.

.

Tuesday, October 10, 2017

HOLLYWEIRD AND THE MEDIA, PERVERTS OF A FEATHER…


Never will you be able to find a greater concentration of perverts, addicts and/or just plain freaks than you’ll find in Hollyweird.  A place chock full of crazies of every stripe who somehow feel entitled to critique the lifestyles of those who refuse to go accept the rather bizarre way they choose to go through live.  Yup, big brave moral Hollyweird!  They don't have a problem with standing up to Trump but they have been, for nearly 30 years, rather accepting of Harvey ‘The Pervert’ Weinstein's systematic abuse of women.  If Kim Jong-un launches a missile toward the West Coast I just hope it’s Hollywood that becomes ground zero.

And it has recently surfaced, courtesy of a former New York Times reporter who investigated allegations of sexual harassment against Weinstein going as far back as 2004, that actors including Matt Damon and Russell Crowe lobbied the Times to kill her little expose.  In a column for ‘The Wrap’, the entertainment industry trade outlet that she founded, former reporter Sharon Waxman claimed that while investigating the then-recently appointed head of Miramax Italy, Fabrizio Lombardo, sources claimed he was installed in the position solely to arrange escorts for Weinstein, and that he had no prior filmmaking experience.

And then, in what was a pathetic attempt to shield their buddy, Weinstein, from a potentially damaging story, both Damon and Crowe allegedly contacted Waxman to “vouch” for Lombardo’s credentials.  Hey, it’s what these people do, they protect one another’s preferred perversions.  Ms. Waxman wrote, “After intense pressure from Weinstein, which included having Matt Damon and Russell Crowe call me directly to vouch for Lombardo and unknown discussions well above my head at the Times, the story was gutted.”  Ms. Waxman went on to say, “I was told at the time that Weinstein had visited the newsroom in person to make his displeasure known.” 

Waxman also spoke to a British woman who claimed she had been paid off by Weinstein after what she described as being an “unwanted sexual encounter” but was bound by a non-disclosure agreement.  However, the story was eventually killed by The New York Times, after Waxman said the Times’ then-culture editor Jon Landman found it ‘unimportant’.  Waxman wrote, “‘He’s not a publicly elected official,’ he told me.  I explained, to no avail, that a public company would certainly have a problem with a procurer on the payroll for hundreds of thousands of dollars.  At the time, Disney told me they had no idea Lombardo existed.”

Waxman added that she was “devastated” that her story was finally published over a decade after she corroborated the evidence.  She went on to say, “I was devastated after traveling to two countries and overcoming immense challenges to confirm at least part of the story that wound up running last week, more than a decade later.”  And she continued by saying, “Today I wonder: If this story had come to light at the time, would Weinstein have continued his behavior for another decade.”  So you have to wonder how many more women would go on to be molested by this pervert, and shouldn’t Damon and Crowe be considered as accomplices to the crimes?

And oddly enough, yet another, at least potential, accomplice in all of this weirdness should be none other than George ‘Looney’ Clooney, who has worked with Weinstein for 20 years and although he claims never to have ‘witnessed’ Weinstein’s history of sexual harassment, he admitted to taking the rumors “with a grain of salt.”  It was in an interview with the Daily Beast that Clooney said, “We’ve had dinners, we’ve been on location together, we’ve had arguments.  But I can tell you that I’ve never seen any of this behavior—ever.”  For anyone believing this drivel, I’ve got some prime ocean front property in Arizona that I can let you have really cheap.

Because while Weinstein has reportedly been sexually harassing his employees and actresses for nearly three decades, Clooney said he had heard some rumors but he simply turned the other cheek every time.  He said, “I’ve heard rumors, and the rumors in general started back in the nineties, and they were that certain actresses had slept with Harvey to get a role.”  And he went on to say, “It seemed like a way to smear the actresses and demean them by saying that they didn’t get the jobs based on their talent, so I took those rumors with a grain of salt.”  Really, George?  What that sounds like to me is nothing more than a lame response and a cop out.   

Clooney admitted that there were warning signs, but never would have thought that Weinstein was going to the point where he had to pay women to keep quiet.  He said, “A lot of people are doing the ‘you had to know’ thing right now, and yes, if you’re asking if I knew that someone who was very powerful had a tendency to hit on young, beautiful women, sure.”  And added, “But I had no idea that it had gone to the level of having to pay off eight women for their silence, and that these women were threatened and victimized. I’ve been talking with a lot of people about this and I don’t know many people who knew of that.”  What a bunch of bullshit!

But look, there’s nothing really new here, Hollyweird has always been like this, hiding the sexual and drug, escapades (even the criminal ones) and sexual proclivities of its big name stars, directors, producers, etc. was just routine, all part of the cost of doing bussiness.  Consider Fatty Arbuckle, Rock Hudson, Montgomery Cliff, Roman Polanski, hidden, covered up and protected.  As for the women, the ‘casting couch’ has always been around and probably most of the women considered it just what they had to do to get the good roles and their name up in lights.  Sad to say, that attitude hasn't actually changed as much as you would have thought.

Those in our state-controlled media complex can also be said to have been accomplices.  They have long been charged with the covering up of bad behavior and have been very accommodating when it comes to those in our entertainment industry.  Thus, the media has played a critical role in destruction of our country, knowing, that if it could destroy the family, sufficiently undermine the Judeo-Christian standards of behavior and morality, then America could be made to belong to the left forever.  Acceptance of drug use, recreational sex of every sort and all manner of gender redefinition, could never succeed without the media’s very enthusiastic championing.

All our favorite media types from Walter Cronkite to Peter Jennings, Tom Brokaw all the way to today's con artist driven ‘fake news’ circus barkers makes those in the state-controlled media complex the champions of oppression and tyranny.  And isn't it amazing how no one in leftist Hollywood, or the media, or the Democrat Party, of which Weinstein has always been a strong supporter, knew anything about this until just last week?  All they do is tell us how deplorable and stupid we are, how we need to ignore our values and belief and be more accepting of perverse behavior.  When in truth most of them are either perverts or simply enablers.  We should turn them off.

As we all know, or should know, the media in this country has had a very sinister agenda for some time.  An agenda that has them thinking we’re too stupid to understand and that they can easily con us when it comes to things like the protecting of scum like Weinstein.  Anyone with any amount of sense can tell this guy is a pervert just from looking at him.  And yet the New York Times was willing to keep hidden Weinstein's nasty deviant criminal behavior for decades.  Believe me, the New York Times is an organization of the left and seeks to protect others of the left, and in so doing enabled this pervert to cause women to suffer for more than a decade.

You can say what you want about the so-called right-wingers, but they live much closer to what they preach than do those on the left have been doing for decades.  We on the right ask people to live within their means, not to break the law and not to kill innocent children just because they might cramp your lifestyle.  Meanwhile, Al Gore preaches from on high about how we are destroying the world with our carbon footprints while enjoying life by making one of the largest footprints the Earth has ever seen.  Hollyweird spends time condemning the way regular folks choose to live, while taking part in every perversion imaginable.  And Democrats just don’t care.

No comments:

Post a Comment