Those on the left had better hope that old bitch
Hitlery can pull this thing out, because those waiting in the wings, should she
stumble even more than she already has, are all candidates who seem to more
than ready for the loony bin. Take as a
for instance, Marty O’Malley, former governor of the People’s Republic of
Maryland. And so it was that fresh off his apology to an obvious racist who professed to be some Democrat strategist
for saying that all lives matter, Marty has since seen fit to blame the rise of
ISIS on, of all things, ‘climate change’.
Anyway, for as long as I have been paying attention
he has ostensibly been trying to separate global warming from national security
concerns. But recently Democrat
presidential candidate Marty O’Malley saw fit to jump on the environmentalist wacko
crazy train, joining his fellow wackos who now claim that global warming is the
true culprit behind the creation of those conditions which are necessary in
order for the Islamic State to grow. Now
I’ve heard a lot of cockamamie theories coming from the left but I gotta tell
ya, this one is pure idiocy.
It was in responding to a question on foreign policy
that this genius told Bloomberg news:
“One of the things that preceded the failure of the nation-state of
Syria and the rise of ISIS was the effect of climate change and the
mega-drought that affected that region, wiped out farmers, drove people to
cities, created a humanitarian crisis that created the symptoms — or rather the
conditions of extreme poverty — that has now led to the rise of ISIL and this
extreme violence.” That this guy actually
sees himself as capable of handling the job of Commander-in-Chief is laughable!
So, Marty’s comments now seem to echo those of Barry,
John Kerry-Heinz and any number of other environmentalist wackos who continue
in their effort to paint global warming as not merely as an environmental
issue, but also a national security problem.
You’ll probably remember how back in May Barry told graduates of the
U.S. Coast Guard Academy to prepare for the fight against global warming. The
White House has been working hard to shift the focus of global warming away
from temperature and more towards public health and national security.
In past comments, Marty has made a point to declare
global warming a “natural threat,” distinguishing it from “man-made” threats,
the greatest of which he said is a nuclear Iran. It was back on March 29 that Marty told ABC’s
George ‘Stephy’ Stephanopoulos that, “The greatest danger that we face right
now on a consistent basis in terms of manmade threats is — is — nuclear Iran
and related to that, extremist violence.”
He went on to say, “I don’t think you can separate the two. I think they
go together.”
Marty would go on to add, “In terms of natural
threats, clearly, it’s climate change. And we have to confront — we have to
confront manmade and natural threats.”
Maybe it’s clear to those on the left who, despite the now overwhelming
amount of scientific proof that has come out against their insane theory,
continue to claim that the discussion is now settled. Far from it.
With each passing day the claims made about the consequences of ‘manmade
climate change’ become more extreme and all the more unbelievable.
But today Marty is singing a different tune, playing
up the national security side of global warming, joining a chorus of ‘scientists’
and environmentalist wackos claiming the war in Syria is a prime example of how
a warming Earth will cause violent conflicts.
For years, reports have been trickling out attempting to link the
beginnings of Syria’s deadly civil war and the rise of Islamic State to global
warming. Most recently, a study out of the University of California, Berkeley
argued that man-made global warming made Syria’s 2006 to 2010 drought worse,
therefore driving political discontent and civil war.
And while the study’s authors are careful not to claim
that the drought directly caused the rise of ISIS, those that comprise the state-controlled
media were quick to make just such a connection. It would seem that anything that can even
remotely be tied to the insane theory of ‘climate change’ and can in any way be
said to support the theory that man is in fact the culprit behind some supposed
warming of our planet must be exploited as much as possible. But to believe any of this nonsense one has
to be ignorant beyond belief, or a Democrat.
So, is global warming responsible for the rise of
Islamic State? Hardly. Even if a drought did exacerbate tensions in
Syria, research shows environmental factors are rarely the cause of violent
conflict. Other researchers have
postulated it was the Bashar Assad regime’s response to the drought that
sparked tensions, not the drought itself. Syrians are no strangers to prolonged, vicious
droughts. People there have weathered their way through low rainfall for
centuries. But that hasn’t stopped the
hardcore believers from making their outlandish claims.
In terms of the climate science behind the claim, there’s
not much evidence of a man-made fingerprint on the climatic backdrop of the
conflict. According to Chip
Knappenberger and Patrick Michaels, climate scientists at the libertarian Cato
Institute who wrote back on March 5: “It is not until you dig pretty deep into
the technical scientific literature, that you find out that the anthropogenic
climate change impact on drought conditions in the Fertile Crescent is
extremely minimal and tenuous—so much so that it is debatable as to whether it
is detectable at all.”
The two scientists argued “the identifiable
influence of human-caused climate change on recent drought conditions in the
Fertile Crescent was almost certainly not the so-called straw that broke the
camel’s back and led to the outbreak of conflict in Syria.” They then added that drought “conditions
which are part and parcel of the region’s climate and the intensity and
frequency of which remain dominated by natural variability, even in this era of
increasing greenhouse gas emissions from human activities.” None of this has any effect on the
true-believers.
So the liberal hysteria surrounding ‘climate change’
mythology continues to intensify as believers continue to search out new and
more calamitous ways that can then be used convince an increasingly skeptical
American public that they now face an increasingly dangerous future if nothing
is done to address this bogus threat.
The latest ploy is put forward the claim that if we do something about ‘climate
change’ we will at the same time make Americans safer from those very same Muslims
who seem so determined to kill us. When
all else fails, simply make shit up!
No comments:
Post a Comment