of Virginia Democrats who disapprove of Northam.   So you see it’s not only the Democrat politicians who have blood on their hands, it’s anyone who is willing to either support, or worse to vote for, ANY Democrat!

No comments:

Post a Comment