Well it would seem that, much to the disappointment of the faux reverends Sharpton and Jackson, and, perhaps even to some degree, of Barry himself, as things progress regarding the shooting of an unarmed black ‘teen’, in Ferguson, Missouri, it’s beginning to appear as if we might not have a racist cop, eager to shoot the first unarmed black ‘teen’ he saw, on our hands after all. Imagine that? But how can that be?
Apparently, Michael Brown, the unarmed black ‘teen’ in question, was shot in the hand at close range, or so says an official county autopsy report obtained by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. That would appear to bolster police officer Darren Wilson's claims that the 300 pound black ‘teen’ had attacked him. No, say it isn’t so. You mean to say that this innocent black ‘teen’, may not be so innocent after all?
The Washington Post also reported early Tuesday that at least six black witnesses support Wilson's account of the shooting, that he was attacked by Brown. Which begs the question, where were these honest, upstanding individuals while all of the rioting and looting were taking place? These six would seem to be at odds with earlier accounts suggesting that most black witnesses said that Brown was shot for no reason at all.
And, as it just so happens, Wilson’s account is also backed up by the physical evidence that leaked from the grand jury last week. That includes blood spatter analysis, shell casings and ballistics tests. Taken as a whole this casts our innocent black ‘teen’ as being the aggressor in this little altercation and the one who threatened the officer’s life. And, I might add, as being the one solely responsible for his own death.
The examinations were conducted by the St. Louis County Medical Examiner's Office, and contradict the private autopsy that was conducted for Brown's family. It was that autopsy that was said to show there were no signs of a struggle between the ‘teen’ and Wilson, who shot Brown on Aug. 9, sparking weeks of often violent protests in Ferguson, a predominantly black suburb of St. Louis.
After all, it makes it rather difficult to profit off the death of one’s son, or to ‘justify’ outrageous public behavior if it’s shown that this black ‘teen’ was anything but a victim of police racism. But it’s the official autopsy that backs up Wilson's account of how this tragedy unfolded, that this innocent black ‘teen’ had struggled for his weapon while inside the police car. That the cop was fighting for his life.
St. Louis Medical Examiner Dr. Michael Graham, who is not part of the official investigation, reviewed the autopsy report and told the Post-Dispatch that "it does support that there was a significant altercation at the car." Also it has been reported that a toxicology report taken during the autopsy showed that Brown's body tested positive for marijuana. And yet, we’re still supposed to view him as some sweet and innocent little teenager.
And there now appears to be underway what is nothing more than effort that seeks to go after this cop who is guilty of nothing more than trying to keep himself from being killed. Because we now have yet a third autopsy that has been ordered, this one by federal officials, and those results have not yet been released. Meanwhile, the official and private autopsies both agree on the number and locations of Brown's wounds.
And now we’re being told that as the election grows near we have now going on that which I’m sure comes as a surprise to no one. We now have the official Democrat Party in the state of Georgia sinking to an all new low as it goes about the using of this tragedy in Ferguson as a way of motivating blacks to get out and vote next month. I’d like to think that most blacks would see through such a ploy but, sadly, I doubt that that will be the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment