BEWARE THE ‘NEVERTRUMPERS’, THEY”RE ONLY OUT FOR THEMSELVES…

As the 2016 presidential election approaches its final stretch, those Republicans who stand in opposition to Trump are ramping up their efforts to do all that they can to guarantee he loses.  One of those ‘Republicans’ is John Stubbs, a co-founder of ‘Republicans for Hitlery’, who has made it quite clear that he believes Trump is unfit for the presidency.  Stubbs, who was a senior advisor for the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative during the George W. Bush administration and a policy director for Jack Kemp’s Empower America, describes ‘Republicans for Hitlery’ as a group dedicated to returning the GOP to its principles in the pre-Trump era.

It was in a recent interview that Stubbs said, “Trump is kind of like a parasite who came into the party and is now eating the host,” the pro-Clinton Republican said. “This is one of the reasons I hope he is beaten like a drum.”  Stubbs believes that Trump’s annexation of the Republican Party will cause irreparable harm.  He said  “If Trump controls the brand, the Republican brand is done.”  He then went on to say, “The Republican Party to my children is Donald Trump — just like to me it was Ronald Reagan.”  And he added, “My kids don’t want any part of the Republican Party now. It is literally the opposite of everything I worked on as a Republican.”

Sounding much more like someone from the other side, he claims that many of Trump’s supporters have “outright racist intentions.”  He made the claim that the Trump movement amounts to little more than “a dog whistle for white racial identity” and “needs to be a fringe party — something like Le Pen in France.”  The way forward, at least as Stubbs sees it, is for Republicans to roundly reject Trump and instead embrace a Hitlery presidency.  Sorry, but from where I’m standing that’s nothing but f*cking nuts!  Stubbs said, “It cannot be the case that any major party candidate empowers people who have such ill will to enter polite society.”

According to Stubbs, “The only thing to do now is to say to Republican voters: ‘We have to vote for Clinton.'”  He said, “There is imminent danger and we have a moral obligation to make that step.”   And he also suggested that voters who don’t like Hitlery or Trump “can still agree that Trump is a full-on catastrophe and they can agree that Clinton will not be a disaster.”  The ‘Republicans for Hitlery’ founder admitted that his rationale for giving Hitlery a four-year presidential term isn’t exactly the stuff of a hope-and-change-style mantra.  He added, “It’s not that inspiring.”  His plan is nothing short of pure insanity!

At the same time, Stubbs and ‘Republicans for Hitlery’ insist that a vote for Hitlery isn’t merely a vote against Trump.  In a Washington Post op-ed published back on July 22 — the day after “Trump’s apocalypse speech in Cleveland,” as Stubbs describes it — the pro-Hitlery Republican praised Hitlery for her history of willingness to reach across the aisle to get things done. The gist of the op-ed was that Trump’s unpopularity among so many otherwise disparate segments of society has created the potential for a peculiar window of bipartisanship the likes of which the United States hasn’t known for decades.  Hitlery, bipartisan?  Is he nuts?

Demonstrating just how clearly naïve he so very obviously is, Stubbs went on to say, “Although she’s taken criticism for overstating her record of bipartisanship, she was hardly a partisan shill in the Senate.”  He went onto write, “Sixty-eight percent of her bills had GOP co-sponsors.”  “Hardly a partisan shill?”  Has this boob been watching the same Hitlery that I’ve been watching for the last 30+ years?  Because I gotta tell ya, the Hitlery that I’ve been watching for what seems like forever, is little more than the worst kind of partisan hack, and someone that even the New York Times once referred to as being a “congenitial liar.”

Stubbs said his initial plan for ‘Republicans for Hitlery’ was to create a website that would function as something of a support group for grieving Republicans grappling with the decision to vote for Hitlery.  In recent months, it would seem that the group has advanced considerably beyond that vision.  In anticipation of tonight’s final presidential debate in Las Vegas, for example, ‘Republicans for Hitlery will run a large anti-Trump mobile billboard along the Las Vegas Strip. An image of Trump looking at his own hands and the message “DON’T GROPE. VOTE” will be emblazoned on signs up and down the famed stretch of Las Vegas Boulevard.

Stubbs said, “We are sending a clear message that sexual assault does not belong in a presidential race, and we should use our vote to ensure Trump loses big.” ‘Republicans for Hitlery’ has also rolled out a vote-swapping honor system — a “Never Trump” market, really — “for all the people who agree on one main thing: Trump should lose.”  The site, called Trumptraders.org, is designed to match third-party voters with people who refuse to vote for Trump — and to facilitate a two-to-one bargain which will increase third-party votes in noncompetitive states and add votes for Hitlery in swing states.

And it was in an op-ed this week in The New York Times, Stubbs and his ‘Republicans for Hitlery’ colleague Ricardo Reyes recommended “the new #NeverTrump app, which will organize your contacts into safe states and swing states, enabling an easy trade.”  It was in some press release that this Reyes said, “Clinton supporters stuck on the sidelines in safely blue or red states can now get involved in battlegrounds of Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.”   Beyond his dedicated opposition to Trump, Stubbs is not particularly optimistic about the future of the Party of Lincoln.  And to be honest, neither am I.  Especially after the last eight years.

Stubbs need not worry himself too much regarding the life expectancy of the Republican brand.  Because thanks to the likes of john Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan and a rather long and impressive list of limp-wristed RINOS, the party is nearly already dead.  While it would seem that the concept of "for the people, by the people" is really not a difficult concept, it has proven to be somewhat difficult to administer.  And if Trump loses because of these cowards, I’ll likely leave the party for good.  I grew up wanting to believe in America and all that it stands for, but these people have done nothing but erode that over the past 20+ years.

Not wanting to support Trump is one thing, but coming out and openly supporting Hitlery, knowing what we know about her is nothing short of insane and, frankly, evil.  Any Republican, at any level, who supports Hitlery should be shunned.  What this clown Stubbs doesn’t seem able to grasp, not surprisingly since he served in a Bush administration, is that if Hitlery is elected, both the Republican Party, and the United States, are done, and done forever.  He's trying to figure out how to rearrange the chairs, while not realizing that the direction he wants us to go is backwards so that we can run into the same iceberg again.  Nothing about his plan makes any sense!

THE SUPREME COURT…WHY I AM VOTING FOR TRUMP…

Just chalk this up as being my last plea for folks to simply suck it up and focus on what’s best for the country and for the future of our kids and vote for Donald Trump.  Granted he is not the candidate that many of us wish we had, but he’s the candidate that we do have and one that is a far better option than the candidate being put forth by the Democrats.  At least I am able to say, with a great deal of confidence, that Donald Trump loves this country.  Which is something I feel I can’t say about Hitlery.  While the economy is very important, as is keeping the homeland safe from those practitioners of the cult often times referred to as a “religion of peace”, the single most important issue for me is maintaining a Supreme Court that is more center right than it would be hardcore left.

When Chief Justice John Roberts promised the Senate Judiciary Committee he would serve as the U.S. Supreme Court’s umpire — dutifully calling balls and strikes — he most certainly did not anticipate Justice Sonia Sotomayor swinging for the fences from the end of the bench.  As one barely suited to serve even on some low level city ‘night court’, Sotomayor is one who so very obviously has no business whatsoever serving as a justice on the highest court in the land.  But as we all know, her selection by Barry had far less to do with her judicial prowess than it did with her willingness to legislate from the bench.  And it was Sotomayor who gave the Robert A. Stein Lecture at the University of Minnesota Law School Monday night, where she let slip the inner monologue that runs during oral argument.

It was there that ‘Justice’ Sotomayor told the assembly, in reference to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, “There are things he’d say on the bench, where if I had a baseball bat, I might have used it.”  So this is the caliber of individual that Barry “Almighty” thought suitable for nomination to the court and the Senate thought worthy of conformation?  Really?  So I’m sure you can sense the level of my fear when it comes to just who it might be that Hitlery would nominate and a Senate, likely to be controlled by the Democrats with none other than ‘Chuckie’ Schumer running the show, most assuredly would confirm. And if that little nightmare scenario doesn’t send a cold chill right down the center your spine you’re either dead, a NeverTrumper or a hardcore Hitlery supporter.

It was during this very same lecture that Sotomayor went on to acknowledge the rather significant ideological chasm between them, but said losing Scalia was the equivalent of losing a member of one’s family.  So I’m guessing she views as being acceptable behavior the beating of one’s family member with a baseball bat?  She has elsewhere said she suspects Scalia raised arguments “just to annoy” her, but that they enjoyed a warm interpersonal relationship.  She further explained it was important not to impute ill will to one’s adversaries.  She said, “If we’ve lost anything, it’s remembering that differences don’t stand, necessarily, on ill will.”  And she went on to add, “If you keep that in mind, you can resolve almost any issue, because you can find that common ground to interact with each other.”

So, are you having a difficult time telling she's a Democrat?  Violence is always the answer when they hear something they don't like.  Instead of trying to convince others into accepting the validity of their position, their normal course of action is one of character assassination, slander, innuendo and, of course, violence.  And it’s a vote for Hitlery that will result in getting more losers like Sotomayor onto the high court.  Sotomayor very clearly reveals herself to be little more than your typical, run of the mill, Democrat thug, no different than the "protesters" burning down Ferguson, the fire bombers in North Carolina, the spray painters in Bangor, or those who thought it was ok to dump human feces into storm drains.

According to liberals being a conservative means being opposed to everything liberal, which means despising anything associated with being a liberal. Liberalism, according to liberals, is strongly aligned with the values of science, honesty, rationale, human rights and reason.  Conservatives, again according to liberals, oppose those values in and of themselves.  Actually, Liberals, in the context of current politics, deny individual Liberty and Justice as put forth in the U.S. Constitution. Liberals hate America as well as the founding documents of this country.  By denying people of their God-given rights, liberals have no moral basis for their rather twisted line of thinking.  Conservatives, on the other hand, want to ensure those rights for everyone, regardless of religion, race or sex.

OUR WHINER-IN-CHIEF ACCUSES TRUMP OF WHINING???

Barry “Almighty” recently took a few jabs at the Republican nominee on Tuesday, telling Donald Trump to “stop whining [about rigged elections] and go try to make his case to get votes."  Barry was responding to Trump’s completely logical allegation that “the press has created a rigged system and poisoned the minds of the voters.”  That’s beyond true and anyone who has read the Wikileaks e-mail dump, or been alive for the last 50 years, can attest to the media being in the pocket of the Democrat Party.  But what about Barry himself?  Has he not proved himself to be quite the whiner, and on more than one occasion?  I think the cartoon, by the great A.F. Branco, at the top of this post sums up the truth rather nicely.

But in an attempt to refresh everyone’s memory how about we take a quick little journey down memory lane by doing a rundown of just a few of those occasions where Barry was guilty of doing a bit of his own ‘whining.’

Like the time when Barry blamed George Bush for the rise of ISIS.  I’m sure everyone remembers when Barry said, “ISIL is a direct outgrowth of Al Qaeda in Iraq that grew out of our invasion, which is an example of unintended consequences which is why we should generally aim before we shoot.”

Or, how about the time Barry blamed Fox News and Rush Limbaugh for Washington gridlock. Remember when he said, “The issue has been the inability of my message to penetrate the Republican base so that they feel persuaded that I’m not the caricature that you see on Fox News or Rush Limbaugh, but I’m somebody who is interested in solving problems and is pretty practical, and that, actually, a lot of the things that we’ve put in place worked better than people might think.”

And who can forget the time that Barry blamed “right-wing radio” for threatening his legacy.  You know, when he said, "I mean, we have been hearing this story for decades: tales about welfare queens, talking about takers, talking about the '47 percent'. It's the story that is broadcast every day on some cable news stations, on right-wing radio. It's pumped into cars and bars and VFW halls all across America, and right here in Elkhart. And if you're hearing that story all the time, you start believing it.”  And then added, "It's no wonder people think big government is the problem."

And then there was the time Barry blamed the “bitter clingers” for being against him.  When he said, “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not.”  And then said, “And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

The time when Barry blamed the Tea Party, whom he mocked as “tea-baggers,” for not taking his health care plan “seriously.”

And then the time Barry actually blamed the rise of terrorism on climate change.  That was the time he said, “Understand, climate change did not cause the conflicts we see around the world. Yet, what we also know is that severe drought helped create the instability in Nigeria that was exploited by the terrorist group Boko Haram.”  And then said, "It's now believed that drought and crop failures and high food prices helped fuel the early unrest in Syria, which descended into civil war in the heart of the Middle East.”  And finally said, "Climate change increases the risk of instability and conflict.”

So even after all that he still has the nerve to stand there and accuse Trump of whining?  As far as I’m concerned Barry’s little tantrum is nothing more than the pot calling the kettle black.  I mean how juvenile can a grown man behave?   But those who have been paying attention over the years will be aware of the fact that Barry has a rather long history of such sophomoric behavior.  Like the time he thought it would be so very presidential to display his schlong to the female reporters around him and to go to great lengths to make sure all those present we able to get a good view.  Behavior I’m quite sure that both his daughters would approve of, right?  And behavior I’ve yet to hear has been seen coming from Donald Trump.

FEAR NOT A HITLERY VICTORY…THE RINOS WILL BE THERE TO PROTECT US…

Never fear, says RINO John McCain of Arizona, because he says should Hitlery actually win the upcoming election, as he and his fellow RINO are desperately hoping, he and his fellow Republicans in Congress will stand united against any Supreme Court nominee or policy deemed to be harmful to our country that she would choose to put forward as president.  However, that statement comes with a disclaimer because an aide to McCain would later go one to clarify that McCain will examine the record of anyone nominated for the high court and vote for or against that person based on their ‘qualifications’ or support any policy deemed to be ‘beneficial’ to the country.

McCain's initial comments, provided in a Philadelphia talk radio interview on Monday, suggested possible obstruction by Republicans without regard to whom Hitlery might go on to nominate. The result could be major conflict next year in the Senate and between Congress and the, God forbid, Hitlery White House, given the possibility of several Supreme Court vacancies.  As we all know, there is already one vacancy which Republicans have thus far refused to fill after the death of Antonin Scalia early in the year.  And frankly, I remain rather surprised that our band of gutless wimps in the Senate hasn’t yet already gone belly up.

So I guess what this bonehead is really telling is that those who love our country shouldn’t worry about this election because even if Hitlery does win, it really no big deal because we can count on our fearless Republicans to be there to stop her nominees and leftist policies.  Are we actually expected to believe that for eight years, if she wins, there would be no changes to the Supreme Court?  Who’s actually stupid enough to believe that that’s going to happen?  By then two more judges, and likely even McCain himself, may be dead.  What a moron.  McCain, and the rest of our congressional RINOs, will resist Hitlery just like he, and they, resisted Barry.

Now McCain must also working on the premise that there will be enough that remains of the Republican Party to mount and sustain an effective challenge to the Democrats.  Because, thanks to all those NeverTrumpers the potential does now exists for significant down-ticket carnage resulting from a Trump loss that makes that little more than a pipe dream.  What’s truly frightening here is the prospect of not only having Hitlery as president but also a Senate that’s run by Chuckie Schumer, and Nancy “Botox’ Pelosi in change over in the House.  Talk about a nightmare scenario.  And all because of those who just could not bring themselves to support Trump.

I'm simply not buying any of what I’m hearing from McCain.  I’ve heard it all before and been burned rather badly in the process.  And it’s essentially why we now have Trump as our nominee.  What exactly have our Republican majorities in Congress gotten us since 2014?   Absolutely nothing, except so much hand-wringing and and a near endless stream of insults cast in the direction of the Tea Party base.  Isn't it laughable that McCain has made the point that he thinks Hitlery is going to win BUT the Republicans promise to fight her SCOTUS picks with their last breath!  Anybody else not buying any of this backstabbing UNIPARTY bullshit?

Personally, I have but one word to describe old John McCain, ‘The Maverick.’  And that word is L-I-A-R!   And how stupid does he and his fellow RINOs really think we are.  After all, the American people gave the Republicans their current majority in the Senate in 2014 and a majority in the House going back to the 2010 election.  And it was in 2014 that Republicans were handed the largest House majority possessed by either party since World War II.  And still they did absolutely NOTHING to stop Barry and his Islamization and socialization of America.  And now this senile old fossil wants us to actually trust him to stop Hitlery?  NOPE, I DON'T THINK SO. 

And what was it that the Democrats did when they had their majorities in 2009 and 2010?  Hmmmmmmm, let’s see.  I remember, wasn’t that when they proceeded to shove through Congress that which had been their wet-dream since the days of FDR?  Yup, they succeeded in ‘passing’ Obamacare which was intended to be nothing more than it has turned out to be, the groundwork for socialized healthcare, or single payer government run healthcare here in America.  And what did our Republicans do to stop them?   Did they pull out all the stops and stand united against what was so obviously a political scheme by the Democrats?  Nope, they left us out to dry.

Seriously folks, in looking back over the course of the last eight years when was it, that anyone can recall, that the Republicans united to resist Barry’s anti-America agenda?   Now think what you will about Trump but the fact is that we need him if for no other reason that because the Republican controlled Senate and House of Representatives are nothing but a bunch of do-nothings who insisted in doing nothing more than to go along to get along.  There's no reason to believe they will perform any differently with Hitlery in the White House than they have with Barry.  They will always have an excuse for why they can't get anything done.

One last thing I’d like to mention here before I close is the fact that there are now rumors flying about that Hitlery’s hit team has come into possession of what has been described as being some rather potent opposition research on Trump.  And it’s information that they apparently intend to drop at the most inopportune time before the election, most likely when there would be no time to respond.  And they came into possession of that information courtesy of those closely associated with our ‘Establishment Republican’ types, aka the ones who have been so determined in their effort to sabotage Trumps campaign.  So stand by and keep the faith.

TODAY’S DEMOCRAT PARTY, ‘A WRETCHED HIVE OF SCUM AND VILLAINY’…

Now I may be one of those that Barry has now identified as comprising a “swamp of crazy”, but both he, and those who supported him and now support Hitlery, are really little more than scum-sucking-turd-blossoms.  So far this campaign season I have been referred to as everything from an unredeemably deplorable, to an unrepentant redneck, and I’ve been called a predator for no other reason than because I’m happen to be a male of the species.  And now, according to Barry “Almighty” I’m also part of something he called the “swamp of crazy.”  And why am I, and those like me, being so categorized by those who reside on the outer fringes of the loony left?  Well, for the very simple reason that we want Donald Trump to be the next president and not Hitlery Clinton.

It was at a campaign rally in Ohio last week that Barry made his rather sophomoric claim that Democrats have Republican friends and neighbors who are "some great people," but, the Republican base is, according to Barry, nothing more than a "swamp of crazy".  And how, you may ask, does one come to be included in that specific group of people?  Well apparently it’s pretty easy because all one needs to do is to deny climate change, espouse conspiracy theories, watch Fox News and listen to Rush Limbaugh.  Barry said, Republican politicians who "knew better" never spoke up.  So "all that bile -- all that exaggeration, all that stuff that wasn't grounded in fact, just bubbled up," Barry said -- producing Donald Trump as the Republican Party's presidential nominee.

Barry went on to make the claim that even most Republican politicians don't believe Donald Trump is qualified to be president and went so far as to declare, "I know because I talk to them."  Now despite the fact that Barry is a pathological liar, why is it, exactly, that I or anyone else should believe him when he makes such a claim.  While I’m certain that there are more than a few RINOs who do agree with him, those of us beyond the beltway certainly don’t.  Barry said, "So the problem is not that all Republicans think the way this guy does. The problem is, is that they've been riding this tiger for a long time. They've been feeding their base all kinds of crazy for years, primarily for political expedience.”  That sounds eerily reminiscent of Barry and his party.

So anyway, he who will, in all likelihood, go down in history as being our worst president EVER, went on to say, "So if Trump was running around saying I wasn't born here, they're OK with that as long as it helped them with votes. If some of these folks on talk radio started talking about how I was the anti-Christ, well, you know, that's just politics.”  And he added, "You think I'm joking."  He went on to say, "If somebody completely denies climate change or gets filled up with all kinds of conspiracy theories about how me and Hillary started ISIL, or that we were plotting to declare martial law, take away everybody's guns. And we did a military exercise...in Texas, and suddenly all the folks in Texas were like, they're going to take over right now."

Barry mocked those concerns saying, "But they took it seriously. This is in the swamp of crazy that has been fed over and over and over and over again. And -- you know, and it's-- there's sort of a spectrum. It's a whole kind of ecosystem, you know.”  And in what has become his very familiar smug attitude, Barry said, "And look, if I watched Fox News, I wouldn't vote for me. I understand. And if I was listening to Rush Limbaugh, I'd say, man, that's terrible. Fortunately there are more diverse sources of information.”  Granted, while there are more ‘diverse’ sources of information, it depends on what sort of information one is actually looking for.  Because few of those resources ever provide information that’s actually usable to the American voter.

He added, "And I want to make a serious point here. Because I'm really not exaggerating. Everything that I'm saying are actual things that have been said, and a fairly sizable number of people in the Republican primaries believed. And the people who knew better didn't say anything.”  So that’s what Barry calls making a serious point?  Barry said, "They didn't say well, you know what, I disagree with his economic policies, but that goes too far. They didn't say, well, I'm not sure his foreign policy is the right one for America, but you know, we can't allow our politics to descend into the gutter."  Hey Barry, too late for that!  Because, you see, it’s the Democrat Party which was born in the gutter, and to this day prefers to operate from that same location.

And I guess I’m still not quite understanding why it is that idiotic comments made by Trump 11 years ago are considered to be far more relevant than the fact that Hitlery, and much more recently, exposed an untold amount of classified information to our growing list of enemies.  I guess we’re simply supposed to ignore all of Hitlery’s past shenanigans and focus solely on the stupid things that end up being broadcast ad nauseam by those who are essentially on the payroll of Hitlery’s campaign.  And from people to pride themselves as being serious, objective, and unbiased journalists, but are anything but.  Such journalists became long ago extinct.  And to imply that Fox News is somehow an illegitimate news source, demonstrates just how much of an ideologue Barry really is. 

Barry said, "And that's what's happened in their party. All that bile -- all the exaggeration, all the stuff that was not grounded in fact, just kind of bubbled up, started surfacing. They know better, a lot of these folks who ran, but they didn't say anything.”  I would argue that the party of bile and exaggeration is the Democrat Party.  To provide an accurate description of today’s Democrat Party, I’ll borrow a line from Obi-Wan Kenobi when he was describing Mos Eisley spaceport.  It was Obi-Wan who told young Luke that he would never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.  And it is the very same thing that can be said of the political party that saw fit to first nominate and then re-nominate Barack Hussein Obama, the same pervert who likes to show off his crank to the ladies.  

And now it turns out the ‘crazies’ were right when they said the state-controlled news media is in collusion with the Democrats and about how we are being sold out to global interests on both trade and immigration.  Wikileaks is now confirming, on a daily basis, the corruption that runs straight to the core of our Constitutional Republic.  Barry ‘O’ can bleat all he wants about the crazies, but he knew all along about Hitlery’s private server because he was emailing her with a fake name.  Just like he knew Obamacare wasn't going to lower premiums and would allow folks to keep their doctor of choice. The list goes on and on about his abject lies.  But you know what's really CRAZY?  Believing anything that comes out of his mouth or that of his handpicked successor.

Perhaps Barry should stop and leave what decent legacy he may still have left, alone.  While there are those who might agree that there may be an issue with our climate, only the most kooky among us actually believe that man has had anything to do with it.  And no one is opposing a move towards clean energy, they only request that we go about it bit smarter than Barry has done.  And how about the Democrats stop all their lying and talking shit about the only media outlet that actually tells us the truth?  The corruption needs to stop, that’s why people are turning to Trump.  There is an increasing amount of evidence that there is a real danger that this election will be stolen by the Democrats.  If it weren't for whistleblowers the majority of the American public wouldn't know how corrupt things have really become!

We're not crazy, what we are, is disgusted!  Disgusted with the lies and happy that we finally have someone willing to call it like it is!  We will be bullied NO MORE!  For six years we’ve allowed ourselves to be played by congressional Republicans.  In 2010 they said, “Give us control of Congress and we’ll stop Barry.”  We gave them control of the House, and they did nothing.  In 2012 they said, “We really need control of Congress.”  But, while we allowed them to keep control we did reduce their numbers in the hope that it might provide a little motivation.  It didn’t.  Then in 2016 we handed to the Republicans complete control of Congress, because they promised to prevent Barry from doing more damage.  But they’ve done nothing, leaving us no recourse but to select Donald Trump.

MAYBE IT’S TIME TO TRY SOMETHING NEW…

For over 150 years now there has been going on here in the United States the conducting of a rather interesting little experiment.  And those involved in this experiment are blacks and working-class whites.  And the hypothesis being tested is as follows:  Can a people who have been taken from the jungles of Africa and then forced into slavery ever able to be fully integrated as citizens in a nation with a majority white population?  The whites are descendants of Europeans who created for themselves a prosperous, innovative and resourceful civilization.  Meanwhile, these former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements.  Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors.  America has struggled with varying degrees of racial discord pretty much ever since.

Decade after decade the problems persisted but those behind the experiment refused to give up.  They insisted that if they could just find the right formula the experiment would eventually succeed, and therefore they concocted program after program in an effort to get their desired result.  They created the Freedman’s Bureau, passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered race preferences, built housing projects, and even tried midnight basketball.  Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have otherwise been unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association. Over the protests of parents, they put white children on buses and sent them to black schools and vice versa.  Attempts were made through the spending of vast amounts of taxpayer money, all manner of special programs, the relaxing of requirement, and, of course, endless handwringing to close the “achievement gap.” 

And in an effort to keep any and all white backlash in check, to the greatest extent possible, they began ‘punishing’ public and even private statements on race.  They hung up Orwellian public banners that commanded whites to “Celebrate Diversity!” and “Say No to Racism.”  Nothing was deemed to be off limits if it might salvage the experiment.  Some thought that what W.E.B. Du Bois called the Talented Tenth would lead the way for black people.  A group of elite, educated blacks would knock down doors of opportunity and show the world what blacks were capable of.  There is a Talented Tenth. They are the black Americans who have become entrepreneurs, lawyers, doctors and scientists.   But ten percent is not enough. For the experiment to work, the ten percent has to be followed by a critical mass of people who can hold middle-class jobs and promote social stability.  That is what’s been missing.

However, through the years, too many blacks have continued to demonstrate a complete inability to function and prosper at any meaningful level in a culture unsuited to them.  Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and the vast majority of black cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And it is never that you will see blacks taking any level of responsibility for their failures.  Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment, always blaming others for their misfortune.  Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark, Los Angeles, Cincinnati, Baltimore and Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away. The white elite insist upon telling us that this does not mean the experiment has failed, it only proves that we have to try harder.  We just need to spend even more money, waste even more time, possess more understanding, create even more programs, ensure there are more opportunities, more, more, more.

But no matter how much more money is ever spent, no matter how many new programs are dreamt up, no matter how many more laws are forced down the throats of the American people, no matter how many black geniuses are portrayed on television, and, apparently, no matter who is our president, nothing ever seems to change except for the worse.  Some argue it’s a problem of “culture,” as if culture creates people’s behavior instead of the other way around.  Others blame “white privilege.”  But I think it’s obvious that things began to go south in 1965, when LBJ’s made the promise that he’d have blacks in this country voting Democrat for the next 200 years.  Because it was then that the slow painful death of the black family in America began which has played a very big part in why it is that black “youths” are committing half the country’s violent crime.  So before things will improve for blacks in any meaningful way, it is they who must first genuinely want things to change.

So while I hate to be the one to break the news, there is little doubt that this decades old experiment been pretty much been nothing but an abject failure.  Not because of culture, or white privilege, or even racism. The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in a certain amount of social incompatibility.  Our rulers don’t seem to understand just how tired their white subjects are with this experiment. They don’t understand that white people aren’t out to get black people; they are simply exhausted with them. They’re no longer willing to tolerate the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, and the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity.  The elites explain everything with “racism,” and refuse to believe that white frustration could soon reach the boiling point.

MOOCHELLE RUSHES TO THE DEFENSE OF WOMEN…IMAGINE THAT???

Well, let’s see now. First I was considered to be an unredeemable deplorable, then I was a redneck, and now, according to Moochelle Obummer, I’m a predator?  What’s next?  And all of these accusations are supposed to do what, exactly?  Convince me that I must vote for the most corrupt individual in American politics?  And where exactly does Moochelle, or she who has been nothing short of a complete embarrassment as first lady, get off accusing me of being a predator?  Anyway, it was at a Hitlery gathering there in New Hampshire that Moochelle, in was little more than a display of faux outrage, said she "can't stop thinking" about a presidential candidate bragging about "sexually assaulting women."  Well, Moochelle, I can’t stop thinking about how it’s been over the course of the last eight years that you and her parasitic husband have to proceeded to rip off the American people to the tune of $100s of millions for all manner of ritzy vacation and ‘official’ boondoggle!

And in working hard to appear properly offended, Moochelle went on to say, "It has shaken me to my core in a way that I couldn't have predicted."  And, she said. "So while I'd love nothing more than to pretend like this isn't happening, and to come out here and do my normal campaign speech, it would be dishonest and disingenuous to me to just move on to the next thing like this was all just a bad dream.”  Moochelle continued saying, "This is not something that we can ignore."  And she added, "It's not something we can just sweep under the rug as just another disturbing footnote in a sad election season. Because this was not just a lewd conversation. This wasn't just locker-room banter. This was a powerful individual speaking freely and openly about sexually predatory behavior, and actually bragging about kissing and groping women, using language so obscene that many of us were worried about our children hearing it when we turn on the TV."

I’m sure by now we all know how Donald Trump, eleven years ago, was caught unawares on an "Access Hollywood" videotape saying vulgar things about women to whom he was attracted.  He apologized to Americans at last Sunday's debate, where he denied ever acting on his stated impulses.  But since then, in the final days of the campaign, a handful of women, likely on the receiving end of a rather sizable amount of cash from Hitlery’s campaign, have now come forward to accuse Trump of groping and abusing them, roughly 30 years ago.  Let’s face it, when you have, literally, hundreds of supposed journalists working 24/7 to dig up as much dirt as they can find on Donald, they’re going to come up with stuff.  And how many of us could survive such scrutiny?  It’s just a shame the same amount of energy is never spent delving into the past life experiences of Democrats.  I am curious about how much these women might have been paid to reveal such things now.

The apparently psychic Moochelle said it "seems very clear" to her that this is how Trump has always treated women.  And it was then that Moochelle proceeded to make the case that men are predators and women are victims.  She said, "It reminds us of stories we heard from our mothers and grandmothers about how, back in their day, the boss could say and do whatever he pleased to the women in the office, and even though they worked so hard, jumped over every hurdle to prove themselves, it was never enough.”  And she added, "We thought all of that was ancient history, didn't we?  And so many have worked for so many years to end this kind of violence and abuse and disrespect, but here we are, in 2016, and we're hearing these exact same things every day on the campaign trail.  We are drowning in it.”  Drowning in it?  I’d say Moochelle is being more than just a bit melodramatic about something that is really nothing more than a she said, he said kinda thing.

She said, "And all of us are doing what women have always done: We're trying to keep our heads above water, just trying to get through it, trying to pretend like this doesn't really bother us maybe because we think that admitting how much it hurts makes us as women look weak. Maybe we're afraid to be that vulnerable. Maybe we've grown accustomed to swallowing these emotions and staying quiet, because we've seen that people often won't take our word over his.”  And she also said, "Or maybe we don't want to believe that there are still people out there who think so little of us as women. Too many are treating this as just another day's headline, as if our outrage is overblown or unwarranted, as if this is normal, just politics as usual."  Well it certainly was politics as usual for every Kennedy who was ever elected to public office.  But since they were all Democrats, all of those ‘indiscretions’ were simply deemed to be a ‘boys will be boys’ kind of thing.

And speaking of members of the infamous Kennedy Clan, I seem to recall how one of them was able to literally get away with murdering a young woman.  A young woman whom it was rumored, at the time, to be pregnant with the child of this particular Kennedy.  Now I know the death of the baby is no big deal for Moochelle, but if she’s as concerned about women as she claims, you’d think she would be bothered a little by the death of this young woman.  Or maybe since the woman was white that has an impact on the level of her concern.  And oddly enough, it was this very same Kennedy that her husband Barry was desperate to receive an endorsement from back in 2008.   So even getting away with murder didn’t seem to bother Moochelle much back then.  No, she’s only concerned about those women who claim to have been ‘assaulted’ 30 years ago and who have now, courtesy of significant financial inducement, have come forward with their ‘stories’.

Moochelle said it's not normal, it's not politics as usual (neglecting what ‘Slick Willy’ did to a female intern young enough to be his daughter when he was president). It's disgraceful, it's intolerable, and "it doesn't matter what party you belong to -- Democrat, Republican, independent -- no woman deserves to be treated this way. None of us deserves this kind of abuse!"  Moochelle said it's about right and wrong.  But again it would seem that what matters most is to which political party the offender belongs.  She said, "And we simply cannot endure this, or expose our children to this any longer -- not for another minute, and let alone for four years. Now is the time for all of us to stand up and say enough is enough. This has got to stop right now!"  And am I the only one who sees it as being a bit hypocritical that these women are to be believed at face value while we’re just supposed to ignore all of those women assaulted, even raped, by ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton?

Ok, so let me see if can put this all into its proper perspective.  There has now been all manner of allegations of he said, she said kind of stuff, and Moochelle’s faking a few tears really doesn’t add any level of authenticity to any of these claims.  They are nothing more than an attempt on her part to make it seem as if she genuinely cares.  When in fact she couldn’t care less.  This is nothing more than another way to attack Trump, she doesn’t give a squat about these women and she cares even less about the women raped by ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton.  And we now have a video of her own husband flaunting an erection while on a campaign plane, standing in front of a group women reporters, making extra sure that they are all able to get a good look at it.  But perhaps Moochelle was proud of her man showing off his ‘equipment’.  Might she have even gotten together later with all of those very same females from the plane and discussed things on a more ‘personal’ level?

Oddly, Moochelle makes the claim that she's 'never heard such words' before.  Yeah, right, in order to that to be true she and Barry must have had their ears covered while voicing la-la-la-la-la for the entire 20 years they spent there in the ‘church’ of Rev. Jeremiah Wright.  Granted, Michele isn't delusional, but she is a liar and a deceiver, as are most of those on the Left; and she is a hater of Trump because he chooses to put America FIRST, and is not a globalist hater of America as are the Obummers and the Clintons.  Trump has never claimed any moral high ground as far as I know except to try to keep the Left from utterly destroying America.  The people representing the Left certainly have no moral high ground on which to stand. They are Godless, Lawless, Liars, Thieves, and Perverts.  But who's keeping track?  Certainly not Moochelle nor her schlong displaying husband.  I do have to wonder though, are Barry’s daughters proud of daddy’s essentially exposing himself? 

TURNS OUT AMERICANS FEAR THEIR GOVERNMENT MORE THAN THEY FEAR GUNS…GO FIGURE!!!

While we have heard much during this presidential campaign about the need for much stricter gun laws, a recent poll from Chapman University seems to show that Americans fear gun control, Obamacare, and tornadoes far more than they fear the next mass shootings occurring.  In fact, the poll shows that Americans are more fearful of reptiles and extinction than of gun crime.  The poll–released October 11–shows that “corrupt government officials” are Americans’ greatest fear. That is followed by a “terror attack, not having enough money for the future, and terrorism.”  Fifth on the list of things that scare Americans most are “government restrictions on firearms and ammunition.”  And you have to go a long way down the list–yes, past Obamacare, reptiles, tornadoes, and even the threat of extinction–before you finally get to fear of a mass shooting or other crimes committed with a gun. 

Here are some of the other things people fear more than mass shootings:

•People I love dying

•Economic/financial collapse

•Identity theft

•People I love becoming seriously ill

•Biological warfare

•Government tracking of personal data

•High medical bills

•The US will be involved in another world war

•Global warming and climate change

•Nuclear weapons attack

•Cyber-terrorism

•Being hit by a drunk driver

•Pollution of oceans, rivers and lakes

•Pandemic or major epidemic

•Corporate tracking of personal information

•Pollution of drinking water

After pollution, Americans fear “break-ins”–and although break-ins do not require a gun, they represent the first thing on the list that could involve one. Following break-ins, Americans fear “widespread civil unrest” and “nuclear accident/meltdown.”  And then, finally, a “random/mass shooting.”  Think about it, “Corrupt government officials” are Americans’ number one fear, gun control is number five, and way down on the list–at number 30–is fear of a mass shooting. Such a list is encouraging, because it indicates that Americans have yet to buy into the left’s relentless talk about how unsafe America is and how desperately Americans need government to come save them.  And I would argue that this poll also provides to those who are having a difficult time deciding whom to vote for, or those thinking about just staying home, one less reason to vote for Hitlery and a little incentive to get out and vote.

And I think it would be safe to say that if we’re going to be genuinely serious about our attempt to stop gun violence, then what needs to be done is really relatively simple.  Because, you see, all we really need to do is to completely disarm all Democrats. And why is it that I say that?  Well, because:  Ft Hood Shooter - Registered Democrat. Columbine - both families were progressive liberal Democrats. Virginia Tech Shooter - Registered Democrat - Wrote hate mail to Bush. Connecticut School Shooter - Registered Democrat; hated Christians. Colorado Theater Shooter - progressive liberal Democrat; staff worker for the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street!  It all seems pretty cut and dry to me.  So there you go, disarm the Democrats and our problem is solved.  And it would also make it much easier to identify those with mental issues if were to simply check to see who it is that’s a registered Democrat.

So now that it's been confirmed that Americans fear big government more than they fear domestic terrorist attackers I think we had best be prepared for even more contrived terrorist attacks in America because that is what D.C. wants us to do so they can have justification to take away more of our freedoms in the name of "national security".  They need crime and violence with a deafening discrimination campaign echoing through the state-controlled media in an attempt to justify even more gun control schemes!  They now have less than 30 days to try to stage something to backdrop behind Hitlery and her pledge to restrict gun rights.  Everyone needs to keep their powder dry and to be vigilant!  And take someone shooting for their first time!  We as a nation are better than the screw ups in the Democrat Party and their many willing accomplices in the state-controlled media!!  Our country needs us as it has never needed us before!

THE NEW YORK ‘SLIMES’ PUSHES FOR STRICTER GUN LAWS…

The New York Slimes, that provider of even less useful information than is ‘The National Enquirer’, now appears to be actively encouraging voters in those states where gun control on the ballot to vote for stronger regulations and all under the guise that more gun control equals less crime and therefore a safer populace.   Meanwhile, gun-controlled Chicago is nearing 600 homicides for 2016 alone.  According to ‘The Slimes’, “analysis” from George Soros-funded Center for American Progress shows that “gun fatalities in states with weaker laws are three times as high as in those states with tougher restrictions.” Based on this, the paper calls for voters in “California, Maine, Nevada, and Washington” to support gun control measures that will be on the ballot next month.

But something that ‘The Slimes’ fails to mention, because it would likely damage their argument, is that California is already one of the most gun-controlled states in the union.  It has comprehensive background checks — which eliminate a “gun show loophole” or “online loophole” — a waiting period on gun purchases, firearm registration, and gun confiscation laws, yet it also had the May 23, 2014, Santa Barbara attack, the December 2, 2015, San Bernardino firearm-based terror attack, the June 1, 2016, murder-suicide on the gun-free UCLA campus, and the October 8, 2016, high-profile shooting deaths of two police officers in Palm Springs.  So once again we have an argument being advanced by this rag of a newspaper that’s completely devoid of any logic or truth.

And it’s another very blue state, Washington, that also has comprehensive background checks — the very checks which Hitlery, Gabby Giffords, and ‘Nanny Mike’ Bloomberg-funded gun control groups pursue as being key to American safety.  Yet our nation’s most recent mass shooting took place in Burlington, Washington, on September 23. Five innocent lives were taken in Cascades Mall. On July 30, three innocents were shot and killed at a house party just north of Seattle, and in late February, the AP reported a gunman killed four people then himself in Belfair, Washington.  It’s as if these people don’t even bother to do the slightest amount of fact-checking regarding what’s really going on in places where strict gun laws exist, before opening their big, fat pie-holes.  Oh, that’s right, they don’t!

Ironically, much of the momentum for gun control continues to come from the December 14, 2012, attack on Sandy Hook Elementary.  Even now, new laws are being pushed under the guise of preventing such an attack, and ‘The Slimes’ says a total of eight states have passed “universal background checks” — the same thing as comprehensive background checks — as a way to keep a Sandy Hook-like attack from occurring.  But if the examples of California and Washington state teach us anything, it is that comprehensive background checks offer no hindrance whatsoever to determined attackers.  All that they offer is very much a false sense of security.  Because as has been said before, repeatedly, criminals don’t volunteer for background checks, only law abiding citizens must. 

In fact, I think it’s worth remembering that Connecticut was ranked 5th in the nation for most stringent gun controls when the attack on Sandy Hook occurred.  The Brady Campaign Against Gun Violence lauded Connecticut for 5th “toughest” laws in 2011, and in 2012, Adam Lanza, the shooter involved, circumvented every one of those laws by stealing his guns and carrying out a heinous crime in a ‘gun-free’ zone.  Nevertheless, ‘The Slimes’ contends that more gun control will ultimately make us all safer.  Now I suppose if you’re some mentally challenged Democrat, stricter guns and ‘gun-free zones’ make a lot of sense.  But it’s best to keep in mind that if something makes sense to a Democrat then it’s highly likely that there’s going to be some pretty dire consequences for the rest of us.

Meanwhile, as mentioned earlier, homicides in gun-controlled Chicago so far this year are approaching 600 following another weekend of firearm-related death and mayhem. The Chicago Tribune reports that “at least 35” people were shot and wounded and another five were shot and killed between 6 pm Friday, October 7, and the morning of October 10. “Four people were shot within six blocks of each other over one hour Sunday night.”   The weekend’s violence brings the total number of homicides in the city to 578 year-to-date.  The Tribune also reported there have been a total of 3,368 shooting victims between January 1 and October 11, 2016 — that figure includes fatal and non-fatal shootings.  There were 2,988 shooting victims for the whole of 2015.

Violence in gun-controlled Chicago set a record in August 2016 with 472 people shot and 90 people killed, and that was according to ABC News.  It was the deadliest August in two decades and it came on the heels of the deadliest July since 2006.  ABC News also reported “nearly 12” people, on average, were shot every day in Chicago between January 1 and September 1.  And yet the call for even stricter gun laws has persisted despite the fact that it has been consistently shown that stricter gun laws do absolutely NOTHING to reduce gun violence.  When you make it increasingly difficult for law-abiding citizens to possess a firearm, allowing them to defend themselves, all you are really doing is to make those citizens little more than sitting ducks.  It’s a policy that makes zero sense.   

It’s in the long term that should the American people ever be forced to give up their weapons, while at the same time the state is not, that’s when the American people become defenseless and the state really gets to work.  And once the state has its boot on your neck it will crush the life out of you.  Those who hold all of the power know full well that the biggest obstacle to their sinister plans is a well-armed free American public.  If I was a cynical person I would guess that Democrats need to load about 80 million Americans onto trains for their final solution of bringing in 100 million foreigners that will be slaves to the Democrat Party for the next 100 years, if not longer.  There is no other way to load that many people onto trains for the final solution but to take all the guns away first.

But in the short term, gun control has little to do with the level of violence that’s occurring because it’s 100% a demographic problem. Just look at the population make up of Chicago and that should tell you why there is so much violence.  Use a global map that shows global rates for violent crimes, you will notice a direct correlation, the darker the population gets, the higher the crime rates go.  It's a cultural problem not a race problem. Take for example Nigerian Americans who excel in the US.  They are West African, which is where most African-Americans come from, and routinely outperform most other ethnic groups.  Most of the problems can be traced back to failed social programs, mass media and constantly being told no matter what you do, the man will hold you down.

This is the environment that has been created by the Democrats and that has continually allowed them to harvest what can only be described as being election gold for decades.  If black Americans were to ever actually assert themselves, Democrat power in this country would be brought to an end.  And it’s obvious that those in the Democrat Party realize this because of their efforts to open the floodgates to illegal immigration.  These are the folks who are essentially their electoral failsafe should the lightbulb ever go off in the heads of enough blacks and they suddenly realize how it is that the Democrats have been playing them for fools for over 50 years, if not longer.  Now I’m not saying that that’s ever going to happen, but the Democrat Party must be of the opinion that it might.

“DEPLORABLES” AND “REDNECKS” UNITE…LET’S TAKE THIS CROOKED BITCH DOWN!!!

Well the Clinton clan has once again demonstrated its utter contempt for average everyday Americans.  First it was Hitlery who infamously described half of Trump’s supporters as a “deplorable” group of hateful bigots, and now her husband ‘Slick Willy’ has said that Trump supporters are “standard rednecks.”  The word redneck has obvious negative connotations, especially when bandied about by liberals, and ‘Slick’s’ use of the term was a clear dog whistle to Democrats. Trump’s base, ‘Slick’ is saying, is a bunch of ignorant, white racists.  And as despicable as they may be, ‘Slick’s’ comments are by no means surprising. 

‘Slick’s’ redneck remarks, while politically convenient in the short term, will likely prove to be, in the long term, divisive and dangerous.  Race relations in this country are worse than they’ve been in decades and society is so polarized, politically, that it often seems as if there are two entirely separate Americas trying to occupy the same country.  These wounds will likely continue to fester, and true bipartisanship will continue to be little more than a pipe dream, as long as liberals and progressives continue to portray all opposition to their ideological agenda as manifestations of ignorance and hate.

But for all but the most ignorant among us it has long been pretty clear the rather low opinion that ‘Slick Willy’ and wife ‘Hitlery’ have had of us average Americans.  So we shouldn’t be surprised how we have now been lumped into essentially two categories.  We’re either nothing more than a “basket of deplorables” and just a bunch of “rednecks”.  The primary focus all along of Hitlery’s campaign has been to dismiss and demonize Trump and his supporters as bigots.  So let’s all be proud, backwards, deplorable, and irredeemable rednecks and vote to make sure Hitlery never again sets foot in the White House!

Anyway, for those who missed it, Hitlery's full quote went like this:  “You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic – you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people, now have 11 million. He tweets and retweets offensive, hateful, mean-spirited rhetoric.  Now some of those folks, they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America.”

And then it was at a recent campaign stop in Florida that old ‘Slick’ identified those of us who choose to support Trump as nothing more than "your standard rednecks."  He made his comments on Tuesday at a voters’ registration supporting Hitlery’s presidential campaign.  ‘The Slickmeister’ characterized us Trump supporters as part of the culture that he was raised up in while in Arkansas. ‘Slick’ was governor of the state before becoming president.  He said, “Look man, the other guy’s base is what I grew up in.”  And he went on to say, “You know, I’m basically your standard redneck.”

This is not the first time that ‘Slick’ has mocked Trump’s supporters. Last month at a rally in Pennsylvania, he joked about the "coal people" that support Trump in eastern Kentucky and West Virginia.  He said he was confused by those people because they used to support him.  He said, “They all voted for me. I won twice, and they did well, and they blame the president when the sun doesn’t come up in the morning now.”  Might the fact that Hitlery has threatened to put them ALL out of work have something to do with the fact that these “coal people”, or many of them, have chosen to support Trump?

Now imagine, just for a second, the level out outrage that would be directed at we Republicans if we dared to identify those who so enthusiastically Hitlery as being "wetbacks", "porch monkeys" or any other name that degrades an entire race of people?  Let's be clear here, calling white people who grow up on farms or in low income suburban areas populated by honest, hardworking people, and usually with a relatively low crime rate, "rednecks" is not only racist, it's degrading, stereotyping and demeaning, and it's completely wrong.  But I guess as long as it’s being directed at Trump supporters it’s ok.

But I gotta be honest, I would much rather be viewed as being your standard redneck than as a someone who: 1) Has been accusing of raping political associates, 2) has molested interns young enough to be my daughter, 3) Rented out the Lincoln Bedroom to political supporters as well as donors, or 4) is one of only two president ever to have been impeached.  Personally, I don’t know one redneck that’s ever been guilty of committing any of these activities.  And while Democrats can slam Trump for having a potty-mouth, it’s ok for Barry to flaunt, and pretty blatantly so, his ‘manhood’ to female reporters.

The fact is, the Democrat Party today has literally become the party of the lazy, the unformed and the ignorant.  It’s a party supported by leftist elites who profess themselves to be the only ones capable, or willing, of ‘taking care’ of the little people.  That would be those very same little people who, because of how they like all their ‘freebies’, always vote for Democrats.  And the same ones who have absolutely no clue what Socialism is like and who will be in for a very big shock when they find out that the Left’s utopia is nothing more than an illusion!!  They are the party of the haves and unfortunately we will be the have nots!!

Every hardworking American has long known what the Democrats think of us.  We're rednecks, uneducated, deplorables who insist upon clinging to our bibles and guns. We're xenophobic, racist and sexist.  Which begs the question, why it is that Hitlery so desperately wants to be President?  And yes, that’s a rhetorical question.  A big portion of Hitlery's base are the blacks, of which 85% never finished high school.  And in talking about the "uneducated" conservative voters, most of them DID graduate high school!  And since when does NOT having a college degree make it possible for one to be identified as being "uneducated"??

Anyway, it’s in closing that I thought I would take the opportunity to provide some level of clarity to what it is that’s often described as being ‘The Progressive Welfare Plantation’.  And in so doing I will take advantage of a survey that was conducted by the Maxwell Poll (Maxwell School of Syracuse University) on the political affiliation of those who receive government aid/benefits that makes it quite clear how it is that the Democrat Party uses our tax money to do little more than to purchase votes.  What’s listed are the specific ‘benefits’ and how voting patterns match up with those receiving those ‘benefits’:

Benefit                      Voting Democrat   Voting Republican                              

Public Housing                  81.0%                     12.0%          

Medicaid                          74.0%                      16.0%
Food Stamps                     67.0%                      20.0%                      

Unemployment                 66.0%                      21.0%

Disability (From Gov't)      64.0%                      25.0%

Welfare/Public Assistance 63.0%                      22.0%

The Curley Effect - Harvard University:  “As defined by Harvard scholars Edward L. Glaeser and Andrei Shleifer in a famous 2002 article, the Curley effect (named after its prototype, James Michael Curley, a four-time mayor of Boston in the first half of the 20th century) is a political strategy of “increasing the relative size of one’s political base through distortionary, wealth-reducing policies.”  Now, for all you uneducated “rednecks” I’ve included a translation which is as follows: A politician or a political party can achieve long-term dominance by tipping the balance of votes in their direction through the implementation of policies that strangle and stifle economic growth. Counter-intuitively, making a city poorer leads to political success for the engineers of that impoverishment”.

Much has been made about all of the so-called ‘Republicans’ who have, and very loudly so, either abandoned Trump, rescinded their endorsement of him or have been generally badmouthing him.  But little is ever said about who exactly these ‘Republicans’ really are, and there’s a reason for that.  Because most are ‘Establishment Republicans’, aka RINOs, who view a Trump presidency as being something that must be prevented at all costs.  These are RINOs who also have a nasty habit of referring to themselves as conservatives and who think that if they talk about Ronald Reagan we will view them as such.

These RINOs are also the very same ones who have spent much time talking about, over the course of the last six years, the need to reverse the leftist agenda of our current president, but have done absolutely nothing except to allow it to continue.  Therefore they view Trump as being a threat to the business as usual mentality that is rampant in Washington.  So if change is actually going to be brought about, the responsibility for making sure that happens is going to fall to we the people.  And there is but one surefire way to make sure that happens, and it’s by voting for Trump/Pence on November 8th!