While appearing on ABC's "This Week" with
George ‘Stephy’ Stephanopoulos, just this past Sunday, Hitlery Clinton went to
great lengths to dismiss entirely the ongoing FBI investigation into her rather
questionable use of a private email server.
She would describe it as being nothing more than "a continuation of
the story that has been playing out for months.” And she would say again, “There is no
classified-marked information on those emails sent or received by
me." As someone with experience handling
classified material myself, I think a bit dishonest of Hitlery to use the disclaimer
that none of the information was actually “marked” classified.
Hitlery said she wants the all of her emails
released, including, I guess, the 22 documents said to contain a "category
of top secret information," that were announced by the State Department
just last Friday. It was the State
Department that said those 22 documents, covering seven email chains, were not
marked classified at the time they were sent, but they "are being upgraded
at the request of the Intelligence Community.” ‘Stephy’ pointed to a non-disclosure agreement
that Hitlery signed as secretary of state which states that even if information
is not marked as classified, she should have known to treat it as such.
And then Hitlery very enthusiastically declared,
"Well, of course. And that's exactly what I did." And she then went on to say, "I take
classified information very seriously. You know, you can't get information off
the classified system in the State Department to put onto an unclassified
system, no matter what that system is.”
She said, "We were very specific about that, and you -- when you
receive information, of course, there has to be some markings, some indication
that someone down the chain had thought that this was classified, and that was
not the case." If you’re too stupid
to recognize sensitive information, with or without markings, should you be
president?
Hitlery then went on to repeat her call to release
even the information that the State Department now says is too sensitive to
release. She said, "Let's see what
it is, and let the American people draw their own conclusions. This is very
much like Benghazi, George. You know, the Republicans are going to continue to
use it, beat up on me. I understand that. That's the way they are.” So this is all simply a plot concocted by the
Republicans? And regardless of the fact
the information is considered classified, in an effort to prevent her from
getting further beaten up on, we should just release it? Is this
really the kind of person that we want as our Commander-in-Chief?
I mean not only has she clearly demonstrated her
inability to answer that 3 am phone call which resulted in four Americans,
including our ambassador, to be butchered by a bunch of religious fanatics, and
for no other reason than because it was too close to Barry’s reelection, now we
find out that she can’t even be trusted with the handling of state
secrets. And it was in mentioning
Benghazi that Hitlery said, "But after 11 hours of testimony, answering
every single question, in public, which I have requested for many months, I
think it's pretty clear they're grasping at straws." Grasping at straws, really? If anyone’s grabbing at straws, it’s not the
Republicans.
And so it is then, that like that proverbial broken
record, as we have seen numerous times before over the past couple of decades, Hitlery
would like us all to once again believe that, somehow, the source for all her
troubles has little or nothing to do with the fact that she sees herself as
being above the law. No, the source of
all her troubles, just as it was the cause of her husband being unable to keep
his pants zipped up, is that ever so dastardly, that quite diabolical and that downright
evil, vast right wing conspiracy. Yup,
it held a gun to her head forcing her to send and receive classified
information just like it forced her husband to rape numerous women.
No comments:
Post a Comment