It would seem that many of those folks who proudly identify
themselves as being members of the supposed “party of diversity” feel they have
struck upon a winning combination for retaining control of the White House once
we are finally rid of Barry “Almighty.”
That combination being, candidates that are both old and white. So maybe old white men are about to come back
into fashion.
After years of progressives in academia denigrating
anyone who they deemed as being an "old, white man" as not worthy of
study or respect, the "progressive", and some would even say
socialist or communist, Democrat Party is becoming increasingly comfortable
with an old, white dude being the de facto leader of their party and, at the
same time, with enthusiastically embracing socialism.
Associated Press (AP), for example, has reported
that Democrat voters are really digging the 74-year-old socialist from Vermont. It reports that a greater percentage of
Democrat voters view the Vermont senator as being likable, honest, competent
and compassionate than they did just two months ago. And how a substantial percentage now believe
he could actually win the general election.
It also points to the challenges facing Hitlery as
she enters the Democrat contest's pivotal spring stretch, when primaries across
the country mean that many of the party's voters will finally get their say on
her candidacy. And while Sanders is
attracting more grassroots Democrat voters he still faces an uphill battle for
the party's nomination due to the "superdelegates" who typically back
Hitlery.
Though Sanders is gaining ground with Democrat
voters, Hitlery maintains a lock on the party's leadership. An AP survey of
superdelegates, who are influential in picking the nominee, found that 449 of
the party insiders back Hitlery, while only 19 support Sanders. If they continue to back Hitlery
overwhelmingly, Sanders would have to win the remaining primary contests by a
landslide just to catch up.
Today Democrats will vote in the South Carolina
primary and caucus in Nevada as both states make their pick regarding who it is
that they would like to see as their next president. Sanders won in New
Hampshire while the two were essentially tied in Iowa. And it’s those who get paid to discuss such
matters who are saying that much now hangs in the balance for these candidates regarding
these two contests.
As a side note here, does anyone remember the last two
presidential elections when the DNC said all the Republicans had to offer were
"Old white men?" Yet it is in this
presidential cycle that it’s the Republican Party who put up two Hispanic/Cuban(s),
a black man, a woman and several men, one with a horrible combover. Yet the media says nothing when the DNC puts
up an "old white man" and an old white grandma.
Hypocrisy much? Rules for thee and not for me? I have to admit that when Bernie first announced
he was going to run I thought there is no way this guy has a chance. Fter all,
he’s old, he’s white and he is a very proud Socialist. And every time this guy is interviewed he
just seemed so full of hate and venom. So I can only guess that Democrat voters
find his age, his whiteness and his socialism appealing.
What the candidacy of Sanders has demonstrated is that
if you give away enough free stuff you can convince the young and the stupid to
support you and to, very obviously, vote for you. I’ve heard some say that this country will
never elect a blatant socialist, that there are still enough sane folks who
realize that that would bring about a level of economic ruin never before seen
in this country. But I wonder.
No comments:
Post a Comment