As the midterm elections rapidly approach it should come as no surprise that we now find those who call the Democrat Party home being very busy in trying to come up with some way that will allow them to maintain their current strangle hold over the U. S. Senate. And in so doing they continue to pull out all the stops as they go about the leaving of no stone unturned in their ongoing quest to preserve their current majority in the Senate.
And with them now experiencing some degree of difficulty in being able to bullshit the requisite number of voters that their task demands into supporting their so obviously discredited agenda, the Democrats have now struck upon what they think may be just what the doctor ordered. That being, the idea of using a "false flag" strategy in the attempt to successfully advance their plan to literally steal a Senate majority for themselves come this November.
So while now masquerading as independents in four key Senate races, Democrat candidates are fully embracing a wolf-in-sheep's-clothing tactic in the hopes of being able to fool just enough voters into believing that they are not the party Barry rubberstamps that they actually are. And it is in pretending to be ‘Independents’, that they plan is to maintain their power and thus remain able to assist Barry implement his plan to create a single ruling party.
So as Democrat campaigns unfold, we’re seeing what some may view as being a conspiracy theory actually being backed up by the facts on the ground. And were these "Independent" Democrats true Independents, their presence in our national politics would be welcome. But they are not. And if elected, they most assuredly would cast their ballots for ‘Dingy Harry’ Reid to be Majority Leader, allowing him to maintain his bloc that controls the Senate.
It’s in South Dakota that we now have a former Republican senator turned liberal Democrat, Larry Pressler, running as an "Independent" against former Governor Mike Rounds, the Republican candidate. Having served three terms as a GOP senator, Pressler backed Barry in 2008 and 2012 and supports Obamacare. His strategy is either to win or to take enough votes away from Rounds to elect Rick Weiland, the overt Democrat candidate.
Meanwhile in Kansas, Republican Pat Roberts was coasting to a fourth Senate term when Greg Orman jumped into the race as an Independent. Orman also voted for Barry in 2008 and 2012 and, like Pressler, backs Obamacare, embraces the Democrat platform in toto, and actually tried to run before as a Democrat. But now he’s an "Independent." The fact that George Soros' son is reportedly hosting a fundraiser for Orman should make it very clear that he's no Independent.
And in North Carolina, Republican Thom Tillis is locked in a close battle against Democrat Kay Hagan. The only reason the race is close in this state Mitt Romney carried in 2012 is the presence of Sean Haugh, a pizza delivery man running as the Libertarian Party candidate. Haugh draws between 4 and 8 percent of the vote, in various polls, but all of it comes from Tillis, the Republican candidate. Where is Haugh getting his support? His money? Ask the Democrats.
And then we come to Kentucky, where we have Alison Lundergan Grimes running against Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Ms. Grime, as you may have seen recently in the news, refuses to say whether or not she voted for Barry in 2008 or 2012. Obviously, she did. And just as obviously, she is running away from it now. She says she will oppose Barry’s war on coal, but, if elected, it is clear she will toe the party line as Reid demands.
This tactic is actually nothing new for the Democrats, they first used this false flag strategy successfully in Maine back in 2012 when Governor Angus King, running as an Independent, was successful in his attempt to win seat formerly occupied by, Republican, Olympia Snowe. Once in the Senate, all traces of independence vanished and King fell in line with the Democrat Caucus. Granted most folks are smarter than those found in Maine, but still the tactic worked.
Independent Senator Bernie Sanders has been telling his Vermont voters for years that he, too, was not a Democrat. But at least old Bernie has had the guts to call himself what he really is, which is a Socialist. These new Democrat "Independents", however, have no such courage. And I think that it’s also worth nothing that the previously mentioned South Dakota seat had been written off as a certain Republican pickup until Pressler implemented his "false flag" strategy.
I wish I could say, with some level of confidence, that the American people are simply too smart to fall for something so obviously transparent, that they would never fall for such a scheme. But sadly, I fear, such is not the case. And I’m concerned not only about those folks who are certain to be fooled, but also with the folks who couldn’t care less about the dishonesty involved here, caring only about who it is that will ‘give’ them the most in exchange for their vote.
No comments:
Post a Comment